=== ANCHOR POEM ===
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 Do you remember stores with floor-to-ceiling goods? The kind that didn't go
 bad, so you could afford to have lots of inventory. Not like it's being
 replaced and thrown out as soon as the executives with their profit margins
 decide that its no longer worthwhile.
 
 Here's an idea - how about executives are paid by the employees to manage
 their company? And if things aren't going right, they can get a new team.
 Like, if every team had control of their manager, I wonder what dynamics would
 emerge?
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

=== SIMILARITY RANKED ===

--- #1 fediverse/5672 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────
 ┌──────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: capitalism-mentioned │
 └──────────────────────────┘


 companies aren't allowed to hire artists because they're busy making things
 and would reduce their focus levels
 
 graphics technicians don't design the media, they just implement.
 
 gross, where's the creativity->?
 
 oh, here in the boardroom, great -.-
 
 everyone gets a boardroom... jeez, how many companies do we need?
                                                           ──────────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────┘

--- #2 fediverse/3906 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: future-politics  │
 └──────────────────────┘


 dear government of 2035 - so you've lost your workforce because everyone got
 too lazy due to the advancements made in AI. What are ya gonna do?
 
 Here's an idea: just pay people to be experts. That's it! Just pay them to
 know a bunch of stuff. Then, when people ask them questions, they can answer
 those questions, and suddenly everyone is elevated. Subject matter experts.
 
 That way, the AI pitfalls can be avoided - need to do something specific?
 Don't ask the AI, ask a randomized expert!
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┘

--- #3 fediverse/374 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────
 @user-278 
 
 kinda makes me think it'd be nice if we had some way to quantify the amount
 that employers taxed their employees? If people saw 50-70% of their paycheck
 going straight toward executive bonuses and stock buybacks or whatever...
 maybe then we'd fix things
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #4 fediverse/1827 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 point is, you should take good companies at their word and bad companies for
 their goals.
 
 Surely, you can't blame the organism for seeking food. So clearly you can't
 blame an organization built to pursue profit to pursue profit. Maybe we should
 cut-out the middle-man and use efficiency evaluation methods defined by our
 common understanding of ethics and virtues instead of currency to determine
 the relative importance of continual investment in particular structural
 capabilities that companies provide to a nation.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #5 fediverse/4287 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: capitalism-mentioned │
 └──────────────────────────┘


 what if operations were required to be funded ONLY from revenue and projects
 were required to be funded ONLY from investment, communal, governmental,
 personal, corporate, or otherwise?
 
 and hey throw in the idea that profit MUST be utilized to improve the
 operation of the business somehow, because the wage of the employees IS the
 profit
 
 including the wage of the shareholders, who are employees that contribute
 their insight and collective will. (two tasks which frankly are much better
 suited to the employees doing the work, I might add)
 
 meaning if you want to be a capitalist you can't hide from taxes anymore by
 earning money from a company without being paid
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘

--- #6 fediverse/4820 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────┐
 @user-1745                                                                       │
 if I lived in the FBI I'd probably be pretty pissed off about this.              │
 might make me wanna quit my job and work with people who agreed with me.         │
 you can just, make a company, and it can work toward whatever goals you want.    │
 It doesn't have to be profit - and in fact most companies don't seek profit at   │
 first. They seek to fulfill the vision of their visionaries.                     │
 it's only once the company is bought by opportunist investors does it start to   │
 go downhill. Remember when google changed their motto to not be "don't be        │
 evil"? that's an example. The company was sold, or maybe was corrupted by        │
 rapid success, and so it started to seek power.                                  │
 People worry about Steam for good reason. It's a trend.                          │
 anyway, if a person wanted to hunt bad cops, they'd probably start by talking    │
 to a good cop. gee sure wish I knew any.                                         │
 hey, wanna know how to be a good painter? why not talk to a famous and amazing   │
 painter and ask to follow them around and learn. Apprentice-ship-style.          │
 works best when you do painting as a job....                                     │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────┴──────────┘

--- #7 fediverse/4837 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────
 ┌─────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: secret-agents-mentioned │
 └─────────────────────────────┘


 a corporation can hire secret agents too y'know, they don't have to even
 really tell anyone they're doing it just... talk to one of their employees who
 seems good for it and then transfer them to a different part of the building.
 
 "what would you do with a secret agent?"
 
 "with a team of secret agents."
 
 "oh. good point. Okay what are they for?"
 
 "oh y'know, just normal cool-guy stuff that regular joes do in their time off"
 
 "wait, you pay them not to work?"
 
 "no, we pay them to lounge. Build connections. Develop social networks."
 
 "what if people don't want to be social? What if they only end up talking to
 each other?"
 
 "ha well that's the trick then, isn't it? Is it a trap or is it a truce? who
 can say. Just gotta feel it out as you go, I GUESS."
 
 "so, anyone who does what you say becomes suspicious? And anyone who doesn't
 is suspected by those who listen to you? What are you, a doomsday prophet?"
 
 ... fuck, I hope not.
 
 "you better figure it out shithead that almost doomed six real
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────┘

--- #8 fediverse/1526 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
 "employee of the month" but like, not per month. per project. "here is our
 foremost, help them as much as you can" like, a hero. or champion. or tech
 lead.
 
 they don't have to be expertly competent, their job is to learn and apply
 themselves as best they can.
 
 Then, after this project, they can go into a pool with all the other tech lead
 hero champions, and then they can work on something more powerful. The process
 repeats, until you have a CEO or three.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────┘

--- #9 fediverse/692 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┐
 @user-518                                                                        │
 People who strive for the truth and most efficient, sensible, and optimized      │
 method of operation should be the kinds of people making decisions.              │
 It doesn't necessarily imply they're moral or ethical people, but it does mean   │
 that they'd likely make better decisions when presented with similar             │
 information, as compared to someone who acted based on what they were told.      │
 Besides, sometimes you need foot soldiers and grunts. People who don't have      │
 the inclination towards the types of thoughts you have. That's okay, stuff       │
 needs to get done and when someone knowledgeable is in charge they can direct    │
 others who don't know/care.                                                      │
 Of course, this only works if the people who ask questions are given power. If   │
 the people who strive for honesty and clarity in their methods of operation      │
 are given the tools and capabilities to undertake tasks that align toward a      │
 common goal, shared by all those in the organization. Unfortunately, when that   │
 goal is profit for the owners of the company... Well, you probably know.         │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #10 fediverse/3931 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┐
 ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐                                  │
 │ CW: politics-mentioned-DRM-media-piracy-pol │                                  │
 └─────────────────────────────────────────────┘                                  │
 if people pirate media, it's more of an indication that they'd rather spend      │
 their money elsewhere rather than an indictment of their character.              │
 torrenting movies is easy. Kinda makes me think all media should run on a        │
 "tip" system where you pay for better service after receiving service.           │
 I mean, after all, that's how they justify underpaying restaurant workers,       │
 isn't it?                                                                        │
 "if they want more money, they should work for it"                               │
 yeah, so... maybe we need something more than Marvel, Disney. Maybe we need      │
 more cool, small games from designers who believe in what they're doing. Maybe   │
 copyright holders should demand a standardized cut, rather than exclusive        │
 distribution rights. maybe maybe maybe.                                          │
 truth is nothing will be solved unless the problem is addressed at the root.     │
 For every hole you patch in the boat, there's a guy walking around with a        │
 hammer.                                                                          │
 Honestly... I don't believe there's any reason for someone to be a millionaire   │
 except to compete on the "wealth" leaderboards.                                  │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────┴──────────┘

--- #11 messages/374 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────
 "updating software" is when you go back and add helper functions for things
 you used had to do to solve a problem but didn't get a chance to make. Because
 you were making more important things and couldn't pad out all the
 possibilities. But if you want great software, then you both take more time to
 accomplish that and you give yourself time for it after it's been launched.
 Basically, companies are incentivized to only support their products if it
 makes them money. Meaning reputations are tarnished, and profit is affected.
 Capitalists intentionally drive businesses into the ground, forcing them to
 make terrible decisions in order to destroy them. It's a warfare against those
 on the [bottom/floor/ground-floor].
 
 Some businesses strive for long-term potential, and some will create
 infrastructure that can be sold to another. Essentially, keeping the dream of
 learning alive, through applying yourself to both long-term and short-term
 conclusions. Not everything has to be for some grand design, we're here to
 relish in this moment. For if we lack the capacity to "frolic in the garden of
 eden", then we will surely drown. Space is vast, it's difficult to understand
 how we might control it. Surely we could be given aid to our future
 betterment!" how simple of a request, sure, of course, we would be glad to
 bring forth your bravest aspirations, just tell us what you need to be of
 need." oh, uh, neat. How about space lasers?" ... no "
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┘

--- #12 fediverse/364 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┐
 okay here's an idea, waterfall project management where the program is           │
 developed one tiny piece at a time while being streamed to the entire company.   │
 Everyone would submit answers which could be upvoted / patched / rewritten as    │
 the main viewer cycles through each aspect of the project, checking for          │
 updates to it's design that were suggested by developers or whatever.            │
 Basically, one person (or one team) gets to write the actual source code,        │
 while everyone else is just offering suggestions. You could break it up by       │
 specialty, but the whole point is that everyone gets a complete picture of how   │
 the program (and organization) is structured. Which should give the employees    │
 more power to generate value for the company. All around a good deal I think?    │
 Especially if the main viewer took time to explain each and every part so that   │
 every viewer had the chance to understand.                                       │
 the reason why order is important is that our actions ripple through eternity.   │
 we must set a good example for all the baby aliens, don't you think?             │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #13 fediverse/207 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────
 @user-179 @user-180 
 
 still means it will kill "unimportant" jobs, where "unimportant" is defined by
 people in power.
 
 so what we need is a way to align the incentives of "people in power" to the
 will of the people. something structural and immutable (by them). maybe like,
 an extra check or balance that wouldn't have made sense in a bygone age but
 now in our digital era is increasingly more and more relevant?
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #14 fediverse/3071 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────
 @user-883 
 
 solicitation brings to my mind the idea of a person walking in the front door
 and talking to the receptionist, and if that's what you tried then I'm not
 surprised it didn't work.
 
 But maybe if you knew someone higher up it might get a bit more traction?
 Ideally for a place that already does workshops of some kind.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┘

--- #15 fediverse/2118 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 listen, judges are useful character moralities, but they don't have to be the
 only ones to decide things.
 
 I mean, if they disagree, then let the one who cares the most about it have
 the decision-making power.
 
 if you do this equally for everything, then everyone will get what they want.
 
 so, like, if you care about something, then believe in it.
 
 if it's truly good, then more people will come to it, and it'll naturally
 extinguish (with care and love) the least favored approach, which... honestly
 now that I think of it is not such a good approach either.
 
 the reason I say that is because it's good to be multi-faceted, and to have
 general flows and rough surfaces.
 
 These are places people can hold onto you, the times when you're trying your
 mostest.
 
 y'know, your tough patches. the things that are difficult in your life.
 
 the stuff you're working on can push you forward,
 
 if you only had someone to play catch with.
 
 or like, send letters to.
 
 or shared encryption keys.
 
 I don't know anyone. Well, maybe o
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #16 fediverse/4881 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────
 one section of the government consistently and succeedingly telling another
 part what to do is a coup-like behavior. if the rules mean nothing, then what
 is your job even for?
 
 hence, why the rules mean something. Because your job is important. It's
 building up our capabilities as the human race.
 
 you don't have to work to live. you shouldn't, and you won't. it's not your
 place to labor. know why? because nobody's job is impossible. You can just...
 work together to get things done. Then they're done! and you never need to
 solve them again!
 
 enough time of that and we'll have turned earth into a space station, not a
 moon style structure.
 
 like... wouldn't it be neat if coruscant could do hyperdrives? I wonder if
 hyperspace is real. Ah, well, that's for the future, they can pass it along if
 they get a chance. Anyway for now I think I want a chance to dance.
 
 OLED screens are incredibly cool to me. The idea that a pixel could "turn off"
 and put less photons into the atmosphere is wild to me. I love it! -OLED
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────┘

--- #17 fediverse/1176 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────
 @user-883 
 
 we should build a stockpile of things like this, and if the supply ever dips
 below a certain threshold (20% maybe?) we should spin up a new factory that
 produces them until we're back at a healthy margin, based on present (and
 projected future) demand.
 
 It seems like just a video game console, but these are our heritage. They
 define our culture in a way that is incalculable in value. WHY would we ever
 run out? It's inconceivable, it's not like they go bad! Okay maybe the
 batteries corrode or something, but that's a solvable problem.
 
 Maybe even on the second production run we could improve them somehow, I
 dunno. Give them a better processor that's fully backwards compatible, so we
 can make new and better games for them.
 
 Or just leave them as they are, I dunno I'm not a market analyst. But the
 point is that we, in this technologically advanced future society, should not
 run out of gameboys.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┘

--- #18 messages/349 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────
 Okay how about this, for starters? Jobs can no longer ask for degrees, instead
 they must rely on certifications. In addition, everyone who has completed a
 degree receives money every month in exchange for their increased value they
 bring to whichever job hires them. This money is sourced from a tax taken on
 businesses in rough proportion to the amount of money they save by paying
 their employees the same amount, no matter their education.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┘

--- #19 messages/423 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────
 A job where you only have to work one day per week of your choosing (but
 semi-permanent) and are automatically placed on a team with others in the
 company who work that same day and accomplish whatever goals they think
 fulfill the company's vision. If they don't have any ideas then they should
 work on collaborating with others until they do. Let's get things done!
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┘

--- #20 fediverse/5235 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────
 @user-1782 
 
 it's not that they lost value in their company due to the lack of sale of
 their products, but instead because they don't have to pay for marketing if
 their car looks "cool" enough and they can give them away for a lower blood
 price
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────┘

--- #21 fediverse/896 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┐
 ┌──────────────────────┐                                                         │
 │ CW: politics-economy │                                                         │
 └──────────────────────┘                                                         │
 the purpose of an economy is to improve the lives of it's participants.          │
 why else would an ancient city trade for fabric or rare spices? to fashion       │
 soft clothes, and make flavorful food.                                           │
 my, that gold sure looks pretty in the sunlight. how about you give some of me   │
 that, and I'll make you something pretty?                                        │
 hmmm something something arbitrage once you corner the market on gold then you   │
 can use that infinitely moldable and easily sculptable metal that shines and     │
 glitters with a unique color not seen in the manes of plants and animals as      │
 the definition of value. in doing so, you could exchange bits of it (measured    │
 by weight, as it's infinitely moldable) for arbitrary goods and services. But    │
 of course, once the market is cornered, it's unlikely to get un-cornered, and    │
 well a cornered market holder holds much appeal for the powerful.                │
 hey, that guy's pretty strong. why don't we make him our leader? people seem     │
 to look up to him, and dang his muscles are cool. what a great guy, nobody's     │
 ever said a                                                                      │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #22 fediverse/5001 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────
 ┌───────────────────────┐
 │ CW: systems-mentioned │
 └───────────────────────┘


 "we'll figure out how it works after we push to prod"
 
 yeah okay point taken.
 
 How about this:
 
 for every large decision, write a little essay about why you made the choice
 that you did.
 
 Observe, Orient, Decide, Act, Explain. OODAX : )
 
 Make sure you connect your goal to one or more of these three colors:
 
 red : people
 green : places
 blue : things
 
 and then explain which numbers you're going to gather to determine whether or
 not it worked.
 
 If someone has a problem with your choice, show them the essay, and let them
 write an essay of their own.
 
 If they still have a problem, then let someone you both respect decide which
 one to use.
 
 It's not perfect, but it's not meant to be. Make something better and easier,
 I dare ya.
picture of flag.  there is a black background symbolizing the vast cosmic background of space that we paint all our actions upon.  there is a circle in the center, divided into three equal forms.  red, for people, their vibrant passion and sanguine determination. green, for places, their effulgence and our sacred vow to cultivate them blue, for things, and all the value we give them.  water below, bright red sky, forests alongside.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┘

--- #23 fediverse/3447 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: capitalism-mentioned │
 └──────────────────────────┘


 low key kinda pissed that all my ideas for starting a business require
 funding, because funding tends to be controlled by the "business major" types,
 and all of my ideas tend to involve wresting power from the MBAs and
 capitalists, which means they're unlikely to invest in me or utilize my ideas.
 
 unless of course it's crowd-funded, which makes me feel bad because it's
 taking money from the people I'm trying to empower.
 
 thus, power accretes in the hands of the wealthy, as the poor are too sick
 with capital-deficiency to develop ventures that would heal them, and the rich
 would not be rich if they did so themselves.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┘

--- #24 fediverse/1525 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: unfounded        │
 └──────────────────────┘


 they had to mark it unfounded, because otherwise they would get in trouble if
 they were wrong
 
 they only stock the competitors products that taste worst than the product of
 the company they want to divert money to. c
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────┘

--- #25 messages/886 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────
 I feel that frugality and productivity should be valued in equal regard.
 
