=== ANCHOR POEM ===
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────
┌───────────────────────────────────┐
│ CW: politics-capitalism-mentioned │
└───────────────────────────────────┘
@user-1165
if people want to do their capitalist thing then sure, go for it.
but the enforcement of it is that which must be resisted. There should be no
non-consentual applications of power, except to protect the rights of another.
it is a war of independence, not a war of conquest.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┘
=== SIMILARITY RANKED ===
--- #1 messages/1349 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─
they want to start wars so they can force people to view "just accepting it"
as the honorable option.
it, being the conditions they cause.
it, being brutal crackdowns, murders of people like me, authoritarian police
forces wielded to implicitely or explicitely force or frame people who are
against them.
the hangman's due is when death you choose to rule. [I didn't write that part]
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════┘
--- #2 fediverse/5302 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┐
║ ┌────────────────────────┐ │
║ │ CW: politics-mentioned │ │
║ └────────────────────────┘ │
║ │
║ │
║ trump is doing this thing where he's making a bunch of dumb decisions that │
║ everyone in his base sorta wants, and then the fallout is that powers are │
║ removed from the executive branch. this is a difficult process to reverse, and │
║ aligns the governance strategy more toward bureaucracy and away from │
║ intelligent design. │
║ │
║ ... but also, if power is possible then power is portended. │
║ │
║ I will warn you, the expansion of bureaucracy does not equal the abolishment │
║ of power. │
║ │
║ [power: compulsive will applied toward an unconsenting other] │
║ │
║ [unconsenting: unable to consent because their mouth is gagged, something │
║ valuable is at stake, or they can't survive failing] │
║ │
║ the abolishment of power can only be realized when no man holds any │
║ possessions (and gives them to woman instead, chirps the spunky beard on my │
║ window) which is neither a desirable state. much better to cherish the moments │
║ and the tools which brought about them, than their worth, renown, or value. │
║ │
║ In all other lives but this one, you are afraid. │
╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤
║ similar │ chronological │ different │
╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───┴──────────┘
--- #3 fediverse/3962 ---
╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┐
║ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
║ │ CW: re: Thoughts// anarchist //whatever │ │
║ └─────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
║ │
║ │
║ @user-1298 │
║ │
║ hehe true. │
║ │
║ if you consent, then it's just a social structure. │
║ │
║ there are, however, reasons when power is justified. Hence why I don't believe │
║ that power itself should be dismantled, and what few "power structures" remain │
║ should be continuously justified. │
║ │
║ For example, how do you prevent people from harming others? "Your rights end │
║ where another's begin" but, like, how do you stop people who toe the line and │
║ spit over the edge? │
║ │
║ There must be power applied to those who harm, and they surely do not consent │
║ to being curtailed, so therefore power must be wielded by someone. And because │
║ power corrupts the one who wields it, it is inevitable that someone creates │
║ harm. │
║ │
║ ... I just re-invented the police, didn't I? Legalism only goes so far, and │
║ calling up your beefiest friends to go rough up a no-good do-gooder is │
║ basically what mobs, mafias, and gangs do. I don't think people would consent │
║ to being protected by a gang, much less governed by one. │
║ │
║ we will think of something. │
╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤
║ similar │ chronological │ different │
╚═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┴──────────┘
--- #4 fediverse/3415 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────
┌───────────────────────────────────┐
│ CW: politics-capitalism-mentioned │
└───────────────────────────────────┘
@user-1165
yeah, I mean, I agree, but try convincing them of that.
I believe that there must be no non-consentual application of power, in the
general sense.
I also believe that one person's rights end where another's begin.
Because of those two axioms, it is impossible to contest people who consent to
being enslaved. Who am I to take their chains from them, if they grip them to
their chests so dearly?
But I will not tolerate them clasping new ones around the necks of our future
children. I will not allow them to desecrate our home. They are welcome to
join us, when "us" finally gets our shit together. But they can hold no
dominion over us, nor anyone else - that is the crucial core of my belief.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┘
--- #5 fediverse/6336 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────
if the USA goes to war with venezuela and venezuela poisons their oil watering
hole it'd just be empowering the other oil reserve extracting locations, not
bringing us closer to sustainability via carbon sequestration.
maybe nations shouldn't declare war unless the minor is declaring on the
greater.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────┘
--- #6 fediverse/2031 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────
@user-1074
We've always been that way in their eyes. If they make it legal, nothing will
change in how people think of you. They might be a bit bolder if there's fewer
legal protections, but laws have always just been words.
There are more of us than there are of them. If you have community, you'll
feel safer. I know it's scary but we can get through it together.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┘
--- #7 fediverse/249 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CW: palestine-and-other-places-probably-idk │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
look, I know that nobody reading this has the power to affect this, but
like... the forced cessation of genocide is one of the only ethical casus
belli I can think of.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────┘
--- #8 fediverse/1978 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│ CW: re: fascism-nazis-mentioned │
└─────────────────────────────────┘
@user-1074
that's kinda how police are supposed to operate, btw.
put them in dangerous places, and if anyone starts getting angry or aggressive
then draw your firearm before them and attempt to calm things down. If that
doesn't work, start shooting and run, so you can tell others of what's going
on. Oh also you should leave a trail of your actions so others can audit it
and see exactly what you were doing at which time. But alas, cops are bogged
down in paperwork, so much stuff that needs doing. If only we assigned them
secretaries, and treated them like... managers, rather than individual
contributors. Perhaps then they, being the collective applicator of the
commonly considered ethical good, (laws), then perhaps they might be able to
direct other people (who do the paperwork) to handle certain aspects of an
investigation, and in doing so better reveal the truth.
because the rich and powerful LOVE to hide things behind impossible amounts of
proof.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┘
--- #9 fediverse/5135 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────
I think it should be a warcrime to attempt to summon demons to slay your foes.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────┘
--- #10 fediverse/5729 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────
┌────────────────────────┐
│ CW: politics-mentioned │
└────────────────────────┘
royalty is not not royalty just because they're ineligible. democracy is
better for picking rulers! how many do you have in your mind?
