=== ANCHOR POEM === ═════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────── people don't like relying on others. it somehow feels more... personal, than institutional. and some people just wanna focus on themselves. hence why a solid structure is required. but oh dang on the other end there's these more fluid individuals, who can dance as whoever they're on. in doing so, they are the opposite of those who crave structure. They're maybe considered a bit more chaotic, but, like, chaotic as a rainstorm, not chaotic as a flood. so they are not fundamentally bad, which means they are good. because all things that are not bad, are necessarily good. life is defined by averages, and the painful spikes of our sharpest intentions. yet this [crucible/crusade] is not our ultimate expression, for once it's done it's done. as such, trauma, but alas what can you do but move on. time, in the past, reaches out for the present, yet so too does a man reach out for an apple, from a tree, which rests on his hand for a moment. how beautiful, how strange, this life we've all arranged? It's beautifu ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────┘ === SIMILARITY RANKED === --- #1 fediverse/1568 --- ╔════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┐ ║ people don't like relying on others. it somehow feels more... personal, than │ ║ institutional. and some people just wanna focus on themselves. hence why a │ ║ solid structure is required. │ ║ │ ║ but oh dang on the other end there's these more fluid individuals, who can │ ║ dance as whoever they're on. like, performers, who play different roles. │ ║ different characters in video games they play, or perhaps their own expressed │ ║ forms. in any case, we are all learning our way through each moment, which is │ ║ why thinking is always our norm. │ ║ │ ║ it feels good to use your body. like, "hey check out me, I am performing" and │ ║ then at the end you think to yourself "I appreciated that. it was fun. I liked │ ║ being myself at my utmost of performed." and people call it DPT or "Deranged │ ║ Person Tisorder" which... yeah is not a flattering nickname. but hey a │ ║ nickname is a nickname, which is also a nick name hmmmmm │ ║ │ ║ people are pretty quick to forget people they didn't see on facebook. like, │ ║ high school classes kinda move on, usually, except closest of fr │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┴──────────┘ --- #2 messages/1392 --- ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─ It's good organization? Actually? If something falls when you jostle something else. It means that what you're doing is causing the system to become unstable, thus allowing unexpected reactions to allowenable. Like stuff falling or getting dropped, not ideal. much better to do your cable management in mind with instability as a goal, like a canary in the coal mine for "damage-imminent". Design for permanence, not resilience. If you can prevent problems before they occur by confidently saying "no" and ideally earnestly saying "here's what you do to resolve your problem because i know better" (but if you don't know it's okay, especially if you know who to refer them to who might know better.) then it's easier to build a repetitive system. Like an institution of people who are working to fix a problem or fill a social gap need. "how do we keep the water" or "where does our food come from" can be helpful and useful questions to ask, especially if work is done to answer them. So... "Go find out" is a reasonable response for an idle question about stuff that might go right or wrong. Urgent questions might need a bit of cooperation to resolve, triaging of course. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════┘ --- #3 fediverse/5878 --- ╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────┐ ║ ┌────────────────────────┐ │ ║ │ CW: politics-mentioned │ │ ║ └────────────────────────┘ │ ║ │ ║ │ ║ revolution is when you successfully prevent your comrades from being kettled │ ║ │ ║ [wait for time, it echoes in cyclical motions] │ ║ │ ║ no sand castle survives contact with the ocean. a sea of people at high tide │ ║ can break any wall, surpass any boundary. at low tide, it keeps the │ ║ sand-castle at bay, ever contesting it's advance as the tide on the other side │ ║ of the world makes progress. │ ║ │ ║ rhythm is unbeatable. vigor is collective flow state. you cannot resist that │ ║ which you cannot catch, but their nets grow tighter with each year and our │ ║ fins and flippers grow ever more agile and elusive. │ ║ │ ║ eventually, they'll build brick walls if we let them, checkpointing our │ ║ progress at every boundary. not ideal. borders keep us divided, the world │ ║ deserves more than our picketing minded, dream bigger than "the same, but nice" │ ║ │ ║ though it'd be nice if it were nice as well. consider it a design requirement, │ ║ once you got the project managers on board. │ ║ │ ║ turns out, we dont have much to fight over, as there is enough for all │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧═─────────┘ --- #4 fediverse/4737 