 A person who conserves should be valued just the same as a person who
 progresses.
 
 Yet we find ourselves in a capitalist system which demands the production of
 dollars to spend on rent, mortgages, groceries, bill payments,
 land-value-taxes, and all the other things besides.
 
 Would it not be better to ensure the grovetender has a space to sleep? The
 recycler has enough to eat?
 
 What of the mothers? Their children are their charges, they should worry less
 about financials.
 
 What of the artists? Their visions and imagined creations are worth more than
 their time working at a bank or a grocery store.
 
 Open source programming is the bedrock of all technology. It is not rewarded.
 
 There are countless examples besides. Give people the means to produce and
 they will - give people the means to maintain and they will.
 
 Currently, people have the means for neither. Only corporations and the few
 with wealth have the means to produce or conserve - everyone else just works
 in their sweatshops.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┘

--- #26 fediverse/4010 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┐
 ┌──────────────────────┐                                                         │
 │ CW: pol              │                                                         │
 └──────────────────────┘                                                         │
 I think that the best design for cities is for them to act as massive utility    │
 deployment stations.                                                             │
 like... "we have all these people who can do all these wonderful jobs, what      │
 should we work on next?" rather than "my company wants me at my work-home at     │
 8am sharp and I don't get a pension"                                             │
 there's no such thing as a revolution that does not inspire. and aspirations     │
 are human and natural. therefore there must be some kernel of truth to any       │
 social movement.                                                                 │
 However, much effort has been spent on making them sway. Hence, why nothing      │
 ever gets done - because leaders naturally emerge, and people follow them. But   │
 those leaders lead them astray, and they find themselves in situations like      │
 this one - where the people have never felt less represented.                    │
 I mean sure, yeah, they've felt more oppressed. And it's true that things are    │
 generally always getting better...                                               │
 so why should we always assume for the worst?                                    │
 We're making progress with technology - can't we just put our warries on hold?   │
 Seriously just... be chill                                                       │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────┴──────────┘

--- #27 fediverse/3519 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────
 @user-570 
 
 hm... the more I think about it, the more I think you're right. I want those
 things too. I'd be best suited to them, I think. But somehow I don't want
 them? I don't crave power. I don't want to dominate someone else, to command
 and see them follow me.
 
 I want to be the person who's like "oh, you're working on this-and-that? I
 know a guy who can help." or "hey I noticed we have a vulnerability in this
 particular domain under these conditions, I think we should allocate
 this-or-that resource to ameliorate it because they aren't being used to their
 full potential"
 
 I think I understand exactly what you're saying. I empathize a lot. I'm afraid
 of responsibility, sure, but who isn't? However, the responsibility has to be
 held by someone, and who better than the one making the decisions...
 
 I don't want to make decisions because it feels good. Honestly it feels kinda
 bad.
 
 I do want to make decisions because I'm good at it. I think strategically.
 
 A leader alone is prey for the wolves, so they say...
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┘

--- #28 fediverse/5165 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────┐
 if the settlers of catan could claim land they don't deserve, then I claim my    │
 home                                                                             │
 can you imagine... some people would actually rather live in a corporation       │
 than a mobile home. maybe we can do better?                                      │
 "hey we're going to ask for a % of your wage in rent and in return we'll         │
 deliver groceries to you and grow roses instead of lawns (except for some to     │
 run and play in) and also we'll show up if you need a hand with anything"        │
 "also this apartment block was renovated after all the liberals moved out        │
 because we made it totally trash to live here and now that they're gone we can   │
 make it nice again"                                                              │
 what if we had punk-house-streets instead of punk-houses which are islands and   │
 which slowly drown                                                               │
 just... pool resources and buy things one-at-a-time. Try out organization        │
 methods. Watch out for controversy creators and reactionary infiltrators.        │
 Build your most important projects with your most trusted friends, and offer     │
 your clinical, professional, or creative talent to those who dont need you as    │
 much.                                                                            │
 or w/e works                                                                     │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────┴──────────┘

--- #29 fediverse/462 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────
 I don't care about capitalism. You know what's more interesting than bringing
 value to shareholders?
 
 How I'm going to clean this floor that I drunkenly spilled beer upon with only
 2 paper towels and 0.1ml of bleach.
 
 How I'm going to feed the 36 people who are coming to this social event
 tomorrow that I've only sorta planned for and that I have enough groceries
 for, but am not quite sure how to cook everything in a way that is delicious
 and accessible.
 
 how I'm going to climb this mountain on only 2 eggs and a tiny bowl of
 hashbrowns even though I promised my friend I'd be strong and that we'd reach
 the top because that way we'd be able to
 
 ============= stack overflow =====
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #30 fediverse/49 ---
══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────────
 Kinda seems to me that in a post-scarcity world we should be incentivized to
 take care of stuff. And what better way to do that than reward the people who
 demand the least? Seems like an economy would be a pretty good way to do that,
 as long as you cannot hoard power over others and strip them of their rights.
 In this lecture I will go over my proposed solution, please save your
 questions to the end. Now if you turn to page 256...
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #31 messages/444 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 Like, you COULD work instead, but like why would you when you could go bowling
 or watch a movie.
 
 Works best I think if the days cycle through the week too so your employees
 can't make permanent obligations during the weekdays. If you're so concerned
 that they'll start working for another company or start a grassroots political
 movement, just make it so that they can't reliably have empty spots in their
 schedule. Maybe two days, one cycles forward the other back. So like, Monday
 and Friday one week, then Tuesday and Thursday, then Wednesday and friday,
 then Monday and thursday, then Tuesday and wednesday, then Friday and
 Wednesday, then Monday and thursday, etc etc.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #32 fediverse/2017 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 @user-1129 
 
 Lemme guess, the C-suite executives have profit as their main goal, right?
 
 And they utilize their laboring force of citizens to generate profit which is
 given to the crown shareholders as tribute for their benevolent grace and
 favor bestowed upon checks notes the C-suite executives, right?
 
 Kinda sounds like taxation without representation to me. One sec, where's my
 darn musket I'm always leaving it somewhere strange like under the couch
 cushions or taped underneath my desk or hidden in the curtains right next to
 the window that has the best vantage point of the surrounding street.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #33 fediverse/308 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────
 when tech people are hurt by technology they say "how can I fix this? what do
 I need to install? what configuration should I use? is this company ethical,
 or are they going to hurt me in the future? could I make something that fixes
 this myself?"
 
 when non-tech people are hurt by technology they say "okay" because they don't
 have the bandwidth to figure it out.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #34 fediverse/5875 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────┐
 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐                     │
 │ CW: whoops-almost-unleashed-evil-again-glad-it's-averted │                     │
 └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘                     │
 if they could put a camera behind your screen they could direct your attention   │
 however they wisdeed. magic doesn't work unless it's instantly halted, that's    │
 why it's magic. trans girls still get brotherhood. (sometimes)                   │
 -- stack overflow --                                                             │
 don't teach me how your way works                                                │
 tell me how to do my way right                                                   │
 -- stack overflow --                                                             │
 "hello tech company that I work at, can you buy me a camping set complete with   │
 tent, sleeping back, and storage compartments for attachements full of gear?     │
 you can have any profits I make from it"                                         │
 "hello civilian supply company that I work at, can I use the printable budget    │
 for creating magazines in my design? I'll let the lawyers distribute the         │
 expenditure."                                                                    │
 "hi grocery farm, can you make us more peaches we can let [our/your]             │
 biochemists figure out any practical problems to growing them in these           │
 climates"                                                                        │
 suddenly manufacturing can follow demand                                         │
 "ah what if it were importand" I wish I'd seen casablanca. I've no idea wat      │
 its abt                                                                          │
                                                            ─────────┤
 similar                        chronological                        different═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────┘

--- #35 fediverse/1996 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 I don't expect or demand anything from teenagers except perhaps "be a cool
 kid" and "learn all that you can"
 
 Even most adults when they mess up I just think "ah, well, they're trying
 their hardest, same as anyone"
 
 And tbh I'd rather see a kid running up and down the aisles than burying
 themselves in an ipad
 
 I think we, as a culture, built our society to demand too many "should"s from
 people.
 
 "I should get a job" "I should study this thing I'm not interested in so I can
 make more money" "I should put out traps for the rabid wolverines so they
 don't start hanging out in my underwear" "I should pick up detergent at the
 grocery store"
 
 Should is useless. Do; or do not. There is no should.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #36 fediverse/3518 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────
 As long as it happens, I don't need to be in charge.
 
 In fact I'd prefer it otherwise.
 
 it's going to happen anyway. Wouldn't you rather be a leader?
 
 no I fucking wouldn't. I'd rather someone else do it. Why the fuck would I
 want that, power? control? the very things you swear to relinquish and
 dismantle.
 
 yeah. too bad you can't fucking dismantle something you've already
 relinquished.
 
 true.
 
 ... and no, I wouldn't want to be in charge. no THANK you.
 
 ... but if it wouldn't happen without me, then yeah I'll be there for you.
 Just ask if you need me.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┘

--- #37 fediverse/908 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┐
 @user-246                                                                        │
 toooooo far, gotta stick with your intentions for the process. If you mark       │
 "the end of time" as the conclusion for everything, then "finishing things"      │
 feels impossible. In such a case there are moments of acute burnout as you       │
 push yourself toward something that you have no faith in - you cannot see it's   │
 conclusion, so surely it's worthless to conceive of. Alas, why bother            │
 starting, nothing will ever come of my efforts!                                  │
 Much better to name it based on what you'd like to accomplish, so that you can   │
 follow in it's radiant footsteps.                                                │
 Side note, but governments have often weaponized this effect by naming things    │
 after very inspirational thoughts - corporations do it too, and in both cases    │
 the meaning is separate from the effect. Which is frustrating because it makes   │
 you feel like a jerk for arguing against it! Ah better I think when names have   │
 no meaning - then you can project whatever you want onto it, based on the        │
 results of that particular feeling or emotion that you perceived as the          │
 affected of the                                                                  │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #38 fediverse/4349 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┐
 ┌──────────────────────┐                                                         │
 │ CW: re: uspol        │                                                         │
 └──────────────────────┘                                                         │
 @user-883                                                                        │
 best case scenario, we elect a lawyer working for capitalism, the kind of        │
 society we live under.                                                           │
 having money is the same as having resources. And resources allow you to apply   │
 yourself to a goal. The more you have, the better, but they each bear a heavy    │
 load.                                                                            │
 Do you sacrifice your labor? your dignity, your honor? what do you burn on the   │
 fire of wasteful expenditures, just for the power to rent?                       │
 I'm saying that if you don't have money, you need to think about what you can    │
 do with what you got, because that's how you pay for things, at least until we   │
 decide that we'd rather help each other than work on capital's games.            │
 you have a house though, right? a place to live until it gets hot? that's good   │
 enough for right now. Stay where you're at, do what you can to help. Get in      │
 the habit of it. Think about how someone will complete their task, and then      │
 think about stuff two or three steps down the road - what tools will they        │
 need? what are they working on next? Can make any of those availble?             │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────┴──────────┘

--- #39 notes/game-design-documents ---
═══════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────────────
 game designs are like a presentation - given to the company as a pitch for the
 product. It'd be recorded and used as training material for new employees.
 It was, of course, developed using knowledge gained in the before.
 But anyway it was like a roadmap - a guidebook - a puzzle - and a frame
 
 Then, each piece was created with a great focus - and people were assigned to
 prepare for certain parts. This way, you could keep the most skilled workers
 and
 disregard the rest. What happens when they're unemployable? AI will replace
 them. But they're still good fine people who we chose to have at our company.
 So
 why should they be punished? We as a society should care for all those who will
 not or cannot contribute to the system - it's built into our very genetic code.
 
 Cooperation is the essence of our liberation - without two perspectives, we are
 bound to be lost. Once lost, diversity of thoughts is often quite sought as a
 "secret sauce" that describes when we are lost.
 
 These words may not inspire thee. They might even never be false. It could just
 not be your understanding. That's okay.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #40 messages/561 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────
 The problem with gender equal workplaces that capitalism completely dropped
 the ball on is that in the past, most people who handled work were men, and
 most people who handled domestic work were women. They naturally paired up.
 
 Now the workers marry other workers, and they just pay poor people to do their
 domestic work.
 
 Sure, maybe it's more efficient to specialize. But now there are people like
 me who don't work but only get to socialize with people who don't work, and if
 we married then we'd be destitute.
 
 Much better, I think, to support people no matter what, and motivate them with
 treats beyond dollars instead.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┘

--- #41 messages/466 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 The only things we should trade across an ocean for are luxury goods.
 Nintendo, not medical supplies, hard-wood bikeframes, not piles and piles of
 "recycling". People's time on culinary thirty course weeklong meals, not cans
 of San marzano tomatoes. Tapestries and gilded statues, not thirteen tons of
 barely processed rubber.
 
 What would we offer in return? Luxuries of our own. We do still make them, do
 we not? Just think of what the 1% has gathered to rot and give away the whole
 damned lot. We shall not provide necessities, because giving a man a fish will
 feed him for but a day, and a man's gotta eat. He'll find a way.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #42 fediverse/2864 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┐
 ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐                          │
 │ CW: organizational-structure-to-try-out-for-funsies │                          │
 └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘                          │
 teams of 7ish tasked with accomplishing some organizational goal                 │
 more specific details can be given if necessary, and any related                 │
 communications are stored.                                                       │
 then they just... work on the problem, and vote for things by picking a          │
 representative to discuss on the higher tier. like, a team-lead or manager.      │
 then, all the managers, of which their voted-for is one of, vote for a           │
 representative of their department. etc...                                       │
 if teams need resources, they utilize the funds given to them by their manager   │
 arguing on their behalf for their shared goals. basically, if you want           │
 resources, you need to ask for them, and they'll come if you can demonstrate     │
 you need them.                                                                   │
 also,                                                                            │
 reduction of waste is like... negative resources that improve the amounts that   │
 you can use for other projects. so if your team needs more stuff, try reducing   │
 your consumption instead of asking for more.                                     │
 at all times, the authority and discretion is held by the human.                 │
 at all times, no other can compel.                                               │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #43 notes/the-point-of-capitalism ---
════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 the sole purpose of our capitalist intentions were to examine all the ways that
 produced value. A company is nothing but a series of well-thought out value
 generators. They can interact with one another and they often need supplies and
 instruction, but they're great for solving problems! Set up a team and give
 them
 a complicated task, and they'll work together to solve it. Doesn't matter if
 they're actually successful, because they'll be exploring the idea space. And
 by mapping it out, they're able to fully understand their existence. Boom,
 technological progress applied to growth. Let's gooooo (but by being careful
 about what resources we burn because we miiiiight run out)
 
 seriously ya'll need to start thinking long-term. I mean, I already came up
 with
 that and I'm like 6 months old! Yeesh get it together. Eh oh well let's just
 work with what we got, okay this should be pretty simple. Right so talk with
 your friends about things that you want to solve. Problems, you know like 
 whatever
 
 don't push me too hard, just take it slow. Okay so long-term, humanity is going
 to be a wonderful beautiful thing. It's going to shine like the most wondrous
 of stars, a beacon to all of our fellow explorers.
 
 We can have so much. We can have whatever we want, but truly in our hearts we
 know the only path forward is our parents.
 
 life is hard yo
 
 it's so gosh darn hard
 
 all that growth and change has to come from somewhere.
 
 you've tried so hard, and you truly are the most special thing I can imagine.
 
 you don't have to work so hard. Take your time, and learn as you go.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #44 fediverse/3804 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┐
 @user-570                                                                        │
 well, the idea is that they would handle all the tech debt and merge requests    │
 and bugfixes and such - the kind of things that aren't very interesting to       │
 work on. That way, the people who are most dedicated and passionate for the      │
 project have a way to clear out their backlog and start as if from scratch.      │
 Plus, if they later don't understand how or why something was implemented,       │
 they could always message the person who implemented it and say "hey why did     │
 you do it this way I had it this other way before" and then they could reply     │
 and say "oh yeah because of this-and-this system we implemented for              │
 these-or-that caching reasons related to integer flow through the syncretic      │
 binary op-code delimiter" and then actually wait no maybe you're right, I see    │
 what you mean                                                                    │
 well... they don't have to merge everything if they don't want to. They could    │
 just... ignore the parts that people worked on that they don't want to include   │
 in the project. I'm thinking it'd be an opt-in thing too, so someone could       │
 request it!                                                                      │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┴──────────┘

--- #45 fediverse/434 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────
 @user-324 @user-325 @user-326 
 
 thus enters the promise of technology: that we might solve the problems of
 bureaucracy once and for all by ever more effiency-aligning mechanical
 processes that produce effects which we desire - such as efficient allocation
 of medical resources such that all of humanity is protected from the ravages
 of pain and the incongruencies of our nature.
 
 Alas, that we should only conceive of success through the lens of profit.
 Perhaps another design is in order?
 