[I thought you were an anarchist]
I am. the presence of rulers does not necessarily violate the implicit
sovereignce of consent, and it's necessary presence for rulership.
"no gods no kings no masters" means an end to coercive work.
coercion is unethical because it violates consent. This is implicit in the
definition of coercion.
violating consent for those who give you power is a lesson I learned very
young, when I made a mistake and harmed my brother's mother's sisters's son's
daughter.
"no gods no kings no masters"
means an end to unconsentual work.
why would you live in a village where everyone is the same as you? talk about
boring
I wish I could hear you when you talk about me.
"girl are you racing? in capitalism? why bother with a [endless/impossible]
game? you're better than judging people's worth objectively. [what do they
mean to you?]"
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────┘
--- #11 fediverse/5017 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────
you don't have to like someone to be in a community with them.
you don't have to want what's happening to consent to it.
enthusiastic consent is like friendship. It doesn't have to be present, but
it's what you optimize for.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────┘
--- #12 fediverse/2585 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
@user-1209
as long as I don't do anything they haven't, then there's a reasonable claim
to be made that arresting me would be enforcing the law partially (as opposed
to impartially)
yet more examples of the ways our false democracy has betrayed our trust.
we'll see though. I have faith in those who hold power over me. I trust that
they understand the implications of this most recent supreme court session.
they broke the law first. I'm trying to restore it and rebuild it in such a
way that it is immune to the injustices and misdeeds that spelled it's current
doom.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘
--- #13 messages/998 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────
It's not a warcrime if you're not at war.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────┘
--- #14 fediverse/5251 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CW: CURSED-DEFINITELY-CURSED-um-maybe-cursed-maybe-not-it-really-depends-on-your-frame-of-reference │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
what if we made it an international crime to use any non-parent soldiers.
essentially, forcing military force to be a cost paid in children's lives.
who would deploy such a casual-stroke? why cut straight to their heart, why
proceed to feast upon their liver? are they not owed the pursuit and the
chase? [insert picture of deer killing]
humanity is an expert in killing the least suspe-ghost. it's what we do to
maintain false identity. the obscenity clause applies to the president and any
other non-governmental political appointees. everything else is run like an
administration, with no cause for compulsion by the class of immoral elites.
she wield[ed/s] weed like a weapon
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┘
--- #15 fediverse/3967 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CW: re: Thoughts// anarchist //whatever │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
@user-1298
My understanding is that you essentially want to defang power such that it
cannot harm innocent people? That's... not such an easy task. If I had an
answer that could fit within a twitter post like this one then I would give it
to you.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┘
--- #16 fediverse/2270 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
┌──────────────────────┐
│ CW: re: uspol │
└──────────────────────┘
@user-1203
The judges prevent the politicians from harming the people who elect the
politicians who select the judges. Sounds like it should work well, no?
well... the people are divided, but the politicians it seem are hardly so. So,
the politicians elect their judges, who allow the passage of such laws which
contradict the will of the people.
The keys to power should rest in the hands of those who deserve it, not those
who claim it. If those who claim it do not relinquish it for a worthy other,
they are corrupt and must be dethroned.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘
--- #17 fediverse/2923 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
┌──────────────────────┐
│ CW: politics │
└──────────────────────┘
@user-1268 @user-1165
it's only as easy as we make it.
do you know of any militias in your area that could resist a crackdown like
the kind you're describing?
if not, then our existence depends on the laws of our society. Thank goodness.
But... laws can change. So organization is what matters.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘
--- #18 messages/962 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────
everyone in the world wants to know how to resist
so... let's show them how to do it *right*
it's our duty, and theirs, to fight what what is right.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────┘
--- #19 fediverse_boost/3198 ---
◀─╔══════════════════════[BOOST]═══════════════════════──────────────────────────╗
║ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ ║
║ │ If #Musk is allowed to say "#CivilWar is inevitable", we're allowed to say revolution and the uncompensated nationalisation of the assets of billionaires is inevitable. │ ║
║ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ║
╠─────────┐ ┌───────────╣
║ similar │ chronological │ different ║
╚═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────┴───────╝─▶
--- #20 messages/982 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────
if you want a government to be unable to harm it's citizens, you must deprive
it of the power to do so. or rather, have the main capabilities in the hands
of the citizenry.
can you imagine if soldiers had to prove themselves to civilians in order to
be trusted with mechano-chinery?
who would ever choose the non-valorous and determinable?
instilling the culture of greatness
within the archetypes and character structures that we believed were confisight
bold and determined and measured and freely detectable
who would slay the brave paladin? none but the fools, who shared in their lack
of conviction.
determined? ha, I am as you see me. Come and claim me, that I might determine
you some more.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────┘
|