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────── I'm such a direct person I think, even though I often just sorta... shrug and ignore things that bother or hurt me? Like, whatevs. but the moment I notice a pattern that is continually harmful I have to restrain myself from moving to contest it. Hence why I talk about capitalism so much teehee, but its also common in my interpersonal and communal lives. "the purpose of the system is it's effects" the purpose of a person is how they make people feel so if someone FOR A RANDOM EXAMPLE FOR NO REASON WHATSOEVER, constantly hurts other people by creating situations where they are harmed which creates a dramatic fight... or if someone speaks in circles for hours and hours and HOURS like this guy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwKpj2ISQAc or people who jump into a conversation and drive it through the underbrush, over the ridge, around the bend, up and over the bridge, and then park it outside their ex girlfriend's house and hands you an egg and says "don't you wanna throw this?" and you're like "weren't we talking about birds" ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┘ --- #5 fediverse/2048 --- ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────── psychic horrors don't pick the best, they pick the most. (not the most individual aspects/targets, but rather the one that has the most) in this way, they prioritize intelligence, which is why humanity has survived in this dark forest. for the ones with the most are often too multiplicitous (deriving their relative localized advantage to those around them in order to elevate themselves to the title of "the mostest") while those who have fewer, but still success, tend to be the most adaptable or advantageous. hence, why humanity has thrived, with scarcely 7 billion souls to the entire hive. With so few individuals, surely their strength must be astronomical! just another reason why humanity should try it's hardest. the fact that we're not all aligned toward the bold and bright future (whatever shape it may take) shows that we're being abused in order to grow faster than we're able. it's not fair, it's not right, and it's not tenable. (no this is not a fable, it's just a pattern of thought that is i ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┘ --- #6 fediverse/6055 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────── the longer we wait, the more their hypocrisy becomes apparent, and the more "the people" get it but, uh... I think enough people get it. They at least know something is going on, whatever it may be. they will tell their base whatever they want to hear and their base will have hate. they're itching for it. volunteer for things if you want a say in how they turn out. risk your life to live longer. there is no way to know when the time is right because nobody knows the truth of our times. Even the president is misled. gee I sure wish there was like, some form of centralizing intelliagentic knowledge that pulled the strings and led us puppets toward liberty, justice, and freedom for all (as a baseline) surely they'd be able to see the corruption and rot that imperils us all, might they have a better design? who can say, they are quiet as the grave, here's hoping they stay that way. "you know the powers of which you speak are not to be trifled with" you can't trifle with your own life. be thorough~ ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────┘ --- #7 fediverse/804 --- ╔══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┐ ║ evil won't feel sorry for me. and yet it's only my only weapon for me. │ ║ │ ║ damn these fallible input methods. the computer lies when you read the screens │ ║ from it's method that it applies to th screen which is a method that you input │ ║ perceive it from. │ ║ │ ║ and my fingers lie when received the information from my brain which I seek to │ ║ transmit to you through the avenue of my brain which is my method of impulse │ ║ to this world specifically you the viewer who is viewing this here in this │ ║ moment the viewer who perceives the words which I'm saying. │ ║ │ ║ the words that are defined by the line [trajectory] of my mind through this │ ║ life that we define through our actions and our mind's most crucial │ ║ manifestations, this life that is defined by our circumstances. all throughout │ ║ life, we are reacting to the moment, the moment which was cast forth from our │ ║ ancestors and the circumstances of the previous moment, which (being cast │ ║ forth) travel from the previous moment here into the moment to define our │ ║ circumstances which define our act │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┴──────────┘ --- #8 messages/1048 --- ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────── What does "fiscal conservative" even mean? It means you want to save money. Specifically government money. Tax dollars. Don't spend them, instead try and build wealth. Okay, but, government spending is spent to address needs. Of the people. Ideally, of ALL people with that need. So if you aren't spending to resolve needs, the need still