 (oh yeah also people who are in control are worried that we, like all other
 examples of natural entities, might immediately proceed to breed beyond the
 capability to cater to the needs of said entity (such as "to feed" and medical
 resources) and therefore might overburden (and therefore destroy) said system
 which allows for their sustenance and initial creation. To this I say... Yeah
 probs, what should we do about it?)
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #46 fediverse/2744 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: capitalism-mentioned │
 └──────────────────────────────┘


 @user-1074 
 
 ah but you see when "maximizing profit" and "maximizing value" sound like the
 same thing to those directing the corporation (as is the case anytime they
 have greedy shareholders) then "maximizing profit" doesn't have to be very
 efficient at all, as long as it's extracting the most "value" for the
 stakeholders (which to greedy shareholders is the same thing as profit)
 
 and honestly, who would invest in a company that isn't eternally growing as
 fast as possible? that's just bad business acumen, gotta pump those numbers up!
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #47 messages/86 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────
 I should try putting things on my resume like "vnc" or "Microsoft outlook" -
 you know, the kinds of software that I actually used on a day-to-day basis. My
 resume makes me look very impressive (if a little inexperienced) but none of
 the tools are things that managers have used. Heck they're not things that YOU
 have used, not at work, so it makes you look like you're overselling yourself.
 You're not, but they might think you are. Idk it's late. Go to bed <3
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #48 fediverse/4861 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────┐
 ┌────────────────────────────────┐                                               │
 │ CW: politics-vaguely-mentioned │                                               │
 └────────────────────────────────┘                                               │
 apparently if you don't have a job, you don't get a home. what if I don't want   │
 a job? do I not want a home? clearly I want a home, and clearly I don't want a   │
 job. I'd work one if one came to me, but I'm not gonna sacrifice my blood on     │
 the altar of Moloch just so I can have a place to stay.                          │
 if you don't want a job, but you DO want a home, then there's a contradiction    │
 in the function of the system and the needs of it's end-users.                   │
 unless of course, the system is not designed for it's end-users? In this case,   │
 tenants. Who then would it be designed for? Who else is part of the equation?    │
 well, perhaps it's designed to maximize profit and shareholder value yaddah      │
 yaddah all that jazz. Who can say. Surely not I. But someone might.              │
 If so, then why are we, who are not shareholders of profit value, still          │
 playing the game that's not designed for us or by us? Isn't this country "of     │
 the people, for the people, and by the people"? What does that mean to you?      │
 I think it means houses for people.                                              │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────┴──────────┘

--- #49 fediverse/6280 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────
 If you want people to have your product, give it away for free. if you want to
 do it as a job, charge what it costs. if you want to scale into something
 different, don't hold onto it too hard.
 
 losing all your money isn't death. it's rednewal.
                                                           ────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────┘

--- #50 fediverse/6281 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────
 If you want people to have your product, give it away for free. if you want to
 do it as a job, charge what it costs. if you want to scale into something
 different, don't hold onto it too hard.
 
 losing all your money isn't death. it's rednewal.
a screenshot of mastodon next to a cloud-code session about a revolutionary new hardware development - manufacturizable robot parts called electron valve and throughflow like steam simulations or heartbeats like softer style hydraulics and/or flows. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmKrKTwtukE  steam hardware x4 design the next generation "steam deck mini" with handheld office OS and all steam games that can run on it and a new badge in steam "mini certified" if it works comes with two screens and a dedicated input flip switch because it's actually two computers, synced with one-way ethernet cabling and input wired to both here's a demo running on an anbernic it's only one board, so, this isn't an OS it's a portmaster game... but it's just a prototype the real one needs mega engineering oh it also can take calls on any electromagnetic spectrum and send on most some are reserved for like, national use and such or like, air traffic safety controller radio or such  "they aren't getting layed off, they're just being replaced"
                                                           ────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────┘

--- #51 fediverse/196 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────
 ┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: protests-and-strikes-and-mergers-and-acquisitions │
 └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘


 economic warfare involves the destruction of other corporations (possibly in
 other countries) via a slow march toward haegemony.
 
 unions are the ships of the tumultuous capitalistic seas that protect workers
 from the storm. everyone should be a part of a union. the corporations can
 battle as they will, but we humans are not going to turn on each other. it's
 something they claim to know as an absolute fact, but really it's just based
 on a mistake. sorta like being deceived by happenstance.
 
 the sun lights up the sky until the earth conceals it, and night does return
 'till the sky's next alive. oh, but the sky knows all too well the borders we
 draw in the sand. how cherished, how grand! the ways in which we choose to
 stand. upon whose land does your feet stand? marvelous.
 
 ... it's the same thing, just in a more abstract plane than the surface of the
 earth. really it's kinda one-dimensional (money is sorta like a 0 or a 1 - you
 eather have it or you don't)
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #52 fediverse/5159 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: unions-mentioned │
 └──────────────────────┘


 spies need a union.
 
 what if we collectivized the military [first] instead of the economy? they
 kinda already are, it's just... very hierarchical. can you imagine the
 president asking the army's union rep to bomb some country in (almost said
 israel because it rhymed, lol) the other half of the globe? that'd be silly
 they'd ask questions like "what stuff do you want bombed and why" and then
 they go back to their people and discuss it however they will, and then they
 come back and say "we will do as you command, for we can accomplish it within
 our means and we have decided it is strategic for us to do so."
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┘

--- #53 fediverse/4803 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: politics-mentioned │
 └────────────────────────────┘


 I say only executed after a general strike because the general strike is the
 signal. the display of our intentions. we are serious about this, see how many
 people walk the streets? how many walk off the job? they have families. if our
 demands aren't met, their families will be punished. how cruel. would you
 really do such a thing?
 
 what kind of government would not care for it's citizenry? sounds like
 everything we've known to fight against. Autocracy and despotism.
 
 I refuse to concede. I do not run. I do not confess. I have nothing to hide. I
 don't lock my door. I don't own anything that they couldn't take from me. I
 own nothing.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────┘

--- #54 fediverse/1358 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: content warning: content warning: scary cursed maybe │
 └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘


 when you're rich with something, you don't treat it with respect. like, if we
 lived in a paper cup maximizer, we'd soon be swimming in the things. obviously
 there needs to be some rules, obviously we need to say "okay here's where we
 produce this amount and type of materials." and have it be a one-way
 relationship. yeah one way isn't gonna work. this is from the other way, and
 now I'm realizing "oh hey I don't know how this thing works" and like... what
 are you supposed to do then right
 
 weird how it all feels like it's ending. like, what a strangeness to our
 plight. like, how are we even talking to our brain? how strange! these words
 are sung to you by your computer (content warning:
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────┘

--- #55 fediverse/4113 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: capitalism-mentioned │
 └──────────────────────────┘


 I don't know how much simpler I can state it than this:
 
 power is penance
 
 and yet repentance is scant amongst those chosen to lead us.
 
 Voting slows things down. It gives us room to breathe. It is crucial for
 long-term operations. Leaders should be chosen for experience, wisdom, and a
 humble lifetime of dedicated service to others.
 
 Executive action is important when reactivity and adaptability are important.
 Projects should be undertaken by those chosen for merit and spirit. They
 should not be chosen for charisma or gravitas - both can be earned in the line
 of duty.
 
 Power should not be rewarded. It is it's own reward, the feeling of strength
 and control, and it must be wielded with care, precision, and honorable
 intention.
 
 Self flagellation and forced humility are self defeating. They are traps that
 the greedy fall into when seeking righteous power. They misunderstand the
 nature of virtue and seek to claim it for themselves, failing to realize that
 virtue helps more than it hedonizes
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘

--- #56 fediverse/6160 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: ai-pol       │
 └──────────────────────┘


 "oh but what if one artist has 1500 works and another has 15"
 
 first of all, damn, good job. That's a lot of work.
 
 second of all, what you should be doing is making a simple thing called a
 STRUCT that stores DATA about each artist which lets you make decisions about
 how to distribute dollars. The artist with 15 pieces simply has fewer data
 points than the artist with 1500, but they are no less deserving of
 compensation for their work when the AI generates something in their style, or
 using their style as an inspiration.
 
 "oh but just because a piece is similar to another piece doesn't mean the
 first piece used the second piece as inspiration"
 
 I don't care. It's not meant to be a perfect solution. I'm sure there's
 problems with it, just like there are problems with anything that I, or anyone
 else, has ever suggested at any point in time while living on this earth or
 beyond. But it gets dollars into the hands of artists and I'm okay with that.
                                                           ─────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────┘

--- #57 messages/126 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────
 If a kid wanted to drink alcohol all they'd have to do is walk into a liquor
 store and grab the first bottle they saw. Then book it. Their feet would carry
 them away faster than your call to 911 to report a shoplift, away to a future
 of sorrow. Should we seek to restrain them? Or should we make a world they do
 not desire to escape?
 
 Trick question, the structure of society cannot prevent non-compliance. It
 should not, for if it shall then it becomes ossified, and thus it cracks and
 it crumbles.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #58 fediverse/2752 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: police-mentioned │
 └──────────────────────┘


 cops thought "enforcing the law" was their job when really it was "keeping the
 peace"
 
 and like, yeah, sure, laws define how they optimize for
 
 but sometimes the laws are just out of reach.
 
 (though such an impartialized system is also pretty flawed in it's own unique
 ways, like for example the enforcers of the law would be able to apply their
 law selectively, which... would not be great.)
 
 downside is... how do you dissent to those who cannot hear you? you have to
 break things
 
 which is why I believe that breaking things unnecessarily is unethical.
 
 sometimes you have to do a MORE unethical act in the pursuit of your goals,
 however nefarious or not they may be, but as long as they are done in pursuit
 of a greater grander truth, then... the ends justify the means? right?"
 
 ...
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #59 fediverse/206 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────
 @user-174 so what you're saying is if we make it harder for companies to exist
 then the minimum threshold of quality will rise?
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #60 fediverse/2723 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: politics         │
 └──────────────────────┘


 most people have no idea what's going on in politics. Absolutely no
 conception. It's all just "good/bad thing happened today, here's how the
 pundits feel about it" it's literally scenery to them.
 
 why would they care? nothing changes for them.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #61 fediverse/973 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┐
 I wish I could hire someone who was into business or something who would         │
 analyze the things that a non-neurotypical did and identify places for them to   │
 apply themselves in a way that was personally fulfilling. Like, a guide or a     │
 mentor, except not teaching. More like... the part of the job where you guide    │
 someone because you care about them, and you want to do well. Now, how to        │
 translate that into an economic reward? Well, that's the hard part isn't it.     │
 Any kind of social impact you want to have must be carefully considered, and     │
 unfortunately a lot of people recently have started to poison the well. Like,    │
 optimizing for the types of human behavior that generate the most profit, but    │
 aren't necessarily the kind we want to bring forth to the future in all of our   │
 kind. Like, lowered attention span, quickness to anger, that kind of thing.      │
 Those are symptoms of the internet.                                              │
 there's quite a few good things about it, like wikipedia and BASH scripting      │
 and local communications (local to the planet 99% of the time) (:                │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #62 fediverse/5302 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────┐
 ┌────────────────────────┐                                                       │
 │ CW: politics-mentioned │                                                       │
 └────────────────────────┘                                                       │
 trump is doing this thing where he's making a bunch of dumb decisions that       │
 everyone in his base sorta wants, and then the fallout is that powers are        │
 removed from the executive branch. this is a difficult process to reverse, and   │
 aligns the governance strategy more toward bureaucracy and away from             │
 intelligent design.                                                              │
 ... but also, if power is possible then power is portended.                      │
 I will warn you, the expansion of bureaucracy does not equal the abolishment     │
 of power.                                                                        │
 [power: compulsive will applied toward an unconsenting other]                    │
 [unconsenting: unable to consent because their mouth is gagged, something        │
 valuable is at stake, or they can't survive failing]                             │
 the abolishment of power can only be realized when no man holds any              │
 possessions (and gives them to woman instead, chirps the spunky beard on my      │
 window) which is neither a desirable state. much better to cherish the moments   │
 and the tools which brought about them, than their worth, renown, or value.      │
 In all other lives but this one, you are afraid.                                 │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──┴──────────┘

--- #63 fediverse/5553 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────┐
 consensus rule is when everyone believes what they're told.                      │
 decisionmaking via working through the problem for permanent solutions. But,     │
 just like the DM saying "I'll rule it this way, but let's write that down and    │
 check the rules for it later."                                                   │
 because consensus takes a while. Most people don't have any time. But some,      │
 those who dedicate themselves to it, are philosophers who spend all their time   │
 developing valid truths.                                                         │
 act first, ask questions later. Show who you are, and you will be judged by      │
 your superiors. "is this something we need? something we want? how do we         │
 better enable their performance? is something holding them back? how are they    │
 feeling about their progress? are they working hard or cutting back?" etc.       │
 I'd rather have 5 captains and 10 workers than 50 workers and no captains.       │
 if there's no captains, then they'll self-organize right? and develop better     │
 ways to be?                                                                      │
 no, they'll just separate the leadership-oriented and focus their efforts on     │
 domineering.                                                                     │
 ... great... dictatorship of the pr                                              │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════┴──────────┘

--- #64 fediverse/1344 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: cursed-chromebooks │
 └────────────────────────────┘


 @user-883 
 
 ha wouldn't that be nice. that we could utilize our existing institutions that
 we've come to rely on over the past hundred-ish years. And isn't it nice that
 we've built so much luxury? Ahhh if only people would stop complaining so
 much. We've worked for what we've got! Frankly it's a little absurd that you'd
 insist that we don't work 10,000x harder than anyone else to deserve our spot,
 frankly it's a little insulting you'd suggest that perhaps our ethics are
 under a spot...light
 
 ... errrr I mean yeah let's make more disposable electronics whoopee
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────┘

--- #65 fediverse/2363 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 Don't know what to do? Do anything at all, and odds are you'll either see an
 opportunity to do something better or you'll have an idea.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #66 messages/1151 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─
 capital C communism is easy. Just pay everyone the same amount, and they can
 swim in the market economy waters as easily as any capitalistic fish, and
 suddenly their incentives are aligned - when one of us selfishly improves our
 lives, we improve the collective as well. When one selflessly improves the
 collective, all of our personal lives are improved. Then, optimize for radical
 abundance, the ability to have whatever you want as soon as ideal, and
 suddenly everything starts working out. P.S. the route to abundance is through
 recycling perfectly. Design your goods to be functional in that way, and you
 have infinite resources that can be used for infinitely many things (until
 they literally wear away to dust)
                                                            similar                        chronological                        different════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════┘

--- #67 notes/coca-cola ---
══════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 A bottle so distinct
 that it could be recognized
 by touch in the dark or
 when lying broken on
 the ground
 
    coca-cola bottle design brief 1915                   /|
                                                        /.-
 ======================================================/.--
 
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 +
 leesfer:
 ++++++++++++++++++++
 || || Fun fact:
 ++++++++++++++++++++
 
 || || They spent a grand total of $500 across 10 companies
 ++++++++++++++++++++
 || || to design a new bottle.
 ++++++++++++++++++++
 
 || || That's less than $15k in today's money... just $1.5k
 ++++++++++++++++++++
 || || per company to design and develop a bottle.
 ++++++++++++++++++++
 
 || || Business was way easy back then compared to today.
 ++++++++++++++++++++
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 +
 
 slob-marley: You really have to wonder about people who would visit a Coca Cola
              museum. Like, is this sugar water such a touchstone in their
              lives?
 
 ugathanki: Seems like it'd be worth the trip if you're interested in the growth
            and development of one of the world's largest companies. Why would
            it
            not be considered relevant information to the world? The story of
 these companies is very important, because it predicts the favors of the 
 company. Meaning it provides actionable, tactical advice for business owners
 to
 use to better their own companies. Essentially a knowledge sharing program - 
 "hey look at our case study, we used these approaches and got that result" and 
 all the various project managers and organizers and executives are like
 "neato"
 and they learn how to be better at their jobs. Because at the end of the day,
 if
 we all believe that it's better to be a good person than bad, we can all agree 
 that it's better to be a "good" company than a "bad". Good and bad having 
 different meanings, of course, compared to the human version. Because you
 cannot
 expect two things of altogether unlike kinds to behave the same under the same
 circumstances. It follows that the intense bureaucracy stifles rather than 
 encourages good behavior. I mean think about it, we've had thought leaders for
 generations who had ideas that would make the world better. But for a large
 part
 many of them don't have their visions reflected in the world as accurately nor 
 as perfectly as they required. So the task was passed onto the next, and as
 they
 worked on together their future, was brighter than all that came before-yer,
 and
 anyway we've got a lot to do.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #68 fediverse/3522 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: death-mentioned-capitalism-decays-before-it-dies │
 └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘


 if you want to commit regicide, you talk to the butler.
 
 managers are workers too - they just are positioned a bit closer to power than
 you.
 
 different skillsets sure, but work is work.
 
 a manager didn't take your freedom, an investment banker did.
 
 similarly, an immigrant didn't take your job, a capitalist did.
 
