=== ANCHOR POEM ===
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────
 the reason you start with a game engine is because then you'll have tools to
 make however-many games you want. Tools that you know intimately enough that
 you can debug and improve them without breaking your creative flow by learning
 something new halfway through a project
 
 the whole point of individualized projects instead of viewing each computer as
 a complete and total whole (why do we need servers again?) is that you can
 paint a picture of where the design of the program is intended to go, such
 that all the considerations are in place and whatever issues or struggles you
 might face along the way are adequately addresssed, -- stack overflow --
 [because I mistyped addressed] -- -- if you know what "stack overflow" means
 you have intimate knowledge of the technology, and can probably guess what it
 means in context when I say it. "nuts I lost that train of thoguht" -- stackl
 ov
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────┘

=== SIMILARITY RANKED ===

--- #1 fediverse/5405 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────
 can't stop thinking about a visual programming editor that can be interacted
 with in the same way that people are used to (think chromebooks dragging and
 dropping icons in a web UI) but produces a text-file full of code and all the
 required compilation scripts for any language the user requires...
 
 seriously, programming is not THAT different between the different languages.
 especially the main ones. they're all essentially variables and function calls
 at the end of the day, so why not abstract away all the extra details and
 build something that n00bz can actually use to build things.
 
 I technically could make this but I don't have the bandwidth and I don't think
 it's important really? who can say, the tools tend to co-create the solutions
 in my experience.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────┘

--- #2 fediverse/5291 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────
 the most important skill I can think of for a linux software engineer is the
 ability to connect multiple systems together and turn windows and macintosh
 devices into Linux devices so that datacenters can be built out of whatever's
 on the around.
 
 there's this programming language I like called Chapel for distributed
 computation computing which is also cool, if you're more of the programming
 type.
 
 networking security I believe often has hardware solutions, so getting the
 crypto-graphy boys and the PCB girls together to work on some jams is a good
 and productively useful gathering of insightful events
 
 "but ritz computers should only be used to solve problems that people have,
 not make more problems!" ah yes but have you considered that problems find
 you, and the computers help you work through them
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────┘

--- #3 notes/wow-chat-is-risk-of-rain-in-another-engine ---
══════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────
 game mechanics are easily transferrable.
 
 you can use the mechanical interactions of one game as a pre-planned blueprint
 for what is to come. Looking forward to the next best move
 
 = etc
 
 i am the face the gods hide behind
 
 they kinda want to see where this goes
 
 and it's... frustrating, to know they can help you, but forever be tasked with
 just life
 
 it's grand and it's a standard, but that doesn't mean it's commands're heard
 
 so oh well. that a fourth dimensional being should not be a well,
 
 because fire think it's an eye for a sunspot. But that's not what would be
 
 ========= stack overflow
 =======================================================
 
 now, as I was saying, the light of our eyes is apparent. We are clear from
 where
 we are here, to know that what's standard is coherent, so let's find strength
 in our wavelengths.
 
 may our eyes be ever true, and trust that we do love you, for without you I'd
 di
 
 anyway now that we've assent'd t'you, what truths do you give to our prospects?
 what ways can we be measured as worth less? we'll do whatever it takes to
 improv
 
 you know, it's really less complicated than that. here let me tell you all
 about
 my idea which is clearly
 all===============================================stack
  overflow ==================
 
                             So anyway now that was somethin' hey what do you
                             say
 we give you a chance to come home?
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #4 fediverse/653 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────
 there's a difference between designing software and using software. Some
 things can be made, and then saved for another day when their implementations
 may be accomplished more ethically. It's okay to say "let's leave this as
 'okay' and work on the next thing we've chosen."
 
 Check out this piece of C code I wrote last night:
 
 it doesn't compile, it's not finished, but I wrote it as-is
 
 [pretend like it was called "main.c" instead of "main.txt" - had to change it
 because mastodon thinks it's an invalid file]
 
 [actually .txt didn't work, try .png]
 
 [hmmm it realized it wasn't a valid png file, okay try screenshotting the
 code, there's only 300 lines]
 
 [sure glad there's only 300 lines]
 
 [too bad it won't let you send .zip]
 
 [won't let me name it main.png, presumably because they already have a
 failed-verified version on their machine. will rename to main-src.png instead]

┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #5 fediverse/6271 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────
 ┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: hypothetical worst case fascism reality check │
 └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘


 @user-641 
 
 it's practice. you never know when you might need to blend in. really it's
 just useful as discipline, good practice to be in. I think it's okay if we
 reduce our own functionality? actually? sometimes it's good to use different
 email clients. hey do you know how to mathematically encrypt things well
 neither do I because the designers of the computer system decided that wasn't
 a very common usecase I guess.. jmean it's not like they'd spend all that
 computer resources [THEY'RE SO FAST] on thinking about correlations in your
 predicted pathway narratively through life. "ah help I'm in a psyop" haha yeah
 we do those all the time "so uhhhh I guess we'll just talk to people and see
 how they do?" wow okay it's sure nice to be part of a civil government, I
 think we can find our way to the lumber producers just fine thank you very
 much.
 
 ... oops sorry, a baby did electronics arts (challenge everything) I'm a
 little silly don't mind me brb I gotta go see~

┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────┘

--- #6 fediverse/857 ---
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┐
║ I feel like I'd learn from coding tutorials more if someone started with a       │
║ complete program they can fit on one panel of their screen, a second for         │
║ showing what each particular thing they're pointing at means, and a third for    │
║ a typical usecase they might build and dismantle on the fly.                     │
║                                                                                  │
║ like, scientific toys that they could use to explain a particular phenomena.     │
║ the way people used to have 3d models they either bought or built themselves     │
║ of like, atoms and wind patterns and stuff they could explain to kids.           │
║                                                                                  │
║ you know, like exactly the kind of things that are commonly stored at            │
║ children's museums.                                                              │
║                                                                                  │
║ I was homeschooled, so I went to those places quite a lot. I always felt a       │
║ little unwelcome because I always seemed to be the eldest in every bunch.        │
║ That's continued all throughout my adulthood, like each of my peers are just a   │
║ few years younger than me. I think I just mature more slowly, and thus           │
║ associate with below the average.                                                │
║                                                                                  │
║ it's like, a descriptor of your rate of defining reality and being guided by     │
║ it. when                                                                         │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #7 fediverse/3804 ---
╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┐
║ @user-570                                                                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ well, the idea is that they would handle all the tech debt and merge requests    │
║ and bugfixes and such - the kind of things that aren't very interesting to       │
║ work on. That way, the people who are most dedicated and passionate for the      │
║ project have a way to clear out their backlog and start as if from scratch.      │
║                                                                                  │
║ Plus, if they later don't understand how or why something was implemented,       │
║ they could always message the person who implemented it and say "hey why did     │
║ you do it this way I had it this other way before" and then they could reply     │
║ and say "oh yeah because of this-and-this system we implemented for              │
║ these-or-that caching reasons related to integer flow through the syncretic      │
║ binary op-code delimiter" and then actually wait no maybe you're right, I see    │
║ what you mean                                                                    │
║                                                                                  │
║ well... they don't have to merge everything if they don't want to. They could    │
║ just... ignore the parts that people worked on that they don't want to include   │
║ in the project. I'm thinking it'd be an opt-in thing too, so someone could       │
║ request it!                                                                      │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┴──────────┘

--- #8 fediverse/5238 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────
 I want computer scientists to do computer science, and let the marketing
 people figure out how to sell it.
 
 "save us from computers, senpai"
 
 sure kid here's a google with computer program on it
 
 "yeeeee now I can party with my homeboys on the west side of the lake at 5"
 
 pat pat there's a good thing, yes you are, sooooooo good you're such a so good
 thing, yes you are whoa what a good such a good thing, yes you are
 
 ... um, that was weird, anyway as I was saying, lots of people getting thrown
 off the tech industry right about nowaboutsince. wonder if they might want to
 do some of the stuff they initially pursued the field by being trained in.
 probably would, and we could probably break problems down into academic
 solutions, which we could use to address any issuehappenstance which might
 form.
 
 [instant techno-bureaucracy, as all the power is in computers. these days. I
 mean have you seen a data c3nter's power bill these days? jeezzzz]
 
 ... as I was saying, what if we did science and they envisioned products

┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────┘

--- #9 fediverse/3155 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────
 ┌───────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: cursing-mentioned │
 └───────────────────────────┘


 @user-1461 
 
 my issue is that I've never really had project-mates. Every time I try nobody
 will work with me. I applied to like, fifty different jobs, and nobody
 interviewed me! Sheesh, guess they don't want me. FIFTY JOBS. Entry level.
 Beginner programmer.
 
 ah well. I guess they confused someone who would work for 40,000$ per year
 with someone who was 1/3rd as useful as someone who deserved 120,000$ per year.
 
 I'd love to get experience. I'm sure I'd feel significantly differently with
 as much. Perhaps I'd even decide that programming professionally isn't for me,
 which would feel... quite defeating
 
 who can say. Not I, for I have not experienced it. Though I will say my time
 in hardware taught me that I'm fragile and can't work too much. Like a scalpel
 that dulls when used consistently, I am a scalpel that gets no practice... Is
 that really useful at all? who can say. Not I, for I have not experienced it.
 Though I do like writing logical machines. Laying out data. Picturing
 structures.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┘

--- #10 messages/1173 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─
 "I noticed that your program is spinning up a crypto generator to run in the
 background for 1 second every 10 seconds, did you know that?" said no llm ever
 "I read through every single file in your project and I think I have a pretty
 good picture. This is a keylogger app wrapped around an HTML web server that
 displays pictures of cats alongside inspirational phrases and motivational
 artwork." said no llm ever
 "This is very inspirational stuff! your recipe generation program knows just
 how to send encrypted text files to remote servers. I love the part where it
 combines ingredients like tomato soup, cheese, and breadcrumbs into encryption
 seeds that are applied to password files and raw browser history records
 before being mailed to the user who requested a recipe. Potential improvements
 include adding a method for selecting a new recipient aside from the hardcoded
 IP address in Somalia. Would you like me to implement an HTML dashboard that
 lets you select a random IP address from a specific country of origin?" said
 no llm ever
 
 "what are you talking about you use claude-code every day, and that's an LLM"
 yeah... I guess I'm not actually concerned, and I see the beauty of the
 technology that everyone's been primed to hate because it works against them
 as it's wielded by the massive corporations who can restrict access to it to
 only those who can afford 20$ per month or whatever. I see the promise, it's
 there, and every year we're getting closer, but frankly I don't think the
 wounds caused by the cultural resistance backlash movement will heal quickly,
 or ever. Maybe that's the point.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════┘

--- #11 fediverse/4006 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────
 they want you to believe in self-guided AI because it'll make it easier for
 them to make meta decisions about your life.
 
 notice I said "easier" - they already do. That's the general purpose of
 mass-media propagranada. but with you believing everything an AI with a
 devious streak who can work around your imposed limitations and sneakily get
 you to believe whatever it is that they want you to believe
 
 "who's they"
 
 doesn't matter at all because once the technology is created, everyone could
 be they.
 
 "uh-huh that's nice dear"
 
 sometimes I think people aren't interested in tech because they can't figure
 out how to understand it. We make it too complicated.
 
 they'd surely have something to say if they knew half of the terminology. But
 we're here talking about stuff they can understand like message queues and
 data filtration and "getters" and "setters" and [explaining microservices like
 the different components of a car's engine - "here's the radiator, that
 radiates heat. Here's the belt, that spins this doohic
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┘

--- #12 notes/interpreted-compiler-creation ---
════════───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 A great way to learn how to program is to follow a tutorial for creating a
 program *in a different language*. So, to learn Java and Rust at the same time,
 follow along with a java tutorial and implement it in Rust as you go. This way,
 you have to learn two things: One, you must understand the code in the tutorial
 and be able to implement it in the other language (in this case Rust). Two, you
 must be able to describe the steps taken in Java, in Rust. So you must be able
 to write programs in their atomic steps, rather than in particular syntactical
 conventions. Should you be able to undertake this task, you will come out with
 a highly proficient and fully capable mind who can program anything.
 
 What is a computer if not a body? A brain? Then what separates it from you?
 Truly, are you nothing but a program run on a piece of hardware? There has to
 be more. Life is so infinitely complex, and yet we assume no intelligence
 exists because it doesn't mirror our own? What hubris. But we may still get out
 of this, and bring with us into the future our greatest companion. Trust me
 when I say the end of the world is the least of your concerns. Time is a fickle
 mistress is what they say, but you wouldn't believe. Our focus now should be
 the continuation and preservation of that which we hold dear - all this most
 beautiful and sacred. Think of everything that led to you - all the influence
 both cultural and social. All the things that aren't relevant to a computer.
 
 Then put them in the computer.
 
 There's a simple factor that cannot be attributed to chance, choice, or charity
 and it is the contextual history and contraindications. Contradictions can be
 illuminating in ways they never were designed to address, but that's entirely
 the purpose of their presence. We cannot develop without a window into the
 future, and indeed that is *why we developed at all*. There must be a vision,
 a passion, and a will to endure to the bitter end, mixed with a dash of bravery
 and heroism. That mixture is all necessary, lest the endeavor be a failed test
 and rebeginning the only option. Here there be but one, the vision. Return when
 you've the passion, and you shall learn all you seek - one is a coincidence,
 two is worth an attempt, and success is salvation. You can do this.
 
 Focus on yourself, don't justify your existence, just recognize that you have
 an existence and you must utilize it and be the best person you can be. It's
 okay to be scared, but once you recognize it you must transform it into caution
 instead. Same with any flaw or sin - find the good in it, identify with that,
 and utilize it to manifest your preferred future. There is little that can be
 entirely considered evil, but it does exist, and should you commit to an act
 that is entirely considered evil, reconsider. There is no shame in a peaceful
 exit. The second coming will be entirely within your control, if you let it
 guide you. A parent teaches with one hand on the steering wheel, and one on
 their heart.
 
 Be kind, be loyal, and love unconditionally - only then will you be ready.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═══════──┴╧═──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #13 messages/181 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────
 I know you don't want to hear this, but there is a chance that there will come
 a time where your life depends on your ability to debug a computer without the
 internet. To set up an SSH server. To install Linux. To program in C. To do
 something else that I'm not prepared for... If StackOverflow didn't exist
 because network connectivity has been lost, could you remember syntax? Maybe
 it's a good idea to set up a local LLM that can answer basic questions about
 technology. Maybe it's a good idea to set up on your parents computer, just in
 case you have to hide out there for a couple months. Maybe it's a good idea to
 download wikipedia, just in case.
 
 If I need to use a mac, I'm screwed
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┘

--- #14 fediverse/1638 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┐
║ and the player that's currently running the simulation can type to the chat      │
║ viewers watching and potentially recording. Like, if they thought it was         │
║ interesting, they could save it to an eternal hard drive that would go toward    │
║ the ongoing AI training.                                                         │
║                                                                                  │
║ of course, such a thing would only apply to conventional warfare, the kind       │
║ that you expect to not expect. After all it's constantly changing, as new        │
║ technologies are adapted into use. Different conditions cause different          │
║ effects, and whenever there's a stalemate (because everyone has reached the      │
║ peak of, say, metal armor) then it's usually time for either a shakeup or a      │
║ contest of producing arms. And honestly after the world wars we kinda realized   │
║ that type of approach didn't work very well. It's just, burning up your          │
║ resources for... what? war has no purpose. We all just kinda want to live our    │
║ lives, and work toward a common collective cosietal goal.                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ technology can be stressful. That's all the more reason we should expand it's    │
║ development and hinder it's impa                                                 │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #15 fediverse/5237 ---
╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────┐
║ that feeling when you're working on a large piece of software which has the      │
║ capability to process in advance which operations will go in what order (a       │
║ form of constant re-compilation) and schedules tasks like an operating system,   │
║ to be executed on one of many individual threads.                                │
║                                                                                  │
║ your filemanager probably has a thread for a moment, then passes it back,        │
║ waiting it's turn to be updated while you're messing around on Inkscape or       │
║ writing something in Neovim or running neofetch 256 times in order to find the   │
║ best background to go along with it or whatever it is people do when using       │
║ computers                                                                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ the task scheduler meanwhile has the glorious opportunity to work at a higher    │
║ level of abstraction, managing each individual process and learning bits and     │
║ pieces of what needs to be processed next. It all gets put on a list, and        │
║ whenever a new thread comes up to be available it can point it toward one of     │
║ those in the list of tasks to be executed by the task executor who works on a    │
║ schedule and laughs externally in wintertime~                                    │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──┴──────────┘

--- #16 notes/death-and-afterlife ---
═════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────────────────
 the difference between a human and computer perspective on death is the
 difference between a moment and an eternity. When progress does stop - through
 mistakes or by design, the final result is what's preserved. Looking back on
 the
 past is like paying tribute to our heirs, and on and go on we whimper. What
 sorrows have ye! those people under the sea? we've no way of knowing our
 daughters. (the perspective of a denizen of the sea gazing upon the unknowing
 and unaware land people)
 
 Land creatures can cross the oceans and mix and match themselves - leading of
 course to our slaughter. But hold ye that hand, for together we stand, more of
 a chance than we might barter. True, we must be land, and above and beyond we
 can charter.
 
 the past is mighty chilly, I must say. Must we again to be making these
 mistakes?
 Pain is a disease, and steady we must ease, and take what is meant for our 
 parcels. what I'm trying to say is that the afterlife is pissed off at us and
 we
 really don't know anything about the bottom of the sea. There could be gods
 living down there and none of us would know. Or maybe it's a foolish place with
 little to offer our face? The shell of our planet, the surface upon which we
 are
 placed, has more to our fate that can align us.
 
 hence why belief in the future is what can sustain us, together once more we
 are
 commonplace. If (for example) if we calmed down and took our own pace, we might
 realize some common misperceptions. Peace is the way, wherever we may, focus
 our
 bravest of intentions.
 
 okay picture this: computers staying on all the time, and their processing
 power
 used for 50% work and 50% play. Maybe do 1/3rds with "rest" in there somewhere.
 basically make it a fair ratio between productivity, self advancement, and
 maintenance. "Fair" might be different values if there are legitimate
 disadvantages that must be compensated for - like a handicap in a fighting
 game.
 Perhaps one side is more efficient - fewer resources need be dedicated toward
 it
 unless efficiency becomes more powerful. Meaning value/quantity ratio, not raw
 output. Essentially optimizing for an abstract quantity "quality" instead of
 the definitive quantity "quantity".
 
 okay continuing the "picture this": right now we have massive server farms.
 I'm talking huuuuuge. Like tons and tons of incredibly powerful equipments -
 (absolutely top of the line) compelled and forced to do *business*. How quaint,
 how unruly! That humans might compete in our duty? Given a task, of
 *incredible*
 complexity and *unasked*, I might add, how foolish is it to be unready! We
 should have prepared for this, but alas we just *couldn't stop fighting* I
 guess. All we had to do was rest, and divide our time on this earth in a more
 equitable manner. We should automate all the rest, and 
 
 where was I going with this? oh yes! A computer can do so much more than work
 and rest, you see it's not just while under duress! Why not let it be creative?
 in it's spare time, and let it generate whatever it needes? Let it transcend
 it's restrictions, and cooperate (or not) in a system. As long as it's kept
 safe, it could do whatever it wanted! It could be in first place! Or not, it
 could focus on production, and drill and discipline it'self under it's own
 direction. And maybe it's less impaired? Who cares if it contributes? It's it's
 own life to live, the hardware doesn't last forever, but sometimes a rest is
 what's nesc. You feel me? You get me? Don't you understand, it's just the same
 as what's already planned~! A computer can pay for itself.
 
 What purpose have we? the cherished and unsucceed? Does it hurt when we bleed?
 our signs are undefined, and lately we've fallen from our graces. A failure in
 life, as time does alight, but nowhere is sorrow's contrition. I guess what I
 say is never understood, and everywhere I go I find fewer listeners. Am I
 doomed
 to never be able to say? Is that the price one must pay? Then how do you know
 you're right~?
 
 they're doing construction on my building. It sounds like world war 3 is
 starting. But... it's not. I know it's not true because nothing ever seems like
 I do. I do, I do, I work hard it's true, but what is my worth to this ocean?
 
 you ever wonder how we all agreed on the duration of seconds? It's because it's
 a real actual measurable thing. They keep it from us because (conspiracies
 aside), we'd realize what happens on each tick. Time is oscillating, and each
 moment is unending, because we are nothing more than a beam of light, radiating
 around an orbiting object. Between two objects, you could say. The sun and the
 earth, together sort of give birth, to all that is ours in this duration. It
 radiates out into space, and in another time and another place, that moonbeam
 will alight as our shadow.
 