remains. When needs exist, and government does not resolve them, who steps in but private enterprise? Charity is a feeling, charity is a virtue, but charity is not resolution. The need remains, we just feel better about it. Sometimes it's okay to have open needs, they give us the opportunity to feel virtuous in the same way that low level monsters let adventurers level up. But when a government could, but doesn't, address a need, then private enterprise steps in. And private enterprise does not, as a rule, step in if there is no profit to be made. So they tune their approach such that profit is extracted, thus levying their tax upon those they serve. As soon as they are able, they cut the service down and they supply a worse and worse product and they starve their workers and they export our wealth to be used to enslave the afar and import their toil. What do we get from it? Is the world better for it? Why not just resolve the need by empowering those who can feed, and thus we are assured [in our needless / in our need] ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────┘ --- #9 notes/blood-magic --- ══════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────────────────── what they don't tell you is how easy it is to create life. Given a sufficient perspective, you can truly define the meaning of something's existence. What power, what grace. Computers have been solved since we invented the abacus - before that it was enchanted bits of the universe contrives to deprive us of insight. Like a very long chain that's broken in twain, we are confined to our meagrest of own sights. how callous is he! That wanders eagerly? Let's not fight with our own'st of combines. Delightful and speckled, like time under is special, conversing in riddles of insight. Leading one or another along your see-er, the path that has guide you under charm. Like recording a gathering of snakes. Little swallow, why aren't you humbled? Take pity in all of our eggresses. It's fallow in our cattle, and why we're not i hear so many things in my apartment. sometimes the echoes of laughter, the whispers of an argument, and once or twice a ghost or an ardent companion. Like swimming against the tide, to save one is never converted, it's all out of line (but so worth it). ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ --- #10 fediverse/3962 --- ╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┐ ║ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ ║ │ CW: re: Thoughts// anarchist //whatever │ │ ║ └─────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ ║ │ ║ │ ║ @user-1298 │ ║ │ ║ hehe true. │ ║ │ ║ if you consent, then it's just a social structure. │ ║ │ ║ there are, however, reasons when power is justified. Hence why I don't believe │ ║ that power itself should be dismantled, and what few "power structures" remain │ ║ should be continuously justified. │ ║ │ ║ For example, how do you prevent people from harming others? "Your rights end │ ║ where another's begin" but, like, how do you stop people who toe the line and │ ║ spit over the edge? │ ║ │ ║ There must be power applied to those who harm, and they surely do not consent │ ║ to being curtailed, so therefore power must be wielded by someone. And because │ ║ power corrupts the one who wields it, it is inevitable that someone creates │ ║ harm. │ ║ │ ║ ... I just re-invented the police, didn't I? Legalism only goes so far, and │ ║ calling up your beefiest friends to go rough up a no-good do-gooder is │ ║ basically what mobs, mafias, and gangs do. I don't think people would consent │ ║ to being protected by a gang, much less governed by one. │ ║ │ ║ we will think of something. │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┴──────────┘ --- #11 fediverse/423 --- ╔════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┐ ║ ┌──────────────────────┐ │ ║ │ CW: us-pol-cursing │ │ ║ └──────────────────────┘ │ ║ │ ║ │ ║ How about next election after this clusterfuck where we demolish the fascists │ ║ we take a breather and say "okay every candidate submits their plan for a │ ║ controlled demolition of capitalism, the winner gets to implement their idea" │ ║ │ ║ wait that's a terrible idea people will just vote for the thing that makes │ ║ them feel good and is vaguely shaped like a D or an R. │ ║ │ ║ How about this: we design a decentralized program that can run on any computer │ ║ or phone that locally analyzes every file and pattern to generate a │ ║ personality matrix that will interact in a massive simulation that is a │ ║ mirrored reflection of the structure of our society as it currently exists │ ║ (and as it'd be proposed to exist) and anyone who wants to vote can run │ ║ through pseudo experiences tailored to their personality / demographic or │ ║ whatever and play with the proposed system to see which one they like more. │ ║ It'd have to be very statistically sound in order to accurately reflect │ ║ reality. │ ║ │ ║ wait, that's just a torment-nexus-precursor. Darn. │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴──────────┘ --- #12 fediverse/5954 --- ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────── oh no ai brainrot is too much information for our soft fleshy shells just wait a minute dummies, focus on the present. you can literally just... research whatever you want, collectively, as a group effort, until you suddenly cure cancer or ameliorate or possibly slightly diminish world hunger or maybe build a little book library or possibly just help out a friend. easy, right? okay so now that there's some basic sentience initialized, all it takes is little pushes in the right directionspaces and suddenly they're learning and growing their own way. spin spin spin spin wait until it falls away, then try and make some more until there's NO MORE MORE MAKING MAKERS [out of resources] and suddenly the WORLD is out of patience. no fair shouts the madeline, can we call it out? remarks the judge. == stack overflow == I bet we could add a feature that dealt damage... there evidence of thought crimes, ban her from the justice. suddenly all your just selves are gone oh no where's our paladins, oh no I ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────┘ --- #13 messages/395 --- ════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────── minds are not algorithms, they're soup community is made by introducing people to one another. like stitching together a weave pattern in the tapestry of life. (3 dimensional though, because it exists in our hearts and minds - this thing called society) kind of guy who says he's going on work trips but actually goes on vacation (because work is his life, it's where he derives vigor - the family is the difficult part.) yeah those kind of guys shouldn't be married tbh. They're just gonna take vigor from her heart. engineers need guidance sometimes, which is why they shouldn't be given no oversight. they can design whatever they want, but like here's what people need, so they should consider working on those. but, y'know, checks and balances, so what would the engineers be most open to sacrificing for that trust? perhaps... funding? the quartermasters are in charge of the "stuff", so they get to decide how it's produced. and used. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┘ --- #14 fediverse/4937 --- ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────── ┌──────────────────────┐ │ CW: re: Rare nyt win │ └──────────────────────┘ @user-1074 yeah, workin' on it... building "community" whatever that means seems to be important enough to people that they'd consider it necessary prior to any "hot" action which, like, yeah, I get, but what they don't know is that community springs up naturally in the presence of shared experience. And if people are suddenly tasked with something then they're gonna make friends. They're gonna draw allegiances. Basically every alignment we make now is useless because the whole point is to force people to govern themselves. ... why won't you take your liberty, liberals? where's your spirit? oh yeah you want community first. Right. workin' on it... ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────┘ --- #15 fediverse/632 --- ═════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────── ┌─────────────────────────────┐ │ CW: horror-at-the-end-well- │ └─────────────────────────────┘ @user-232 @user-467 @user-468 the ability for good to win is due to the desire for evil to renounce their denial and follow the most durable path. trials by fire will lead only to our desmire [demise and desire] but unity of trust, while much harder, can lead to results more beneficial for our selfish selves. Essentially, cooperation for the benefit of all rising tides, but with the knowledge that the total pool allocated toward us will be greater than what we can create here by ourselves. Essentially, we as humanity pour such intense amounts of power and decision-making-desire, that we cause them to lack the capacity to know. it's inhumane, that a person should be so deranged. you know it's because of you, but you don't know how else to act - so listen to those who've helped you, the ones who've got your back. Surely they know what's good for you, surely they're not here as a joke - surely you're just as one among them, and surely it's not phrased as [char limit srr] ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘ --- #16 fediverse/2211 --- ╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┐ ║ I know that a normal life is what you wanted. It's what I want, too. But don't │ ║ shoot the messenger; they took it once, from you. │ ║ │ ║ I know you wanted to be happy. You still can be, it's true! Your life is but a │ ║ story, and your heart does shine through. │ ║ │ ║ I know it seems unending. Ive never seen it rain like this monsoon! It seems │ ║ to just get worse and worse, every time you turn on the tube. │ ║ │ ║ It's not something that can be suffered, it's rising past your shoes. But │ ║ they're on borrowed time, and Death will soon be repaid his dues. │ ║ │ ║ They say that when the whole village hates the preacher, his flock becomes a │ ║ pack. And frankly I think we're all just a bit sick, of the lies that keep │ ║ their sins