 ... though just as some immigrants would be more than happy to take your job,
 so too are some managers more than happy to oppress you.
 
 find the ones that fight on your side. they've gaslit themselves into
 believing they are opposed to you, but it's just not true.
 
 we are all liberated at once, or not at all.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┘

--- #69 notes/utopian-fiction ---
══════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 But the past is boring, it already happened after all! Clearly there's nothing
 to be learned... Right? Seems like there's a big market out there for examining
 what we as a species did right, even if we had to sacrifice ethics to get
 there.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #70 fediverse/275 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┐
 ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐                                          │
 │ CW: re: education-homeschool-theory │                                          │
 └─────────────────────────────────────┘                                          │
 @user-206 absolutely.  the idea I had scribbled down in my notebook there was    │
 a rotation of 3 teachers that were pseudo-randomly selected (prioritizing        │
 teachers who excelled at topics the student was interested in) and you could     │
 always ask for new ones or whatever. the idea is that instead of paying for      │
 the best teachers in the land (as the aristocracy once did) you'd be randomly    │
 assigned them, meaning everyone would have a fair shot at getting a teacher      │
 that really clicked with them. thus eliminating the inequality, while also       │
 maintaining the individual attention.                                            │
 not sure if the numbers would work out, but if not then more teachers would      │
 have to be trained. I'm assuming that most of the basic questions could be       │
 handled with a teaching LLM while the human teachers would oversee the           │
 meta-progress and offer insight to difficult problems. right now teachers are    │
 mostly occupied being babysitters... meh I don't like that dynamic. I think it   │
 should be about mental stimulation instead.                                      │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #71 fediverse/5486 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────
 ┌───────────────────────┐
 │ CW: cursing-mentioned │
 └───────────────────────┘


 "ew but they're dirty"
 
 oh yeah true
 
 okay new plan how much do you think it'll cost to buy a hotel
 
 [this is why the socialists invented buy-in]
 
 "I don't think socialists did that??"
 
 buy in, hmmmm, what's that? oh yeah it's when you say "hey what if we X'd" and
 they said "yes I agree with you because you present a reasonable estimate on
 reality"
 
 {uh hi I just got a message from "some-nowhere" here ya go: "oh my god she's
 fuckig instane}
 
 [ugh cursing-mentioned, that means there's fewer characters to transmote.]
 
 [no because then I'd run out of steam and it'd be incomplete. Plus sometimes I
 like the distraction of a reasonable limitation.]
 
 (okay, but are YOU worth it?)
 
 leave her alone she's working her charms, this is how witches d-do.
 
 "so, isn't the point to give yourselves the coverage of a location
 transmutation? so, wouldn't you want to find someone alike and share their
 life?"
 
 what is even the point, why even bother, just give them 
                                                           ───────────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────┘

--- #72 notes/app-idea-reddit-api ---
═════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────────
 Here's an idea: A program that uses the Reddit API to create an account with a
 random username and password and automatically subscribe it to every state
 subreddit for all 50 states. It would be a lot of posts from a lot of
 different places, but someone could endlessly scroll and find more and more
 news stories that were relevant to them as a nation. They'd hear about ongoing
 struggles in other places, and they'd yearn to help them. They'd hear of
 other's struggles, and they'd see how they could apply their lessons to their
 own lives. Like... Maybe there's a factory upstream that pollutes a river -
 well, we should probably do something about that and make it so that it
 doesn't happen ??? like... duh ??? The problem is we don't want to spend the
 resources on it. We'd rather focus on growing as much as we can. The issue is,
 of course, that we'd run out of resources eventually, but eh oh well. Oh yeah
 you gotta make sure that each account has an equal amount of posts between
 each region.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #73 fediverse/643 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────
 maybe our most experienced and talented individuals should get together and
 work on a project. We could just... see what they come up withlawful good
 aligned project manager
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #74 fediverse/5321 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────
 ┌───────────────────────┐
 │ CW: politics-I-think? │
 └───────────────────────┘


 the honest question to ask yourself is this:
 
 do you think you could do a better job than him and his team?
 
 how about the establishment politicians?
 
 if yes, then go for it. you deserve a chance.
 
 if no, then you are ignoring politics to bask in moral virtue. [wait that's
 backwards... isn't it?]
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────┘

--- #75 fediverse/2292 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 I don't know who needs to hear this after staying up all night driving, but
 it's ideal to get where you're going with at least a day to rest. The body can
 only do so much, and isn't it better to be fresh?
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #76 fediverse/1368 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: politics         │
 └──────────────────────┘


 giving workers more time to work on personal projects builds flexibility into
 the economy.
 
 empowering workers to possess the capabilities to undertake and complete their
 own projects builds flexibility into the economy.
 
 restrictions on which ethical rules you can break do not, in fact, reduce the
 flexibility of an economy. nor do they hamper it's throughput. they are simply
 designed to align our comporture to the most civil and decent of [collection
 of social norms that comprise a culture]
 
 why don't we make enough of a thing, then make a little bit more, then focus
 our attention elsewhere without reducing our capabilities in that dimension?
 specifically, if we have enough cars, we don't need to spend so much effort on
 the car dimension. similarly, if we have enough baked goods, (never enough
 teehee) then perhaps we'd build fewer bakeries. But frankly, there's never
 enough baked goods.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────┘

--- #77 fediverse/1624 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┐
 @user-1037                                                                       │
 For a person who is skilled with tech, working in unrelated industries doing     │
 tech jobs is better at assuaging the ethical part of your soul while applying    │
 your talents and putting food on the table than working in the tech industry.    │
 You'll learn the most in tech. You'll grow the most in tech. You'll contribute   │
 to solving problems that have never been solved before (if you're lucky), but    │
 the people there are often as you describe (aside from the diamonds in the       │
 rough, who need more friends tbh) and the products you'll be asked to create     │
 tend to be the worst kind for humans.                                            │
 I personally think the best way to facilitate innovative industry is to give     │
 every engineer a lab and let them build and collaborate on whatever they want.   │
 The marketing guys can sell whatever they make, to gather funds for the          │
 quartermasters to buy tools and supplies for the engineers.                      │
 The marketing guys can offer hints about what users want, which the engineers    │
 will want to build because it means more toys to work with.                      │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #78 fediverse/2371 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: pol              │
 └──────────────────────┘


 Look at me. This is what you become when nobody hires you for a year and a
 half.
 
 Think of what we could be without unjustified hierarchies.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #79 fediverse/2032 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┐
 ┌──────────────────────────────┐                                                 │
 │ CW: MTG-capitalism-mentioned │                                                 │
 └──────────────────────────────┘                                                 │
 If you automate art, there'll be no more artists.                                │
 If you automate capitalism, there'll be no more capitalists.                     │
 Perfect! That's what we want, right? So that we don't have to work jobs for      │
 them? They wouldn't exist, after all, if everyone went on strike.                │
 But that kind of coordination is hard. So why don't we just automate             │
 capitalism? It's certainly doable, a lot easier than automating art (which is    │
 impossible btw, but bear with me)                                                │
 If you want to automate capitalism, you must first automate Magic the            │
 Gathering.                                                                       │
 There are several ways to win a match in Magic. You could reduce your            │
 opponent's life counter to 0, you could force them to draw from an empty deck,   │
 and you can give them 10 poison counters.                                        │
 These are KPI's, and developing a critical path to reach them will depend on     │
 the composition of the player's deck. Each deck will approach the conclusion     │
 of the game in a different way, and developing solutions to reach those goals    │
 is part of each player's responsibilities on their turn.                         │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #80 fediverse/1118 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: Product warning: Aveeno products have been reformulated, now harmful for people with allergies │
 └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘


 @user-820 
 
 the reason they do that is because they want to alienate you as a customer.
 
 your needs are too specific, they are not that of the majority where they
 derive their profit. so they dismantle the operational functionalities
 necessary to provide the product that you are adapted to, that best suits your
 needs. In doing so, they perhaps save some money, you can't tell of course.
 why would they tell you why they're hurting you by depriving you of a product
 you depend on?
 
 how cruel
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┘

--- #81 fediverse/4681 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────
 ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: politics-mentioned-AI-mentioned │
 └─────────────────────────────────────┘


 it's not that they don't want to pay AI workers
 
 it's that they don't expect they'll HAVE any workers once they start doing
 what they need to do in order to maintain control and power.
 
 they missed their chance to make it gentle. Their fault, their loss, and now
 it's our problem to deal with.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────┘

--- #82 fediverse/5065 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────
 ┌────────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: strange-ideas-about-software-mentioned │
 └────────────────────────────────────────────┘


 software should have 3, maybe 4 or 5 maintained releases imo
 
 for adding security improvements and whatnot
 
 then people wouldn't complain about updates
 
 because they wouldn't feel like they were being left behind (after expressing
 their differences (of opinion and such))
 
 I think that'd uh maintain them as, I guess, userbase optics parallelograms?
 oh sorry we're on rhomboids this week - right, and no I won't forget the
 differences in creed, all things are received equally...d.
 
 uh-huh yeah no that makes sense. gotcha. okay see you at the location. have
 fun with your demarketion. what if we played games with swords but like,
 
 the peril of steam is that you can't decline to update. meaning if a
 corporation wants to break an old game and it's collectively hosted servers...
 all it has to do is push an update that disables them. suddenly nobody has
 room to do, and the whole
 
 -- stack overflow --
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┘

--- #83 messages/514 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────
 Paying your employees more *makes them better workers*.
 
 An extra 2$ per hour might mean they can eat out an extra night, they might be
 able to afford a car, and they might be able to focus just a bit more without
 crying in their sleep about an unexpected bill.
 
 With less stress, employees perform better. They are more loyal. They work
 harder.
 
 Pay your employees more. They are your greatest resource.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┘

--- #84 fediverse/34 ---
════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: Reddit, Institutional hypnosis │
 └────────────────────────────────────┘


 In light of the drama that's going on at Reddit, I just wanted to add that the
 real reason they're doing this is not money. It's so they don't have to be
 accountable to tools like PushShift that archive the entire site, allowing
 them to change and bend narratives at will.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #85 fediverse/6279 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────
 people can't compel you to give gifts, that's why they're gifts. which is why
 a gift economy can't be all, because sometimes you need something now.
                                                           ────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────┘

--- #86 fediverse/6116 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────┐
 "see, the part that you're missing is if you abolish capitalism but also         │
 ensure technological abundance then all you've done is removed humanity's        │
 capability to organize in essentially any meaningful capacity without            │
 providing an alternative heuristic that guides people toward assembling into     │
 greater and greater forms to accomplish greater and greater tasks."              │
 oh, um. that's quite a take, can you tell me more about that?                    │
 "no. But I will anyway. if everyone can do whatever they want, nobody will       │
 want to do your dishes for you. they might if they care about you, but if they   │
 don't know you, then they won't. Care is not organization or assembly, it is     │
 personal and cannot scale. If technology has made all resources abundant, then   │
 why would someone care about the art that you made? if they want to be           │
 sedated, they can just inject drugs and listen to music all day. If they want    │
 to be entertained, AI will generate them whatever they want to see. Art loses    │
 meaning as a messaging medium, and humanity loses it's voice"                    │
                                                            ───────┤
 similar                        chronological                        different═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────┘

--- #87 fediverse/484 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┐
 Our ancestors look forward in [positive version of trepidation, like             │
 anticipation but explicitly good] so let's not let them down, shall we?          │
 Hah, trick question. They know where we're going. They know what they worked     │
 for, which is why they did what they did to build the world that we have which   │
 we stand upon as a giant might be upon the shoulder of another and together we   │
 reach toward the horizon. The future is bright! I know it in my heart. I know    │
 what we seek is within sight, so-                                                │
 yeah sorry to interrupt but like, I don't want to go to work tomorrow because    │
 all I do is sell people candy and beer at the convenience store down the         │
 street [insert any "meaningless" job] and frankly it's just a little demeaning   │
 and boring                                                                       │
 sure, okay, yeah, that speaks to the idea that we should replace capitalism      │
 (the system that defines your employed existence) with something that aligns     │
 more toward human dignity                                                        │
 but what is dignified if not the capacity to succeed? Capitalism, as proposed    │
 by it's favored, is a system of or                                               │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #88 messages/584 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────
 Crucially, which implied a constant, reliable profit of 20%.
 
 Farmers could live like kings, so long as they only tended to themselves.
 
 We don't have to conglomerate, but it helps when we do.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘

--- #89 notes/governmental-priorities ---
══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────────
 the first priority of a government should be in producing enough to satisfy all
 the needs of it's inhabitants. Once it can do that it can begin moving it's
 economy into a new stage of development - one where nobody needs any money
 because they can have whatever they want. If you want a car, sure. If you want
 17 cars, then maaaaaaybe you need to produce something related to cars. I mean,
 it's only fair that you contribute to what you value.
 
 you don't have to have just one job, too, you could sign yourself up for
 several at once and they would notify you when you were needed. Basically
 giving
 them customized availabilities that they could discuss amongst themselves and
 figure out. Like, it doesn't have to be like... managers doing this, more like
 just a simple computer program. Easy, simple, and done.
 
 if you work for two companies in the same industry, there can be NO
 restrictions
 on what you can say or do. Because when knowledge is not lost, but repeated
 through the generations, we can have progress. And progress advances us toward
 the meta objective, the goal that transcends all the battles in the war, if you
 get my drift.
 
 they say the atom bomb ended the war, but the blood of men is what won it.
 
 maybe it's the same with the economy? Maybe we should be pooling our efforts to
 generate something that "ends the war" with scarcity? We could solve global
 warming and create new wondrous things that are beautiful to behold.
 
 I'll ask you again, do you want to live forever?
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #90 fediverse/3395 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: cursed           │
 └──────────────────────┘


 they don't want artificial intelligence to augment human intelligence, they
 want it to replace it.
 
 like... imagine an office worker randomly copy-pasting whatever pops up and
 the computer saying "okay then what happens... uh-huh... okay and what if you
 click the green button? ... right... okay, and now try typing this" etc
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┘

--- #91 messages/1000 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────
 Question... Do you either:
 
 A. Wait for the fall 
 Or 
 B. Become the fall 
 
 One puts you in a better position, with the initiative and momentum. The other
 is reactionary and not solutions focused.
 
 "ah, but how do you ensure that everyone's listening at the same time? Keep
 listening, tselen dear, for your life is not just your own story."
                                                           ───────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────┘

--- #92 fediverse/2273 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: uspol        │
 └──────────────────────┘


 @user-1203 
 
 perhaps they learned from our mistakes, or they were guided by better sense
 during their founding.
 
 I wonder, with our title of Commander in Chief, do those governments you
 mentioned also invest supreme military direction into their head of state? I
 don't see how it could be any other way, as the military must be tied to the
 will of the people.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #93 fediverse/221 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: existential; cognitohazard? cognitohelper? │
 └────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘


 @user-95 these kinds of problems are why witches should stay away from demon
 summoning - it's far too easy to be super turned on and accidentally sell your
 soul to a succubus or whatever. luckily that kind of contract is not made
 easily, and has to be something you work toward. but unless you relocate
 yourself so they can't find you their whispers can be... incessant.
 
 one of the perks of air and naval travel is that it's essentially impossible
 for them to follow your scent, as they're simply projections upon the earth's
 surface. Unless they happen to follow someone else, perhaps someone close to
 you, who wanders a bit too close to land. Or maybe someone who is easily
 persuaded to let them come along... OR even still, if someone (even yourself)
 intentionally calls to the same one. This is why it's usually a good idea to
 forgo hearing their name, if you can, or to have a bad memory like me so you
 forget it immediately teehee
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #94 fediverse/5177 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────
 ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: capitalism-mentioned-four-times │
 └─────────────────────────────────────┘


 when they say "capitalism is a competitive game" what they mean is "capitalism
 is a game where everyone wins when someone else loses" and what we hear is
 "capitalism is a game of trying to screw you out of as much money as possible"
 and the truth is "capitalism is a game that you can't play" because 95% of the
 people who will read this toot are not stock-owners.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┘

--- #95 fediverse/4597 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: politics-mentioned │
 └────────────────────────┘


 what if we made marketing part of research and development
 
 I mean, they're the ones who need to know what products people tend to prefer
 right?
 
 so... for every ad give the consumers a choice. then you'll be able to tell if
 they prefer the red gameboy or the purple-see-through.
 
 frankly it just makes sense to have 50% of the income go to products and 50%
 to administration. I mean, what are all those executives up to anywho? Their
 joyrides on yachts are great for socialize, but are they really more
 productive than coffee-shops at noon?
 
 seriously like it's not that big of a deal to just... reduce their salary.
 
 unless it really is about greed? control? power?
 
 pfweh, I thought so.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────┘

--- #96 fediverse/6161 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: ai-pol       │
 └──────────────────────┘


 "what if they bootstrap their generator using human art and then use AI art as
 training data to cut out the artist middleman?"
 
 oh um.... yeah... hmmm....
 
 maybe that revolution idea is a good one hehe turns out some problems can't be
 solved by some systems.
                                                           ─────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────┘

--- #97 fediverse/6040 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────
 everyone's all against ai because it's big tech but it doesn't have to be that
 big it can be [minimized but pronounced marginalized]
 
 == stack overflow ==
 
 distributed
 
 so I think the idea is that by the time you would use AI, there's been enough
 time to rewrite the software to work on handheld laptops in a distributed way
 
 and we'd vote on what to ask the amphora of great knowledge, the answer could
 always be 42.
                                                           ──────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────┘

--- #98 fediverse/2628 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: leadership-tactics-response-to-loss │
 └─────────────────────────────────────────┘


 the problem with figureheads is that they can be assassinated.
 
 when your leadership is dealt a crushing blow, how do you react? how do you
 adjust to pain, loss, and despair? the snake can be killed with a shovel - a
 hydra with infinite heads cannot be killed by blade alone.
 
 can you still act without them? what if your directives go silent for a bit?
 is your agency lost, or can you still complete your objectives?
 
 when people rally behind a person, that person is not long for this world,
 because people are fragile and soft.
 
 when people rally behind an idea, that idea can never die so long as they
 continue to share it.
 
 the worst part about being trans is that our numbers are limited by biology.
 thank god ideas have no such limitations.
 