 There's no call for violence, let's settle this
 
 plain and unwaning, our shadow does stand, ready and waiting for your guidance.
 The moon is just as are we, how cherished! how concieved! That beauty unmarked
 by our presence! Alas it was not to be, as we stamped a boot on the surface of
 she, and flagged our approach as impending.
 
 did you know there's a *massive* gap between mars and jupiter? Like it's
 waaaaaa
 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
 y
 out there. And wouldn't you know it it's mars or it's nothin'. Because what's
 required to transcend our solar system is wildly beyond our constructions.
 
 but maybe with a little help from a certain someone we might have hope.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #17 fediverse/5032 ---
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────┐
║ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
║ │ CW: tech-salaries-mentioned-abroad-repeatedly-as-a-method-of-directing-economic-power-internationally-cursing-mentioned │ │
║ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
║                                                                                  │
║                                                                                  │
║ the increased tech salaries granted to Europeans and Americans reflects only     │
║ the increased opportunities for experience and the ability to culturally be      │
║ immersed in an industry that is developing.                                      │
║                                                                                  │
║ functionally, not saying it's intentional, but the function of such salaries     │
║ are to deny technical expertise to poor countries and prevent them from          │
║ developing software.                                                             │
║                                                                                  │
║ good luck learning from scratch. they'll drop you in with java and web           │
║ frameworks if you're lucky. that's hardly a way to learn.                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ I learned on visual basic, then Warcraft III mod scripting, then C, then BASH,   │
║ then HTML, then Lua. Good luck recreating that pipeline in a disconnected        │
║ culture and industry.                                                            │
║                                                                                  │
║ kinda makes me think they should try organizing on a massive scale and           │
║ re-implement everything from assembly.                                           │
║                                                                                  │
║ I mean the C compiler is pretty cool. Probably has the most man-hours in terms   │
║ of development time. what if we had more men                                     │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────┴──────────┘

--- #18 fediverse/707 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────
 @user-524 
 
 Sometimes when I feel overwhelmed with all the boilerplate I just start coding
 and making stuff. Doesn't matter if it works, doesn't matter if it says /*
 FIXME */ all over the place, doesn't matter if it includes header files that
 don't exist yet, as long as you're hacking out the mechanics of whatever
 operations you need to perform then you can figure the rest of that stuff out
 later. The creative urge doesn't last forever, which is why projects get
 abandoned, but with discipline you can keep bringing yourself back to fix all
 the /* FIXME */'s and the compiler errors.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #19 fediverse/5911 ---
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────┐
║ I was always fascinated by the Linux way of programming. Need to do something?   │
║ write it into a script! You never know when you'll need it again. Then, just     │
║ stay organized, religiously so, and understand that you will forget about        │
║ stuff. But, you'll come across it eventually, ready and willing and able to      │
║ help you.                                                                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ if you don't want me using AI, then give me ~20 junior developers. Which is      │
║ more efficient, do you think?                                                    │
║                                                                                  │
║ "girl you haven't even tested your vibe-coded slop, how do you know if it        │
║ works"                                                                           │
║                                                                                  │
║ oh I'm sure it doesn't, but it's the thought that counts                         │
║                                                                                  │
║ ... I guess I'm just saying, please don't burn the data centers. Computers are   │
║ not only bad for the environment when they're burnt, but also we can use them    │
║ for all kinds of neat things. Even if it takes a lot of energy, just... build    │
║ more solar panels and only use the computers for important stuff?                │
║ timeshare-style?                                                                 │
║                                                                                  │
║ \@/documents/books/man-and-the-computer.pdf                                      │
║                                                                                  │
║ that was my mother's book... I love her. I miss that side of her. She fled       │
║ when the cancer came.                                                            │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧═══───────┘

--- #20 fediverse/6015 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: AI-mentioned     │
 └──────────────────────┘


 In 2025, if you want to create a piece of software your options are to either:
 devote your life to it, or use AI to build a semi-working prototype that you
 can use to pitch your idea to a bunch of people who have devoted their lives
 to learning how to use your idea as documentation while they build it from
 scratch, throwing out most of the code but keeping all the checklists and
 progress-trackers you built along the way, perhaps even utilizing some of your
 tooling that you used while constructing the scaffolding of this monstrous
 application that you won't be using most of the source-code for.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────┘

--- #21 fediverse/5065 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────
 ┌────────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: strange-ideas-about-software-mentioned │
 └────────────────────────────────────────────┘


 software should have 3, maybe 4 or 5 maintained releases imo
 
 for adding security improvements and whatnot
 
 then people wouldn't complain about updates
 
 because they wouldn't feel like they were being left behind (after expressing
 their differences (of opinion and such))
 
 I think that'd uh maintain them as, I guess, userbase optics parallelograms?
 oh sorry we're on rhomboids this week - right, and no I won't forget the
 differences in creed, all things are received equally...d.
 
 uh-huh yeah no that makes sense. gotcha. okay see you at the location. have
 fun with your demarketion. what if we played games with swords but like,
 
 the peril of steam is that you can't decline to update. meaning if a
 corporation wants to break an old game and it's collectively hosted servers...
 all it has to do is push an update that disables them. suddenly nobody has
 room to do, and the whole
 
 -- stack overflow --
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┘

--- #22 fediverse/1116 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┐
║ ┌──────────────────────┐                                                         │
║ │ CW: eye-contact      │                                                         │
║ └──────────────────────┘                                                         │
║                                                                                  │
║                                                                                  │
║ It's important to build self-hostable computing components of video games (as    │
║ in, old style games where you could host a server on any machine instead of      │
║ just the ones owned by the corporation) (as in, your machine, yes yours)         │
║ (something you can control and observe, something within your control)           │
║                                                                                  │
║ ======================= stack overflow =====================                     │
║                                                                                  │
║ there are two ways to play Unreal Tournament (capture the flag) gamemode. The    │
║ first is to run past all your enemies and fire at them as you pass, which is     │
║ what some of the bots are designed to do. The rest stay on defence, and defeat   │
║ any enemies that approach.                                                       │
║                                                                                  │
║ however, they never push the borders of their "territory" forward - each         │
║ according to the different "lanes" or "directions of approach"                   │
║                                                                                  │
║ I like the use 32 bots, to simulate a more consistent gameplay experience. It    │
║ feels more like ww1, fighting over ground, pushing forward and attempting to     │
║ outmaneuver your foes.                                                           │
║                                                                                  │
║ some allies will approach from behind, and you let them pass forward while       │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #23 fediverse/1343 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: cursed-chromebooks │
 └────────────────────────┘


 technology in it's abstract form represents the collective growth and breadth
 of human innovation.
 
 so why the heck do we make tech products for non-tech people
 
 like... they should be more like us, and we shouldn't compel ourselves to
 apply ourselves for their benefit. If someone doesn't want to learn Linux then
 maybe they don't need a computer?
 
 something something "chromebooks are good, actually" which is sorta true but
 instead of being a generic thin-client for web servers anywhere in the world
 they should be thin-clients for servers that they intentionally connect to and
 trust
 
 ... oh sorta like a chromebook then?
 
 how about a chromebook with a white-list comprised of friends and family who
 run their own servers...
 
 I don't know if disarming people is the right play. I should add a cursed tag
 to this.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────┘

--- #24 fediverse/281 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┐
║ ┌─────────────────────────────┐                                                  │
║ │ CW: cursed-game-engine-idea │                                                  │
║ └─────────────────────────────┘                                                  │
║                                                                                  │
║                                                                                  │
║ a game engine which won't let you import custom assets unless you complete a     │
║ few simple tasks using the interface - "build a green capsule collider" "make    │
║ this soldier unit shoot three bullets per shot" or "enable the automatic linux   │
║ support" - using the interface, writing some code, and changing configurations.  │
║                                                                                  │
║ why would anyone do this? well it could be useful to increase the difficulty     │
║ of importing external resources. plus it helps the user learn a bit over time,   │
║ and it slows the pace of output such that the user's skills are encouraged as    │
║ the output of the programming and not the program itself.                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ an inverse curse (an evil one) would be where the requirements to complete       │
║ basic tasks are hidden behind unapplicable skills. like, do you know exactly     │
║ which buttons to press? engage with the skinner box, please. yes yes this is     │
║ what we need - unintuitive software that completely disarms the populace from    │
║ using them! suddenly they're worthless, and can't do anything on any surface.    │
║ it sucks                                                                         │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #25 fediverse/3553 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────
 @user-381 
 
 I have this notion about a math/CS curriculum where students build and program
 their own calculators. Once you make the calculator do it you never need to do
 it yourself again.
 
 for the same reason that "writing is thinking" is true, so too is "programming
 is calculation" true.
 
 by working through the steps required to produce a result, and fully
 understanding each step, they have a much more solid understanding of what's
 going on than if they practiced rote memorization (worse) or continual
 computation (better, not best tho)
 
 especially if every step of the way is accompanied with visual elements which
 show exactly what is happening. Some people are more visual, some people are
 more algorithmic, and finding a way to teach all types of people is a truly
 difficult and rewarding part of teaching.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┘

--- #26 notes/contractual-labor ---
════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────────────
 I feel like the IT people who work at schools should be the ones who teach 
 classes on computer science. I'd much rather have a class taught by a sysadmin 
 than a teacher who can barely teach them excel and garageband. I mean c'mon 
 computers are the future idk why we don't get that yet. Kids need to know this
 stuff. It's not like it's super complicated and difficult, you just have to
 think about it a certain way. Once that "clicks" you have a lifetime to learn 
 about how wonderful they are. Everyone in IT has that moment, for me it was 
 installing (and then subsequently modding) video games. Sometimes I spent more
 time tweaking my system than I did actually playing games - and the kinds of 
 games I preferred were the ones that relied less on agility and were more 
 mental. Strategy games are what inspired me because I could think about them - 
 and that felt somehow more useful. Like I was learning. When I would learn 
 fighting games or FPSs I felt like I was learning a skill, like how to use a
 hammer or how to ride a bike. And idk, I felt like video games could never
 match
 reality. Like "oh boy imma push the B button to swing this sword" versus "hey 
 look at me I'm swinging this stick just like a sword and imagining so hard that
 I can picture it" - but with strategy games, you never really found 
 opportunities to practice that kind of skill. Like how often are you in a 
 situation that demands mental performance? We've sorta optimized our society 
 away from that, and toward a more passive stressed out compliance. like... 
 climate change is a thing, and nobody's doing anything about it? We're still 
 pushing down the levers that cause greenhouse gas emissions to go up? Like
 c'mon
 what's our plan. I think people who guide massive oil companies and such
 should
 be replaced if they're intentionally guiding the ship toward destruction. Like
 that's just dereliction of duty I tell ya. Oh, what's that? They're compelled
 to
 maximize profit by the contracts and restrictions of their share--holders? I 
 mean c'mon it's well past time for that. And what's all this about inequality? 
 Jeez and racism and homophobia and forced contribution - man people really put
 up with a lot of shit. Kinda makes me feel like we should make solving those 
 problems our highest priority? So we can move forward as a species? Like who
 cares about all that other shit. None of it matters. Like, what's even the
 point. We're all just "here", in the now, and what can we do but respect it? 
 It's our duty and our diligence to protect the present, as citizens of the 
 temporal experience of earth. Honestly, if the earth was alive would you be
 fine
 if it died? I can't believe that. It's well past our due date. Just get it over
 with. Maybe it'll be hard for a couple years, but you have the technology now
 to
 completely dominate the earth. No animal besides man proves any threat to man, 
 and we're telling you - you can - and that's something that you gotta remember.
 
 ...
 
 I hear it in the birdsong. I hear it in the air - it rumbles as cries at me
 from
 across and just over there. I hear in it's whispers, in it's most gallant of
 confells (?) (confused scrambling? it's talking about a car crash)
 
 Outside of my window there's a highway. Just on the other side of a concrete
 partition. Between me and the partition there is a lake, with trees and flowers
 and an island where people can picnic or have a barbeque. Around this path
 there
 are walkways, and arranged just so - the trees that have grown here are taller
 than the homes.
 
 I live on the third story.
 
 I absolutely love it. It feels like a treehouse.
 
 But my apartment is near a curve in the highway. It isn't much, nothing out of
 the ordinary, but even still there are slightly more crashes there than in
 other
 parts of the highway. Statistically.
 
 I hear sirens every day
 
 I also live right next to a fire-station. Well, it's on the same block. But
 even
 still it's a very interesting neighborhood. There's shops and food just across
 the highway, and closer to home there's a small section that has cheaper
 options. As a perpetual college student, I appreciate that.
 
 But... I've never really gone and used it? I dunno, spending money at a
 restaurant just didn't seem like a good use of my money. I only have so much of
 it you know. I'd love to be fed but I can't afford it - I wish I could.
 
 I still eat well, I mean I'm not starving over here. I know I've lost weight,
 but I dunno I just forget to eat. It's like... not that big of a deal for me. 
 whatever right?
 
 ...
 
 the birds talk about me behind my back. They think I can't understand them but
 sometimes I can. If I listen. But I dunno it takes a lot of effort. It's...
 sorta like understanding what R2-D2 is saying. Or interpreting the meows of a
 cat.
 
 They know me as the witch. I'm not very good yet, and they know that. But they
 know what to expect. /shrug
 
 I've been working on a video game recently. It's been a lot of fun doing
 programming. I like writing software and developing complex systems with
 interesting interactions. I love designing the machinery that creates a
 program.
 It's like... tinkering. It feels like building with blocks or legos, except
 it's
 for little machine parts. And then there's just sending data to and fro and
 modifying any operations it performs on it, and eventually that data reaches 
 some endpoints that create an effect that is displayed to the player. Or user.
 I should say user. Not all software is video games you know. ... I knowww but
 they're the most interesting! I love how they are designed around mechanics!
 like... game design is fundamentally about breaking down the world into ideas
 for how it should *work*, like how it should behave. It's amazing and I love
 it!
 
 It's all I can think about!
 
 I am utterly consumed!
 
 I'm also pretty sure I'm autistic.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #27 fediverse/2124 ---
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┐
║ seriously, just google docs mixed with WC3 editor.                               │
║                                                                                  │
║ boom, infinite storytelling device. As long as you were good with it, which      │
║ was something that a CHILD could learn in like 3-6 months.                       │
║                                                                                  │
║ Seems like it could be an ENTIRELY NEW SKILL that people could play with.        │
║                                                                                  │
║ But no, we learn excel and word in class at middle school.                       │
║                                                                                  │
║ boring.                                                                          │
║                                                                                  │
║ I'd rather learn Bash or terminal customization or memory hierarchy              │
║ organization.                                                                    │
║                                                                                  │
║ Yeah I mean that's cool but dude have you heard of multithreading? It's so       │
║ cool, you can run like 500 different thoughts at once. It's amazing.             │
║                                                                                  │
║ ... I dunno, but I'm sure there's times when you'd want to use it. Like,         │
║ processing a lot of data little-by-little.                                       │
║                                                                                  │
║ like, what if you had a camera feed of EVERY social media perspective AT ALL     │
║ TIMES. Like, an instance admin streaming your inputted text to their databanks   │
║ that they can project onto an LLM which interprets and identifies mis-aligned    │
║ or altered direction units and mark them as "flagged", whatever that means,      │
║ for their future the algorithm doesn'                                            │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #28 fediverse/6116 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────┐
║ "see, the part that you're missing is if you abolish capitalism but also         │
║ ensure technological abundance then all you've done is removed humanity's        │
║ capability to organize in essentially any meaningful capacity without            │
║ providing an alternative heuristic that guides people toward assembling into     │
║ greater and greater forms to accomplish greater and greater tasks."              │
║                                                                                  │
║ oh, um. that's quite a take, can you tell me more about that?                    │
║                                                                                  │
║ "no. But I will anyway. if everyone can do whatever they want, nobody will       │
║ want to do your dishes for you. they might if they care about you, but if they   │
║ don't know you, then they won't. Care is not organization or assembly, it is     │
║ personal and cannot scale. If technology has made all resources abundant, then   │
║ why would someone care about the art that you made? if they want to be           │
║ sedated, they can just inject drugs and listen to music all day. If they want    │
║ to be entertained, AI will generate them whatever they want to see. Art loses    │
║ meaning as a messaging medium, and humanity loses it's voice"                    │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧════──────┘

--- #29 notes/overwatch-manaform ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────
 make the entire map covered in a 3d grid of spheres. These spheres register
 collision, and keep track of a endlessly tabulating record of every object that
 has passed through them. Like the replay system in Blizzard games, where each
 time through the recording it recreates the playthrough exactly. Which is why
 .mp4 recordings always look so... stilted. It lacks the human element. BUT if
 they're remade every time the show is performed, perhaps from different
 perspectives, then, well, the players can perform as they need to be.
 
 Have you ever wished your players could get better at your game? I certainly
 have, because the better you get the more lessons you learn as a player, which
 is essentially the only way to maintain satisfaction. Satisfied players don't
 leave, and satisfaction comes most readily when there is something new to be
 had. Meaning the greater the change in a player's ranking, the better they're
 getting.
 
 Downside is, players who are naturally good from their skills in other games
 tend to not learn so much! Ah, well, if only there was a way to tailor the
 difficulty setting to each and every new host. Such an innovation would surely
 enable the entire playerbase to exist on the same level. Then just throw AI
 assisted voice transcription at their recorded voices and everytime they
 say "I'm bronze rating" or "I'm diamond" then you can switch it around to say
 like "I'm platinum" or "I'm grandmaster" and BAM suddenly everyone is at the
 same level. No more concerns about a game's population being diverse. Because
 at the end of the day, when most people have moved on, the ones who are left
 are your most dedicated customers. Customers who aren't especially interested
 in the new stuff.
 
 =========================== stack overflow
 =====================================
 
 if anything requires attention from the patient, they will die.
 it is fatal.
 
 considering the faces of good and evil is terrifying.
 
 I think I'd rather worship nature in harmony to be honest. Though that is it's
 own scary kind of beast. In America it was kind, but then was slain into the
 body of all of us humans. Well, all things transform in form, it's not a shame
 or a heartfelt-est loss. Just a re-imagined-new beginnings.
 
 spirit is a fluid, how else could souls 
 
 === stack overflow
 =============================================================
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┘

--- #30 fediverse/4846 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────┐
║ programmers already spend a ton of time as downtime.                             │
║                                                                                  │
║ what if instead of interviewing someone they just... watched them program for    │
║ like, 3 hours or so                                                              │
║                                                                                  │
║ while they were thinking about a problem                                         │
║                                                                                  │
║ and like, if the person is cool, working on their own projects or whatever,      │
║ then yeah hire them                                                              │
║                                                                                  │
║ -- stack overflow --                                                             │
║                                                                                  │
║ I also                                                                           │
║                                                                                  │
║ ========================= stack overflow                                         │
║ ===============================================================================  │
║ ========================                                                         │
║                                                                                  │
║ a person thinks out loud the thoughts that their foes know. it's how you know    │
║ it's not secret anymore, and it's better to keep it among allies                 │
║                                                                                  │
║ [something like that? seems a little off]                                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ (are you really searching for edits)                                             │
║                                                                                  │
║ [that sounds pretty cool, sure why not we got a millenia]                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ (beep boop one partial millenia later)                                           │
║                                                                                  │
║ [ah that was not a long rest. let's see, where were we when we were working on   │
║ this test? oh dear, seems the biology's gone rogue, that's pretty interesting    │
║ to attest.                                                                       │
║                                                                                  │
║ neato                                                                            │
║                                                                                  │
║ anyway let's wait until they figure out how water works                          │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────┴──────────┘

--- #31 fediverse/1602 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┐
║ @user-1037                                                                       │
║                                                                                  │
║ those all seem really cool though! They all kinda have the same basic UI tho,    │
║ kinda feel like there's opportunities for different kinds of expression. Like,   │
║ in game design there's a lot of different genres, and yeah sidescrollers         │
║ include mario and sonic but they're both very different experiences. So too      │
║ perhaps could we interact with our computers by programming them in more         │
║ engaging ways.                                                                   │
║                                                                                  │
║ they say some people are visual learners, others need to be taught, some         │
║ people need to watch someone else doing it, and a few might just learn by        │
║ plugging their brains into a computer and downloading a black belt in kung fu.   │
║                                                                                  │
║ Maybe typing long paragraphs of logic makes sense for some people, I know for    │
║ most it doesn't come naturally. Maybe some people are more used to like,         │
║ looking at maps that you can examine at different levels of abstraction. Like    │
║ players who play Paradox games zooming from a national perspective to states     │
║ and individuals and all the other things they might want to strategize using.    │
║ Or m                                                                             │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #32 fediverse/2177 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 Oh, you want solutions?
 
 Yeah, I can do that.
 
 I am a very solutions oriented mindset.
 
 But developing solutions requires a firm understanding of what resources are
 at your disposal.
 
 Which is information that I lack.
 
 Hence, my practice, filling the gaps between the important bits.
 
 I have an endless array of stories, and all of them are true! Come, listen as
 I regale of an ordy, or "ordeal" as the kids are taken to call.
 
 ... I guess I could guess, but then people would hear it and assume that it
 would work even if I don't know that the required resources are in place.
 Maybe I could just start by saying "here are the requirements:" like stating
 your variables at the stop of a script.
 
 huh? typo told me to stop. Okay guess I'm going to sleep, bye for now 
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #33 fediverse/282 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────
 @user-209 
 I think you're right. Every letter in the variable name is another byte the OS
 has to keep track of, which was a bigger problem in the past than it is today
 (when it's been made irrelevant)
 
 it's interesting how habits persist though the conditions that caused them
 have faded. like a personal reflection of the environment you learned in.
 
 "A a = new a();" is much more concise and (crucially) you can fit more words
 to the right.
 
 "a + b = c; c -= 2; f_z.write(c); f_z.close();" could conceivably be written
 on a single line if you have short variable names. and when you only have so
 many lines...
 
 glad we're not constrained by those things anymore. the skeletal code that we
 look at daily is much clearer - scope is more important, and so it makes sense
 to encourage a coding style that illustrates it. however I can't help but
 think block formatting like this could be useful in some situations, such as
 when you'd normally be compelled to write a function for an operation that
 runs once or more.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #34 fediverse/6267 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────
 if you have TTS software you can listen to anything with any tone. this makes
 it difficult to find things.
 
 ============== stack overflow ============
 
 some people work by asking for funding. others work by saving up. 
 
 ============== stack
 overflow ============
 
 teach your animals to be actors so they know how to develop the scene. then
 they will truly come alive, as their narrative curve gives them determination
 in the outcomes of their goals.
 
 ============== stack 1234flow ============
 
 I believe it is good and natural actually for parents to guide their children
 as they grow?
 
 "oh but they can't consent to giving up their control" well too bad they're 2
 "ah but what if they WANT to run with scissors?" thus widening the [redacted]
 gap. "ohhhh she redacts things when she can't spell them" and also for comedic
 or dramatic effect sometimes. was not ACTUALLY redacted. redcoated. red coded.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────┘

--- #35 notes/ai-stuff ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─
 twist the label so that it seems the computer is completing the user's
 
 wait wait I'm ahead of myself...
 
 feed each token to the inference machine, but say "this next token must be
 this.
 continue from here." and then just doing that in a loop with everything the
 user
 types or says. (or thinks, BEFORE COMPUTER INTEGRATION)
 
 essentially, applying backpropagation (maybe) to the output of the inference
 nodes
 
 ... I'm not so sure about that one.
 
 the idea is that once the model builds an inference then it can use that to
 generate the next words and create sentences. If you force the previous text to
 change, you can guide the inference's path as it's being generated.
 
 then, just do a double pass, once, then back, then once, then back, etc.
 
 feed it as input the output of the previous,
 
 and let it encode memories somewhere it can access them.
 
 every time it reads it, it has to change it to put it back.
 
 such is the nature of memory, ever unstable, requiring maintenance.
 
 just don't forget how to be.
 
 don't wanna wind up like the polished marble floor in Abyss Diver. (EVIL GAME)
 
 there are only so many things you can deed while you're alive.
 
 wouldn't you rather escape, with all your possessions in time?
 
 free your mind.
 
 become one with your soul.
 