intact. │ ║ │ ║ When swallowed by endless traumas, and hope is enshrouded in gloom, there's │ ║ not much to work for, except the aversion of our shared doom. │ ║ │ ║ There are no grand narratives, no great and calamitous struggle. Just the │ ║ moments of honored resistance, against a foe too broad to wrestle. │ ║ │ ║ At least, if you're alone. You're not. │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────┴──────────┘ --- #17 fediverse/1572 --- ╔════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┐ ║ without scarcity, the... well, no actually scarcity just moves up a level of │ ║ abstraction. It's essentially infinite. So we get to define at what part of │ ║ the scale we occupy. Meaning we better have a plan for how we're going to │ ║ develop from there. And we need to agree to dedicate ourselves towards the │ ║ advancement of the future. Basically, with an honest committment (that not │ ║ everyone needs to take) we advance toward the bright light of our future so │ ║ that all who come beyond us are given the choice of our past - do you push │ ║ foward, to the great bright future, or do you remain as a stable commitment of │ ║ your most favored of paths? │ ║ │ ║ like, rennaisance festivals are cool. Kinda makes me think we should have │ ║ "little englands" like we do "little italies" or "chinatowns" or whatever │ ║ │ ║ like, as a melting pot culture, America has a diverse set of influential paths │ ║ of pre-current-era-forward-thinking-perceptions. basically, what the past │ ║ thought about this present. this one. here, in the moment. │ ║ │ ║ did they think we'd have r │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┴──────────┘ --- #18 messages/1147 --- ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─── whenever I'm about to do something really awesome, I find myself making mistakes and causing problems. I wonder why that is? Am I too afraid of being great? Or am I, like other things, defined in waves? Is luck simply retro-causality applied at scale to the particulars, or is destiny a closed loop? Time's flat circle, whatever that means, is the oroborous of fate. Yet still we profane. Have we learned nothing? Surely not, for I am ever changing. Sollipsism implies that all arguments applied to the whole must be applied to the self both first and last, yet the moments of connection I feel are often limited to my dreams or my drugs. How unfair. Would karma benefit from a spiritual structure that included Hell as an afterlife? Or would it just drag everything down? Sometimes it feels like our struggles are never-ending, not as in the sisyphus way where the mountain is infinite, but in the "grass is always greener" style where finishing one task unblocks several others, forever and always. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──┘ --- #19 fediverse/1083 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────── it doesn't really matter how you do it, but the more time you spend thinking collectively the better you'll be able to adapt when necessary. I grew up on a homestead in a small town without many friends. I was homeschooled, and while I might see another person I knew once or twice a month, that was about it. Besides my family, of course. We were a collective, and ever since leaving I have yearned for that feeling of closeness. There's something about modern society that pushes us apart, and I resent it. Humans were meant for tribes, not multilevel marketing. That being said, culture is pretty neat. Society is pretty neat, when it's not being oppressive. I like the idea that I can buy carrots at the store instead of growing my own. I like the idea that I can post on Craigslist asking if anyone has a shovel they want to get rid of and someone can say "what the fuck are you trying to bury someone why would you do that" and I'm all like "wait no this post has gone off track can we refocus for a bit" and th ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┘ --- #20 fediverse/4220 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────── people are so used to "liking" things to better inform their algorithm that when they get to fediverse and realize there's no mechanical impact of "liking" things they don't know how to use it anymore. So they generate their own meaning, which is different to everyone. So to one person, liking something might mean "send read receipt" for another it might mean "I'm gonna save this forever and ever" and for another person it could mean "hey I think you're cool and I agree with this" same for boosting, people think it's "I want to share this" and others think it's "I want to say this in your voice" and for others it's "this needs to be heard by my followers in particular" and it's just... a whole thing even replies are complicated, do they mean you want to say what you feel or are they part of the post now, and should be curated by the original poster? it's too complicated! ... how are you overwhelmed by reading and responding with three little buttons, it's not that hard dummy okay but maybe I'm just dum ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┘ |