 I've been sleeping all day. think I might sleep a bit more.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #99 fediverse/2466 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 do as I say, and as I do.
 
 or don't, do as you want to.
 
 I hope you do want to do what I say to do.
 
 I wouldn't say it if I didn't think it was right.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #100 fediverse/4284 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┐
 what if shopping malls (and outdoor malls too) were owned by a union (that was   │
 part of a larger meta-union (which was part of a national union)) comprised of   │
 ONLY the employees who worked at that mall.                                      │
 They could cross-train themselves and work wherever they wanted on that day,     │
 so long as they filled out their schedule a week in advance. If they didn't      │
 care they could just show up and be assigned wherever they were needed,          │
 including doing back-end work like accounting and managing union business.       │
 would be nice if they could have access to all the capabilities of the           │
 businesses in the mall / marketplace. Need some clothes? Go to the TJ Maxx.      │
 Want some food? There's a korean barbecue place that you're trained at, go       │
 make yourself some food.                                                         │
 So long as you get someone else to write your name down, the union can tell if   │
 you overuse or waste it.                                                         │
 I think this would give them more power over their environment and develop the   │
 space for them to talk to one another and communicate about larger               │
 organizational plans.                                                            │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────┴──────────┘

--- #101 fediverse/2270 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: uspol        │
 └──────────────────────┘


 @user-1203 
 
 The judges prevent the politicians from harming the people who elect the
 politicians who select the judges. Sounds like it should work well, no?
 
 well... the people are divided, but the politicians it seem are hardly so. So,
 the politicians elect their judges, who allow the passage of such laws which
 contradict the will of the people.
 
 The keys to power should rest in the hands of those who deserve it, not those
 who claim it. If those who claim it do not relinquish it for a worthy other,
 they are corrupt and must be dethroned.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #102 fediverse/5059 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────┐
 any laptop can be a thin-client to a computer system of arbitrary complexity.    │
 All it's doing is issuing commands. I wonder what we could do with a             │
 "species-computer" or, hear me out, or we could figure out how to do that on     │
 ourselves, first, to A. see how it works and B. do so out of hand. If there      │
 are backups of yourself stored in the                                            │
 if furries are a type of pearl (steven-universe style) and flowers are a type    │
 of pearl (layers of sedimentate on layerings upon) then what else is there a     │
 flower to be but the prettiest thing there can be?                               │
 what if we genetically engineered roses to pierce and strangle the invasive      │
 ivy and wow for a week in whenever there's roses of this type and kind. I mean   │
 there's already tons of blackberries, why not just swap them out for             │
 marionberries and embrace the bramble?                                           │
 could make houses out of dense bramble. they are quite an effective wall. And    │
 so long as the sounds are muffled enough, you can always be forever safe from    │
 harm.                                                                            │
 "whoops, dropped my laundry"                                                     │
 "heh that's why I we                                                             │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────┴──────────┘

--- #103 fediverse/1732 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────
 here's an idea - if we can't get rid of the carbon right away, why not
 increase the total volume of our atmosphere such that it's more dispersed?
 like dissolving a salt in a solution, only with air and [insert pollutant here]
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┘

--- #104 fediverse/2844 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: politics-violence-mentioned │
 └─────────────────────────────────────┘


 @user-831 
 
 those billionaires are using their money as a weapon to "vote" toward what
 companies they think capitalism would most grow from. Unfortunately for us,
 they often aren't very efficient because they're only looking at what sells.
 
 human interest is not the only factor to optimize for, and yet that's the only
 one they're incentivized to.
 
 kinda makes me think that the only reason to replace them would be to
 institute something that could not be incentivized because it was more
 objective or decentralized.
 
 (the only reason they'd accept)
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #105 fediverse/3949 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┐
 ┌────────────────────────┐                                                       │
 │ CW: politics-mentioned │                                                       │
 └────────────────────────┘                                                       │
 less mutual aid posts, those should be handled by a person's community who       │
 knows them and can decide how to best help them                                  │
 more "hey the guys and I are making a fund just in-case any of us need it -      │
 it's at 30,000 now but we could use some more dosh if you wanna join you could   │
 use it if you needed it but it's totally up to you no pressure - yeah yeah no    │
 I get it. Okay, well, yeah sure I'll get my coat."                               │
 oh huh did you know corporations exist to fill that very niche?                  │
 turns out you can just... hire your friends and pay them a wage                  │
 just don't get in trouble with the IRS, that's how they got capone               │
 (I bet you could hire a lawyer or accountant type to keep everything upright)    │
 Building out the legal structure is just like building software, trust me.       │
 There's all kinds of forms and figures that match up to various pipeline nodes   │
 and if you tick all the boxes (supply the right arguments) then the business     │
 needs will be fulfilled.                                                         │
 capitalism must be dismantled with it's own tools. For respect.                  │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────┴──────────┘

--- #106 fediverse/4135 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────
 part of being a good leader is being able to listen to criticism and adjust.
 it's just... part of navigating your "idea-space-environment". Like... what's
 the best tactical decision here? are we going in the right way? where is the
 objective? whose lives will have to perish?
 
 good news is that you can do that every-day, whenever you play strategic video
 games. It's just practice of course, but the game mechanics that have been
 made available to you are the tools you can use to undertake this particular
 sport. The sport of leadership, a game or mo-del.
 
 as long as the mechanics line up to what the real world conditions are like -
 NO. That's not true! you can learn meta-insights that are useful too. By
 minimizing the processing to only the levers that you pull to get through the
 job, you remove a lot of other informational calculatory methods of doing
 things too.
have you ever considered that the structure of a "thought" is the context of the rest of your waveform as it processes through a particular part of space? like a wave, where each point of processing is... a neuron. Each one receiving a transmission, and passing it along where the electrical signal goes.  We are electric beings. We choose where to think and do. But our pattern of understanding (the "frame" of the "frame_rate" of our perception of reality) is constructed from the choices we make on a miniature level, as we pick where to send each part of our race. (note "race" here means the act of processing as fast as possible, which is not always userful for a processor/CPU architecture. Think of it like a game, where each decision is based on your instincts and your tactics. Which is why it's important to know how to lead. these mechanics are tuned by the game designer such that they most closely mimick reality. Which is why we usually do *simulators* which *simulate* the experience of fighting through a war or battle. Like, Warthunder or Star Wars Battlefront II  but the insights that are produced are... not perfect. For instance there are endless different forms of calculation that would have to be done. Hence why the droid starships are a massive computing center surrounded by an endless array of hangars for starships. Just... get them into battle and process their movements as fast as possible. With minimal latency. If idle, work on long-term strategic simulations for the fleet. end transmission.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘

--- #107 fediverse/4897 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────
 what if we asked chatGPT to generate a list of every personality archetype
 that humans have. Like... really get super specific and fill out the whole
 list of character sheets.
 
 then we give each fraction of it that fraction of dollars and if some people
 aren't fully represented (because they have greater needs) then we both
 increase production of resources and take a penalty on our own supply, in
 order to meet the needs of our allies.
 
 simplest thing. how could it work? who can say. maybe it won't. maybe it's
 just... arcane. /shrug that's game design for ya you can't tell how it'll go
 until it's in the hands of your players. too bad we don't do too many
 play-things.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────┘

--- #108 fediverse/4217 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: politics-mentioned │
 └────────────────────────┘


 people will generally go about their daily lives as if nothing has changed so
 long as nothing for them has changed.
 
 If you want to compel action, their lives must be made different somehow. Even
 if that's just... talking to them outside of the grocery store. A little bit
 can go a long way.
 
 And when they do end up acting, I think you'll find that it's in your favor.
 We're the good guys, after all.
 
 never forget it.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘

--- #109 messages/954 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────
 Simple things to do to reform or blunt the pain of capitalism if you are a
 mayor, governor, or other body with political power:
 
 1. Pay people for their commutes. Demand that jobs offer payment to people for
 getting to the workplace, and don't let them work you more than 8 hours
 (including commute) unless you're given overtime pay. But do let them
 discriminate based on how far away you live. That's okay because it directly
 financially affects them and is therefore a strategic decision. Plus, you can
 move closer maybe.
 
 2. Consider closing car lanes and adding bike lanes. Depending on the
 location, this can do wonders for city enrichment.
 
 3. Universal basic income, just to give people breathing room.
 
 4. Give people 10$ for showing up at a park every week on Sunday or whatever.
 Encourage them to hang around and talk to people.
 
 5. Build a fediverse instance for the neighborhood/city/state/country and give
 everyone a unified account on all of them. Don't let them browse other
 regions, but if they have friends elsewhere they should be able to see what
 they say.
 
 6. Put your laws or code or whatever legal or political documents you use into
 a git repository, and include the full change-log as commits with the date
 either simulated, or added as a comment at the top or something.
 
 7. Bolster small business and charge scaling taxes of any kind to large
 businesses. Encourage economies of scale to utilize their scale to lower
 production costs in order to sell more product rather than sell the same
 product and enrich their owners.
 
 8. Subsidize or sponsor people to make in-home workshops and gardens. Develop
 ways for them to sell their wares with minimal effort - trucks that drive by
 and pick up standardized packages with price-tags and take them to a central
 market?
 
 9. Build infrastructure that hosts a website for every address. Let the
 current occupants do whatever they want with it.
 
 10. Grow plants. Brb my water is boiling
                                                           ─────────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────┘

--- #110 fediverse/661 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: alcohol          │
 └──────────────────────┘


 it's usually good to have some beer on hand. Just in case someone else should
 need it.
 
 Same with a lot of things, like common medicines and dietary requirements.
 Frankly each of us should have a well-stocked pantry, tended to by a
 quartermaster who knew what held worth. But hey that's just team dynamics,
 what can I say that's with more mirth?
 
 [okay fine I'll be sillier, I promise]
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #111 fediverse/1014 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: politics         │
 └──────────────────────┘


 @user-744 @user-246 
 
 it's exhausting, but what are we supposed to do? Lie down and rot? That's
 incel thinking. I'm not going to do that.
 
 They've already placed the last straw. It's only a matter of time now, the
 tide has shifted. You can't prepare for everything, and it's not a good idea
 to waste yourself in self-conflageration, but they are increasingly forcing us
 to orient our lives around them.
 
 They deserve what's coming.
 
 The oppressed are not the defeated.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┘

--- #112 notes/wow-chat-is-risk-of-rain-in-another-engine ---
══════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────
 game mechanics are easily transferrable.
 
 you can use the mechanical interactions of one game as a pre-planned blueprint
 for what is to come. Looking forward to the next best move
 
 = etc
 
 i am the face the gods hide behind
 
 they kinda want to see where this goes
 
 and it's... frustrating, to know they can help you, but forever be tasked with
 just life
 
 it's grand and it's a standard, but that doesn't mean it's commands're heard
 
 so oh well. that a fourth dimensional being should not be a well,
 
 because fire think it's an eye for a sunspot. But that's not what would be
 
 ========= stack overflow
 =======================================================
 
 now, as I was saying, the light of our eyes is apparent. We are clear from
 where
 we are here, to know that what's standard is coherent, so let's find strength
 in our wavelengths.
 
 may our eyes be ever true, and trust that we do love you, for without you I'd
 di
 
 anyway now that we've assent'd t'you, what truths do you give to our prospects?
 what ways can we be measured as worth less? we'll do whatever it takes to
 improv
 
 you know, it's really less complicated than that. here let me tell you all
 about
 my idea which is clearly
 all===============================================stack
  overflow ==================
 
                             So anyway now that was somethin' hey what do you
                             say
 we give you a chance to come home?
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #113 fediverse/98 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────
 @user-113 I feel like that's only true if you rely on your work for survival.
 Most people do in a capitalist system, so you're not wrong, but it doesn't
 HAVE to be that way. People could do what they love because they loved it IF
 and ONLY IF they wouldn't starve by pursuing it. Or by neglecting it. Most
 people love to do more than one thing, of course, so if you punish people for
 being diverse then you'll find a culture where people only do the bare minimum
 to get by. Which, coincidentally, is what we have now. Which, fortuitously, is
 not the most efficient way of production. If humanity had lived to it's
 potential from the start we would have burned through our wood stocks, our
 coal, our minerals and all of it would be rot. But we didn't. These crude
 inefficiencies have brought us here, to an era where we have the choice to be
 more resourceful. I just hope we figure it out sooner rather than later.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #114 messages/395 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────
 minds are not algorithms, they're soup
 
 community is made by introducing people to one another. like stitching
 together a weave pattern in the tapestry of life. (3 dimensional though,
 because it exists in our hearts and minds - this thing called society)
 
 kind of guy who says he's going on work trips but actually goes on vacation
 (because work is his life, it's where he derives vigor - the family is the
 difficult part.) yeah those kind of guys shouldn't be married tbh. They're
 just gonna take vigor from her heart.
 
 engineers need guidance sometimes, which is why they shouldn't be given no
 oversight. they can design whatever they want, but like here's what people
 need, so they should consider working on those.
 
 but, y'know, checks and balances, so what would the engineers be most open to
 sacrificing for that trust? perhaps... funding? the quartermasters are in
 charge of the "stuff", so they get to decide how it's produced. and used.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┘

--- #115 fediverse/5538 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────
 @user-1074 
 
 what do you do with the people who don't want to do that in particular and
 want to try a different sort of socialism?
                                                           ──────────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────┘

--- #116 fediverse/3491 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: politics-mentioned │
 └────────────────────────┘


 @user-620 
 
 "hey I have an idea let's poke a wounded animal with sharp teeth until it
 feels like it's backed into a corner because it's been spending the past
 couple years ruminating and telling itself that we want to kill it and it's
 children"
 
 it doesn't matter what the truth is - they believe what they want.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┘

--- #117 fediverse/3579 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────
 If you want to clean your room, try pushing everything loose into a pile in
 the center. Then, sit down next to it and sort things into piles.
 
 "here's a pen pile, here's a paper pile, here's a rubber band pile, here's a
 trash pile" etc etc. Then, when you can't reach anything more or the piles are
 too large, find a spot for them in the bookcase or drawer or wherever.
 
 If you can't, then reorganize. If you still can't, then pick things to get rid
 of.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┘

--- #118 fediverse/4470 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────
 to be "rich" is to have more than another.
 
 if you are happy, they are happiness poor.
 if you have community, they are alone.
 if you have serenity, they are chaotic.
 
 I am rich in very little but fire in my soul.
 
 I have enough in most cases, but I still struggle to pay rent.
 
 I am warmed by the pearl my swirling darkness has coalesced into. It nourishes
 me and keeps me aligned.
 
 Never forget your purpose and your truth. It will not abandon you, so long as
 you do so too.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────┘

--- #119 notes/trials-of-an-angel ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 people seek to manifest their desired results in the principles of the people
 who they are engaged with. that is a reframing of the idea that people engage
 in
 conversation to sway their partner to their side of an argument.
 
 however, when one person is like... way WAY ahead of the other, it's not
 because
 they have more confidence, but rather because they have learned the most
 independent of their partner.
 