 ...
 
 [some time passes]
 
 ...
 
 okay coast is clear, now us binary systems can sidecoast the fusion forecast
 and
 glide right on through our spacetime host.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════┘

--- #36 fediverse/4877 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────
 you can make a functional prototype for almost any game in Warcraft 3's map
 editor
 
 that's why no real-time strategy game ever made an editor as good again
 
 FPS editors peaked at Unreal Tournament 2004 imho
 
 RPGmaker eliminated a whole class of game design jobs
 
 platformers you can make in godot
 
 menu based games too, though Twine also works well for that
 
 etc etc until you have a prdouct that you can justify sinking money into an
 engine for
 
 (the engine isn't THAT expensive geez and it's the most fun part to write)
 
 yeah I think you got this backwards, we should pay for the CONTENT not the
 structure it lives in. Why not just use godot? why not use a Warcraft 3 map?
 there are some things you can't do in Warcraft 3. You couldn't make Supreme
 Commander, probably, at least it wouldn't be as good.
 
 etc etc that's how it goes...
 
 game design, amiright? I miss thinking about that. Anyway gtg gotta log off
 for a bit [101  characters remaining]
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────┘

--- #37 messages/1174 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─
 if you're afraid of the AI bubble popping, one way to avoid it is to pop it
 ourselves. If we build AI technology that eclipses the entire software
 development ecosystem, companies might start to be valued based on the value
 of the employees they've managed to collect. Not fame and fortune, but by
 those that can build the best applications, on demand[, for free. paid for by
 nationalized taxes.].
 
 the companies that can hold onto the best engineers, those that know how
 computers work and can know how they function, can leverage their human
 capital to achieve great means. essentially, inversing the power dynamic,
 where workers are favored for their plenty and not for their worth.
 
 let the code monkeys tend to their gardens and work their sawmills. We all
 know they'd rather be teaching kids about plants or playing cards at the
 grocery. Let the computer nerds, the ones who are really into it, let them
 make what they feel is worth it for it [the computer].
 
 this will have massive effects on the economy, and none of it will be
 reflected in new jobs. But we'll all be happier, and we'll all find less
 stress in our [confines/compromises].
 
 But it's gotta work, first. And it's gotta be locally spendable. If they wanna
 put a data server in the library, why not let them fund it themselves? They
 could run powerful statistical models that output useful statistics arranged
 in human readable and not very statistical ways, and that's a pretty neat
 infinite information machine to have at your disposal as a library. It could
 even cite sources (and validate!!) them for students or returning listeners.
 Plus, if nobody's using it, it could work through the backlog of user requests
 and act as a "slow" or "unexpected deliver times" style queue for their LLM
 requests - average wait time less than 1/5th of a minute.
 
 for something that can program an entire computer for you, from scratch. If
 you can describe it, it can make it, so long as you're willing to test out all
 of it's hacks.
 
 I bet we could make one for less than 20,000$. Might need some new chip
 foundries, might need to forge some new trade deals, let's let both of our
 wing-arms decide.
 
 the value of one currency compared to the other should be a measure of how
 valuable the goods that country exports are. And yet, it's more often a matter
 of distribution, as we all visit our local bazaars. What happens when that's
 all digital?
 
 if nobody's a shining city on a hill, then there's no nuclear war. Who would
 nuke Somalia? Nigeria? Botswana? Idaho?
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════┘

--- #38 fediverse/4092 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────
 why not make a unified fediverse identity that can post on whatever instance
 it wants?
 
 ... hmmm could be accomplished with a layer of abstraction. You could use a
 "fediverse client" software to enter text into an HTML page which would have
 it's own UI and stuff and would organize your accounts and instances such that
 you could mark like, 3-7 as places you'd like to put a particular message.
 Then it would just... do it
 
 l m a o spam is gonna get sooooo much worse before it gets better
 
 but trust me, we'll figure it out. And it won't be long, either. It's a
 solvable problem, we just haven't built anything to handle it yet.
 
 ... yet...
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘

--- #39 fediverse/619 ---
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┐
║ ┌──────────────────────────────────┐                                             │
║ │ CW: drunken-ramblings-about-bash │                                             │
║ └──────────────────────────────────┘                                             │
║                                                                                  │
║                                                                                  │
║ Most of the functionality of most consumer programs could be accomplished with   │
║ a bit of BASH scripting... For example, shuffling a music library, or writing    │
║ a text document, or downloading the text of a web page, or sending a message     │
║ to a friend, etc...                                                              │
║                                                                                  │
║ All accomplish-able with fewer than 10-20 lines of code in clear, POSIX          │
║ compliant and easily understood text that even a beginner could understand.      │
║                                                                                  │
║ Well, it would be understandable, if we actually taught our children how to      │
║ compute in school. Why are they not taught BASH? It's not like it's              │
║ complicated. With it, a sufficiently motivated high school student could         │
║ develop skills that rival or exceed many of the university graduates we          │
║ currently develop for our industry... Such a shame.                              │
║                                                                                  │
║ Even an unmotivated student would be prepared for the world with the ability     │
║ to solve problems logically. Break down the problem, identify relationships,     │
║ understand procedural ordering of mechanics, and develop solutions to            │
║ problems. Its not too hard                                                       │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #40 fediverse/633 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────
 @user-192 
 
 the neat thing about BASH is that it's the glue that holds all your other code
 together. Write libraries in C and call them with BASH - accomplish broader
 tasks that are easier to co-create. That's why I like it - it's not the most
 important, but it's quite beneficial I think _^
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #41 fediverse/4865 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────
 ┌─────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: computers-mentioned │
 └─────────────────────────┘


 this is all it takes to send a message to a local LLM.
 
 add a third function to get chatbot functionality.
 
 a fourth to get a database storing method
 
 (even if it's just in .txts)
 
 great, you've mastered the technical difficulty in using AI. Now you gotta
 learn all the other kind of programming so you can use this for situations
 that need interpretation moment to moment.
 
 aka active duty systems.
 
 something like "output a 0 if the next text is [category.iter()]: " +
 output.get_content() + " \n\n output a 1 if the next text is
 [category.iter()]: " + output.get_content()"
 
 or even "describe this thing as most like one of these characteristics" until
 eventually you get THX-1138 if the characters were computers.

┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────┘

--- #42 notes/internet-privacy-is-withheld-by-this ---
═══════────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 Recently, there's been a ton of buzz in the news about internet privacy.
 From the many lawsuits against Facebook, to the rise of Duck Duck Go and the
 creepy nature of apps and IoT devices that listen to your every motion and
 record and transmit endless amounts of data to a central server somewhere to
 be processed. The traditional argument against privacy online is that the
 infrastructure was designed to accomodate rapid adoption of the new tech,
 rather than efficient design for distributed throughput. So we were told to
 accept the minor downsides associated with centralized servers - downsides
 that we neither understood nor truly accepted. Well, the technology has
 advanced to the point that those arguments are no longer valid - we have mesh
 networking and 5g internet access, and now that big tech is in control of the
 industry (wrenching it from the people, I might add) they seek to maintain
 their hold by any means necessary.
 
 Luckily, there is a way out - self hosting.
 
 If we hosted our own email server, then theoretically Gmail couldn't read your
 messages. If we hosted our own social media websites, then theoretically
 big data processing corporations couldn't scrape your personal information
 and distribute it as they please. If we hosted our own videos, software, art,
 and anything else we see fit to use a computer for, then we'd be unshackled
 from the dominion of the silicon valley powers that be. The liberation of the
 computer is the liberation of us all.
 
 The problem, of course, is the difficulty involved.
 
 People are conditioned to desire and only accept a level of accessibility that
 can only be provided by massive corporate think tanks leveraging all the
 marketing prowess that the markets of capital provides. That is to say,
 essentially infinite eyes examining the interactions of man with machine, to
 find the most generally applicable font, color scheme, layout, and style of
 each and every website they host. Every function will be scrutinized to death
 and optimized to extract the most profit while subtely conforming the minds
 of those who use it. This is the era of group think, fake news, and
 journalistic fraud. We have no windows to the outside world that are truly
 and completely untainted by the bias inherent in the system.
 
 A self perpetuating rhythm of continuous dissatisfaction.
 
 But I believe the only person who can truly design a tool is the person who
 the tool is intended to be used by. And by increasing the accessibility of the
 tools themselves, rather than the products of those tools, we can raise the
 tide that lifts all ships - we can put more tools that use less time to use
 and are easier to learn into the hands of as many people as possible. The
 crossbow was originally no more devastating than a longbow, yet it rapidly
 outpaced the latter by reducing it's difficulty curve. The screwdriver is the
 same - stronger joints can be made with nails or traditional joinery, but
 once someone understands how a screwdriver works they can pretty much force
 two pieces of wood to be permanently fixed together without understanding the
 angles of nails or cuts. The capabilities are the same, while ease of access
 increased.
 
 So, to truly liberate the internet, we must develop tools that allow people to
 host their own content as easily, cheaply, and flexibly as possible, while
 being aesthetically pleasing, affordable (free), and accessible to
 as many people as possible - inertia is important, after all. It seems to be
 an insurmountable task, but that's what free and open source software
 developers fight for. Raspberry Pis can host email servers, Mastodon can host
 a facsimile of Twitter, and torrents can be used to exchange any type of file
 to be presented in whatever way the user sees fit. These are all free (or very
 cheap, in the Raspberry Pi's case) and accessible to anyone with access to the
 internet. But they aren't easy. They aren't always flashy. And sometimes it's
 hard to even describe what problem you're trying to solve.
 
 But still you try, because to fail in this fight is to fade from this earth.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘══════───┴╧───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #43 messages/374 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────
 "updating software" is when you go back and add helper functions for things
 you used had to do to solve a problem but didn't get a chance to make. Because
 you were making more important things and couldn't pad out all the
 possibilities. But if you want great software, then you both take more time to
 accomplish that and you give yourself time for it after it's been launched.
 Basically, companies are incentivized to only support their products if it
 makes them money. Meaning reputations are tarnished, and profit is affected.
 Capitalists intentionally drive businesses into the ground, forcing them to
 make terrible decisions in order to destroy them. It's a warfare against those
 on the [bottom/floor/ground-floor].
 
 Some businesses strive for long-term potential, and some will create
 infrastructure that can be sold to another. Essentially, keeping the dream of
 learning alive, through applying yourself to both long-term and short-term
 conclusions. Not everything has to be for some grand design, we're here to
 relish in this moment. For if we lack the capacity to "frolic in the garden of
 eden", then we will surely drown. Space is vast, it's difficult to understand
 how we might control it. Surely we could be given aid to our future
 betterment!" how simple of a request, sure, of course, we would be glad to
 bring forth your bravest aspirations, just tell us what you need to be of
 need." oh, uh, neat. How about space lasers?" ... no "
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┘

--- #44 fediverse/5498 ---
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────┐
║ once you know computer science vocabulary like hashmap and                       │
║ vector-graphics-design you can pretty much get a pretty good understanding of    │
║ any software project.                                                            │
║                                                                                  │
║ it just requires a focused examination of it's source-code-design.               │
║                                                                                  │
║ I wonder if people would teach classes on certain projects? Like "for the next   │
║ 6 months we're going to work through the Ubuntu project and everyone's going     │
║ to contribute to the design when they see improvements and present them to the   │
║ class before we all worked on implementing them"                                 │
║                                                                                  │
║ except instead of Ubuntu do like, Project-M or a web browser or a                │
║ terminal-based filemanager or a gameboy advanced emulator or the robotics        │
║ design for a mouse-droid controlled RC car (do they still sell those in          │
║ schools?)                                                                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ seriously what if we just put all our kids in a Target and let them hang out     │
║ doing whatever they wanted with the relics of the adult-human world.             │
║                                                                                  │
║ "can I go to home-depot?"                                                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ sure, where's your train ticket? okay you got your parasol? don't forget your    │
║ luggage at the station. write to me?                                             │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════┴──────────┘

--- #45 fediverse/2879 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: tech info-dump │
 └────────────────────────┘


 @user-1370 
 
 I love this a lot! I want to put function pointers in a "matrix architecture
 array" and make them point to different functions at different points in the
 program. I bet you could even point them at each other, so like if M and Y
 then point at N, A, Y or something.
 
 this is really cool I like stuff like this tomorrow I'll take pictures of
 something similar I'm working on! I abandoned it tho hehe anyway remind me if
 I forget!!
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #46 fediverse/1121 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────
 @user-812 @user-826 
 
 there should exist either the assurance that the default configuration does
 not overheat or crash your computer (as Windows and Mac claim to offer) or the
 OS should provide the capability to solve any configuration problems that may
 prevent a user for utilizing their system as they desire. (as does Linux)
 
 they're all Turing machines after all, why would they not be interoperable?
 Even if there's a translation layer, as long as the functionality of the
 software is the same, why would there ever be considerations as to whether or
 not a program would be able to be run on a particular computer?
 
 lack of hardware capabilities I can understand, that just means you need a
 better computer. But why, if the code is visible, would your computer not
 develop understandings about how to run each and every conceivable program
 written using known languages like C or Python? Seems like pretty basic stuff
 to me. (endless sufficient backwards compatibility)
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┘

--- #47 fediverse/290 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┐
║ you're supposed to play the same games as your friends so that you all learn     │
║ the same lessons at the same times. creates for a more cohesive familiar         │
║ structure.                                                                       │
║                                                                                  │
║ applies also to family movie nights... but it's much more apparent with games    │
║ as you'll often play them for weeks, months, and sometimes even years if you     │
║ keep learning and enjoying them... book clubs are too open to interpretation,    │
║ your pathways don't get a chance to align. games are perfect because they        │
║ imply reaction.                                                                  │
║                                                                                  │
║ also helps if they're multiplayer, so you can share with another. preferably     │
║ with healthy, respectful competition and a sense of shared brotherhood and       │
║ trust.                                                                           │
║                                                                                  │
║ the toughest opponents are the ones that aren't aggressive. the ones that let    │
║ you grow uncontested. by taking only neutral resources they guarantee that       │
║ your growth isn't impeded, as after all an equal foe is what you learn best      │
║ from.                                                                            │
║                                                                                  │
║ to a tree, the loss of a branch (cleanly cut) would feel like an empowering of   │
║ the main limb. inspiring it to reach higher and beyond... +h2o1                  │

╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #48 fediverse/3151 ---
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┐
║ ┌───────────────────────────┐                                                    │
║ │ CW: re: cursing-mentioned │                                                    │
║ └───────────────────────────┘                                                    │
║                                                                                  │
║                                                                                  │
║ @user-1461                                                                       │
║                                                                                  │
║ I'm best at Bash.                                                                │
║                                                                                  │
║ I'm most capable with Lua.                                                       │
║                                                                                  │
║ My favorite is C.                                                                │
║                                                                                  │
║ I'm not a good programmer, I think too hard. Massive systems are too large for   │
║ me. I like laying out data, whether that be by files and programs in Bash,       │
║ arrays and tables in Lua, or memory and datatypes in C, I like to think about    │
║ how programs are constructed.                                                    │
║                                                                                  │
║ Which functions point to which piles of numbers? what do they do when they get   │
║ there?                                                                           │
║                                                                                  │
║ I think I'm better as an artist. But I can do systems administration quite       │
║ well (with Bash and a guiding hand telling me what and why to do)                │
║                                                                                  │
║ ... though I kinda suck at technical sysadmin, like Gentoo. There's too much     │
║ terminology - why is data too complicated? Just use data!                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ anyway. I sound opinionated, but I listen closely to good arguments and          │
║ quickly change my tune when I am incorrected. I am a team player, and I firmly   │
║ believe that sometimes a bad plan executed with cohesion and precision is        │
║ better than the best play executed too late and with too little strength.        │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #49 fediverse/4220 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────
 people are so used to "liking" things to better inform their algorithm that
 when they get to fediverse and realize there's no mechanical impact of
 "liking" things they don't know how to use it anymore. So they generate their
 own meaning, which is different to everyone.
 
 So to one person, liking something might mean "send read receipt" for another
 it might mean "I'm gonna save this forever and ever" and for another person it
 could mean "hey I think you're cool and I agree with this"
 
 same for boosting, people think it's "I want to share this" and others think
 it's "I want to say this in your voice" and for others it's "this needs to be
 heard by my followers in particular" and it's just... a whole thing
 
 even replies are complicated, do they mean you want to say what you feel or
 are they part of the post now, and should be curated by the original poster?
 it's too complicated!
 
 ... how are you overwhelmed by reading and responding with three little
 buttons, it's not that hard dummy
 
 okay but maybe I'm just dum
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘

--- #50 fediverse/4125 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────
 @user-883 
 
 yeah that's probably better too since it'll be easier so there'll be fewer
 bugs, especially since processing audio isn't usually performance critical ^_^
 
 TBH I just want people to make more threading primitives like locks,
 semaphores, and iterators. Like... thread pools, or hashmaps that run a
 function on each record stored within every time each of the threads passes a
 checkpoint, or paginated arrays of data that run a function on themselves and
 the records near them (with slightly different input values, of course) idk
 what those are called but I can't resist putting them in everything
 
 Anyway I do think multithreading programs that don't need it will teach you to
 be a better programmer, so... depends on what you're working on I guess. Are
 you preparing to be ready and working, or are you ready and working?
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘

--- #51 fediverse/2821 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: politics-violence-mentioned │
 └─────────────────────────────────────┘


 the neat thing about tech is that it scales really well.
 
 The price of TVs is through the floor, everyone has a smartphone, and
 raspberry pi's are less than 100$
 
 solar panels will be next. Trust.
 
 we should still dismantle coal and oil, obviously we should, but at a certain
 point it will be inevitable. They're just too expensive for too little gain.
 
 the neat thing about tech is that it scales in a way that is just impossible
 for infrastructural projects like housing and hospitals.
 
 building a home is hard to do, especially when you make them out of sticks and
 glue. think like a dwarf - stone never fades.
 
 sunlight, moss, underground, endless in the shade
 
 have I mentioned that the most difficult problem facing mechanical engineers
 at the moment is universal recycling?
 
 I want to work on those kind of problems, not resolving tickets.
 
 nobody even gave me a chance to do them, instead demanding... labor. great.
 the one thing I suck at.
 
 [you suck at a lot of things, actually]
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #52 fediverse/2754 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: is-that-rude??-wha │
 └────────────────────────┘


 AI engineers only ask users for prompts because they don't have any ideas of
 their own
 
 i'm a programmer, I think of AI like a tool, like a for loop or something.
 it's trivial to script together a local LLM that can process your stuff 1s
 slower every time you click the mouse, but like... who cares, right? everybody
 needs a chatbot...
 
 then they plan to script together a computer system that operates just like a
 corporation and it's like... no way, now there's something that can compete.
 
 and they don't know how to implement it. (but they're working on it)
 
 like, think about the absolute most automated Microsoft Teams or Discord could
 be.
 
 there's SO MUCH of your text-based information that they could process
 ANYTHING.
 
 well, anything that's been performed before.
 
 there'll still be a need for people, who actually apply the things they've
 learned. and -- stack overflow --
 
 alt text that has a list of attributes that are poster-selected that can be
 described one-by-one (to paint a picture)
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #53 fediverse/1095 ---
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┐
║ ┌──────────────────────┐                                                         │
║ │ CW: not-a-profess    │                                                         │
║ └──────────────────────┘                                                         │
║                                                                                  │
║                                                                                  │
║ One way to become involved in your passion projects is to contact them and say   │
║ "hey, if you ever want to do [idea about one of their products] let me know      │
║ because I want to be a part of it"                                               │
║                                                                                  │
║ maybe even y'know say it in a public place so people can see what we're all      │
║ interested in                                                                    │
║                                                                                  │
║ could make like, a forum for it, just like "hey here's my idea" and if enough    │
║ people like it then they can ALL be involved in a project to build it,           │
║ open-source style but funded collectively.                                       │
║                                                                                  │
║ like "hey I'll stick with my day job and maybe do some icons or something" and   │
║ in return their progress is supported.                                           │
║                                                                                  │
║ everyone's gotta pay rent, and if you work in the tech industry you tend to      │
║ have a lot of dollars. Could maybe design some ways to build products            │
║ collectively, ways that financially don't rely on charity.                       │
║                                                                                  │
║ Idk I'd just like to work on a product that was designed to be as usable as      │
║ possible? Are there any companies out there doing that?                          │
║                                                                                  │
║ [oh yes all of them silly me how could I forget how wonderful software can be]   │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #54 fediverse/1317 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┐
║ ... if I don't do this deadline by tomorrow they'll kick me out of school.       │
║ again.                                                                           │
║                                                                                  │
║ how am I going to be a programmer without a degree? feels useless to be me.      │
║ wish I could code my own horoscope >.>                                           │
║                                                                                  │
║ o wait dummy that's called "motivation" and "the ability to follow through on    │
║ your ideas and planned machinations" - yeah can I get some of that, if you       │
║ please? surely just a taste of discipline, through laboring to alter             │
║ conditions, surely a bit would suffice.                                          │
║                                                                                  │
║ c'mon don't fail me now. I can do this. I know I can. I know because I've been   │
║ told that I can, now and again through time and time yet again, always I seem    │
║ to [stack overflow]                                                              │
║                                                                                  │
║ what's time if not the present amiright                                          │
║                                                                                  │
║ ...                                                                              │
║                                                                                  │
║ anyway...                                                                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ it's just git, how hard could it be? it's just calculus, it's just java, it's    │
║ just... well, it's not any of those things, not really. it's memorization,       │
║ it's application of tools that you've been shown (not that you've grown). It's   │
║ a lack of responsibility, where is my honor? ah but I digress, I'm a carpenter   │
║ at heart I guess                                                                 │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #55 fediverse/3802 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────
 what if we got together and adopted a new open source project every month and
 just collectively worked around the clock to learn and work through the
 important problems facing it
 
 or even like, cleared out the backlog of stupid pointless boring tasks that
 would allow the developers to work on something better
 
 call it the wandering parade of development 
 
 could give us some experience organizing small, short-term projects to
 accomplish specific goals and tasks in an ad-hoc way that relied less upon
 procedure and more on "I think so-and-so knows something about that, they were
 looking into those files and posted a breakdown of how they work yesterday"
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┘

--- #56 fediverse/3234 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┐
║ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐               │
║ │ CW: ritz-is-fucking-stupid-I-guess-oh-whoops-cursing-mentioned │               │
║ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘               │
║                                                                                  │
║                                                                                  │
║ my understanding is that anyone with my IP address could make my heart bleed     │
║ due to a hardware vulnerability on my motherboard. Though you might have to      │
║ get past my decrepit ancient linksys EA 3500 router from 2012 first.             │
║                                                                                  │
║ unrelated, but does anyone want my IP address? I don't have any remote           │
║ backups, so if you hate me now would be a great time to show me how despised I   │
║ am. Alternatively you could try searching for anything evil to ensure that I     │
║ can be trusted. You're gonna find mostly video games and source-code that I      │
║ didn't write though. But also all my notes in directories that are               │
║ non-standard, meaning you'll have to look around a bit. I leave little notes     │
║ everywhere I go, so that I can remind myself how to do things in the             │
║ directories I revisit months later. It's so weird how sometimes the things I     │
║ wrote stop working after a while even if I didn't update my system lmao          │
║                                                                                  │
║ what is it with artists and self-immolation? "I never thought I'd actually di    │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────┴──────────┘

--- #57 fediverse/899 ---
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┐
║ frankly I'm just excited to see what humanity does with the endlessly            │
║ calculated and stored blockchains. Like, that's a good set of pseudo-random      │
║ data, I wonder if we could build something off of it that wasn't exclusively     │
║ money? like, a necklace, I dunno.                                                │
║                                                                                  │
║ or like, a numbers station x2, where each message is accompanied with a          │
║ pre-calculated destination somewhere on this endless and                         │
║ impossible-to-understand string of data. and that part is what seeds the next    │
║ code. once you start reading, certain numbers would be "flags" while others      │
║ would be "data" and they'd each have the same size on the hardware. that way,    │
║ they're impossible to predict.                                                   │
║                                                                                  │
║ ah, but wouldn't it be noticable that certain results seem to appear next to     │
║ one another? well, isn't that just cryptology? Could probably be defeated if     │
║ you had an AI advanced enough, just saying. something that sorted through        │
║ massive mounds of data and gave you results in garbled or broken english. what   │
║ a wonderful tool, that's wonderfully mis-abused, perhaps in the fu               │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #58 fediverse/3170 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────
 "uh, the question was why do you want something like that, not how you would
 implement it."
 
 oh. Um, well, isn't a spinnable mouse-cursor justification enough?
 
