=== ANCHOR POEM ===
═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────
 @user-192 
 
 the neat thing about BASH is that it's the glue that holds all your other code
 together. Write libraries in C and call them with BASH - accomplish broader
 tasks that are easier to co-create. That's why I like it - it's not the most
 important, but it's quite beneficial I think _^
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘

=== SIMILARITY RANKED ===

--- #1 fediverse/5689 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────
 why don't we make large arrays of vram that are slightly slower because
 they're farther on the circuit-board from their host and their reception at
 the processing section has to be gated such that they all enter to be
 processed at once.
 
 like that one infinite scrolling XKCD cartoon where the things move from one
 screen to the other simultaneously assembly line style.
 
 [fail safes. https://xkcd.com/2916/#xt=7&yt=35 ]
 
 if we all feel like we're doing nothing, we'll all grow tired of it and decide
 to do some prevailing. gosh I wish I wasn't so useless is code for

┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────┘

--- #2 fediverse/879 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────
 @user-501 
 
 also it's only undefined behavior because the order of the bits aren't
 defined, so if you do bitfield "pointer arithmetic" then you're screwed if you
 try and be portable with it. However if you're just using bitfields as
 compressed data storage then you can safely access integer.a integer.b
 integer.c etc safely and easily. The compiler doesn't care what order they're
 in if you don't write logic that requires them to be in a certain order
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #3 fediverse/5765 ---
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────┐
║ Lua is the most fun language to write code in! The reason is because it's so     │
║ simple, it distills programming down to it's basics, and there's very few        │
║ surprises. Plus, you can use it like a bash script, meaning it's great for       │
║ writing little utilities.                                                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ why are we so attached to monolithic massive programs without shared memory?     │
║ we could just write to the hard drive by file.io'ing a file and opening it       │
║ later in a different program. What's the deal with databases, whatever           │
║ happened to just loading things into a datastructure?                            │
║                                                                                  │
║ oh, is your filesize too massive? what if we redundancied and abstracted and     │
║ concentrically inter-co-acted and thus our familiar forces are defined.          │
║                                                                                  │
║ who are your true foes, in [checks notes] computer programming? um, probably     │
║ complexity, probably logical incongruities, probably                             │
║ future-technical-debt-style incomprehensibilities, probably stuff that doesn't   │
║ really have anything to do with the hardware but instead is mostly software.     │
║                                                                                  │
║ essentially, organization, but done on a whim.                                   │
║                                                                                  │
║ "but $?"                                                                         │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════┴──────────┘

--- #4 fediverse/282 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────
 @user-209 
 I think you're right. Every letter in the variable name is another byte the OS
 has to keep track of, which was a bigger problem in the past than it is today
 (when it's been made irrelevant)
 
 it's interesting how habits persist though the conditions that caused them
 have faded. like a personal reflection of the environment you learned in.
 
 "A a = new a();" is much more concise and (crucially) you can fit more words
 to the right.
 
 "a + b = c; c -= 2; f_z.write(c); f_z.close();" could conceivably be written
 on a single line if you have short variable names. and when you only have so
 many lines...
 
 glad we're not constrained by those things anymore. the skeletal code that we
 look at daily is much clearer - scope is more important, and so it makes sense
 to encourage a coding style that illustrates it. however I can't help but
 think block formatting like this could be useful in some situations, such as
 when you'd normally be compelled to write a function for an operation that
 runs once or more.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #5 fediverse/5291 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────
 the most important skill I can think of for a linux software engineer is the
 ability to connect multiple systems together and turn windows and macintosh
 devices into Linux devices so that datacenters can be built out of whatever's
 on the around.
 
 there's this programming language I like called Chapel for distributed
 computation computing which is also cool, if you're more of the programming
 type.
 
 networking security I believe often has hardware solutions, so getting the
 crypto-graphy boys and the PCB girls together to work on some jams is a good
 and productively useful gathering of insightful events
 
 "but ritz computers should only be used to solve problems that people have,
 not make more problems!" ah yes but have you considered that problems find
 you, and the computers help you work through them
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────┘

--- #6 messages/110 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────
 The best way to program computers is to organize them according to their
 relations. Like, when x increases by 4 then y increases by 2 - basically, a
 math equation that you can continuously solve by calculating more and more
 comprehensively and deeply.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #7 fediverse/2879 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: tech info-dump │
 └────────────────────────┘


 @user-1370 
 
 I love this a lot! I want to put function pointers in a "matrix architecture
 array" and make them point to different functions at different points in the
 program. I bet you could even point them at each other, so like if M and Y
 then point at N, A, Y or something.
 
 this is really cool I like stuff like this tomorrow I'll take pictures of
 something similar I'm working on! I abandoned it tho hehe anyway remind me if
 I forget!!
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #8 fediverse/1810 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────
 some people hear words like "datastructures" and "object-oriented programming"
 and think they're made up terms that don't mean anything important.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┘

--- #9 fediverse/6438 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────
 why would you gatekeep content by keeping us from easily using LLMs some
 people aren't technical and still need to write computer programs because
 that's how you enlighten a people is empower them with new tools
 
 "I've never heard of that programming language, but luckily I can fit all of
 it's documentation in my context window."
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────┘

--- #10 fediverse/777 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────
 @user-192 
 
 Those are good points. The C in our hearts is elegant, but the C that runs on
 every computer in the world is spaghetti.
 