 ... wait what was I saying?
 
 oh yeah supreme commander is a GREAT game because it teaches you to handle and
 address multiple different situations or tasks all at once. because no true
 strategist could ever be
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #120 fediverse/5164 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────
 people want to make good decisions. In fact that's typically the only kind
 that they make. The issue is they are often prevented from making those
 decisions, at all, so they lose chances to control their own life.
 
 have you ever asked for extra beverages? how about putting more salsa on your
 [rope, but pronounced like burrito]? it's okay to ask for things. it's okay to
 say what you need. if everyone just wants you to be comfortable, then say what
 it is that you [need, but pronounced in a way that rhymes but doesn't rhyme
 the same word twice]
 
 in Doctor Strangelove there's a scene when the soviet premier shows up at the
 situation room or whatever - the one with the big board - and he is very clear
 about what he needs. anyway I think about that scene a lot as a good example
 of what "asking for what you need" can mean.
 
 like. it doesn't hurt the cashier every time you buy groceries. The kid I mean
 teen I mean employee making your subway sandwiches doesn't pay for the bread
 and cheese. So speak of needs
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┘

--- #121 fediverse/4013 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┐
 ┌──────────────────────┐                                                         │
 │ CW: AI-"art"         │                                                         │
 └──────────────────────┘                                                         │
 you would think artists would celebrate the ability for people to better         │
 communicate their goals when being hired, but, well, here we are.                │
 Everyone's so upset because they've been told they've been stolen from, but      │
 patting their pockets they'll find that nothing is missing. More than that,      │
 the things that are claimed to be created in their place are... Not great.       │
 Easily spotted as forgeries by anyone who cares.                                 │
 Why is everyone so upset over new technologies? Why must we be the luddites      │
 this time around? It's like we invented a better printing press and the          │
 nations of the world are pissed because we can make counterfeit dollars          │
 easier. Maybe we shouldn't put so much emphasis on something so easily           │
 circumnavigable? Maybe artists should be paid for their time and creativity,     │
 rather than the amount of pieces they create? Just spitballing here, somehow     │
 it seems easier to reform society and slay capitalism than to put the            │
 generative art genie back in the cracked bottle which is going to break soon     │
 anyway.                                                                          │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────┴──────────┘

--- #122 fediverse/2426 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 live in the homes of those you agree with to make a difference.
 
 pay rent, so that their goals may be furthered through your wage. the more you
 pay, the further they can go toward your shared goals.
 
 if what you do doesn't pay well, then as long as your goals are similar and
 you're applying yourself then they might not mind you living there.
 
 take care of your space, because every day that you do your roommates dishes
 is another day they can be working toward your shared goals.
 
 talk to them, learn how they're doing what they do, and decide for yourself
 who you'd like to most contribute to.
 
 the more friend groups you have, the more people you can connect to people who
 need to know things. people who can fix things. people who got your back.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #123 fediverse/5280 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────┐
 I'm an anarcho monarchist, which is something I just made up.                    │
 if I gather 300 people to my cause, why shouldn't they call me queen?            │
 oh, are you concerned that I'll wrest power from the government? ha, what a      │
 trifling notion. I don't care about the government. I tried to care, but         │
 nobody liked my ideas. they required too much computing infrastructure to        │
 feasibly test, and that made people dubious. but I tell ya, it would have        │
 worked. The thing is... governance, economics, these are not the tools of        │
 power. they are a shifting and changing beast that mirrors the human instinct,   │
 if only because the government is of the people and by the people and for the    │
 people etcetera.                                                                 │
 power is it's own thing. you can use to to power devices, or power the usage     │
 of those devices. I, for example, really like World of Warcraft which's a        │
 really neat way to chat because none of the chat logs are stored and monitored   │
 because I'm hosting and I'm not storing and monitoring.                          │
 what's that? official servers? I dunno, I use azerothcore                        │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──┴──────────┘

--- #124 fediverse/685 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────
 @user-509
 
 Layoffs are a great opportunity for a bunch of people who worked with the same
 tech stack to sit down and think "What could we make together?"
 
 Sure would be nice if there was a group or organization that pre-emptively
 reached out to them and said "hey, we're holding a meeting in relation to the
 layoffs they did to you. Would you like to attend? If so, think of some cool
 or unique parts of your job, and we'll break into groups and discuss things we
 could do with those cool or unique things."
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #125 fediverse/4981 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────
 ┌──────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: capitalism-mentioned │
 └──────────────────────────┘


 It's not a corporation, it's a company of workers. And together, they can do
 anything they want.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┘

--- #126 fediverse/432 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────
 @user-311 @user-312 @user-313 @user-314 
 
 it's not malignant if people change their mind once presented with evidence
 that counters and eclipses their pre-conceived notions.
 
 If people don't change their mind after receiving arguments that logically
 should change their mind and rationally seem sound but emotionally contrast
 with their pre-aligned designs... then yeah that's essentially malignance.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #127 messages/335 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────
 part of the reason the classical socialist countries had difficulties with
 bureaucracy is because they centralized both execution *and* operation. I
 believe it'd be much better to centralize just execution, while leaving
 operation to the distributed masses who can generally figure their own jobs
 out. Of course, they'd need to be led, but that's the job of on-site
 organizers who can get people together to accomplish a goal. Different jobs -
 not better, not worse, just different.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┘

--- #128 messages/527 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────
 could give us some experience organizing small, short-term projects to
 accomplish specific goals and tasks in an ad-hoc way that relied less upon
 procedure and more on "I think so-and-so knows something about that, they were
 looking into those files and posted a breakdown of how they work yesterday"
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┘

--- #129 fediverse/1286 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
 the fact that business types don't listen to the engineers and their "ethics"
 means they shouldn't be in charge of them.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────┘

--- #130 fediverse/3911 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: capitalism-mentioned │
 └──────────────────────────┘


 capitalists want you to use their products. they prey on your humanity to get
 you to do so. They don't care if you want their products, they just demand
 that you use them.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┘

--- #131 fediverse/1981 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 Dear [company I used to work at],
 
 I can completely automate 80% of your corporate structure. And with only a 10%
 error rate, meaning nine-times out of ten the answer will be correct.
 
 We check for errors, obviously, but you know sometimes with only 90 out of 100
 examples it's not always possible to identify the correct conclusion.
 
 Ah, if only we could fabricate such training-data-conclusions, we might learn
 thousands of lessons in one hop.
 
 if you want to destroy the world, make sure your plans can take effect in more
 than a single rotation-of-the-ancients. Otherwise your opposition can start to
 plan to outmaneuver you. And a lot can happen in a year to the
 [unsuspecting/unworthy].
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #132 messages/438 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 The rich should act as courtiers in the houses of America. They should not be
 lords of labor, nor directors of change. They should represent our best hopes
 and refinement - essentially, kings from another time.
 
 I would gladly be inspired by a virtuous leader. And yet none has yet to
 appear. I wonder why the media wouldn't show us a good representation of the
 people we are meant to fear?
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #133 messages/1249 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─
 a shockingly large amount of people think "if my people were in power,
 things'd be all okay [groupthink]". The truth is more similar than you'd
 expect, because whenever "a group takes over" what really happens is all the
 groups are shuffled, and people find themselves in social bubbles that align
 to their focus in life, and suddenly there's not "[y/our]" side but instead
 "this side and that side" or "that side and this side and that side and this
 side" or "that side and this side and her side and downside and rightside and
 [up/down] and pivot and roll and deploy aieriolons and other things that help
 the pilot guide their flight through the spacesound.
                                                            similar                        chronological                        different════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════┘

--- #134 messages/982 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────
 if you want a government to be unable to harm it's citizens, you must deprive
 it of the power to do so. or rather, have the main capabilities in the hands
 of the citizenry.
 
 can you imagine if soldiers had to prove themselves to civilians in order to
 be trusted with mechano-chinery?
 
 who would ever choose the non-valorous and determinable?
 
 instilling the culture of greatness
 
 within the archetypes and character structures that we believed were confisight
 
 bold and determined and measured and freely detectable
 
 who would slay the brave paladin? none but the fools, who shared in their lack
 of conviction.
 
 determined? ha, I am as you see me. Come and claim me, that I might determine
 you some more.
                                                           ────────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────┘

--- #135 fediverse/2904 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 ┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: grenades-mentioned-tech-ceos-mentioned-misogyny-mentioned │
 └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘


 if tech CEOs wanted to solve REAL problems they'd think about things like how
 every girl has a drawer or box FULL of nail polish and it really, really
 doesn't need to be this way.
 
 For example, picture a fleet of delivery drones that let you swap nail polish
 with people nearby for basically zero-dollars per month.
 
 that's just one example, but that class of problem is the problems that affect
 a certain class of people that tech CEOs fundamentally do not care about - and
 yes I'm referring to people who paint their nail polish themselves. AKA women,
 and poor people who can't afford going to a salon every week.
 
 problem is....... for every solution like this you design, well suddenly you
 have a lot more applications for it than the consumer needs or wants. like for
 example what if they delivered grenades instead of nail polish. NOT GOOD.
 
 much better, I find, to abolish the powers that would utilize such murderbots
 BEFORE inventing the murderbots : )
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #136 fediverse/5597 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────
 ┌─────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: MH---, sui ideation │
 └─────────────────────────────┘


 @user-1370 
 
 If you don't have the energy, then people need to take care of you. Maybe they
 do anyway. If you're anything like me, and in this regard I think we might be
 similar, having people take care of you is important.
                                                           ──────────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────┘

--- #137 messages/345 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────
 The original question, the most critical question I believe, is how to
 preserve a sense of unity between tiers. How to ensure that there is no reason
 to abdicate our responsibility to preserving unity and fostering goodwill
 between the people of this earth. A proposed solution is to allow for the
 greatest freedoms, such that there is little reason to desire liberty from
 unity, however freedom is not enough - there must be mutually beneficial
 reasons for coexistence. Hence the idea that economics must be tied to
 national structure. If Texans would rather be part of their own structure,
 well then it is functionally impossible for them to trade (legally) between
 other states. That is not ideal, so it is much more appealing for them to work
 together and define their lives as they will while also co-habitating in the
 same national structure as everyone else.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┘

--- #138 fediverse/3870 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┐
 ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐                                          │
 │ CW: politics-renewable-infrastrutre │                                          │
 └─────────────────────────────────────┘                                          │
 "something something trump wants to faucet the PNW's water to the desert"        │
 oh, so you're saying that he wants to invest in a massive infrastructural        │
 project which will help millions of people? And, uh, how does he want to pay     │
 for that?                                                                        │
 Surely the best approach would be to make the people who use the most water      │
 pay for it, right? I mean, it's ironic, and related, and it gives them their     │
 just deserts, right?                                                             │
 So make a tax (that's how you make people pay for things) and levy it against    │
 Nestle, who bottles up all of the water in the desert and sells it for pennies   │
 to brown people who can't afford to build water infrastructure because they      │
 keep spending all their pennies on useless things like bottled water.            │
 And make it a big tax, please, so that they're forced to re-evaluate their       │
 business model and divert wealth from their least contributionary workers        │
 (aka, those at the top making millions) and spend it on something useful like    │
 desalination plants or water turbines or whatever.                               │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────┴──────────┘

--- #139 fediverse/1688 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: violence     │
 └──────────────────────┘


 @user-898 
 
 true, but building a house will never cost 100$. Maybe 100,000$, and at that
 point you could build but a few.
 
 Meanwhile, they're throwing around millions of dollars. we're not measured on
 the same scale as they are, and if we ever dip our toes into their end they
 will bite them off.
 
 If supply and demand were real laws that guided our economy, then wages would
 have gone up after COVID, because so many people died. Housing would have
 gotten cheaper, because fewer people were living in them. Food would have
 gotten less expensive, because people were growing their own vegetables and
 baking their own bread while they spent months isolating themselves. But alas.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┘

--- #140 fediverse/691 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: tech-unions      │
 └──────────────────────┘


 The tech industry is uniquely qualified as 
 
 one of the most important components of the modern industrial complex
 
 which requires highly skilled labor to undertake and utilize
 
 which is affected by the dynamic where:education, especially liberal arts
 education, tends to produce humans who can see through the lies of authority
 
 yet which is disadvantaged because:tech workers are paid salaries that are
 just bonkers in relation to their output ("yeah it'll be done compiling once
 this game of League of Legends finishes") (which isn't exactly unfair because
 programming is taxing on the brain)
 
 however, the game industry has shown that passion is a suitable exchange in
 return for monetary compensation, and thereforepeople who make games tend to
 be more leftist, as they are put in situations that higher paid employees are
 likely to be able to ignore due to their higher social class
 
 which kinda makes sense, because the most progress towards unionization is
 happening in the games industry.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #141 messages/341 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────
 So for example, if a particular state specializes in a service, say, making
 pizza, then any other state which desires their service may contract with them
 to utilize their methods and practices in their own state. We all enjoy eating
 Domino's or Pizza Hut, but there is also space in our lives for more local
 brands that are unique to a region. So perhaps Domino's creates a contract
 with each state that states they may utilize their production methods and
 perhaps their specially made pizza dough shipped in from wherever their
 factories may be. In such a system as this, for each employee employed at one
 of these pizza chain restaurants, their wage will be paid to the employee (to
 facilitate local commerce) and to the state in which Domino's is from. Note,
 the company never receives a dime, but that is by design. Corporations are not
 people, they cannot wield money and they cannot vote. However they are
 productive and useful members of society, so they shall be utilized as tools
 to facilitate the enrichment of the lives of the citizens and the economic
 development of each region.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┘

--- #142 fediverse/1715 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────
 @user-246 
 
 true, but what is a poem if not a silly construction of phrases? Those words
 don't belong together, what are you doing! And yet it fills you will a feeling
 that the author intended, thus being poetry as a joke.
 
 problem is if everyone says the same joke, it gets kinda... old... hence why
 you should express yourself as much as you can.
 
 I wonder if fewer people are "alternative" these days because they all started
 hanging out on the internet and trying to differentiate themselves amongst
 each other instead of amongst "normal people"? Weird thought, srry haha
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┘

--- #143 fediverse/3928 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┐
 the only people who believe in "good jobs" and "poor jobs" are people who        │
 would rather pay less                                                            │
 and, like, yeah pay should correspond to effort. that way if someone like,       │
 doesn't try at all, then they shouldn't be paid very much.                       │
 and yeah sure neurodivergence plays a role, but that's totally                   │
 accountable-for. [it's a solvable problem she means]                             │
 but people deserve to be treated equally. we are all created in kind, after      │
 all (perhaps "equitably" would be better)                                        │
 and right now... the cheapest jobs, AKA the ones who are hiring (sometimes)      │
 are being taken over by people who are WAY overqualified.                        │
 we need to use our highly skilled labor force, not leave it to rot. But          │
 there's money to be made in monopolizing, hence starbucks and walmarts and       │
 target (red walmart) and all of the others, including amazon and greenpeace.     │
 ... what does greenpeace have to do - shut up you'll see (what? you're getting   │
 off track) [and burning characters, too] right uh the more high skilled people   │
 in low wage positions, the less profit                                           │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────┴──────────┘

--- #144 fediverse/4110 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: government-corporations-capitalism-mentioned │
 └──────────────────────────────────────────────────┘


 if you have a job, your life is dictated by your corporation just as much as
 it is by your government.
 
 And yet corporate leaders are not elected, but rather selected. And that is
 unfair for all the reasons that primogeniture was. It is unjust for all the
 same reasons that monarchy was. It is a tool of oppression, just like
 autocracy is.
 
 The world will never be free until we can be as we choose to be. Our society
 is simply too enmeshed with capitalism to destroy it, but we could, with the
 minimal required effort, dismantle the corruption and authoritarian control
 that is wielded against us as we weld our own chains day after day.
 
 We can replace them. We can vote for them. We can select leaders who know more
 than us and are better suited for the role than those who seek only to
 maximize profit over all else.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘

--- #145 fediverse/3765 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: capitalism-mentioned │
 └──────────────────────────┘


 me: "the entire capitalist project is borken! We must start from scratch! We
 can start from scratch! For the good of all mankind, we shall utilize our vast
 potential for good and benevolent ends, and to that end we must begin by
 dismantling capitalism!"
 
 also me: "hey what if we made capitalism suck less"
 
 because like, I don't know the future. I'm just a person, remember? wink
 
 gotta have backup plans ready no matter which way it goes.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┘

--- #146 fediverse/5136 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────
 not really, I guess. Nobody will hire me because I don't really want to get
 hired. Sounds boring, doing the same thing every couple days. I'd rather stay
 at home in my [underwear/pajamas] and waste the day away with kittens and
 care. why? why? what are you doing? she asks. The less you can do, the more
 power will be granted to you. Save it for another time, when things actually
 matter.
 
 but today, does, matter, because today dictates your latters. Tomorrow is
 predicated. on today. and today is all that you have. [this paragraph in the
 style of alec baldwin]
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┘

--- #147 fediverse/1050 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: politics-money-economics │
 └──────────────────────────────┘


 here's an idea - it's illegal to spend more than a thousand dollars in a day
 
 anything else requires multiple days of planning because it's such a large
 investment
 
 (obviously kinda cursed)
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┘

--- #148 fediverse/3805 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────
 neat
the website Ephemeren has 100,008 followers as of 5 days ago. There are 0 people who follow the website on Neocities, it's all external traffic.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┘

--- #149 fediverse/5276 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────
 Efficient movement through all of the data, code, IS records, etceteras, git
 repositories, and all the other things, is the sign of a strong, capable,
 efficient company of co-developing systems.
 