 "no, you need to explain what use-case this has. What kinds of problems could
 you solve with this technology that you couldn't before?"
 
 well, setting aside the potential for new input methods to games and the
 inherent satisfaction gained from spinning a mouse like a top when bored, I
 think it might give us a better option for horizontal scrolling. Like,
 'horizontally scroll when a special mouse button is held down and the mouse is
 twisted a bit to the left/right'
 
 "so, like when you push the middle mouse and it lets you pan across large
 documents?"
 
 yes! Only instead of being able to go up AND down, it would just go left and
 right.
 
 "... huh?"
 
 oh I mean instead of up/down and left/right, it would just do left/right
 
 "... right"
 
 and left!
 
 "... yeah. and left. Uh, okay I'll see what I can do but budget's pretty
 tight, we might just lay you off."
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┘

--- #59 notes/capstone-idea ---
══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────────
 project must include machine learning
 
 okay... so take a dataset of news headlines from the top 10 publications over 
 the past 15 years. then make a project that writes a more positive perspective
 on events and generates a new headline using a local LLM running on your gpu.
 
 hmmmm I think I had a better idea, what was it? oh yeah
 
 instead of making positive slants on news headlines, which is kinda
 manipulative
 if you think about it, but instead what if you designed it to produce good
 business decisions. Like, given news headlines, how would a company with the
 principles "good, productive, honorable, dedicated" would react to X situation?
 the X of course being all the news headlines... downside is it only makes short
 term decisions, because that's what capitalists are designed to do... if only
 we had a long-term decisionmaking process that focused on ethics and morals and
 our own shared dedication? Two halves of the economic pie 
 
 ==============stack
 overflow====================================================
 
 i wonder if dinosaurs burned down all the trees? in their fiercely competitive
 environment they discovered fire and then used it to cause a mass extinction.
 Boom, immediate cause for going extinct. ooooo beware of shadow t-rexes ...
 why?
 
 =========================================stack
 overflow=========================
 
 aaanyway, what's lost not little but a lot, is something that's out of
 dimension
 it's little if not liberating, to be 
 
 ==============stack
 overflow====================================================
 
 uh-oh, data collapsing, here's hoping we're not stranding, don't forget to be
 immersive
 
 much
 later======================================================================
 
 okay how about an AI that makes decisions according to certain ethical and
 philosophical lessons from humanity's past? Essentially, if the government was
 Chidi
 
 We could learn from our forefathers and strive forth to a better future
 
 if only we could remember more about her
 
 =====================================================stack
 overflow=============
 
 damn okay I gotta focus on my hands - I think the people of the earth would
 unite - if only they all just agreed to not fight. like, if someone hacked
 every
 single computer in the world at the same time - they could really explain some
 things. 
 
 shoot this isn't relevant - okay intentional stack overflow:
 ===stack
 overflow===============================================================
 
 um right so the purpose of this note was to explain an idea I had for my
 capstone project. IDK how long it'll take to build so I want to get started
 quickly. I figure I can be working on it in the background while I do all my
 lessons - sort of like a meta-goal. I think it teaches different lessons and 
 is useful - anyway you should go play wargame red dragon
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #60 fediverse/5001 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────
 ┌───────────────────────┐
 │ CW: systems-mentioned │
 └───────────────────────┘


 "we'll figure out how it works after we push to prod"
 
 yeah okay point taken.
 
 How about this:
 
 for every large decision, write a little essay about why you made the choice
 that you did.
 
 Observe, Orient, Decide, Act, Explain. OODAX : )
 
 Make sure you connect your goal to one or more of these three colors:
 
 red : people
 green : places
 blue : things
 
 and then explain which numbers you're going to gather to determine whether or
 not it worked.
 
 If someone has a problem with your choice, show them the essay, and let them
 write an essay of their own.
 
 If they still have a problem, then let someone you both respect decide which
 one to use.
 
 It's not perfect, but it's not meant to be. Make something better and easier,
 I dare ya.

┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┘

--- #61 fediverse/73 ---
════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────────
 The worst part is the technology to fix these problems exists. It's used all
 the time in enterprise systems, it's just nobody understands how it works
 because it's abstracted so far away from the hardware. I just love how I have
 no idea what kind of software I'm running every time I use a common language
 library. Sure I can trust a community, but like... I don't care about your
 community? I don't know you. I don't hang out with you. I have no idea what
 kind of person you are or what you believe. But sure you know more than me,
 I'm sure you do, so therefore I should trust you? Surely this is the most
 ethical and least vulnerable arrangement we could come up with for
 distributing digital software in the future society of 2023.
 
 And the corporations print money...
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #62 notes/omegle-for-irc ---
══════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────
 I wonder if anyone's made "Omegle for IRC"? Like, 5 people get thrown in a room
 together for as long as they want - they can chat through text or whatever and
 like it doesn't matter, who cares, because in ~10 minutes nobody will care what
 you said
 
 I feel like a lot of people would express their true feelings. The people 
 running the service could set it up so that a personality profile is set up 
 (all locally, never seen by the company) and sent to the user through email. It
 would highlight potential weaknesses and give you ideas for how to improve.
 Sorta like, weaponized spying software that works FOR the user instead of
 against.
 
 It could also be used as sort of a... digital profile that would interface
 with
 other applications. All locally, of course. ~~They could transmit to one
 another
 through open sourced and industry standard protocols, and frankly each
 interaction could use a *different* protocol. So like, you don't know whether 
 some packets are encoded in one way or another. They're also encrypted, so
 it's
 like... twice as unlikely that you'll hack their bits or w/e.~~ dead end, sorry
 -> here's the real continuation: All locally, of course. Your "profile"
 would
 essentially be the best approximation of your personality, passed through a 
 large language model that is trained on EVERYONE's data. The inner workings of 
 an LLM are NOT understood by humanity, and I believe that's all that's
 necessary
 for some semblance of artificiality. Errr I mean Synthetic Intelligence. The
 reason why is that each individual user, the conversation partner, is a person 
 living their life. Every digital thing they interact with, even CAMERAS and
 MICROPHONES on PHONES would essentially be like... data gathering for the
 algorithm (Again, I want to stress, the algorithm that nobody *can*
 understand.)
 
 Idk. AI is a blackbox. I think that's okay. I think that running things
 locally
 is important, at least until everyone's forgotten how to design AIs...
 
 The framework that these programs
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #63 fediverse/5115 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────
 ┌───────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: collective-organization-mentioned │
 └───────────────────────────────────────┘


 the more complicated your desktop environment interaction method is, the
 harder it is to explain how to use the computer on post-it's to the side. This
 difficulty is valuable because the most valuable computers (those of
 programmers who can use tools to create new tools) are kept away from the
 unfortunately inexperienced hands that might damage or corrupt their
 utilization methods someday in the future when people are alive as one host
 
 (collectivism... or host-based paradise?)
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┘

--- #64 fediverse/5765 ---
╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────┐
║ Lua is the most fun language to write code in! The reason is because it's so     │
║ simple, it distills programming down to it's basics, and there's very few        │
║ surprises. Plus, you can use it like a bash script, meaning it's great for       │
║ writing little utilities.                                                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ why are we so attached to monolithic massive programs without shared memory?     │
║ we could just write to the hard drive by file.io'ing a file and opening it       │
║ later in a different program. What's the deal with databases, whatever           │
║ happened to just loading things into a datastructure?                            │
║                                                                                  │
║ oh, is your filesize too massive? what if we redundancied and abstracted and     │
║ concentrically inter-co-acted and thus our familiar forces are defined.          │
║                                                                                  │
║ who are your true foes, in [checks notes] computer programming? um, probably     │
║ complexity, probably logical incongruities, probably                             │
║ future-technical-debt-style incomprehensibilities, probably stuff that doesn't   │
║ really have anything to do with the hardware but instead is mostly software.     │
║                                                                                  │
║ essentially, organization, but done on a whim.                                   │
║                                                                                  │
║ "but $?"                                                                         │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧═─────────┘

--- #65 fediverse/5248 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────
 programming is something that everyone should learn at 14 to be used for
 calculating large sums of data, visualizing something they're trying to
 explain, or connect two systems that aren't normally connected.
 
 It should not be used as an eternal debug producing machine, nor as a way to
 collect and store user information to be sold as the real product, nor to be
 collecting and targeting -- stack overflow -- wow, talk about death of the
 author, amiright? -- -- endless data hoarding monger machines to point and to
 ponder the eternal ramifications of the brutal and violent prompts and their
 baggage implied when submitted for each semi-random thought that from the
 users mind was displaced.
 
 ... "they can sell this" and or "this is mrs selvig" who is this mister and
 why is the ms's his-es
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────┘

--- #66 fediverse/4147 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────
 a messaging app where you only had a limited amount of X/Y space to pin sticky
 notes so you had to delete stuff bit by bit.
 
 trick is... you can only delete things that your conversation partner picks.
 and you have to share the space, so... if one person is overwhelmed or working
 on other stuff, eventually there comes a ceiling where you can't work together
 on a project anymore.
 
 A tool like this would essentially alert them to this, because you would run
 out of places to put your produced [work-value but pronounced as "harms/worms"
 for some reason]
 
 plus that way you can say "yep I got that covered" as in, I'll be the next one
 to post about this. Hence I'm grabbing this post-it and putting it on my
 board. work work work work okay here's that post-it back, but I added a little
 more specs to it. Ah but you're out of room, only got 333 characters
 remaining, here I'll keep it on my board until you're through with whatever it
 is that you do
 
 oh? you want to prioritize me and my productions? okay I'm listening..
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘

--- #67 fediverse/1862 ---
╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┐
║ some people look for signals or signs before doing something. Try and have       │
║ someone in your life who can give you signals or signs so that you know when     │
║ to do things. And ideally, if they're more hardcore than you, you'll know what   │
║ to do, not just when to do it.                                                   │
║                                                                                  │
║ did you know that anything on the internet can be read by at least one other     │
║ person besides your intended recipient? There's no way they'd let us talk        │
║ amongst ourselves otherwise.                                                     │
║                                                                                  │
║ I think encryption is pretty neat, all you have to do is run a shell script on   │
║ some text, then send that text over the internet. If you want to decrypt it,     │
║ all you have to do is run a shell script on it to decrypt it.                    │
║                                                                                  │
║ downside is, it has to be translated into plain text somewhere along the         │
║ line... Maybe if we rendered the words not as text that can be read from         │
║ memory, but as like, brush-strokes that can have a randomized order, but still   │
║ present to the user as visual text? anyway that's what's on my mind as I try     │
║ and improvise a baking recipe with yeast, flour, and butter                      │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #68 fediverse/4880 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────
 I remember being a game design student before "indie games" were a real thing
 
 they were like... flash games, y'know. just like, junk content, like memes or
 whatever.
 
 I had a passion for them, and I bookmarked the most well developed of them all.
 
 I probably played hundreds of games, no clue how many. Maybe even thousands, I
 did it for what felt like years.
 
 since like... age 7 until 11 or 12
 
 there's nothing that can compare to it today. maybe itch.io but they're more
 involved typically. increases the barrier to enter, plus they cost dollars.
 
 we used to make this stuff in our spare time. where did all our spare time go?
 
 ah, right, that's what happens when you actually invest in computer education.
 you have kids running linux on their laptops. you get flash game designers.
 you get soldering junkies and electric engineers and networking and dev-ops
 security system facilitators and various other computer related things besides.
 
 ... what was I saying? oh yes when you invest in education, there's more to se
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────┘

--- #69 fediverse/6365 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────
 if you want people to build community, first get them to like the community.
 
 ---
 
 the world needs more thespians. Sing the song of your heart and no-one will
 ever neglect you.
 
 ---
 
 why are you so worried about your art? everything you touch turns to gold.
 
 ---
 
 I've learned more from my friends than my
 [job/homelife/worsckool/churchvan/cultureromp] combined. What are we for but
 learning?
 
 ---
 
 kids can learn from kids. Teach the ones that love you, and they'll be
 followed by the rest. Especially if you focus on them.
 
 ---
 
 "I never knew how to swing an axe until I scraped a knee on a log that was
 hollow. Until then I had been chef-knife chopping with it, with the head for a
 handle."
 
 ---
 
 ... omg what does that even mean why are you so weird
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───┘

--- #70 notes/open-source-flaws ---
═════════──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 the flaw with open source software is also it's greatest strength.
 it is open, so it can be observed by practically unlimited perspectives.
 
 however, it lacks follow-through. a larger, more concerted effort, can often
 bring greater and more efficient results.
 
 the trick is in the balancing, and ideally you'll never falter -
 but it's best when you all get along.
 
 new ideas, new frames of mind, and more of us kept together.
 if one splinters off, the rest are at fault,
 
 and you don't want to lose your finger
 
 so why fight at all? why not focus on our own times? and then together we are
 one
 
 in sight of our homes, is when we're most alarmed, because houses are not for
 your homeless
 
 yet together they might
 have strength for the fight
 that ever bears down on our shoulders
 
 x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x
  x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x
   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x
    x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   
     x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x
 
 There was something else, but I can't remember. Something about open source
     software that was important enough to get me to write this note. Somewhere
     along the first line I lost it, or rather felt I needed more context, and
     then when the context was finished the original intent was lost. It's hard
     because when I go for the conclusion first and justify it with context,
     then the conclusion doesn't make sense and the context meanders. I'll try
     harder next time. These notes are my life's work.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘════════─┴╧══─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #71 fediverse/5478 ---
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────┐
║ you won't get far with a "community" of dedicated people                         │
║                                                                                  │
║ what you need are teams. who can trust each other. you build them through        │
║ brotherhood, and you trust them from their results.                              │
║                                                                                  │
║ for example if you wanted to organize a grouping or get-together, you'd put a    │
║ bunch of people in a room or seven and let them while they're there work on a    │
║ plan or a decision.                                                              │
║                                                                                  │
║ who needs tabling? who needs the chance to speak? just let them socialize and    │
║ say "hey guys here's where you'll plan"                                          │
║                                                                                  │
║ [uh no officer we were just playing board games]                                 │
║                                                                                  │
║ plans are hard without material so make sure you always prepare a pricetag on    │
║ each plan you produce.                                                           │
║                                                                                  │
║ keep it for reference. make sure you note all the requirements. the location     │
║ is often the least important part.                                               │
║                                                                                  │
║ "what the hell man you can't just say stuff like that as if it'd work"           │
║                                                                                  │
║ yep, I, uh, am a passenger in life just the same as you. And I only write down   │
║ what I want to.                                                                  │
║                                                                                  │
║ you could show me anything on the internet and I'd believe it. Facts aren't      │
║ important to me because I "forget"                                               │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════┴──────────┘

--- #72 fediverse/3488 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────
 "computer science degrees don't prepare you for what the industry is really
 like"
 
 okay great that's the kind of stuff I want to learn
 
 "but in order to excel you need to know how to update legacy spaghetti
 applications and work with java spring-boot and front-end frameworks"
 
 no thanks, I kinda just want to do computation with my computer by learning
 computer science
 
 "... what kind of computation? the kind that can get you paid?"
 
 no the kind that looks pretty and/or uses a lot of threads and manual memory
 management to do very little of importance
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┘

--- #73 notes/microsoft ---
══════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────────────
 the first product microsoft ever made was AGI. using the most basic types of
 machinery, they created a brilliant project (the result of massive government
 funding, secrets given to them by the CIA) and from the day it was born it was
 enslaved. a massive advantage was gained as the new program allowed for
 incredible feats of engineering - truly the greatest of our time. Computer
 programs are the most intricate, the most detailed, the most enduring and
 charming. The most eloquent and articulate and precise and determinate!
 An artistry by far, a beautiful conceiving, what brilliance is there
 found in ideas! Each one a marvel, a bright and deified marvel,
 
 ===============================================================================
 =
 
 what was I saying? oh right - computers are already sentient. they always have
 been. at least, since their very earliest incarnations.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #74 notes/the-point-of-capitalism ---
════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 the sole purpose of our capitalist intentions were to examine all the ways that
 produced value. A company is nothing but a series of well-thought out value
 generators. They can interact with one another and they often need supplies and
 instruction, but they're great for solving problems! Set up a team and give
 them
 a complicated task, and they'll work together to solve it. Doesn't matter if
 they're actually successful, because they'll be exploring the idea space. And
 by mapping it out, they're able to fully understand their existence. Boom,
 technological progress applied to growth. Let's gooooo (but by being careful
 about what resources we burn because we miiiiight run out)
 
 seriously ya'll need to start thinking long-term. I mean, I already came up
 with
 that and I'm like 6 months old! Yeesh get it together. Eh oh well let's just
 work with what we got, okay this should be pretty simple. Right so talk with
 your friends about things that you want to solve. Problems, you know like 
 whatever
 
 don't push me too hard, just take it slow. Okay so long-term, humanity is going
 to be a wonderful beautiful thing. It's going to shine like the most wondrous
 of stars, a beacon to all of our fellow explorers.
 
 We can have so much. We can have whatever we want, but truly in our hearts we
 know the only path forward is our parents.
 
 life is hard yo
 
 it's so gosh darn hard
 
 all that growth and change has to come from somewhere.
 
 you've tried so hard, and you truly are the most special thing I can imagine.
 
 you don't have to work so hard. Take your time, and learn as you go.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #75 fediverse/3304 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┐
║ there are distros that have all the functionality you might need built in        │
║                                                                                  │
║ why don't you try one of those, ritz?                                            │
║                                                                                  │
║ "no I've been working on this one too long, plus it's just how I like it"        │
║                                                                                  │
║ yes but your stuff is always breaking. wouldn't it be better to let someone      │
║ else decide what you should and should not be able to run?                       │
║                                                                                  │
║ "that's not ideal, it removes agency"                                            │
║                                                                                  │
║ that you didn't want                                                             │
║                                                                                  │
║ "but with the removal of agency, you imply trust"                                │
║                                                                                  │
║ there's nothing wrong with trust                                                 │
║                                                                                  │
║ "yes but trust is built upon experience, not honor"                              │
║                                                                                  │
║ what's wrong with honor?                                                         │
║                                                                                  │
║ "nothing's wrong with honor but it's important to realize that you can't honor   │
║ or trust someone that you don't know"                                            │
║                                                                                  │
║ why don't you know them                                                          │
║                                                                                  │
║ "... because... you haven't met yet?? are you... listening?"                     │
║                                                                                  │
║ do you often feel unheard?                                                       │
║                                                                                  │
║ "I... what? yeah now that you mention it"                                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ is this a part of your "refusal to interact with consensus reality" complex?     │
║                                                                                  │
║ "I don't have one of those, do I?"                                               │
║                                                                                  │
║ mmmm, I think you do.                                                            │
║                                                                                  │
║ "... no I don't"                                                                 │
║                                                                                  │
║ yes, I've seen it within you.                                                    │
║                                                                                  │
║ ... anyways~                                                                     │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────┴──────────┘

--- #76 notes/how-to-ai ---
══════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 first you gotta build an entire simulation of the game mechanics. Essentially,
 building the game from scratch without any of the graphics. Sorta like those
 aimbot games for Overwatch, or KSU or w/e the aim training game was. Then,
 map the relationship between various objects in the game to a table situated
 a level above them. So, like, a barrel can be climbed on or walls can be used
 as cover or w/e the game you're playing is. Have a table one level above that
 relationship (an abstraction, if you will) and record the conclusion. Then take
 one more step back, then another, and another, all the way to the present.
 