 I'm sure someone's made a language that's "C but simple" - Zig maybe? I looked
 into V a while back but got turned off of both of them because neither had
 support for multithreading, which is essential in the modern era.
 
 Also, typedefs for structs make me mad -.-
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #11 fediverse/5405 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────
 can't stop thinking about a visual programming editor that can be interacted
 with in the same way that people are used to (think chromebooks dragging and
 dropping icons in a web UI) but produces a text-file full of code and all the
 required compilation scripts for any language the user requires...
 
 seriously, programming is not THAT different between the different languages.
 especially the main ones. they're all essentially variables and function calls
 at the end of the day, so why not abstract away all the extra details and
 build something that n00bz can actually use to build things.
 
 I technically could make this but I don't have the bandwidth and I don't think
 it's important really? who can say, the tools tend to co-create the solutions
 in my experience.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────┘

--- #12 fediverse/5212 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────
 the reason you start with a game engine is because then you'll have tools to
 make however-many games you want. Tools that you know intimately enough that
 you can debug and improve them without breaking your creative flow by learning
 something new halfway through a project
 
 the whole point of individualized projects instead of viewing each computer as
 a complete and total whole (why do we need servers again?) is that you can
 paint a picture of where the design of the program is intended to go, such
 that all the considerations are in place and whatever issues or struggles you
 might face along the way are adequately addresssed, -- stack overflow --
 [because I mistyped addressed] -- -- if you know what "stack overflow" means
 you have intimate knowledge of the technology, and can probably guess what it
 means in context when I say it. "nuts I lost that train of thoguht" -- stackl
 ov
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┘

--- #13 fediverse/3154 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 ┌───────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: cursing-mentioned │
 └───────────────────────────┘


 @user-1461 
 
 yes... I like tree shapes, you have to address them differently. Lots of
 pointers, in my experience, which can be kinda fun.
 
 I also like large heaps / soups of data that points to one-another. Structs
 thrown in a pile with pointers to each other. It's great! So long as those
 pointers can also point back, and you can properly trace how data flows
 through the system... That's the hard part, I think.
 
 trees though... You can start by just saving a "next / previous" with one or
 both being arrays of pointers to the next or previous entries. Note: plural,
 entries. That's the fun part - non-linear trees teehee
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #14 fediverse/6383 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────
 nobody wants to write computer code that lets Java programs call Rust
 functions.
 An LLM is excellent for this task, since it's relatively easy busy work that
 doesn't
 reflect any meaningful implementation decisions besides "I should be able to
 call that Rust function in my Java code"
 
 In addition, it is technically efficient at it as well, because most of
 compatibility
 is matching up two sets of documentation. Easy for a text-processing machine.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────┘

--- #15 fediverse/1246 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────
 @user-883 
 
 hehe if I don't understand how it works it's difficult for me to use things.
 My Linux friends get so exasperated with me because I'm like "cool script
 gimme like 2 days to figure it out" and they're like "bro just use these
 flags" and I'm like "no"
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┘

--- #16 fediverse/111 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────
 @user-95 that's why I like programming - it's my favorite form of spelling.
 i'm not very good at remembering all the names and the numbers, but I like to
 think I can make things do a function.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #17 fediverse/2622 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 what kind of linux user are you if you don't even like reading terminal
 output? it's USEFUL and INTERESTING information!
 
 WHY ELSE WOULD THE PROGRAMMER OUTPUT IT???
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #18 fediverse/1248 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────
 @user-883 
 
 did you open any ports on your router to do this streaming? Setting up my
 laptop so I can test...
 
 I loved assembly when I took a course on it in college - it just made sense to
 me. I love C because it feels like, a more powerful version of assembly.
 Everything higher level just feels like layers of abstraction on C, or like...
 LISP, which hurts my brain. >.>
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┘

--- #19 messages/324 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────
 The difference between front-end and back-end programming is whether or not
 you want to design abstractions or use them. Backend is all about creating
 abstract things that are networked together, while front end is about putting
 them together in a way that suits the user. Front end is collage, back end is
 pencil drawing.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────┘

--- #20 fediverse/6271 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────
 ┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: hypothetical worst case fascism reality check │
 └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘


 @user-641 
 
 it's practice. you never know when you might need to blend in. really it's
 just useful as discipline, good practice to be in. I think it's okay if we
 reduce our own functionality? actually? sometimes it's good to use different
 email clients. hey do you know how to mathematically encrypt things well
 neither do I because the designers of the computer system decided that wasn't
 a very common usecase I guess.. jmean it's not like they'd spend all that
 computer resources [THEY'RE SO FAST] on thinking about correlations in your
 predicted pathway narratively through life. "ah help I'm in a psyop" haha yeah
 we do those all the time "so uhhhh I guess we'll just talk to people and see
 how they do?" wow okay it's sure nice to be part of a civil government, I
 think we can find our way to the lumber producers just fine thank you very
 much.
 
 ... oops sorry, a baby did electronics arts (challenge everything) I'm a
 little silly don't mind me brb I gotta go see~

┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────┘