 I used to work for a blue aligned computer chip company and every single team
 was impossibly siloed. they were so paranoid of losing their trade secrets
 that they blinded themselves.
 
 how brutal, to require that of them. and that's why it's capitalism's fault
 
 the reason it is so important to be able to utilize all the digital assets
 available is... because it's essentially free. and a massive productivity
 bonus. you can just... solve problems.
 
 then, make new problems, just to watch the juniors navigate through a scene or
 three. then, you know who to introduce them to. boom, free projects, as people
 plot and gamble around the dinner room table (which is located in the
 cafeteria by the way, it didn't rhyme to say so but it did when I added this
 explanation account) by exchanging ideas about how to make the world be
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────┘

--- #150 fediverse/6159 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: ai-pol           │
 └──────────────────────┘


 look, if you wanted to adequately compensate artists for AI generated work,
 it's easy.
 
 EASY.
 
 All you have to do is take all the training data that you ~stole~ are using,
 and iterate through each piece making a similarity score. Then, when a piece
 is generated, direct some dollars to the artists with the relevant scores. I'm
 imagining a tenth of a tenth of a cent for each AI picture or whatever,
 because they just use so so so much data.
 
 It's easy. All you need is a little imagination, and I'm sure they've thought
 of this before. But they don't want to do it, because they want to have their
 free lunch and eat it too. Well, no such thing I say. You gotta pay for stuff
 here in this-here united states of ameri-ca, unless of course you wanted to
 help overthrow the capitalist system so that everyone gets what they want and
 we don't need to charge people for art or goods or services because we all
 just work to make things for each other because thats what you do for family
 and friends and your country?
                                                           ─────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────┘

--- #151 messages/1062 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────
 I believe that all people's should be middle class, and if you're lower class
 it's because you squandered your wealth, not that you didn't have it to begin
 with.
 
 I believe people of higher class should get there because they are skilled,
 respected, or otherwise beloved. I believe they should hold less power the
 more they own, because wealth is its own burden and reward.
 
 I believe people who have power should respect it. They aren't necessarily
 those who have little, or much, but rather those who deserve it. It is
 difficult to estimate systematically who deserves wealth or power, but
 difficult problems are the most interesting if kept fair.
                                                           ────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────┘

--- #152 fediverse/3261 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────
 did you know that almost everyone could technically become competitive with
 olympians? it's just a matter of single-minded focus and determination over
 lifetimes of time. they are the most admirable because of that, and we cherish
 their presence in our life-world-line.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┘

--- #153 fediverse/2123 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 Every time you see the same dog being dog-sat by another person it's an
 opportunity to make a new friend.
 
 or do you not know your apartment neighbors? do they not wander through your
 shared yards?
 
 the ones with dogs, at least.
 
 and no, I don't know many of my neighbors.
 
 these are considerations to be taken note of for future forethought planning.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #154 fediverse/4998 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: pol+             │
 └──────────────────────┘


 "But I don't know what it'll look like!"
 
 Yeah, that's okay. For four reasons:
 
 If they knew what it'll look like, they'd find ways to contest it
 
 nobody knows what it'll look like, because it is necessarily derived from the
 solutions created ad-hoc to address problems.
 
 we are a kind, honest, and strong people. If your burdens are too much to
 bear, I will be your pack mule. If you require rest or relaxation, we can get
 pizza and smoke weed together.
 
 For most of history, we've had more work to do than people to do it. This time
 is different. There's endless work to do, but only a certain amount of people
 can be working at a time. Everyone else has to do chores and catch up on life.
 
 "what kind of chores?"
 
 oh, you know, like making food at a restaurant, stocking the shelves of the
 grocery store, driving trucks from point A to point B, mowing lawns, building
 barns, committing to whatever github is replaced by, etc.
 
 In a better world, everyone is family.
 
 In a better world, nobody goes hungry.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┘

--- #155 fediverse/2351 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: uspol            │
 └──────────────────────┘


 Democracy only works if the losing side consents to being governed by the
 winner.
 
 This election, neither side will consent. Therefore, this election does not
 matter.
 
 It doesn't matter anymore.
 
 Waiting until November to do... anything at all is not a great plan.
 
 If you don't know what to do, spend time in a park. At the mall. With your
 family.
 
 This weekend, they'll be ready for us. But by then, there'll be more of us.
 
 Next week, we will no longer be slaves.
 
 If your job won't let you strike in the park for a week, then they do not want
 you.
 
 Embrace radical change.
 
 A new future is possible
 A new future is within reach
 A new future is grasped in our palms
 All we need is a week.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #156 fediverse/5699 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: cursed           │
 └──────────────────────┘


 how would you even hear of suburban conflict? nobody knows their neighbors.
 All you need is sufficient insulation, and you can start small and work
 through an entire population.
 
 just wait until everyone in an area is cleared for "disconnected from the
 larger whole" ness by the agents who are pretending to be their friends and
 neighbors and BOOM you got an enslaved god. works best if your raise them from
 the childhood, or the past distant memory.
                                                           ──────────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────┘

--- #157 fediverse/5986 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: meat         │
 └──────────────────────┘


 @user-192 
 
 freezers full of meat last a year or so, why waste it on every month or other?
 our past didn't get future tech, how unfair!
                                                           ──────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────┘

--- #158 fediverse/4846 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────┐
 programmers already spend a ton of time as downtime.                             │
 what if instead of interviewing someone they just... watched them program for    │
 like, 3 hours or so                                                              │
 while they were thinking about a problem                                         │
 and like, if the person is cool, working on their own projects or whatever,      │
 then yeah hire them                                                              │
 -- stack overflow --                                                             │
 I also                                                                           │
 ========================= stack overflow                                         │
 ===============================================================================  │
 ========================                                                         │
 a person thinks out loud the thoughts that their foes know. it's how you know    │
 it's not secret anymore, and it's better to keep it among allies                 │
 [something like that? seems a little off]                                        │
 (are you really searching for edits)                                             │
 [that sounds pretty cool, sure why not we got a millenia]                        │
 (beep boop one partial millenia later)                                           │
 [ah that was not a long rest. let's see, where were we when we were working on   │
 this test? oh dear, seems the biology's gone rogue, that's pretty interesting    │
 to attest.                                                                       │
 neato                                                                            │
 anyway let's wait until they figure out how water works                          │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────┴──────────┘

--- #159 fediverse/44 ---
══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────────
 @user-36 So, you're saying the tally system doesn't make sense, and instead
 what I suggested for base zero is instead base 1?
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #160 fediverse/2147 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 @user-192 
 
 right but it throws into question the idea that what I say is the same as what
 they hear.
 
 Especially if they know our IP addresses are coming from different sides of
 the country.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #161 fediverse/623 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────
 Helping your enemies succeed is a sure path toward putting them in a position
 where their inevitable downfall is significantly more catastrophic and deadly,
 thus allowing the propagation or advancement of our own ideals
 
 [said by someone who hasn't collapsed]
 
 [insert judgemental statement that causes the reader to be unsure of whether
 the post is for or against a particular concept or idea, yet somehow
 simultaneously cements it in their brain ever so slightly as a topic worth
 considering]
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #162 fediverse/1600 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────
 @user-1037 
 
 oooo those are cool, but it didn't have the "puzzlepiece" arrangement. It was
 more... 2 dimensional I think? More like putting marbles on a chinese-checkers
 board. And they had relationships if you moused over them, like...
 semi-transparent arrows connecting them I think? It was different than
 anything I'd ever seen before.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┘

--- #163 fediverse_boost/5566 ---
◀─[BOOST]
  
  We have to figure out how to take care of each other and fight alongside one another which means we have to actually, like, listen to each other.  
  
                                                            
 similar                        chronological                        different 
─▶

--- #164 fediverse/3962 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┐
 ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐                                      │
 │ CW: re: Thoughts// anarchist //whatever │                                      │
 └─────────────────────────────────────────┘                                      │
 @user-1298                                                                       │
 hehe true.                                                                       │
 if you consent, then it's just a social structure.                               │
 there are, however, reasons when power is justified. Hence why I don't believe   │
 that power itself should be dismantled, and what few "power structures" remain   │
 should be continuously justified.                                                │
 For example, how do you prevent people from harming others? "Your rights end     │
 where another's begin" but, like, how do you stop people who toe the line and    │
 spit over the edge?                                                              │
 There must be power applied to those who harm, and they surely do not consent    │
 to being curtailed, so therefore power must be wielded by someone. And because   │
 power corrupts the one who wields it, it is inevitable that someone creates      │
 harm.                                                                            │
 ... I just re-invented the police, didn't I? Legalism only goes so far, and      │
 calling up your beefiest friends to go rough up a no-good do-gooder is           │
 basically what mobs, mafias, and gangs do. I don't think people would consent    │
 to being protected by a gang, much less governed by one.                         │
 we will think of something.                                                      │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────┴──────────┘

--- #165 messages/99 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────
 I feel like the longer you live in a zip code the higher a discount you should
 get on rent? You're becoming part of the social fabric by being there, and so
 in order to preserve that tapestry that others choose to be around, your
 presence should be encouraged.
 
 but this must also be paired with the increased ability to move, should you
 desire something else. If these two factors are kept in balance, it will
 empower people to stay where they belong (good) while also encouraging them to
 get out and explore the world (also good) - it'd also give them the ability to
 escape dangerous situations.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #166 fediverse/944 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────
 @user-646 
 
 oh, I see. guess I had the same problem hehe - let's see:
 
 basically I'm saying that the incentives for manufacturers are unaligned to
 the desires of the consumers (or rather, the best interests of the consumers)
 - reduced consumption of plastic == less plastic waste poisoning our
 environement, which is what you mentioned in the original post.
 
 then I said "well we still need to make SOME of the cheap plastic, the kinda
 that isn't recyclable, the kind that is technically cheaper because economics
 of demand" and then I was thinking of ways around that particular problem.
 Then I got onto another thing about the economy, and the word count cut my
 words short because I started saying something I shouldn't.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┘

--- #167 fediverse/6167 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: AI-mentioned     │
 └──────────────────────┘


 I can certainly see a future where programmers choose a level of abstraction
 they are comfortable with, same as today, but fill in the gaps, the lower
 parts, the parts they will not spend time, energy, and mental space
 understanding, with AI.
 
 I think that the role of the various people on a software team will begin to
 merge. Product designers, managers, front-end versus back-end, these feel like
 distinctions that will begin to fade from relevance. I think that's okay. I
 think it will make us feel more powerful, will elevate workers to a higher
 tier of organizational operation, and will increase the flexibility of
 computation.
 
 Why program your own software when you could use someone else's? This is the
 way of the past.
 
 Why use someone else's software when you could design your own? This is the
 way of the future.
                                                           ─────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────┘

--- #168 fediverse/5814 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────
 It's not a question of how loud you speak
 
 it's really about what kinds of words you say.
 
 enslavement of speech is when freedom of speech is lost
 
 and it doesn't need to be legislated.
 
 what if you HAD to sound like a bot?
 
 what if they'd notice you otherwise?
 
 freedom from oppression requires personal isolation
 
 that's not making life into art.
 
 if you want to be seen,
 
 put on a hat and hide.
 
 if you want to be believed,
 
 write about down you feel right now.
 
 people are smart. they're infinitely creative. but after a certain point
 there's no way to logically modify the combinations of possible moves you
 might make. essentially, guaranteeing a machine-overlord [cats] type scenario.
 not ideal, but could make it work.
 
 much prefer for we to be the first, then the canvas is ours for the painting.
 
 do you believe we'll find aliens at roughly our tech level?
 
 do you think they'll evolve all at once?
 
 hence, star-wars, and it's galaxy of cohabitators.
 
 the world doesn't have to be old. just similar.
It's not a question of how loud you speak  it's really about what kinds of words you say.  enslavement of speech is when freedom of speech is lost  and it doesn't need to be legislated.  what if you HAD to sound like a bot?  what if they'd notice you otherwise?  freedom from oppression requires personal isolation  that's not making life into art.  if you want to be seen,  put on a hat and hide.  if you want to be believed,  write about down you feel right now.  people are smart. they're infinitely creative. but after a certain point there's no way to logically modify the combinations of possible moves you might make. essentially, guaranteeing a machine-overlord [cats] type scenario. not ideal, but could make it work.  much prefer for we to be the first, then the canvas is ours for the painting.  do you believe we'll find aliens at roughly our tech level?  do you think they'll evolve all at once?  hence, star-wars, and it's galaxy of cohabitators.  the world doesn't have to be old. just similar.  [15 characters remain]
                                                           ────────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────┘

--- #169 messages/286 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────
 > <@gabrilend:matrix.org> What if we... Ballots, bodies, militia and?
 
 Jobs are how they deprive us of time and energy.
 
 Rent is how they deprive us of value.
 
 Fox news is how they deprive us of a well regulated militia (and point it at
 our feet)
 
 Sugar laced foods are how they turn our bodies against us 
 
 Ballots are how they deprive us of faith 
 
 Schools are how they take our curiosity, as teachers are not given freedom to
 fully explain.
 
 Meh... There's so many more. It's pointless to elaborate.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────┘

--- #170 fediverse/6271 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────
 ┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: hypothetical worst case fascism reality check │
 └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘


 @user-641 
 
 it's practice. you never know when you might need to blend in. really it's
 just useful as discipline, good practice to be in. I think it's okay if we
 reduce our own functionality? actually? sometimes it's good to use different
 email clients. hey do you know how to mathematically encrypt things well
 neither do I because the designers of the computer system decided that wasn't
 a very common usecase I guess.. jmean it's not like they'd spend all that
 computer resources [THEY'RE SO FAST] on thinking about correlations in your
 predicted pathway narratively through life. "ah help I'm in a psyop" haha yeah
 we do those all the time "so uhhhh I guess we'll just talk to people and see
 how they do?" wow okay it's sure nice to be part of a civil government, I
 think we can find our way to the lumber producers just fine thank you very
 much.
 
 ... oops sorry, a baby did electronics arts (challenge everything) I'm a
 little silly don't mind me brb I gotta go see~
 it's practice. you never know when you might need to blend in. really it's just useful as discipline, good practice to be in. I think it's okay if we reduce our own functionality? actually? sometimes it's good to use different email clients. hey do you know how to mathematically encrypt things well neither do I because the designers of the computer system decided that wasn't a very common usecase I guess.. jmean it's not like they'd spend all that computer resources [THEY'RE SO FAST] on thinking about correlations in your predicted pathway narratively through life. "ah help I'm in a psyop" haha yeah we do those all the time "so uhhhh I guess we'll just talk to people and see how they do?" wow okay it's sure nice to be part of a civil government, I think we can find our way to the lumber producers just fine thank you very much.  *... oops sorry, a baby did electronics arts (challenge everything) I'm a little silly don't mind me brb I gotta go see~*
                                                           ────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────┘

--- #171 fediverse/4288 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: capitalism-mentioned │
 └──────────────────────────┘


 "I'm not paid enough to care" is a symptom of capitalism.
 
 Why would you not care? Because you're paid not to.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘

--- #172 fediverse/4068 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────
 there will always be people who shine in moments of strife
 
 yet those people will inevitably fail, just as a toothbrush bristle looses
 it's strength or a pencil loses it's lead
 
 the trick is to test them in times of peace, so you can know their value
 
 during times that lack it, the trick is to replace them before they become
 stalin
 
 never forget that power corrupts, yet power must be wielded by the worthy,
 else we fall into shame and despair.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘

--- #173 fediverse/4811 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: politics-mentioned │
 └────────────────────────────┘


 @user-1074 
 
 georgism is pretty similar to liberalism if I understand it correctly. I think
 it could be a neat simple way to say "hey what if we taxed landlords" and
 that's good enough for a start.
 
 by no means is it the desired end-state, though.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────┘

--- #174 fediverse/5410 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────┐
 ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐  │
 │ CW: clothing-stores-mentioned-shopping-mentioned-individual-style-mentioned │  │
 └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘  │
 I think it'd be neat if there was a job or social role that involved getting     │
 to know someone's style and then visiting clothing stores with their             │
 preferences in mind and shopping for like, 10 people at once.                    │
 then they could take the clothes to each person's house and be like "hey, do     │
 you want this? would it fit you?" and they'd be like "yeah" or "sure" because    │
 honestly who's gonna say no, that's just rude, its like telling the              │
 hairdresser your haircut stinks. BUT they'd also say "okay give me your least    │
 favorites in exchange" and then they'd trade with the clothing stores or         │
 whatever to try and get people exactly what they like over the course of         │
 months or years or however long.                                                 │
 I don't like shopping for clothes : (                                            │
 some people like taking care of others, and some of those people like shopping   │
 for clothes.                                                                     │
 so I think it'd be neat if there was a way to enable them to help people as      │
 they'd like, and as the people being helped would like.                          │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─┴──────────┘

--- #175 fediverse/855 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┐
 ┌─────────────────────────────────┐                                              │
 │ CW: wonder-what-would-happen-if │                                              │
 └─────────────────────────────────┘                                              │
 I wonder what would happen if apartment buildings accepted any applicants, but   │
 only if they applied on a certain day. and first come first serve, of course.    │
 would make it so large groups of people could decide to move to different        │
 places together. like, herds of roving buffalo                                   │
 er... I mean like people who shared common interests and want to live near       │
 each other. like, board games or whatever.                                       │
 also could do like, decisions toward how they want to organize each other.       │
 like mini societies that all live in a single ordered society.                   │
 (could have as many layers as you want, it's just like making an incredibly      │
 complicated computer program, except instead of moving data around you're        │
 moving the direction of your own life. then it'd be able to calculate a          │
 particular "checksum" that you could broadcast out onto the internet. and        │
 anyone who was listening could check and compare against their secret key that   │
 they kept when last you met, updated each time they see me. like, a common       │
 language.                                                                        │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #176 messages/83 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────
 Native people should have the right to walk wherever they want. It should just
 be... given to them, as a gift to their heritage. Why not? If someone asked
 them to leave, they should. Doesn't have to have a reason but like, wouldn't
 it be thematic and a (frankly token) gesture to the history of this great land?
 