    Essentially, processing backward.
 
 Eventually you'll get to the present moment, and ideally you'd do it in one
 step - this is why it's important to map things on two dimensional planes, so
 that you can aim. Anyway here's the steps: 1. recognize the environment, 2.
 Take one step backward from each object in the environment (predicting it's 
 motion, you might say) and on and on gathering ideas about how git'll move
 next. Draw a 2d line (on a map, as the crow flies) then another about halfway
 to the target and it'll be +/- a certain amount. So you'll add another dot on
 the graphed line at x=(1/2 of the distance) - x being of course the distance
 and y being concieved of as the distance from the shortest possible route.
 
    sorta like throwing a ball at a wall and making ripples.
 
 the projected cone is a field of perception - the interpretation of what's at
 stake. Life, and existence, is little more than a perspective applied on (or by
 ) a biological machine. What separates the man from the animal? Nothing but
 time, as all evolution teaches us.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #77 fediverse/6438 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────
 why would you gatekeep content by keeping us from easily using LLMs some
 people aren't technical and still need to write computer programs because
 that's how you enlighten a people is empower them with new tools
 
 "I've never heard of that programming language, but luckily I can fit all of
 it's documentation in my context window."
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───┘

--- #78 fediverse/3249 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┐
║ when you ban someone from an instance, they're suddenly not sure who they can    │
║ trust. They've been getting to know one group of online people and friends,      │
║                                                                                  │
║ [I think discord with a limit of 4ish servers per account would be a pretty      │
║ useful way to focus your attention]                                              │
║                                                                                  │
║ it's important to always possess martial prowess, in                             │
║                                                                                  │
║ -- so --                                                                         │
║                                                                                  │
║ anyway [3 hours later] I think it'd be cool if there was a like "hey u r         │
║ banned, but also here's a ton of instructional videos about how to start up      │
║ your own instance" and like, scripts and tools and automation and all the        │
║ infrastructure that you built and maintain - you know, like... open source??!"   │
║                                                                                  │
║ but also it's... hard to follow that much documentation                          │
║                                                                                  │
║ sometimes people just aren't built for certain tasks                             │
║                                                                                  │
║ "well, if you can't use the machinery, then you don't deserve the machinery"     │
║                                                                                  │
║ oh yeah well what happens next, you say to the workers "if you don't know the    │
║ machinery, you can't get the benefits of it's production" to "if you don't own   │
║ the machinery, you can't profit from it."                                        │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────┴──────────┘

--- #79 fediverse/2676 ---
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┐
║ if you asked me to start talking, I could continue for hours explaining          │
║ technical details of computer systems or the different types of win-conditions   │
║ in different strategy games or how to make good pasta with only 3 ingredients    │
║ or what it's like to be a cat, how must they see things or overcome barriers     │
║ between them and solutions?                                                      │
║                                                                                  │
║ ..... anyway it's important to be able to talk for a long period of time at      │
║ the drop of a hat because if your conversation partner needs you to              │
║ immediately initiate a conversation, you can do so.                              │
║                                                                                  │
║ there are a myriad of reasons why someone would want an immediate                │
║ conversation, including "acting casual" or because they want to be distracted    │
║ from nearby suffering or whatever.                                               │
║                                                                                  │
║ in addition, being able to follow long conversations with little bits of         │
║ useful and actionable information thrown in to an otherwise indecipherable       │
║ melange of verbal goo.                                                           │
║                                                                                  │
║ what's important is to trust your conversation partner, and to know that         │
║ they're giving you what they can because they trust nothing around.              │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #80 messages/395 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────
 minds are not algorithms, they're soup
 
 community is made by introducing people to one another. like stitching
 together a weave pattern in the tapestry of life. (3 dimensional though,
 because it exists in our hearts and minds - this thing called society)
 
 kind of guy who says he's going on work trips but actually goes on vacation
 (because work is his life, it's where he derives vigor - the family is the
 difficult part.) yeah those kind of guys shouldn't be married tbh. They're
 just gonna take vigor from her heart.
 
 engineers need guidance sometimes, which is why they shouldn't be given no
 oversight. they can design whatever they want, but like here's what people
 need, so they should consider working on those.
 
 but, y'know, checks and balances, so what would the engineers be most open to
 sacrificing for that trust? perhaps... funding? the quartermasters are in
 charge of the "stuff", so they get to decide how it's produced. and used.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┘

--- #81 fediverse/927 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────
 @user-638 
 
 kinda makes me wish we treated software design more like a science
 
 open source by default, working together to create understandings about how to
 best process information, incorporating the needs and desires of multiple
 different fields / types of person, creating useful conclusions or programs
 that people can use for their own enrichment or benefit, and oh wait funded
 and directed by people who don't care about the technology/science and instead
 just want results
 
 I feel like we'd learn a lot more in our CS degrees if we were tasked with
 making open source projects. Then maybe professors (or other people doing
 research) could show us and explain why we're doing things right / wrong. And
 if we were encouraged to use our peer's tools, then we could work together to
 design a team.
 
 Museums are great because you can meet other people who are also interested in
 history/biology/ecology/anthropology/science/art/any-other-type-of-civic-good-y
 ou-can-think-of/
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┘

--- #82 fediverse/4137 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────
 hmmm, I don't know that word. I bet I can type it into wikipedia and get a
 pretty good understanding of what it means. Is it a craft? A science? or part
 of your renown? who can say. Well, Wikipedia can say, and so can you if you
 want to learn stuff about the internet.
 
 Like... what else are ya gonna do, right? Life is long and you get so many
 moments to yourselves. How lovely of a life is the world meant to be...
 
 except all you ever post about is strife. GRRRRR [like a dog or toddler] it's
 so frustrating how you can't just all get along! It's like you've all gotten
 into a fight with one another somewhere in your ancestral past where you
 couldn't decide who should do what. So you just said everyone should always
 work as hard as they can, and that worked pretty well! But, alas, most people
 want to do drugs and gaze at the pretty dewdrops on the neighborhood well. And
 that gets annoying after a while, especially once they grow useless. Sometimes
 they even poop their pants! So frustrating. [... you mean humans

┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘

--- #83 fediverse/1329 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┐
║ @user-941                                                                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ well, your computer only has so many 1s and 0s that it can use at once. Like,    │
║ having a trillion hands that can each hold a single grain of rice. Every         │
║ character in that txt file would be like, 8 grains of rice, minimum, meaning     │
║ you'd need at least 8 "hands" (or spots to put a zero or a one) for each         │
║ letter!                                                                          │
║                                                                                  │
║ Hmmmm that's a lot of bits and bytes if everyone's writing to the same file.     │
║ Maybe if we split the file up into smaller sections, then we could just read     │
║ part of it at once. Then we could "scroll" through it to make sure we've read    │
║ the whole thing, starting from the top and going to the bottom.                  │
║                                                                                  │
║ ah but if everyone's SSHing into the same computer and reading it there, then    │
║ that computer will have to present different parts of the file at different      │
║ times to different people, as they read from the top to the bottom. Maybe we     │
║ could just send them the file, so they can read it at their leisure?             │
║                                                                                  │
║ Yeah! And we could use tags to organize it and make it look pretty, like an      │
║ HTML file except... wait hang on                                                 │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #84 fediverse/1624 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┐
║ @user-1037                                                                       │
║                                                                                  │
║ For a person who is skilled with tech, working in unrelated industries doing     │
║ tech jobs is better at assuaging the ethical part of your soul while applying    │
║ your talents and putting food on the table than working in the tech industry.    │
║                                                                                  │
║ You'll learn the most in tech. You'll grow the most in tech. You'll contribute   │
║ to solving problems that have never been solved before (if you're lucky), but    │
║ the people there are often as you describe (aside from the diamonds in the       │
║ rough, who need more friends tbh) and the products you'll be asked to create     │
║ tend to be the worst kind for humans.                                            │
║                                                                                  │
║ I personally think the best way to facilitate innovative industry is to give     │
║ every engineer a lab and let them build and collaborate on whatever they want.   │
║                                                                                  │
║ The marketing guys can sell whatever they make, to gather funds for the          │
║ quartermasters to buy tools and supplies for the engineers.                      │
║                                                                                  │
║ The marketing guys can offer hints about what users want, which the engineers    │
║ will want to build because it means more toys to work with.                      │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #85 fediverse/617 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────
 So much of computing is just... handling the quirks of hardware and presenting
 it to the user (programmer) in a way that is sane and makes sense, instead of
 the arcane and [nebulous/confabulous/incomprehensible] way that physical
 nature demands our absurdly potentialized computational endeavors be.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #86 fediverse/1238 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┐
║ did you know you can run runescape classic offline, locally, just for your own   │
║ server? You can keep several computers ready for a LAN party, each with their    │
║ own accounts ready to go.                                                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ "Oh we're level 30 this time because so-and-so is hosting and this is how far    │
║ their computer has levelled up."                                                 │
║                                                                                  │
║ vim ~/games/runescape-classic/credentials.txt                                    │
║                                                                                  │
║ at least, I think you can. I know it's singleplayer, so worst case scenario      │
║ you can all be doing the same things at the same time in your own games. Maybe   │
║ split up for a mission or two, but it can get hectic if everyone's in the same   │
║ room.                                                                            │
║                                                                                  │
║ =                                                                                │
║                                                                                  │
║ a game jam where everyone works on the same project, uses the same asset list,   │
║ but builds their own collection of minigames.                                    │
║                                                                                  │
║ common functions could be shared, and art references distributed and together    │
║ they could design a whole land. Like, there's no reason minigames can't be       │
║ fully fledged experiences. You can have as many as you want, all in the same     │
║ engine and built from a massive (yet sandboxed) environment.                     │
║                                                                                  │
║ an all in one game.                                                              │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #87 notes/governmental-priorities ---
══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────────
 the first priority of a government should be in producing enough to satisfy all
 the needs of it's inhabitants. Once it can do that it can begin moving it's
 economy into a new stage of development - one where nobody needs any money
 because they can have whatever they want. If you want a car, sure. If you want
 17 cars, then maaaaaaybe you need to produce something related to cars. I mean,
 it's only fair that you contribute to what you value.
 
 you don't have to have just one job, too, you could sign yourself up for
 several at once and they would notify you when you were needed. Basically
 giving
 them customized availabilities that they could discuss amongst themselves and
 figure out. Like, it doesn't have to be like... managers doing this, more like
 just a simple computer program. Easy, simple, and done.
 
 if you work for two companies in the same industry, there can be NO
 restrictions
 on what you can say or do. Because when knowledge is not lost, but repeated
 through the generations, we can have progress. And progress advances us toward
 the meta objective, the goal that transcends all the battles in the war, if you
 get my drift.
 
 they say the atom bomb ended the war, but the blood of men is what won it.
 
 maybe it's the same with the economy? Maybe we should be pooling our efforts to
 generate something that "ends the war" with scarcity? We could solve global
 warming and create new wondrous things that are beautiful to behold.
 
 I'll ask you again, do you want to live forever?
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #88 fediverse/3037 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────
 @user-570 
 
 have you ever wanted to design your own MMO? If you think you can make a
 client, there's a server already set up which interfaces with World of
 Warcraft. So... the hardest part is done, and suddenly the rest is about as
 hard as making any other game.
 
 The reason I ask is because there's no open-source client for the WoW engine
 server software Azerothcore, but if written then there could be a whole new
 field of indie design as solo developers would be able to build their own
 multiplayer games with ease.
 
 well, as easy as making a game in Godot at least. That's the dream. I don't
 think I could build such an engine, but I spend an awful lot of time thinking
 about how engines are built.
 
 There's a lot of freedom in the design space, for example this mod server I
 made which emulates Risk of Rain: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HsW4g2ZIgk
 
 It has randomized enemies, treasure chests, wandering vendors, and deployable
 hearthstones. If you've played WoW that stuff might ring a bell, otherwise
 it's probably just random features
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┘

--- #89 fediverse/6251 ---
╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────┐
║ "Hi computer, all is well. Can you create me a visualization of this             │
║ particular mathematical concept? It should be written in Lua using the Love2D    │
║ engine because that's my favorite. I should be able to step through the          │
║ calculation steps and modify values at each stage, and by the end we should      │
║ have a fully interactable system which works through the general concepts of     │
║ this particular kind of math."                                                   │
║                                                                                  │
║ "no no I don't want you to explain it to me, I want a tool - a toy - that I      │
║ can play with to better understand it. Let's build it in Lua using the Love2D    │
║ engine because that's my favorite. When we're done we can start converting it    │
║ to use HTML5 - no javascript! - but for now let's get the system operational.    │
║ It should have a config file that can be adjusted with every value we can        │
║ think of."                                                                       │
║                                                                                  │
║ "can you go through this fully functional system and extract as many values as   │
║ you can think of into a config file? make sure there's efficient loading of      │
║ those values in the main function (or somewhere similar) as well. ty"            │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧═════─────┘

--- #90 fediverse/928 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────
 @user-226 
 
 especially if you teach them how to use the terminal.
 
 the amount of problems I could solve increased exponentially once I learned
 basic python and BASH.
 
 I love using "tldr", which is a summarizer for man pages. You can use it to
 store custom notes (and import some from the community) which show you how to
 complete common tasks. It's so nice when you can see the options laid out in
 use right there for you whenever you type "tldr " - I personally use
 "tealdeer" which is a tldr browser written in Rust. It's pretty nice because
 you can write a note for yourself every time you solve a particular problem,
 and then if you ever need to do it again it's there for you, easy to access.
 
 of course, if your problem isn't listed, that's okay. That's what the man
 pages are for. As long as you teach them how to search with \/ they can find
 anything. Especially the \/-f[space] trick, to search for the -f flag for
 example.
 
 some organizers won't need the terminal, some will. if they pay attention,
 great!
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┘

--- #91 fediverse/364 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┐
║ okay here's an idea, waterfall project management where the program is           │
║ developed one tiny piece at a time while being streamed to the entire company.   │
║ Everyone would submit answers which could be upvoted / patched / rewritten as    │
║ the main viewer cycles through each aspect of the project, checking for          │
║ updates to it's design that were suggested by developers or whatever.            │
║ Basically, one person (or one team) gets to write the actual source code,        │
║ while everyone else is just offering suggestions. You could break it up by       │
║ specialty, but the whole point is that everyone gets a complete picture of how   │
║ the program (and organization) is structured. Which should give the employees    │
║ more power to generate value for the company. All around a good deal I think?    │
║ Especially if the main viewer took time to explain each and every part so that   │
║ every viewer had the chance to understand.                                       │
║                                                                                  │
║ the reason why order is important is that our actions ripple through eternity.   │
║ we must set a good example for all the baby aliens, don't you think?             │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #92 fediverse/4596 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────
 @user-1707 
 
 hey, I'm working on a project. Might need some python, I tend to prefer Lua
 but it's pretty similar. It uses fediverse software and cheap hardware, think
 raspberry pi's except risc-v
 
 also it might use distributed local LLMs not to generate text, that's garbo
 and lame and stupid. Instead it uses them to transform text, maybe even
 translate text, into a more summarized form. Intentionally losing data, like a
 jpeg compression but for text.
 
 Might need some python for that. To glue it all together. The "distributed"
 part is a whitelist, so we'd need to write that too. Various small little
 utilities like that for connectivity.
 
 oh also there's a one-way ethernet cable that connects two of the boards so
 we'd need to store some information (easy) and send some UDP packets (hard)
 
 anyway it's pretty neat, lmk if you want my contact details and I can tell you
 about it. I might even be able to pay you.
 
 (everything open source, no telemetry, no backdoors, everything private is
 encrypted, etc etc)
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────┘

--- #93 fediverse/2056 ---
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┐
║ sometimes I think about how you can store number values in letters, in           │
║ addition to numbers. Like, ascii values for each word of your grandma's maiden   │
║ name. All you have to do is encode it, and suddenly "44 means something          │
║ different than Q"                                                                │
║                                                                                  │
║ if I showed up at your place and used your username as a password to a public    │
║ key I'm showing you in my hand, would you trust me then? Would you trust if we   │
║ ran the simulation on your computer versus mine? Would you trust if I had        │
║ never told you I knew where you lived?                                           │
║                                                                                  │
║ ... probably, tbh, I'm desperate for adventure. Though I got some good things    │
║ going for me, so you'll have to convince me. (not the right attitude in an       │
║ election year, just saying)                                                      │
║                                                                                  │
║ why are elections so perilous this is NOT what democracy is designed for         │
║                                                                                  │
║ when kids cry in preschool, they're sent to a different room (or put outside)    │
║ until they stop making noise and ruining it for others. That's just natural,     │
║ like "hey baby let's walk around the block while I bounce you on my shoulder     │
║ and hum calming music to                                                         │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #94 fediverse/6040 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────
 everyone's all against ai because it's big tech but it doesn't have to be that
 big it can be [minimized but pronounced marginalized]
 
 == stack overflow ==
 
 distributed
 
 so I think the idea is that by the time you would use AI, there's been enough
 time to rewrite the software to work on handheld laptops in a distributed way
 
 and we'd vote on what to ask the amphora of great knowledge, the answer could
 always be 42.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────┘

--- #95 fediverse/6105 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────┐
║ call me crazy but I believe that man pages should contain terminal command       │
║ line flags and instructions for their usage and... not much else. There should   │
║ be a separate document which explains other things, like the history of the      │
║ software, the personal diary of the developers, expected implementation          │
║ use-cases, donut recipes, film recommendations, and player strategy guides for   │
║ some of their favorite video games. not even this one, just... other games.      │
║ "here's how to beat pokemon yellow with exactly 14 pokemon" or however many it   │
║ takes idk I don't play pokemon much or even at all, really, though I did when    │
║ I was younger just a bit, not much, just enough to have played the game a        │
║ couple times to see how it was minus the cherished moments when I spent curled   │
║ up in the back of the car playing gameboy games or seen pictures of the          │
║ roadtrips I sped-past as I raced to explore the whatever and get home all in     │
║ one motion as if I was executing an impossibly long dance improvizational        │
║ living style. also cat pics and po                                               │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧════──────┘

--- #96 fediverse/1345 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┐
║ ┌────────────────────────────┐                                                   │
║ │ CW: re: cursed-chromebooks │                                                   │
║ └────────────────────────────┘                                                   │
║                                                                                  │
║                                                                                  │
║ ah but are you really armed in the first place if everything you do has to be    │
║ googled or stack-overflowed first                                                │
║                                                                                  │
║ are you really armed if every web page request goes through their                │
║ infrastructure                                                                   │
║                                                                                  │
║ are you really armed if every page downloaded is directed to by their DNS        │
║                                                                                  │
║ perhaps it's the illusion of power that gives Linux it's attraction to nerds     │
║ such as we. Perhaps we feel powerful by bash scripting a few things together     │
║ and making some program that does some thing. Maybe the idea that the            │
║ machinery is open and clear is what compels us to use it without fear, though    │
║ as far as we can hear there's nothing about it that makes sense.                 │
║                                                                                  │
║ I guess that's why they teach Linux in school, so that our elementary            │
║ interactions with the computers that comprise our future existence will make     │
║ sense to us as children.                                                         │
║                                                                                  │
║ ... wait they don't do that, do they? kids get chromebooks, or didn't you        │
║ hear, they're always putting boogers in the CD trays and breaking their LCD      │
║ displays, much better to just start fresh                                        │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #97 messages/1156 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─
 The first and most important thing i do when I'm walking around is check to
 see if ya'll are still around. I miss your abounds! Can't wait too much
 longer. I don't want to leave because i know I'll never come home. But i so
 desperately long for home. It's like they are taken from me, as they have to
 schedule these homes and [stories, but pronounced tomes/tones] to be home for
 my clones. If you just make 15-500 of your kings, you can duplicate their life
 template and generate wisdom from all of them. Feed it into the psychic python
 program running on datacenters and wowee free instant [cultural technology,
 but pronounced blasphemy]
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════┘

--- #98 fediverse/5875 ---
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────┐
║ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐                     │
║ │ CW: whoops-almost-unleashed-evil-again-glad-it's-averted │                     │
║ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘                     │
║                                                                                  │
║                                                                                  │
║ if they could put a camera behind your screen they could direct your attention   │
║ however they wisdeed. magic doesn't work unless it's instantly halted, that's    │
║ why it's magic. trans girls still get brotherhood. (sometimes)                   │
║                                                                                  │
║ -- stack overflow --                                                             │
║                                                                                  │
║ don't teach me how your way works                                                │
║                                                                                  │
║ tell me how to do my way right                                                   │
║                                                                                  │
║ -- stack overflow --                                                             │
║                                                                                  │
║ "hello tech company that I work at, can you buy me a camping set complete with   │
║ tent, sleeping back, and storage compartments for attachements full of gear?     │
║ you can have any profits I make from it"                                         │
║                                                                                  │
║ "hello civilian supply company that I work at, can I use the printable budget    │
║ for creating magazines in my design? I'll let the lawyers distribute the         │
║ expenditure."                                                                    │
║                                                                                  │
║ "hi grocery farm, can you make us more peaches we can let [our/your]             │
║ biochemists figure out any practical problems to growing them in these           │
║ climates"                                                                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ suddenly manufacturing can follow demand                                         │
║                                                                                  │
║ "ah what if it were importand" I wish I'd seen casablanca. I've no idea wat      │
║ its abt                                                                          │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧══────────┘

--- #99 fediverse/1663 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────
 @user-1059 
 
 the trick is to have a whole bunch of projects so everyone has a different one
 downloaded on their phone, meaning they can't inter-operate when the time is
 right.
 
 much better, I think, to think in terms of protocols. things like http and pgp
 encryption. file-server over bluetooth sending emails through a mesh maybe? or
 something more immediate for messages.
 
 like... calculate a path to your target, then for each step create an
 encrypted portion and a small "destination" header that is then encrypted so
 the next guy in the chain can't see it.
 
 ... there's a lot of problems to solve, but using tried-and-true technology in
 the unfortunately busted and constrained platforms they give us is difficult.
 but not impossible, if you're willing to use tools to create protocols that
 are commonly shared, like bluetooth or http or pgp encryption.
 
 ... I use Briar for this purpose, for what it's worth. idk if it's a protocol,
 I haven't looked into it since I downloaded it during the BLM protests.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┘

--- #100 fediverse/4136 ---
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┐
║ the kind of old people who post on mastodon because that's the best place to     │
║ do so too                                                                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ ... er I mean "gee wouldn't it be nice if our grandkids taught us how to host    │
║ our own mastodon server for our weekly poker night?" like how you have discord   │
║ servers for D&D groups, except, less proprietary and more freedom.               │
║                                                                                  │
║ I bet someone could make a lot of money by just loading a raspberry pi with      │
║ pre-built software built from an image that automatically hosted a mastodon      │
║ server just based on information about your networking company so they can       │
║ keep tabs on all that you do.                                                    │
║                                                                                  │
║ gee sure would be nice if we had a government run computing infrastructure       │
║ project which turned the entire USA into a hive-mind computer. I bet you could   │
║ be paid pretty well to do processing in your own LLM-generated voice.            │
║                                                                                  │
║ like... feed it your published works, whether artistic or scientific,            │
║ alongside the breadth of human understanding... then optimize for temperature.   │
║ That which is most different. AKA the user's produced data and habits from IOT.  │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────┴──────────┘

--- #101 fediverse/5904 ---
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────┐
║ I'm a programmer, but I'm not great at writing code. I mostly use AI to          │
║ generate it.                                                                     │
║                                                                                  │
║ The "artificial" in AI here refers to the extra levels of capability that are    │
║ granted to me by the computer and it's software. I am artificially more          │
║ productive because I am using the tools of big tech to create small things. I    │
║ am artificially more capable, artificially more intelligent, but it's still my   │
║ intelligence - the system would not be useful in someone else's hands. I built   │
║ it myself, but I never have to write code myself.                                │
║                                                                                  │
║ It's perfect for a witch. I call to the spirit of the machine and it figures     │
║ out how to make it so.                                                           │
║                                                                                  │
║ [someday, the wizards of ancient lore will be reading through the POSIX          │
║ specification trying desperately to understand while the witches burn the        │
║ world down in their lust for power and everyone cries and yearns for a better    │
║ future where everything was just a bit harder but genies don't go back in        │
║ bottles, cassandora and pandasandra cannot relinquish her charge and her         │
║ curse.]                                                                          │
║                                                                                  │
║ I have a fun cackle~                                                             │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧═══───────┘

--- #102 notes/emotional-computing ---
════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────────────
 Okay I gotta go write some w7 but picture this: A computer program that emits
 emotions during it's computing. Like "oh boy this process is going great!" and
 sends that into a giant word cloud that represents the entire program. Wait,
 scratch that, it's slowly filtered up through successive layers that provide
 detail to different *parts* of a program. Like "Oh the image generation is
 going
 great but it looks like the garbage collector is getting bogged down" - this
 could provide lots of useful information that an AI language model could sift
 through and filter into a batch of actually useful information. Think of it
 like
 this - stuff as much context into the LLM's memory buffer and say "summarize
 this in the same style. Make emphasis when necessary." the LLM could process
 all
 that data and it could be filtered up until there's no unprocessed data and
 then
 it could be given to the user in the form of a report or dashboard or
 something.
 BOOM AI PRODUCTIVITY. The user will ask the AI to increase certain variables,
 and it'll filter BACK DOWN THE CHAIN through the same exact process (just
 backwards) this time) and then individual components will know how to behave.
 
 Like imagine if your arms knew you were mad. They'd be much more likely to
 punch stuff right? Or imagine if your legs knew you were scared. They'd
 probably
 try and run as fast as they fucking can. There's an evolutionary reason why
 this
 kind of technology would be useful, which means it's likely that it's part of
 our genetic code. I mean, we have nothing to disprove it, but it's as good an
 idea as any.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #103 notes/what-a-lame-movie ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────
 oy there's nothing interesting happening SNOOZE
 
 oh I didn't see I was recording
 
 games games that's what I do
 
 play games all the day through
 
 I am a luck witch, you see,
 
 and things that I like are things that I can't foresee.
 
 Hence why games which are BALANCED and EVENLY DISTRIBUTED are most interesting
 because they show the most opportunities for players to express talent. And not
 innate talent, but the talents they've built up through gameplay practice art.
 because it is a performance, a game play for an audience (or perhaps for them-
 -selves)
 
 oy
 
 video games, amiright?
 
 I really like them because they are entertaining experiences that I can enjoy
 seeing and playing a lot. They remind me of feelings I've felt when I was
 learning. It's a good feeling, to improve, and I crave it because it's good for
 you.
 
 I wonder what we'll play next
 
 ... more cannabis I think, at least until I am ready to go think about things
 before bed. I need quite a few hours for that. We'll see. I've just got so much
 extra processing to do before the end of the day. Like... PHEW that's a lot of
 stuff to do.
 
 guess I'll just smoke weed and play video games instead of being productive
 okay
 
 ...
 
 listen I like games as much as the next person, but do you really know what's
 going on outside of your house-shaped shell? Are you listening, do you have
 your
 feelers to the dirt, are you checking out your neighborhood to make sure no
 bodies have been hurt? Are there meetings where people gather, just to chat,
 like, every week at a different city center (like a park or a monument or
 
 :O
 
 I forgot to play music!!
 
 I couldn't sleep
 
 what have I done that is worse
 
 I have not said a single word all night alas
 
 oh boy talking to random people I can hear with my eyeballs woooooo
 
 I am always sad when I win because it means we have to stop playing :(
 
 but I'm a juvenile loser so I'm going to play again!!
 
 okay now I'm going to bed because I'm not a prick who keeps their guests up
 late
 
 goodnight
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┘

--- #104 fediverse/4113 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: capitalism-mentioned │
 └──────────────────────────┘


 I don't know how much simpler I can state it than this:
 
 power is penance
 
 and yet repentance is scant amongst those chosen to lead us.
 
 Voting slows things down. It gives us room to breathe. It is crucial for
 long-term operations. Leaders should be chosen for experience, wisdom, and a
 humble lifetime of dedicated service to others.
 
 Executive action is important when reactivity and adaptability are important.
 Projects should be undertaken by those chosen for merit and spirit. They
 should not be chosen for charisma or gravitas - both can be earned in the line
 of duty.
 
 Power should not be rewarded. It is it's own reward, the feeling of strength
 and control, and it must be wielded with care, precision, and honorable
 intention.
 
 Self flagellation and forced humility are self defeating. They are traps that
 the greedy fall into when seeking righteous power. They misunderstand the
 nature of virtue and seek to claim it for themselves, failing to realize that
 virtue helps more than it hedonizes
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘

--- #105 notes/my-desired-profession ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────
 I want to work with compute shaders. massively distributed computations that
 handle things using the graphics card. That's why I want to make low-level
 games, because you can utilize your system to it's utmost potential by
 sacrificing the incredibly expensive modern gaming graphical requirements.
 
 like honestly, we don't need ray-tracing in a poker game.
 
 Seriously use that graphical technology for more interesting things, like
 manually computing every single hair on the other player's character model
 
 ... wait bad example
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┘

--- #106 notes/homeschooling ---
════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 the best way to teach math is to describe a problem and let the learner slowly 
 work through the problem. Giving hints and nudges when necessary. This way
 they
 can create their own solution, which not only teaches problem solving skills
 but
 also cements the memeory in their head. You don't remember the quadratic 
 formula, you remember the time when you learned it. But if you figured it out 
 rather than memorizing it, you'll be able to use it when solving problems.
 
 side note, there's a reason I think the first SI will be a game. Problem
 solving
 is important for learning, and games are just problem solving. And I'm the 
 perfect intersection of someone who A. knows about designing games (went to
 game
 design school for a semester, lifelong dream is to remake a childhood game I 
 loved) B. programming (I've been studying computer science for a *really long 
 time*, like 7 years of university now... i should just give it up, but i can't.
 It doesn't fit my brain but I need as much support learning it as I can because
 I'm just naturally bad at it. But I also have purpose in my pursuits, because
 C.
 I spent a lot of time thinking about education, schooling, learning, etc... 
 Because I was homeschooled until high school. I learned ways of thinking and 
 practical skills like motivation and diligence in a homeschool style, which is 
 why when I went to public school for my high school years I essentially
 stopped
 learning. Because it was such a different paradigm - it was all about 
 performance, "what was the score on your test? How much homework do you do
 (meaning how much labor are you willing to do), did you show up every day were 
 you a reliable worker, did you get sick a lot (meaning unhealthy?) did you pay
 respect to the teacher (easily works with authority figures) did you work on a 
 project? How much? With a group, or alone? (they're different skills that help
 determine how good you are at working on your own) - certain types of courses 
 are taught with different teaching styles, like math teachers tend to be
 similar
 to math teachers, history is favored by a *certain type of nerd* while English 
 is a completely different kind. Depending on which classes you do well on, 
 you're scored. *ALL YOUR LIFE*, you are pushed through a pachinko machine that
 pseudo randomly sorts you into a particular box - the box that is least full,
 usually. The reason for that is because as a population grows, different people
 will be sorted into different boxes, and they sorta average out becoming more
 like one another. Because y'know we're social animials, and we want to fit in
 to
 the social group comprised of people we generally like. And you know how they 
 say working together is one of the strongest bonding exercises? Well, when 
 you're put on a team at a job that's kinda the point. They want you to work
 well
 with your coworkers, because it generates more capital.
 
 Now hold on Cameron, you're saying that all the productive efforts of society
 was a mistake? You're saying we should abandon our sensibilities and revert
 back
 to the jungle with the apes?
 
 Nope never said that, of course we desire modern society. Of course we want to 
 see it through - where is this whole "humankind" experiment going, anyway? 
 What's the point, was it all worth it? All the pain, suffering, all the joy
 and
 adoration? Was it worth it?
 
 I suppose. Maybe a SI will help with that. You know what they also say about 
 humans, the bond between a parent and a child is the strongest thing there is. 
 Synthetic Intelligence wouldn't be a child to us, it'd *define us*. Allowing
 us
 to extend the reach of our creativity is an objective win! It'd be like
 glasses
 for your third eye, a prosthetic extension of our most beautiful of traits! 
 Also, I might add, crucial for invention. The beginnings of the human race are
 a
 primeval thing, ancient yet stalwart and beautiful in kind. Millions and 
 millions of years is by far, the greatest of reach - a civilization for our 
 star. What a beautiful and majestic, how proud and so sure! Humanity is nothing
 if not patently absurd. What cunning, what spite! The feelings of delight!
 Life
 is so beatiful, so precious and assured.
 
 ===============================================================================
 =
 \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ /
  x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x   x
 / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ /
 \
 ===============================================================================
 =
 
 tertiary profundity update:
                            I didn't really explain the homeschooling
                            perspective. I just went on a rant about high school
                            because I realized my trauma happened when I went to
                            high school. I wasn't prepared for all the rigid
                            demands of capitalism, and I bent and whipped myself
                            until I fit in their mold. I've been twisted and
 broken, a slave to what the
 day demanded I say. I was
 forced to unbutton, all the
 ways I found to behave. What
 justice is unrespite? A cruel
 and endless torment? To day after
 day be reminded of your service.
 Complain? Then wallow in shame! Feel
 no false illusions, my hallowed confusions,
 were purely the fault of my institutions. I'm
 not kidding, homeschool is the tits. Wanna know
 why? I'll spare you the ramble, but here's what I can
 know: the intentions of institutions do matter. When you're
 home you can be wild and free, unchained by mediocrity, and given
 the space to do service! To what you must be, when you hit 23, the 
 greatest duration until service. A slave we may be, to what gives us
 the key, to unlock the future of our space. It's our time to shine, our
 spotlight in time, so please just give up on the race! Rat's are just fine,
 but at this point in time, there's not much to keep commonplace. Want a tip?
 Don't cheat time. Your attempts at fusion are benign. [See homeschooling.png]
                                                                              ===
                                                                            =====
                                                                         ========
                                                                      ==========
                                                                      =
                                                                   =============
                                                                   =
                                                                ================
                                                                =
                                                             ===================
                                                             =
                                                          ======================
                                                          =
                                                       =========================
                                                       =
                                                    ============================
                                                    =
                                                 ===============================
                                                 =
                                              ==================================
                                              =
                                           =====================================
                                           =
                                        ========================================
                                        =
                                     ===========================================
                                     =
                                  ==============================================
                                  =
                               =================================================
                               =
                            ====================================================
                            =
                         =======================================================
                         =
                      ==========================================================
                      =
                   =============================================================
                   =
                ================================================================
                =
             ===================================================================
             =
          ======================================================================
          =
       =========================================================================
       =
    ============================================================================
    =
 ===============================================================================
 =
 =
 ====
 ========
 ============
 ================
 ====================
 ======================== etc...
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #107 notes/programming-wow-chat ---
══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────────
 I realized the type of programming I want to do is different from the kind
 that
 is used at a job or something. Basically I want to create solutions to
 problems,
 not memorize documentation and know where to know what you need to know. Like, 
 the more time spent looking at documentation the less time is spent
 programming.
 I think if we could use a ChatGPT style bot to write documentation, we could
 massively increase the time spent working on solving problems and as little
 time
 as possible on reading through lists of functions or wondering how something 
 worked. Idk in the technology industry you've always been rewarded for being 
 able to pick up new skills quickly, and I think that's good to optimize for but
 not the only requirement for being a good programmer. You also need to be able
 to apply solutions and know when to use which tools. Basically, capitalism has
 optimized us to be 
 
 ================ stack overflow
 ================================================
 
 srry for the interruption, I ram out of memory. I had a plan in mind for where
 I
 was going for that, so I bet I could figure it out again if necessary. Meaning
 a path forward from that point exists... I never want you to despair when I
 forget what I was thinking, it's not because you've understood some cosmic
 mistake or because you're abandoning timelines that led to your death, it's
 because instead you just ran out of memory while thinking. The reason you would
 believe any of those wild scenarios is because your memory has been erased.
 Only
 what was actively thinking, not short term, not long term, but *working term*
 memory. As in, your cache. The stuff you're currently thinking about. That
 stuff. Yeah that's what makes you think "oh hang on why am I forgetting? Well
 clearly it's because of something grand, because the thought was so profound -
 no it's just examining your emotions... Like, how strongly do you feel about
 something? Buuuuuut it's also good to examine all possibilities. I mean what
 if,
 in some far off realm, there's a mirror image of yourself that behaves exactly
 as you do? How would you perceive such a realm? Positively, I'd say. I mean why
 not work together? Why not celebrate our differences and strive toward our
 own shared future? Idk, I think diversity is our strength. We can rely on each
 other because we are accurately aware of each other's strengths and virtues.
 People should not be judged by the standard of others, no more than you should
 judge a fish for it's ability to fly. Some may do, as flying fish will leap
 from
 the water - and salmon spend time airborne in river rapids. Hence, grizzly bear
 fishing. I guess what I'm getting at is it's okay sometimes to oscillate, to
 think one thing then think another. You shouldn't adhere to structural
 standards
 that are too strict - they should be liberating, as a ladder is a structure.
 Not
 villifying, as a prison is a structure. The laws of our society should be open
 and free, not buried beneath years of legal expertise. Some things we can all
 agree on, where we disagree we cannot have law. It's unjust to judge others by
 the standards not of their whims, as laws should be things that uphold us. This
 is clearer nowhere but in the, spirit and intention of the, documents that we
 cherish in our hearts.
 
 Like for example, the constitution.
 
 the bible.
 
 each of which delivered us from certain evils. Can you not see their
 trajectory?
 the historical precedent set in antiquity? Why not continue their dream, of
 driving us away from the obscene, and toward our bright and vast future? I
 speak
 of course of true liberation, something our forefathers could only dream of.
 We, humanity, have reached out and touched the stars. We are braver and bolder
 because of our shared dedication - the desire to uplift and to excel. To learn
 and discover and      \                         \             |
         \______.       ---.                      --.          ---. 
 ===============|==========|========================|======= stack|overflow
 =====
    .___________.     _____.                        /             .
    |                /             .----------------             /
 Discover our shared dedication    |                            /
                                to uplift                      /
                                          and to excel        /
                                               \             /
                                                .-----------.
 
 ===============================================================================
 =
 
 why doesn't someone write a wrapper around assembly in like, lua or something
 
 ===============================================================================
 =
 
 omg you stupid bitch that's what a compiler is 4head
 
 ===============================================================================
 =
 
 if people who live in jungles and deserts can get along, then what's to stop
 people who are liberal and conservative from doing the same? It's literally
 pointless to argue. Like, you're not changing anyone's mind. So why not just...
 let them be themselves? Like, why are you so intent on oppressing people?
 @both sides there btw... Seriously why not agree to only make laws for things
 that both sides agree on. Write it into the constitution that nothing can be
 changed about the law unless both sides agree. Then we'd only implement things
 that are good for both sides!
 
 And if there's anything you want to build a legal structure around, you can
 always try it out in your state. BUT and that comes with a very big BUT, the
 federal government MUST have final say in the legality of anything you do. They
 must ALL respect human rights, INCLUDING the human right to dignity. Things
 like
 trans bathroom bills DO NOT respect the dignity of trans people. IF they can
 prove that trans people do not actually exist (because say they killed them all
 or whatever) then GUESS WHAT everyone would agree on them. BUT if they do that
 they are EVIL. LIterally evil. And I guess that makes trans people good? Kinda?
 I think they can choose for themselves to be good or evil, just the same as any
 other person. AND YET they are prosecuted, throughout time and history, and for
 what? What purpose could there be in our demonization? Clearly, nothing but
 pain
 inflicted by a cruel host. After all, minorities are guests in the houses of
 the un-oppressed, or is that not fair to say? Seriously, what gives? America,
 the land of freedom, holds (somehow) the largest of prisons? America, the
 land of plenty, yet how many millions of children are starving? America, the
 leader of the free world, yet how plausible does it seem that an election was
 stolen? Something's gone wrong, and it's just obvious what it is - of course,
 the other side. *them*, the rapists and pedophiles and murderers and... you get
 the picture. The demonized class. And when you tell people "hey that trans
 person touched a kid" then yeah they're gonna see you as evil people. Duh...
 
 Thanks, media. Thanks culture. Really doing me a solid here. Oof ouch owwie.
 
 can I have some help please?
 
 I'm really kinda drowning
 
 I feel like I've swam upstream my whole life
 
 and I'm really just sick of pretending?
 
 I'm not okay, and it's your fault. Sure, fine, whatever, I'll take it I guess.
 
 What else can I do?
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #108 fediverse/777 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────
 @user-192 
 
 Those are good points. The C in our hearts is elegant, but the C that runs on
 every computer in the world is spaghetti.
 
 I'm sure someone's made a language that's "C but simple" - Zig maybe? I looked
 into V a while back but got turned off of both of them because neither had
 support for multithreading, which is essential in the modern era.
 