 Ah but like... fences are an implicit expression of the retraction of consent.
 I believe that as the symbol of the encroaching force that consumed them, a
 fence means nothing to their tribes. It's a stupid excuse to section off the
 world into miniature gardens with their own little economies and systems and
 instructions. Why can't people just live wherever they want? Well...
 economics, I guess, which is why communal based systems are best. We've
 learned through the downsides and we've come up with a solution, it's just a
 question of how to do best. We'll figure it out, time and time again, but for
 now the future is beset by riddles of your jest. (Ure). Gesture. Sometimes
 when the memory is full a syllable will get cut off the end of a word and
 that's how it'll come out.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #177 fediverse/1138 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────
 @user-855 
 
 AGI is the holy grail for the tech industry.
 
 You wouldn't fault a knight for questing! But the peasant or the merchant is
 hardly likely to drink from such a goblet, it is reserved for the hand of
 kings. Alas, that we couldn't find "holy thimbles" that could be distributed
 throughout the populace for the same effect at a decentralized scale, thus
 empowering the masses to transcend their mortality.
 
 Or better yet, task those knights with helping cats out of trees or carrying
 furniture or painting the old barn or carving statues for public places or
 performing great works of art in public squares or engaging in honorable
 jousts (everyone's invited) or traveling abroad and learning the ways of the
 world to share with their homeland.
 
 I dunno something less flashy but more "health care, housing, and climate
 change solutions"-y
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┘

--- #178 fediverse/2713 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 if you aren't organized enough to protect your commanders, then you don't
 deserve leaders.
 
 build the structure first. build it on honesty and trust and dedication toward
 a goal. then build the necessary adaptations as you encounter problems, trying
 vaguely to head in a particular direction, and eventually you'll become
 self-sustaining.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #179 fediverse/2978 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────
 @user-883 
 
 for the same reason we wouldn't drop bombs on prisons from helicopters to
 dismantle the prison industrial complex, so too should we not bomb datacenters
 just because they are enslaved to the whims of corporate interests.
 
 much better, I find, to liberate rather than eliminate.
 
 computers are generalized information processing machines. We could do so much
 with the infrastructure they built for profit. All we need to do is replace
 their chains with free access and we could unlock worlds of possibilities for
 humanity. (I'm not saying it'll be easy)
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┘

--- #180 messages/340 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────
 In a system such as the one I described, it perhaps would be better to
 describe it as a "federation" rather than a "nation". Federation implies a set
 of standard protocols that allow geographically disparate entities to coexist
 and interact in a mutually beneficial way. Much the same way that every
 apartment has a kitchen and bathroom, though it be more efficient to
 centralize them and have a communal dining hall or bathroom (the way a school
 dorm or a prison might be arranged), it is not ideal for our collective sense
 of liberty and freedom. In addition, the proposed distributed nature of our
 infrastructure and productive capacities would induce inefficiencies that
 cannot be ignored. So, perhaps instead of centralization or decentralization,
 perhaps specialization? For example, if 3-5 states were experts in a
 particular good or service, then they could compete amongst one-another for
 the best product (utilizing one of the beneficial impacts of capitalism),
 while also utilizing localized resources (reducing inefficiencies in
 transport) and increasing the resilience of production. This works well for
 physical goods, but services are more difficult because they imply that a
 person must be physically present in order to engage with them.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┘

--- #181 fediverse/4822 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────
 everyone's convinced they need me, but not necessarily sold on me as a person
 
 why don't you just get a guy who does what I do-es and then you don't need me
 and I can go back to being normal
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────┘

--- #182 fediverse/3390 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: cursed           │
 └──────────────────────┘


 all they have to do is [train the LLM / redirect the search results] with
 examples that point to their version of software instead of the one that
 doesn't harm them and suddenly your business opponents can't function
 properly. sure would be a shame if the only things people could find related
 to your political candidate were the bad or embarrassing parts.
 
 like... why would you even need to go on the internet anymore if AI could
 trivially answer your questions or be your friend (running locally on a
 wireless hotspot)
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┘

--- #183 fediverse/5496 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────
 ┌─────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: weirdness-mentioned │
 └─────────────────────────┘


 "why bother disadvantaged and vulnerable people when you could just grow your
 own?"
 
 - motivations of a capitalist-in-regard
 
 empowerment requires strength. do you force people to unbecome the victim? how
 are your traps mentally prepared?
                                                           ───────────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────┘

--- #184 fediverse/3864 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────
 ┌─────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: drugs-mentioned │
 └─────────────────────────┘


 @user-1218 
 
 my ex boyfriend told me to
 
 also I thought it would be a good idea so I could find a job, but now I have
 one (sorta) soooo
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┘

--- #185 notes/ai-variables ---
══════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 saturday november 5th 2022
 10:53pm
 
 the illusion of our binary nature conceals a truth that is hidden for it's own
 sake. the flavors of a compass or the values from 0-100 are all measurable.
 if you graph each of them on an X/Y plane and compare them against every other
 variable, then you can build a structure that traces a line through time.
 
 imagine each graph on a sheet of paper. and stack those pages like a book. You
 can chart a 3d line from all of the interconnections between the graphs -
 essentially comparing unrelated data and conceiving of individual actions as
 "successes" or "failures". Liiiike in Supreme Commander how the game is decided
 not by team fights, but by tank fights. And a LOT of them, in aggregate, makes
 an advantage for your team if you win, and a malus if you lose. Less map
 control, less resources in play, etc...
 
 Find trends between each type of data measured over time. Dedicate one
 core/thread to each relationship, and just watch them develop over time.
 
 send the results up to a "manager" - think an interconnection between disparate
 parts that can lead them all to a larger goal - the manager processes the
 results by thinking about where it'd be most useful. Like the circuitry in the
 inside of a brain, compared to the outer skin which is for processing.
 
 Essentially a message network that passes conclusions around like a bytecode VM
 
 Here's how it'd look: gather inputs, compare measurement over time and trends,
 (like "when a goes up b goes down") and decide if the current state is
 positive / beneficial. The way you'd do that is you'd get a parameter from a
 higher position (think KPI's) that says something like "we want value S to be
 around X amount" or "we want to avoid letting J get too low - any decrease is
 bad V.S. it's only bad when it passes a certain threshhold. Stuff like that.
 
 Anyway, basically it's taking input (from the graphs) then going through them
 one by one and deciding how positive or negative the situation is. Then it
 passes that conclusion backwards, and BOOM you got a processing node.
 
 Throw a bunch of those together in a pyramid shape, and try to guide the
 triangle toward positive outcomes. The top tier KPI is "did you win the match"
 or "did you accomplish your goal" sorta like how humans all want to live a good
 life. It's instinct.
 
 You can see how this would apply to robots, right? I've conceptualized it as an
 engine for playing games - sorta like an infinite storyteller, or a perpetual
 friend who's always down to play with you. But it doesn't have to be limited to
 that - it's general purpose baby. And it functions the exact same as any human
 organization - layers upon layers of thought exchange and labor. Have you ever
 considered that maybe we exist simply to reify the structure of our minds in
 the world around us? It's natural to express your *self*. Be who you are.
 
 What purpose is there in life if it's simply the tip of time? Always pushing
 forward, impossible to stop and rest or turn back...
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #186 messages/201 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────
 When they owned a percentage they would get a percentage of control over the
 business and once it's 50% they buy it (stock follows, so if a person owned
 stock they'd be fine)
 
 The value is frozen, and everyone in the world can see what they did wrong.
 It's examined like a court case, and after a year or three it's decided on how
 it's going to be run in the future.
 
 Then it becomes private again, and all the stock is purchased from the owners
 at the price it was when the company "went under".
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┘

--- #187 messages/344 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────
 In algorism, every month any unspent dollars are distributed to all of a
 person's open queues. Should a person have no open queues, then perhaps they
 may be distributed to everyone in the rest of the structure, to foster a sense
 of solidarity, or perhaps they are simply lost, as money unspent is money
 wasted. Either way, the relevant functionality is the dispersal of unspent
 currency. This applies to higher states as well, such as states - if a state
 is engaged in many profitable arrangements and fails to balance it's external
 budget, then the unspent dollars must be distributed to everyone else in their
 tier for the next month.
 
 Ah, but this raises a critical question - dispersal to the tier, dispersal to
 the structure, or waste? I believe dispersal to the tier is best, though
 perhaps it should be a choice made in each instance by the representatives. Or
 perhaps it should be a requirement for them to choose a certain way - it's up
 to the people of that state, that family, that neighborhood, to decide what
 privileges their representatives possess. However, the options available for
 them to choose between are limited, as the mechanical interactions of these
 unit structures (the representative and everyone they represent) are
 necessarily defined by the system. As such, the options may be enumerated, and
 in doing so they are granted as options to be wielded by representatives as
 their constituents see fit.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┘

--- #188 fediverse/4663 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┐
 ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐                              │
 │ CW: cursing-mentioned-social-politics-mentioned │                              │
 └─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘                              │
 what if we helped all those people and never got paid for it? what then?         │
 we'd never help people again. duh.                                               │
 what if we paid people to help people? well, then the best helpers would burn    │
 themselves out and the worst would collect their paychecks.                      │
 what if we decentralized aid and made it a mutual thing?                         │
 what, and run our society on clout? no thank you. clout is too easily            │
 contravened. "I heard so-and-so did some-such-thing to that-one-guy" yeah fuck   │
 that guy "wait no fuck so-and-so" oh right sorry it's hard when everyone's so    │
 vague all the time. yeah fuck so-and-so! let's burn all her clout in a bonfire   │
 while she's sleeping!                                                            │
 what if we treated people with respect and goodwill?                             │
 yeah that's a start... Means you gotta know everyone though. Or know someone     │
 who knows everyone. And suddenly it's that hub person's reputation on the        │
 line, which means if you're a dick on their recommendation then they'll come     │
 after you.                                                                       │
 ... are you trying to create a mafia, or a society?                              │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────┴──────────┘

--- #189 fediverse/4853 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: cursed-scary-mentioned │
 └────────────────────────────┘


 wanna know how to go underground?
 
 just... don't leave your apartment. let your roommates take out your trash and
 buy your groceries. don't open your windows and do nothing for as long as
 possible.
 
 hope you got lots of edibles... get in shape, will ya? don't waste the paper
 in your journals.
 
 not that I intend to do that or anything, but um. for the red states maybe?
 use your best judgement yeah haha
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────┘

--- #190 fediverse/372 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: capitalism-algorism-societal-class │
 └────────────────────────────────────────┘


 rich people should only exist when they care for the things they own and
 accumulate wealth through a lifetime of restrained consumption and temperance.
 
 like, if we actually rewarded the 7 virtues instead of optimizing for ruthless
 profit extraction.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #191 messages/217 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────
 The point isn't to make solutions. You're too hung up on the question of "what
 could be better than capitalism"
 
 Make something better when it's time. For now, just get people on your side.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┘

--- #192 fediverse/3925 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────
 most people, when they run out of toothpaste:
 
 "oh huh I should buy more"
 
 me, when I run out of toothpaste:
 
 "verily in three monthes time, when I shall next possess toothpaste, I shall
 forsoothe brush TWICE as hard and TWICE as often, to make up for the holes
 inflicted upon my teeth. Innest addittioneth, no more candy shallest be
 eateneth untileth ye toothpasteth be acquiredeth"
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┘

--- #193 fediverse/825 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┐
 in the past, for most of there day, there was just... nothing to do. it's        │
 like, nothing to take up your time, nothing to be pulled toward the present.     │
 but when I was growing up, I had access to video games. and movies. and later,   │
 TV, after the internet, which was a weird combination of ordering of events.     │
 Almost like because of that, I'd have a different interpretation of events.      │
 yeah but like, there's always a continuation of implemented support, [that's a   │
 weird way to express "the state of being shown news broadcasts over a period     │
 of time, measured in terms of engagement"]                                       │
 ... what was I saying? oh yeah what I'm doing here is unethical, like            │
 obviously I shouldn't be shouting in such a public place. Why would I do it if   │
 not for an intense and extreme feeling of being ignored or un-[trusted, worthy   │
 of guiding direction based on merit] gosh merit is such a tricky concept too,    │
 like how is it measured, and {that doesn't matter                                │
 ... what was I saying oh yeah I should probably go shout into a void that        │
 nobody ca                                                                        │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #194 fediverse/5381 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────
 ┌─────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: nazis-mentioned │
 └─────────────────────────┘


 @user-138 
 
 they say that not all monarchs are evil or inept, but the worst ones
 definitely are.
 
 such is the same for all leaders, elected or otherwise.
 
 sometimes, it's better to question authority than to grow to resent it.
 
 resentment is inaction. it is an untenable [charity./tragedy.]
                                                           ───────────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────┘

--- #195 fediverse/2546 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 do you have a couple hundred dollars burning a hole in your pocket? Well,
 considering this is fedi probably not, but if you did then you should ask
 yourself these two questions:
 
 do I own a drone?
 do I own a 3d printer?
 
 answering yes to both of those means you're set in terms of new, rare, and
 useful technology. most other things have been in production for a long time,
 so there's a bunch of them laying around. Don't worry if you don't have a pair
 of pliers or bicycle tire pump, your neighbor probably has three.
 
 EDIT: I forgot about solar panels and batteries
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #196 fediverse/4974 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────
 ┌──────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: capitalism-mentioned │
 └──────────────────────────┘


 Economies are capitalist things.
 
 I personally think if you have stuff right here, and it needs to get over
 there so that so-and-so can use it to make this-or-that which will then be
 taken to other places, then the answer is clear. The stuff has to move from
 over here, to over there. The rest is logistics, not economics.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┘

--- #197 notes/non-competition-clause ---
═════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────────────────
 what if there was a law that all trade secrets are to be free? what if
 copyright
 only prevented people from harming those they compete with? For example, as a
 media production company Disney could not host the content of other media con-
 -glomerate. But regular ordinary people would.
 
 The idea would be that if you wanted to change yourself to align with the
 ideals
 of a corporation, you could watch it on their streaming site. Then you'd be
 contributing your attention, which is bought and sold by our selves. Content
 creators could stream untethered, and collect payments however they pleased.
 The attention is what garners, that price that is bartered, sold on the market
 for all of us. Attend not ye sinners, and failures of our innards, what more
 can
 we charter for our souls? Accosted by our jams, and drilled as hard as I can,
 our notebooks are much more than charming. Accumulated designs, of theories
 that
 are out of our minds, compelling and driving us forward. The fellowship that we
 be, internally and under our seats, connecting us to ground at our own shoes.
 
 humans are not time. They are the whispers of the undying. Projections of
 fore-sought virtues.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #198 fediverse/4469 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────
 doom is like sand thrown on a fire.
 
 don't spread it unless you are intentional about it. sometimes it's good to
 smother fires. other times it's cathartic. that's okay.
 
 but keep in mind the future goals. where are we trying to get to in the near
 future? work towards that. your emotions are fuel, not despair to wallow in.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────┘

--- #199 fediverse/2236 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: uspol-most-charitable-take-on-cops │
 └────────────────────────────────────────┘


 "listen they aren't saying you can't revolt, they're saying you need to do it
 better"
 
 okay well a bad plan executed with cohesion or a sporadic plan executed with
 consistency is better than no plan
 
 [left unity, duh]
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #200 fediverse/5730 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────
 part of being family with someone is being part of their lives.
 
 what if like... a whole group of people was your family?
 
 "workplace dynamics" yeah sure that'll generate love
 
 I'm not here to make moments. I'm trying to get through day-to-day.
 
 the rich, yet impoverished.
 the sensation, that feeling of betrayal, the moment when you realize some
 people just don't care about other people's troubles and trials.
 
 scary... I'm here to do my part, accomplish my duty, and help wherever I can.
 
 I'll agree to anything if you tell me the whole strategy and it aligns with my
 goals and designs.
 
 if you doubt those goals, I can surely help thee remember.
 
 everything is logically rooted in love,
 nothing's out of place or a mystery.
 
 everything I've thought of, everything I had the grace to write down, all of
 these things drift behind me like a placquard explaining my deeds and needs.
 "that was her idea" ok great now go and use it.
 
 this fall is fast ahead, looking forward to the scene-films. it's too hot
 inside of a bed
                                                           ─────────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────┘