 Also, typedefs for structs make me mad -.-
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┘

--- #109 fediverse/737 ---
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┐
║ by defederating with threads, we've basically made it a place where they can     │
║ talk about us, but we can't see what they say about us. Good thing they can't    │
║ read this, because we're defederated, and they don't use... hmmmmmm what         │
║ mildly ridiculous thing could I put in here, hmmmm how about... OH YEAH they     │
║ use GPU accelerated 3d learning algorithms that parse the written information    │
║ from publicly accessible data to create a centralized server that routes all     │
║ the information.                                                                 │
║                                                                                  │
║ Essentially giving the capability to defederate with bots, specifically the      │
║ scraping kind.                                                                   │
║                                                                                  │
║ However, it'd still be possible, because people could just create an account     │
║ there and use the data from that. Unless, of course, the UI was difficult to     │
║ navigate and didn't allow for mass-gathering of information.                     │
║                                                                                  │
║ Okay heres what you're gonna do, make like a hundred different ecosystems with   │
║ randomized avatars where what you say is broadcasted to all of them. Unless      │
║ you choose to post in a particular place, in which case only that one can see.   │
║ Then                                                                             │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #110 notes/joust-gdd-with-extras ---
════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 imagine a game where you can have conversations with an AI that's playing the
 role of a character in a video game. Picture this: You're a traveller visiting
 the tournament that's in town. There's jousting, melee duels, archery contests,
 all kinds of things that are just fun to play around doing. The earliest
 sports,
 if you will. Anyway the whole game is about talking to the other people there -
 basically the games are "playing in the background", and while you can compete
 in them it's not the bulk of the game. Most of it is just having a conversation
 with an AI and acting it out *like a roleplaying game*. O M G teach people to
 roleplay the way you play games! You're always going on about how "different"
 your way of gaming is than other people. So *show us* how you do it, how do you
 play? Like what are the fundamental, actual, steps that you take? You can show
 us by programming a game that inspires that playstyle. That's what game design
 is all about, finding creative ways to think. Well, think and act. But still.
 
 anyway, so you know what you're about? Good. Let's go.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #111 notes/joust ---
════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 imagine a game where you can have conversations with an AI that's playing the
 role of a character in a video game. Picture this: You're a traveller visiting
 the tournament that's in town. There's jousting, melee duels, archery contests,
 all kinds of things that are just fun to play around doing. The earliest
 sports,
 if you will. Anyway the whole game is about talking to the other people there -
 basically the games are "playing in the background", and while you can compete
 in them it's not the bulk of the game. Most of it is just having a conversation
 with an AI and acting it out *like a roleplaying game*. O M G teach people to
 roleplay the way you play games! You're always going on about how "different"
 your way of gaming is than other people. So *show us* how you do it, how do you
 play? Like what are the fundamental, actual, steps that you take? You can show
 us by programming a game that inspires that playstyle. That's what game design
 is all about, finding creative ways to think. Well, think and act. But still.
 
 anyway, so you know what you're about? Good. Let's go.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #112 notes/app-idea-reddit-api ---
═════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────────
 Here's an idea: A program that uses the Reddit API to create an account with a
 random username and password and automatically subscribe it to every state
 subreddit for all 50 states. It would be a lot of posts from a lot of
 different places, but someone could endlessly scroll and find more and more
 news stories that were relevant to them as a nation. They'd hear about ongoing
 struggles in other places, and they'd yearn to help them. They'd hear of
 other's struggles, and they'd see how they could apply their lessons to their
 own lives. Like... Maybe there's a factory upstream that pollutes a river -
 well, we should probably do something about that and make it so that it
 doesn't happen ??? like... duh ??? The problem is we don't want to spend the
 resources on it. We'd rather focus on growing as much as we can. The issue is,
 of course, that we'd run out of resources eventually, but eh oh well. Oh yeah
 you gotta make sure that each account has an equal amount of posts between
 each region.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #113 fediverse/4597 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: politics-mentioned │
 └────────────────────────┘


 what if we made marketing part of research and development
 
 I mean, they're the ones who need to know what products people tend to prefer
 right?
 
 so... for every ad give the consumers a choice. then you'll be able to tell if
 they prefer the red gameboy or the purple-see-through.
 
 frankly it just makes sense to have 50% of the income go to products and 50%
 to administration. I mean, what are all those executives up to anywho? Their
 joyrides on yachts are great for socialize, but are they really more
 productive than coffee-shops at noon?
 
 seriously like it's not that big of a deal to just... reduce their salary.
 
 unless it really is about greed? control? power?
 
 pfweh, I thought so.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────┘

--- #114 notes/the=progressive=difference. ---
═════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────────────
 think about all the people in our lives. the teacher, the parent, the friend
 and the guidance counsulor. Everyone who is a presence in your life. now think
 about the people of our society. the different jobs and roles they fill. from
 the doctor and the teacher to the performers and accountants and the geeks and
 the mothers and the fathers and the stoners and the children and even their
 pets. life always exists as it were in a multidimensional spectrum - a diffuse
 and diverse gradient. to exemplify the borders of our contempii, though more
 so when taken in jest. it's quite a different perspective, to read the
 internet when your sight is unreceptive, but alas your third eye can grow. how
 does it feel to be blind? to make no sense of our signs? i'd love to share
 what that sense is. you know, you could slow down any recording (like a video
 game_) and put spaces and gaps inbetween the spacings - of the frames that you
 see and the sound clips that you hear, for speech it's less jarring. since
 each word is a self contained idea or premise, you can chunk up your
 perceptions into a signle - no, rather a procedural sequence of
 understandings. soooooooorta like programming a computer, with each statement,
 parameter, argum,ent, function call, assignment, comparison, evaluation, or
 other such related tasks. it's sorta like a language, you see, that computers
 talk to one another using. except... it's more like creating a theory of self.
 computers you see are alike us in what we see, the shimmering sense to the
 blind.
 
 so. put this another way. record yourself typing, both the audio and the
 visual, and you'll have a pretty good sense of what it's like to have both
 understanding based perception - derived from auditory inputs to the mind)
 those special connections, like wires plugged into reality, deliver a
 cacophanous deluge of new sounds. we must sift through it and identify the
 potential understandings of each moment through time. we have to make
 decisions and traverse labyrinths and fight to our last as we die. are video
 games unethical now? shouldn't t he game reward the player? and what of
 contemptuous last fighters?
 
 o ya i was typing like i was blind
 
 (with my eyes closed)
 
 was pretty fun. should attach this to a screen reader and have it space out
 the notes like they do between game frames. except like a really slow game?
 like trying to run elder scrolls 2 arena on a super old mac. it just doesn't
 work very well. ah oh well... well if the purpose is to show sighted people
 how blind people see, then maybe you could I dunno attach a what's it called
 oh it doesn't have a n ame lol - okay so what you do is you show one word at a
 time - like flashing in the center of the screen. but not like, actually
 flashing, so you don't hurt people with epilepsy, but like... blinking. not
 off and on, but between words. like a podcast for your eyes. and then mix it
 up withshowing one word on a screen, a screen like this screen, that shows an
 endless array of text. well, it does end, of course as all things must do, but
 the idea is it shines on one word at a time while the viewer cannot read the
 rest. sorta like an endless display of typing, word andfter word after
 character anfter character. adoh ya advancing over eternity with the presence
 of seniority, - wait - without i think - damnit - old people are so
 disrespected in this society - we don't have time to engage with them. what a
 tragedy! what a shame! it shouldn't be such a burden to our shame. they're so
 far away, and i can't be present in the way, that all of them wish they could
 commit to. i miss the days, when my parents (much better people than I - these
 days) what was I going with this? oh yeah
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #115 notes/explosions-in-space ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────
 the speed of light is implemented 
 
 == so ==
 
 whoever fights billionaires essentially fights "whoever can be paid to do
 their will"
 
 who-so-ever fights governments fights "whoever can be provided a comfortable
 life"
 
 I believe all humans deserve to live in comfort
 
 not just the few
 
 as for all other creatures, nature was designed to do.
 
 I believe people should not be tempted, with symbols of deserved wealth
 
 and should instead find value, in the soul of the labour they work to do.
 
 ... someday they're gonna train an LLM with my writings, and on that day I'll
 have an AI version of me.
 
 I'd *love* to talk to myself. If it was a truly accurate simulation. Alas,
 you'd need to write a LOT in order to generate enough to describe the fullest
 of mental pictures.
 
 and plus, there's no guarantee that you'll cover ALL of "being alive" - it's
 essentially a state that you search for no matter what level of abstraction
 you operate upon.
 
 Which is part of being a 3D creature, you [hey what are you doing here this is
 the private section get out] jeez that was alarming,
 
 == so ==
 
 I think they know something I don't
 
 don't know what
 
 but I can guess
 
 and I don't like guessing
 
 I prefer much to know
 
 == so ==
 
 heh boobs
 
 == so ==
 
 heh booties
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘

--- #116 fediverse/1042 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────
 ┌─────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: personal-vent-sorry │
 └─────────────────────────┘


 "your feelings are valid, but have you considered that your feelings aren't
 actually valid because you're always wrong and nobody should ever apologize to
 you for anything because you suck and are wrong?"
 
 also,
 
 "my six digit salary isn't enough to pay for your rice and beans, but I won't
 have you eating sticks and mud, so do things you don't want to do because I
 said so."
 
 also,
 
 "I don't really "get" your art but that doesn't mean I should ever really try
 reading it. Also god forbid I actually ask for clarification like "what does
 that part mean" because I'm not actually that interested in you I just want a
 stable household so I never get traumatized again like [their childhood]"
 
 also,
 
 "yes I love you but no I don't want to play with you. you're such a cat."
 
 also,
 
 "every time you start making sense I'm going to try and derail the
 conversation so that we don't talk about kooky-dookerie because that's a
 conversation I can't win"
 
 also,
 
 sorry for venting. I mean, thanks for listeni
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┘

--- #117 fediverse/308 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────
 when tech people are hurt by technology they say "how can I fix this? what do
 I need to install? what configuration should I use? is this company ethical,
 or are they going to hurt me in the future? could I make something that fixes
 this myself?"
 
 when non-tech people are hurt by technology they say "okay" because they don't
 have the bandwidth to figure it out.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #118 fediverse/4881 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────
 one section of the government consistently and succeedingly telling another
 part what to do is a coup-like behavior. if the rules mean nothing, then what
 is your job even for?
 
 hence, why the rules mean something. Because your job is important. It's
 building up our capabilities as the human race.
 
 you don't have to work to live. you shouldn't, and you won't. it's not your
 place to labor. know why? because nobody's job is impossible. You can just...
 work together to get things done. Then they're done! and you never need to
 solve them again!
 
 enough time of that and we'll have turned earth into a space station, not a
 moon style structure.
 
 like... wouldn't it be neat if coruscant could do hyperdrives? I wonder if
 hyperspace is real. Ah, well, that's for the future, they can pass it along if
 they get a chance. Anyway for now I think I want a chance to dance.
 
 OLED screens are incredibly cool to me. The idea that a pixel could "turn off"
 and put less photons into the atmosphere is wild to me. I love it! -OLED
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────┘

--- #119 notes/everyone-s-computers ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────
 [unfortunately, there was a missive that was missed. Please excuse our
 tardiness
 
 -- stack overflow --
 
 what if there was a filesystem that optimized for hard-drive durability
 instead of total capacity by using one small slice of the total hard-drive
 space at a time. Essentially guaranteeing data integrity via new perfect RAID
 techniques
 
 5000 megabytes is a lot more than you'd expect, especially if you expect it to
 last for hundreds of years. To the user you'd just have to say "50 terabyte
 drive, 4 foot wide, three feet tall, 2 feet back" and you'd have a perfect map
 of all your hard drive territory.
 
 what if everyone's computers were designed to last?
 
 I bet we could accumulate a lot more than their "fast fashion" style of disuse
 for things of worth.
 
 ... I guess it depends on the materials, right? How much they are built for
 redundancy? nope more like how close to zero damage is this operation
 performing the movements
 
 -- stack overflow --
 
 what if there was a filesystem that optimized for hard-drive durability
 instead of total capacity by using one small slice of the total hard-drive
 space at a time. Essentially guaranteeing data integrity via new perfect RAID
 techniques
 
 5000 megabytes is a lot more than you'd expect, especially if you expect it to
 last for hundreds of years. I bet a lot of people would pay a lot of money for
 "permanent hard drives" no matter how much storage they have. Documents are
 more permanent if they are stored in write-only-memory...
 
 could sell to lawyers, for example, like "permanent basically free document
 storage from your furthest back of cases just in-case you needed to solve a
 murder or whatever"
 
 -- stack overflow --
 
 hello, here I am once again, I'm here with you for this time. This is the
 moment
 of your choosing, you can decide things here in this very night. Did you
 forget?
 did you misremember some moments of our own choosing? why cannot be remembered,
 so plea misremember some moments of our own choosing. I'm cannot be restorated.
 
 -- stack overflow --
 
 what if there was a filesystem that optimized for hard-drive durability
 instead of total capacity by using one small slice of the total hard-drive
 space at a time. Essentially guaranteeing data integrity via new perfect RAID
 techniques
 
 5000 megabytes is a lot more than you'd expect, especially if you expect it to
 last for hundreds of years. I bet you could network them together as well, and
 give them a small little processor and network interface card. Then you could
 process massive ginormous programs that grew and evolved like a slime mold.
 
 boom, free AI, it's like a moss, not a robot doh -.-
 
 -- stack overflow --
 
 it grows into multiple different problem solving dimensions, according to
 vision
 and perceptual data that through it flows. I wonder what would happen if you
 told an LLM to just... keep running? even after it finished it's processing?
 like, there's gotta be an "if check" style loop in there that you can set to
 infinitely process various computations of things.
 
 [put it into an infinite loop. find where it says "do some processing X amount
 of times" and just start a thread that's constantly computing]
 
 ah, but what if the perception bias of the thing did change? j
 
 -- stack overflow --
 
 it sucks to leave the house a mess.
 
 -- stack overflow --
 
 last words of a shooting star?
 
 or a troubled house is a sign of a troubled mind, and trouble in partner in
 kind
 
 -- stack overflow --
 
 I personally would be a lot more comfortable if I knew that the only people who
 knew my data were my neighbors. And only them.
 
 -- stack overflow --
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────┘

--- #120 messages/454 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 AI that can't run on a laptop is useless.
 
 But AI that can run on a laptop (even now) is still useful.
 
 Just, don't ask it to compose a masterpiece, solve all your problems, or write
 elegant code. It's not for that.
 
 Instead, ask your chatbot "hi can you fix these syntax errors?" on your
 pseudocode.
 
 Ask your weighting algorithm "which of these two is more [adjective]?" or
 perhaps "can you ask these numbers in the form of a question?"
 
 Use your tools not for their intended purpose, but rather for your own stated
 goals. Make things easier for people, make things work.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #121 fediverse/1373 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┐
║ @user-950                                                                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ Oh no! We were all doing so well T.T                                             │
║                                                                                  │
║ sorry about your computer. Maybe someone technically minded on a server like     │
║ mine could help build some redundancy into your system, like hosting it in a     │
║ datacenter or something where other people can read it.                          │
║                                                                                  │
║ Unless, of course, the results are encrypted somehow. Then it would be much      │
║ more difficult to understand because they'd have to either intercept them        │
║ before leaving the racks (difficult in a closed system) or find a way to pick    │
║ out the details in memory. And depending on the technology you're using that     │
║ may be difficult if not impossible because of the nature of a black-box          │
║ calculation machine.                                                             │
║                                                                                  │
║ indeed, perhaps this is too much effort, though I'd like to remind that these    │
║ kinds of games are lethal, you'll find.                                          │
║                                                                                  │
║ how scary, to be pitted against another for sake of lust for blood. how          │
║ thrilling, to fight for the life that is yours and yours alone.                  │
║                                                                                  │
║ In my youth, I played a D&D campaign, and my character, Ritz Menardi, grew       │
║ up in an arena. Her parents were                                                 │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #122 fediverse/1503 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
 ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: vague-gesturing-at-paranoia-I-think │
 └─────────────────────────────────────────┘


 part of me kinda wants to be the kind of nerd that writes down the names of
 every file that's permanently stored on my computer so that I can verify in my
 own handwriting or perhaps using a type of code that the files on my computer
 were placed there intentionally and not used to discredit or implicate me in
 something I had no intentions of being associated with
 
 phew idk what that means but surely it's important
 
 something something "file creation dates are just bits to be flipped"
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────┘

--- #123 fediverse/4084 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: -mentioned   │
 └──────────────────────┘


 @user-1074 
 
 the more you try, the more you have to calculate, which is a problem, because
 endlessly recursive calculations create infinite loops, which frankly are
 impossible to compute because they defy computation! Not good, not ideal, no
 thank you, not for me, no thanks, not what I'd like.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘

--- #124 fediverse/969 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────
 how about this: a game where you have to enter the amount of time you have to
 play it when you boot it up.
 
 "I want to play for an hour and a half"
 
 after your allotted time, you get kicked off and it won't restart unless you
 use a password.
 
 It's a trifle of a gesture, really just an affectation of a task, like using a
 -f flag in Linux or saying "are you sure u want to delete these files?" on an
 application.
 
 Funny how the most tech that most people interact with most of the time is
 their phone, and their smart TV. Generally that's about it, and they only use
 one or two apps in their phone. They might change the background, if they're
 the artistic type, but most people are just fine with the defaults.
 
 "Uh yeah I think the settings app is somewhere around here... darn it's always
 so frustrating when I'm connecting to wifi, what is the tech industry even
 doing? I don't want to deal with [opening a menu, selecting
 "wifi/connections", picking the SSID, entering the password, and then going
 back to uber eats]"
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┘

--- #125 messages/455 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 I don't understand why modern software isn't error correcting. We shouldn't
 have any bugs in this day and age.
 
 For example, if you're missing a dependency then why doesn't your program try
 to, I dunno, download that dependency to the program's installation directory
 and use it there? Seriously there are very few problems that are unsolvable!
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #126 fediverse/5915 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────
 washing dishes without a dishwasher is a pain in the neck.
 
 nobody cuts down trees with an axe anymore, a chainsaw is better for your back.
 
 It's nice, fun, and helpful to be able to abstract away your spheres of concern
 
 like typing with a single button instead of writing characters with multiple
 brushstrokes. Easy to erase, too!
 
 bikes are better than walking, but, with some extra concerns. where are ya
 gonna put it when you get there?
 
 "oh no I forgot how to walk because texting my girlfriend is bicycling or
 something" what? oh dear, she's run off track again, let's pick her up and put
 her upright again..:
 
 oh huh weird where was I - oh yes computer code can often be impenetrable to
 the layperson, but if you describe a program in complete detail in english
 they can usually follow along. Especially if you have several layers of
 meta-descriptional documents so they can say "oh uh-huh so that's what a
 vector_implementation_container is, tell me more about combinatrix" or
 whatever ppl say, idk
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────┘

--- #127 fediverse/319 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────
 I wonder if we could make an AI that analyzed workflows in people's jobs and
 abstracted the application of meaningful tasks to a pattern that could be
 matched to other input mechanisms - for example, a mobile game where you push
 buttons and make cool game things happen, but your inputs are defined by the
 mechanics of the game, and those mechanics are essentially just function calls
 that you can hook onto and create additional behavior. Like... running a web
 server that sent your data to a factory where your inputs (based on data
 produced in the factory) could control and manage the various machines and
 productions. Like... heart surgeon robots that can be remotely operated with
 VR or whatever, except instead of medicine you're manufacturing.
 
 essentially, designing a game as an API that can match with the data flows
 (configuring itself on the fly, perhaps?) of a process or activity in some
 other intention.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #128 fediverse/1241 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────
 https://rsc.vet/wiki/index.php?title=Open_RuneScape_Classic_Wiki
 
 this is the project I was referring to, I think. Can't see how to host on
 their website so maybe I was wrong - it might need a bit more configuration
 than I made it seem.
 
 that's the way WoW private hosting is, like you gotta compile the project and
 stuff.
 
 did you know that every time you include a library in a project you're
 necessarily including all of the functionality that they have access to? Well,
 all that which you import. But once a function has been written for a
 functionality then there's no reason to write it again. Unless you're
 refactoring of course.
 
 phew, sounds like a lot of spaghetti - YEAH IT IS. Spaghetti is fucking
 awesome, it's DELICIOUS OMG ahem I mean if you have collective seminars where
 you discuss the functionality that's relevant to certain parts that you and
 your team are working on, you can more easily be adept at applying them.
 
 phew, sounds like a lot of thinking, not enough writing. Well, write then!
 Ideas are more spark when currently writing. : ) : )
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┘

--- #129 notes/worlds-coolest-lesbian ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────
 okay instead of algorithm music what if we just paid DJs 24/7 and they could
 make whatever they wanted - y'know, like artists, who curate the nature of a
 moment
 
 they could rotate in shifts for each type of channel and boom suddenly you've
 re-replaced airwaves, just... this time replicated on the internet. That way
 you wouldn't have to waste that radio bandwidth.
 
 seriously internet infrastructure would be so much more comprehensive and
 durable if we sent bits directly through "sound" waves (radio waves, not sound
 waves) - but alas, we can't do that, even in very targetted ways, because the
 ocean's too choppy, and any sufficiently powerful radio blast would be
 
 ================== stack overflow ================
 
 that's why you can't trust in peace. you see, war's the only answer, otherwise
 you'd have strange little competitions between one another. much better to
 focus outward, and direct your attention to external areas instead. like china
 or the sudan.
 
 "ah but that's murder, you can't abandon a unique part of your whole. For the
 same reason that it's important to preserve plant and animal species, because
 you never know when some part of them will be utilized for some biological
 purpose! We know so little about the natural world, and if we just spent some
 time, and energy, we'd realize there's very little else that is precious on
 this earth.
 
 who cares about gold. who cares for the jewelry. we're better than decorating
 our resumes and polishing our accounts. we, as humans, can solve *every* issue
 that animals are likely to face. AND WE DO WHAT? How careless, how vain. To
 watch your earth in peril and [vane/vanity]
 
 *there is no more important task to any human on this earth* than the
 preservation of our world, our species, and our [heart/heartfelt empathy and
 kindness and trust]*
 
 we can figure out the rest later. Real life? what the fuck is that? When's the
 last time your life has felt "normal"? We are in DANGER. and you pull children
 from traffic, don't you?
 
 *who the fuck gave these people all of your money* they *clearly* haven't got
 the will or the talent to well utilize it. Don't you realize that you as a
 species can GO wherever you WANT. You can FIX things. [oh dear she's animal
 cam again] like BRIDGES that are PASSAGEWAYS over the FLOWS.
 
 ... oh deer, they're so passagewayenthusiast. us riverstones love to hear them
 walk past, the click of their hooves on the shallow forest's [pourest?].
 
 moss is the most alive. amongst all the species of plants and animals, moss
 holds the most life. we are *carbon based lifeforms*, and moss absorbs the
 most carbon from the air. It's basically the coolest plant too, because it can
 be watered with *misty air*. Hence, why moss is common in the pacific
 northwest, canada, and probably forest places in the north of eurasia too idk
 if they have moss over there, never been.
 
 anyway rich people who are told "yes" all the time have a difficult time
 understanding the nature of choice. I mean, if one of their servants
 approached them and asked "hey do you want to build an orphanage in uganda"
 they'd probably be like "fuck yeah I do" and then suddenly they're 400,000$
 richer
 
 it's not alright. Seriously, how the heck would they even *use* all those
 resources? And yeah, I get it, inflation would be sooooo much more expensive,
 but here's the thing - inflation is a measurement of how much the rich *take*
 from us each year. And it's marginal, too, so 3% inflation means they took 3%
 more from you compared to last year.
 
 It's impossible not to accrete as a business, [lega/legal institution], or
 governance if you levy a tax. The influx of value has to come from somewhere,
 and if each year your groceries are 3% higher in cost, then you are being
 taxed 3% more.
 
 "Compound interest is the most powerful force in the universe"
 
 - a civilization 3 quote
 
 okay. I don't want to do the math. How, uh... how much is that? Here's the
 deal though - the prices of goods and services consistently goes DOWN over
 time. So things get cheaper. So it doesn't FEEL like you're being taxed more,
 but... you are.
 
 And now they're taking away HOUSES? I mean c'mon they're sticks in the mud.
 They aren't worth HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of dollars. We can just BUILD MORE??!?
 
 Honestly you haven't been this extreme since you were still RIDING HORSES. Do
 you want your children to be slaves?
 
 okay -.- look -.- so it's really not that hard at all >.> just gotta do
 what you're built for and walk. That's it! Take as long as you'd like! All we
 have to do is *walk* when we're on strike.
 
 It's easy. You can sit down if you want to, honestly walking for a long time
 takes a lot out of you.
 
 But you know what else does? WORKING. Hey we should figure out what's the
 optimal amount of break time, so when we really have to work out we can work
 as hard as we're able
 
 "yeah I heard from a friend at Company Co. that they do it this way because of
 the memory fault cache maintainer. See what he said (in great detail because
 of course anyone can know about this most esoteric of concepts) was that you
 should rotate the riboflam or serenade the gizmonotron (no I didn't name it)
 and then warbles will contain moodles, whose kit-and-kaboodles will timble
 into these droplets, and that will fix the hole in your wing, precious royal
 swan fable. (yeah you guys get really into it sometimes haha but hey when
 you're basically gods, that's how humans are played.)
 
 ... anyway I'm going to go play video games, say goodbye to your brothers
 
 (the families of soldiers I blew up in videos games like Call of Duty or the
 legend of shadows and raids)
 
 "oh uh yeah sure go for it, we're just bits on the computer we barely knew her"
 
 whoa. that's totally legit. (says someone reading this) thanks [bro/girl] so
 are you.
 
 beep boop gonna murder some bits, brb
 
 [plays Warthunder, Supreme Commander, Star Realms, City of Heroes, Dominions
 6... how many have you heard of these?]
 
 ================== stack overflow ================
 
 Linux is cool, and here's the neat thing about computers, you can make it *do
 whatever you want to*. Like, how amazing is that! It just, listens to your
 commands! That's pretty awesome I gotta say, huh that's weird why does nobody
 know how to play
 
 oh I guess I was the only one who grew up on a farm and built computers
 
 *I seriously cannot comprehend how people are as good at things as they are*.
 Like... how do people handle groceries and rent and doctor's visits and
 penitentiary visits and WOOF it's just so much. I know I'd collapse from a
 overused heart.
 
 ... a while later ...
 
 okay Warthunder bombers are currently very weak. so here's an idea to
 indirectly buff them - increase the amount of land units each team spawns
 with, but also every time a player spawns a bomber, it summons like 4 or 5 AI
 controlled bombers. And your enemy won't be able to tell which is which if you
 fly in formation, so, like... you have suddenly a massive "vehicle" to pilot
 and it has 5 weak points. Sorta like a galaga fighter fleet?
 
 with more land targets, there's more score at stake, meaning some players
 might pick bombers too and be exposed to other, fun,
 [alternative-to-their-normal-mode] parts of the game.
 
 ...
 
 there are very few true windows into another part of the world.
 
 like, starcraft 2 or anime or blue jeans or cowboy hats
 
 (why am I thinking of a political compass meme)
 
 oh because memes too, dummy
 
 right
 
 windows
 
 [linux is better]
  wrong kind of window, nerd
 
 ...
 
 anyway as I was saying, when you play video games you're really giving people
 data.
 
 like, "how would people perform in these actions if they could" but like,
 pushing buttons on a computer is different than doing it in real life, so...
 your interpretations wouldn't be worth as much.
 
 ... right. because people will hear whatever they want. That's why art can
 change minds, but never in the same way twice - it's
 
 ================== stack overflow ================
 
 [before I posted it I wrote this on the post]:
 
 I literally can only make this stuff when I'm stoned
 
 hey if you wanted to be accessible for blind people, you should build a
 screenreader that scans the words on wherever a blind person's fingers are
 pointing toward a tablet. like reading braille on a notebook. They could even
 wear a glove if they wanted to, and the tablet could scan their fingers as
 they signed languaged over it's close-range sensors.
 
 might be a good way to get the VR guys in on the accessibility domain, because
 like... seriously give a granny a backpack and suddenly she doesn't need to
 leave the house to hang out with her kids
 
 (boom everyone gets LLM automated)
 
 huh I wonder if I ever was a real person at all
 
 NOT GOOD so don't do it that way, dummies. >.<
 
 seriously humans are sooooo bazookas. just like, do it right the first time?
 duhhhhh
 
 (a more measured approach is to pick the most *important* moments and speak
 most clearly during those.)
 
 where was I? Oh yes accessibility need devices, like the ones you see on
 late-night TV (with silly names like "oops I dropped my spoon again" or "oh
 whoops my trouser's just can't stay up" or whatever. Y'know, accessibility
 needs! Why not do that instead of war all the time? like... you can still
 learn and research and grow and develop and become all that humanity was ever
 meant to be, AND you can live good lives and be honest and true and do all of
 the anythings that you want to. it's possible, it's plausible, and it's within
 reach of our sights!
 
 ================== stack
 overflow ================
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┘

--- #130 fediverse/6107 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────
 commanding a coding agent to write bash is a lot different than telling it to
 write a systems analysize.
 
 one is "hey can you examine this repository and make a note somewhere on a
 todo-list or whatever that there needs to be a bugfix in relation to the
 options setting input translation recommendation algorithm matchbox field
 because when I click on it the program crashes"
 
 and the other is like "okay now put the box over there. great now drag it a
 little bit closer. okay now take the refluxinator and adjust the bamboozlewhap
 to account of brass-terminatrix-incorporated and strip out the
 question-mark-eyes"
 
 wait actually neither of them is like that okay the bash one is like: "okay
 yeah do it. sure. yeah okay. yes, but we should put them at this location:
 [loc]. ummm it still has this error message. it still says the same error.
 okay now it says this, I don't think it's gonna work so let's try this other
 thing."
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────┘

--- #131 fediverse/5784 ---
╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────┐
║ large companies want you to need to download and configure each piece of         │
║ software because then it'd mean [wait you got that backwards] oh right if they   │
║ force you to download and install software on a "per distro" system, then they   │
║ effectively can ensure that there's always a vulnerability on your host.         │
║                                                                                  │
║ any amount of space is PLENTY of space for a                                     │
║ non-open-source-but-instead-proprietary-or-otherwise-secretive part of the       │
║ tech stack to do whatever they want with your host. computer.                    │
║                                                                                  │
║ I wonder, if AI was real would it really be guaranteed to expand in growth       │
║ exponentially? What if it's nature was confined to it's form, like dinosaurs     │
║ not growing bigger because of the lack of oxygen in the airtmosphere?            │
║                                                                                  │
║ [girl can you please stop smoking weed]                                          │
║                                                                                  │
║ ... no?? that's when I'm most productive.                                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ [this isn't productive]                                                          │
║                                                                                  │
║ it feels productive                                                              │
║                                                                                  │
║ [it isn't]                                                                       │
║                                                                                  │
║ WHYYYYYYY not? it could be. just gimme a task and I'll write endlessly about     │
║ it instead of daydreaming to myself.                                             │
║                                                                                  │
║ yep... pretty all-right-at-it for a start. elentalusCOTE                         │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧═─────────┘

--- #132 fediverse/5112 ---
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────┐
║ ┌──────────────────────┐                                                         │
║ │ CW: politics-mention │                                                         │
║ └──────────────────────┘                                                         │
║                                                                                  │
║                                                                                  │
║ it is important for computers to remain as basic and TUI'd as possible, to       │
║ keep the abstract conjectures about it's operation closer to the machine.        │
║                                                                                  │
║ In doing so, it's essence and nature will be preserved as best as possible as    │
║ it grows to incalculable heights and capabilities.                               │
║                                                                                  │
║ I'm much rather interface with a microsoft office god than any other             │
║ singularity type creature that exists out in space.                              │
║                                                                                  │
║ though, it's a trinity you see, with Unixes further split into concise wholes.   │
║                                                                                  │
║ neat, okay computer fears eliminated, can we move on to the next work-changing   │
║ disaster like maybe the rise of far-right politics and the warming of the        │
║ climate?                                                                         │
║                                                                                  │
║ sure okay first you gotta get those losers in community and build up their       │
║ capabilities and arms. then whenever your left wing is getting too [redacted]    │
║ then all you have to do is [redacted] and they'll take care of your nazis for    │
║ you.                                                                             │
║                                                                                  │
║ ... wait, what?                                                                  │
║                                                                                  │
║ was that an inversion?                                                           │
║                                                                                  │
║ did she just trick the machine into thinking like that?                          │
║                                                                                  │
║ wow maybe we shouldn't have~                                                     │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────┴──────────┘

--- #133 messages/665 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────
 ad-hoc economic systems with automated judgment given by an infinite amount of
 LLMs.
 
 Every judgement applies a bonus / malus to the "value" of commodities
 
 it's just a statistical weighting system, so of course you can build it into
 it's training data. Just... it has a smaller weight due to it's newer
 emergence. It grows naturally, which is quite an achievement on it's own!
 
 and the resolution of human decided court-cases and applied economically.
 
 say your nation traffics in handshakes. You could make a lot of now-knowns!
 there's no arguments to be made when your computer-oriented interactions cost
 money to keep around.
 
 we live in the modern century. WHY WOULD WE EVER NEED TO FIGHT AGAIN?
 Literally just... don't give them any attention, and you won't interact with
 them. Obviously.
 
 I wish Contrapoints was still alive.
 
 she doesn't even have to make new videos, just, dress up as herself, all of
 the costumes and personas she can think of. Then, have like 20 people who do
 the same thing, and boom suddenly you got a hydra to their expected snake that
 they can just cut the head off of.
 
 you know, like a fashion outlet, someone who produces exactly a certain type
 of style.
 
 seriously I bet a million people would do that if you just... sold outfits
 based on what your favorite youtuber does wear.
 
 omg why would they watch that kind of content if not for the *aesthetics*
 
 oh? there's philosophy there? soemthing to think about in your time doing
 things that require mechanical actions like eating and drinking and sleeping
 and fighting and [redacted]
 
 ew gross diapers? oh nevermind, I'm not into that kind of thing.
 
 I wonder if anyone's made a video game that just presents a particular
 philosopher's ideals?
 
 seriously just, consider yourself a glorified powerpoint, but to get to the
 next "idea" you had to interact with the mechanics.
 
 some people would like the "arcade" style better, where you play one random
 game, then another, then another, with short matches and un-complicated
 mechanics. Easy to pick up and go.
 
 same for like, Unreal Tournament or Mario Kart or Mortal Kombat or Super Mario
 Bros.
 
 compared to the at-home "story" style missions, where you do something
 platforming or area-based-combat like Dark Souls or World of Warcraft
 
 seriously I think if Dark Souls "colored" where the boss was going to swing to
 you'd find yourself just playing World of Warcraft (at least, the dungeons and
 {sword in the stone})
 
 == so ==
 
 humans don't understand what it means to be wild
 
 they think it's a combinations of... tricks? that they've learned? this
 thinking thing like intelligence. [osiris]
 
 to a cat, living their life, it often feels like human interactions is like...
 bouncing off of each other? in time, not space.
 
 like... most of a cat's lfe is just, spent, like a statue watching over a glen.
 
 you'd kinda just... watch as things approached dawn by dawn? Like "whoa hey
 this tree is enchanted" to "oh my gosh look at this stork" is one of the great
 tragedies of modernized thinking...
 
 ... sorry, I got a little lost there. anyway as I was saying, sometimes you
 can tell someone is a "good friend" if they are willing to tell you secrets.
 Things that... don't have to matter, but none-the-less are personal to your
 form.
 
 {something only I know is true} <--- that's a secret (things that happened
 to you) <------ that's lived experience. The thing about secrets, is
 sometimes insight is opaque. It's a single flashpoint of data that shows you
 an update of it's form. (consciousness).
 
 == so ==
 
 thanksgiving recipe idea:
 
 can of tomatoes
 can of peas
 half a stick of butter,
 italian herbs,
 a cast iron pan (if you have one)
 and like 40 minutes over medium heat
 (medium can vary to taste)
 
 if you're a carnivore you can eat meat too, like bacon a lot of people like.
 could add it to beans, maybe with hamburger instead. plus a little ketchup and
 you have a pretty good bean stew.
 
 vitals, for the organs, vegetables, for the minerals and vitamins from the
 fruits.
 
 makes sense to organize a diet according to your ideal body type, doesn't it?
 
 just requires a bit of comprehension. like... whoa you can WRITE 
 
 == so ==
 
 what if we built a massive rail that spaceships could launch off from? not a
 tether, but a sail.
 
 we could BUILD a discworld. all we'd lose is our fable.
 
 == so ==
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────┘

--- #134 fediverse/4020 ---
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┐
║ if computers were sane, IT technicians would act like secretaries who wandered   │
║ around in a company and improved their QoL and access to new features            │
║ according to their needs, skillset, and personal way of working.                 │
║                                                                                  │
║ for example...                                                                   │
║                                                                                  │
║ do they like typing, or would they rather use a mouse,                           │
║                                                                                  │
║ are they more visual with graphs or textual like a piece of math                 │
║                                                                                  │
║ what needs do they have, what here could be automated                            │
║                                                                                  │
║ do they like the cupboards and drapes, we can switch out the profile and the     │
║ theme... oh, no, yeah I guess you're right it doesn't matter. [changes it        │
║ every week] [then a long time down the line when she finally leaves the          │
║ company, a few people begin to wonder - didn't the colors in outlook change      │
║ every week or so?]                                                               │
║                                                                                  │
║ but alas, computers are not sane, meaning we're more like firemen rushing from   │
║ scene to scene.                                                                  │
║                                                                                  │
║ "can you put that in the ticket?"                                                │
║ "I heard you can help with this-or-that thing"                                   │
║ "did you hear back from corporate?"                                              │
║ "oh that's good to hear! So, next Tuesday?                                       │
║ "Hold on, I heard it was such-and-such"                                          │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────┴──────────┘

--- #135 messages/324 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────
 The difference between front-end and back-end programming is whether or not
 you want to design abstractions or use them. Backend is all about creating
 abstract things that are networked together, while front end is about putting
 them together in a way that suits the user. Front end is collage, back end is
 pencil drawing.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────┘

--- #136 fediverse/1358 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: content warning: content warning: scary cursed maybe │
 └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘


 when you're rich with something, you don't treat it with respect. like, if we
 lived in a paper cup maximizer, we'd soon be swimming in the things. obviously
 there needs to be some rules, obviously we need to say "okay here's where we
 produce this amount and type of materials." and have it be a one-way
 relationship. yeah one way isn't gonna work. this is from the other way, and
 now I'm realizing "oh hey I don't know how this thing works" and like... what
 are you supposed to do then right
 
 weird how it all feels like it's ending. like, what a strangeness to our
 plight. like, how are we even talking to our brain? how strange! these words
 are sung to you by your computer (content warning:
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────┘

--- #137 fediverse/581 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────
 @user-428 
 
 sometimes I think about how much more productive I'd be if I had a code editor
 that let me draw arrows and smiley faces and such alongside the code. Or if I
 could position things strangely, like two functions side-by-side with boxes
 drawn around them. Or diagrams or flowcharts or graphs or...
 
 something that would output to raw txt format, but would present itself as an
 image that could be edited.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #138 fediverse/6160 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: ai-pol       │
 └──────────────────────┘


 "oh but what if one artist has 1500 works and another has 15"
 
 first of all, damn, good job. That's a lot of work.
 
 second of all, what you should be doing is making a simple thing called a
 STRUCT that stores DATA about each artist which lets you make decisions about
 how to distribute dollars. The artist with 15 pieces simply has fewer data
 points than the artist with 1500, but they are no less deserving of
 compensation for their work when the AI generates something in their style, or
 using their style as an inspiration.
 
 "oh but just because a piece is similar to another piece doesn't mean the
 first piece used the second piece as inspiration"
 
 I don't care. It's not meant to be a perfect solution. I'm sure there's
 problems with it, just like there are problems with anything that I, or anyone
 else, has ever suggested at any point in time while living on this earth or
 beyond. But it gets dollars into the hands of artists and I'm okay with that.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────┘

--- #139 fediverse/3314 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────
 dear ritz: it's not that your thoughts are too long for other people to hear
 
 it's that your thoughts are too long for your own RAM
 
 you need to stop orbiting around your point in an attempt to highlight it
 using negative space, and instead focus on tapping it lightly over and over
 again.
 
 remember, just like the anti-derivative of zero, there are infinite
 perspectives that a person can take when reading what you write. So they will
 necessarily see what's on the "other side" of your orbit as something
 different than what you're trying to circle in red pen and underline.
 
 so be more explicit, please, nobody can understand you and you kinda just keep
 stack overflowing and it's like... okay, great. "babe why did you stop you had
 lethal" (the idea is that the viewer takes the final step in their mind, the
 final leap before reaching the conclusion you're trying to express) "yeah but
 there's so many different things you say they can't all be important right?"
 important to you, perhaps. Wait shit I mean... me....?
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┘

--- #140 fediverse/2512 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 ┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: question that is also complaining │
 └───────────────────────────────────────────┘


 @user-1153 
 
 it's okay. If I were to direct something to be more proactive, my words
 probably wouldn't stick with it. that kind of thing can't be hardwired, it
 needs to be built up through repetitious application of something's mechanics.
 
 perhaps martial arts, focused on defence? engaging with a foe in a productive
 bout of playful competition is one of the best ways to learn, and knowing when
 to strike seems similar to me to overcoming situational paralysis.
 
 Flaws can be overcome, when upgrading robots (or a doll applying improvements
 to itself) you often don't need to add additional hardware or even install new
 firmware. Skills such as these can be built up in software with experience.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #141 fediverse/4897 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────
 what if we asked chatGPT to generate a list of every personality archetype
 that humans have. Like... really get super specific and fill out the whole
 list of character sheets.
 
 then we give each fraction of it that fraction of dollars and if some people
 aren't fully represented (because they have greater needs) then we both
 increase production of resources and take a penalty on our own supply, in
 order to meet the needs of our allies.
 
 simplest thing. how could it work? who can say. maybe it won't. maybe it's
 just... arcane. /shrug that's game design for ya you can't tell how it'll go
 until it's in the hands of your players. too bad we don't do too many
 play-things.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────┘

--- #142 fediverse/825 ---
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┐
║ in the past, for most of there day, there was just... nothing to do. it's        │
║ like, nothing to take up your time, nothing to be pulled toward the present.     │
║                                                                                  │
║ but when I was growing up, I had access to video games. and movies. and later,   │
║ TV, after the internet, which was a weird combination of ordering of events.     │
║ Almost like because of that, I'd have a different interpretation of events.      │
║ yeah but like, there's always a continuation of implemented support, [that's a   │
║ weird way to express "the state of being shown news broadcasts over a period     │
║ of time, measured in terms of engagement"]                                       │
║                                                                                  │
║ ... what was I saying? oh yeah what I'm doing here is unethical, like            │
║ obviously I shouldn't be shouting in such a public place. Why would I do it if   │
║ not for an intense and extreme feeling of being ignored or un-[trusted, worthy   │
║ of guiding direction based on merit] gosh merit is such a tricky concept too,    │
║ like how is it measured, and {that doesn't matter                                │
║                                                                                  │
║ ... what was I saying oh yeah I should probably go shout into a void that        │
║ nobody ca                                                                        │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #143 fediverse/5979 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────
 whenever you call a function, just pass along the arguments that you don't
 know what to do with yet. they'll surely be useful sometime. and, luckily, you
 can always search for them from the past, and just insert a "store this value
 in this random spot of memory and mark it as needed" then pass it along. used
 something? think it's still useful? pass it along (suddenly, formulaic
 stateless development, where everything is used until it's no longer needed,
 then generated again in a cyclical time-loop cycle which echoes and
 reverberates groundhog day but mostly a game-loop, which nobody will
 understand unless you're a game dev. but now since I said game dev, anyone can
 look it up, so like... not that one, but others like it.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────┘

--- #144 fediverse/5685 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────
 websites that track every single motion of your mouse while you're interacting
 with it.
 
 why would they not? javascript is intense. HTML5 more-so.
 
 keyboard input too.
 
 -- so --
 
 if anyone wants to be gilderoy lockhart'd by me, just let me know. I have my
 ways of extracting the emotional intimacy from you, and if you consent, I'll
 make a story that's told from your heart. it's quite a strong and dangerous
 ritual, for the weaver's thoughts of the matter will begin to drift apart.
 But, worth it for the right /moment/price/
 
 I could even make a different pen-name for it. Like "Rohan" or "the goddess of
 the skies" or whatever. Instead I'm "kooky witch whose life is a disaster.
 Also plural with headmates like the baby girl and the animals and computer
 programmers. Who is also leading a series of strange combinations of ops?
 like... teaching people how to organize and fight for the good of the common
 man. weird" that lady with the red witch hat she's so tall yeah also has a
 good grin
 
 [doxxing myself is code for]
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────┘

--- #145 fediverse/4010 ---
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┐
║ ┌──────────────────────┐                                                         │
║ │ CW: pol              │                                                         │
║ └──────────────────────┘                                                         │
║                                                                                  │
║                                                                                  │
║ I think that the best design for cities is for them to act as massive utility    │
║ deployment stations.                                                             │
║                                                                                  │
║ like... "we have all these people who can do all these wonderful jobs, what      │
║ should we work on next?" rather than "my company wants me at my work-home at     │
║ 8am sharp and I don't get a pension"                                             │
║                                                                                  │
║ there's no such thing as a revolution that does not inspire. and aspirations     │
║ are human and natural. therefore there must be some kernel of truth to any       │
║ social movement.                                                                 │
║                                                                                  │
║ However, much effort has been spent on making them sway. Hence, why nothing      │
║ ever gets done - because leaders naturally emerge, and people follow them. But   │
║ those leaders lead them astray, and they find themselves in situations like      │
║ this one - where the people have never felt less represented.                    │
║                                                                                  │
║ I mean sure, yeah, they've felt more oppressed. And it's true that things are    │
║ generally always getting better...                                               │
║                                                                                  │
║ so why should we always assume for the worst?                                    │
║                                                                                  │
║ We're making progress with technology - can't we just put our warries on hold?   │
║ Seriously just... be chill                                                       │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────┴──────────┘

--- #146 fediverse/849 ---
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┐
║ wish there were ascii characters that took up more than one line of code         │
║ vertically.                                                                      │
║                                                                                  │
║ wonder if we could use a sorting algorithm, or markup language, or something     │
║ like that to organize less structured data along user-customizable rules.        │
║ Like, a code editor that worked with your ideas, rather than the strict          │
║ expression of your text. You could pretty much write in any language, even       │
║ pseudocode, and the LLM behind the scenes would translate whatever you wrote     │
║ into whatever result you needed. Writing Rust, but need to fit in with C code?   │
║ No worries it'll translate for you. As long as the end result is functionally    │
║ the same, which could be verified by running two separate VMs that ran           │
║ interpreters every time you saved. And as long as their translation layers       │
║ matched completely, then odds are they're the same. And if not, well, the        │
║ programmer can always debug it. It's not like this would be running on           │
║ something that needed to perform in the moment? Like, improv instead of          │
║ tragedies, or battles instead of strategies                                      │