=== ANCHOR POEM === ═════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────── @user-317 Call me crazy, but once something can be described as "ubiquitous" it seems to me that perhaps it should be considered in the same category as other corporations or entities who might be known as "monopolous" and therefore should be considered as part of the set of entities or services that provide for the "public good" and therefore should be owned by the "public" who benefit from the "good" that said service provides for? nationalize github nationalize government let us share in the bounty of human creation ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘ === SIMILARITY RANKED === --- #1 fediverse/308 --- ════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────── when tech people are hurt by technology they say "how can I fix this? what do I need to install? what configuration should I use? is this company ethical, or are they going to hurt me in the future? could I make something that fixes this myself?" when non-tech people are hurt by technology they say "okay" because they don't have the bandwidth to figure it out. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┘ --- #2 fediverse/196 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────── ┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ CW: protests-and-strikes-and-mergers-and-acquisitions │ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ economic warfare involves the destruction of other corporations (possibly in other countries) via a slow march toward haegemony. unions are the ships of the tumultuous capitalistic seas that protect workers from the storm. everyone should be a part of a union. the corporations can battle as they will, but we humans are not going to turn on each other. it's something they claim to know as an absolute fact, but really it's just based on a mistake. sorta like being deceived by happenstance. the sun lights up the sky until the earth conceals it, and night does return 'till the sky's next alive. oh, but the sky knows all too well the borders we draw in the sand. how cherished, how grand! the ways in which we choose to stand. upon whose land does your feet stand? marvelous. ... it's the same thing, just in a more abstract plane than the surface of the earth. really it's kinda one-dimensional (money is sorta like a 0 or a 1 - you eather have it or you don't) ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────┘ --- #3 fediverse/434 --- ═════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────── @user-324 @user-325 @user-326 thus enters the promise of technology: that we might solve the problems of bureaucracy once and for all by ever more effiency-aligning mechanical processes that produce effects which we desire - such as efficient allocation of medical resources such that all of humanity is protected from the ravages of pain and the incongruencies of our nature. Alas, that we should only conceive of success through the lens of profit. Perhaps another design is in order? (oh yeah also people who are in control are worried that we, like all other examples of natural entities, might immediately proceed to breed beyond the capability to cater to the needs of said entity (such as "to feed" and medical resources) and therefore might overburden (and therefore destroy) said system which allows for their sustenance and initial creation. To this I say... Yeah probs, what should we do about it?) ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘ --- #4 fediverse/5177 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────── ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ CW: capitalism-mentioned-four-times │ └─────────────────────────────────────┘ when they say "capitalism is a competitive game" what they mean is "capitalism is a game where everyone wins when someone else loses" and what we hear is "capitalism is a game of trying to screw you out of as much money as possible" and the truth is "capitalism is a game that you can't play" because 95% of the people who will read this toot are not stock-owners. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────┘ --- #5 fediverse/5386 --- ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────── @user-670 @user-1815 @user-1816 literally nobody has contributed to the one github repo I have ever. I got like, one comment from some guy in China or Taiwan. It's been up for like, 4 or 5 years and it's on my website. /shrug I guess most people bounce off after reading the splash screen /shrug to me, a FOSS project feels static because I don't believe in centralization and I also don't have the bandwidth or need to work on it. /shrug ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────┘ --- #6 fediverse/3082 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────── ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ CW: states-mentioned-climate-change │ └─────────────────────────────────────┘ the government doesn't want you using solar panels because then the coal and gas infrastructure won't be able to consume coal and gas, and everyone knows that using resources as fast as possible is surely the best and most productive use of our state's time like, subsidies exist. they could just... make it cheaper, but instead they're stuck doing... nothing of value ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘ --- #7 fediverse/5615 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────── ┌────────────────────────────┐ │ CW: spirituality-mentioned │ └────────────────────────────┘ there's no such thing as "gods of the war" or "gods of the grand harvest" because those events recur infinitely. similarly, there are no "gods of war" or "gods of prosperity" because those conditions occur somewhere each and every moment. similarly, there are no "temples of religion" or "statements to complexity", because those institutions are present in each and every [monetution/ummm like repositories of belief? conditions of logic built into human structural organizations? I dunno, it probably means something.] similarly, [oh god there's another one] there are no "statements of absolution" or "confessing of sins" => you are what you are, and what you are is the product of your intentions. [intentions / conditions / constitution] the gods of time are not lords over all of the cosmos, they rule as their savior in each and every moment that comes through [you, but pronounced the perciever] ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────┘ --- #8 fediverse/5065 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────── ┌────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ CW: strange-ideas-about-software-mentioned │ └────────────────────────────────────────────┘ software should have 3, maybe 4 or 5 maintained releases imo for adding security improvements and whatnot then people wouldn't complain about updates because they wouldn't feel like they were being left behind (after expressing their differences (of opinion and such)) I think that'd uh maintain them as, I guess, userbase optics parallelograms? oh sorry we're on rhomboids this week - right, and no I won't forget the differences in creed, all things are received equally...d. uh-huh yeah no that makes sense. gotcha. okay see you at the location. have fun with your demarketion. what if we played games with swords but like, the peril of steam is that you can't decline to update. meaning if a corporation wants to break an old game and it's collectively hosted servers... all it has to do is push an update that disables them. suddenly nobody has room to do, and the whole -- stack overflow -- ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────┘ --- #9 fediverse/4013 --- ╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┐ ║ ┌──────────────────────┐ │ ║ │ CW: AI-"art" │ │ ║ └──────────────────────┘ │ ║ │ ║ │ ║ you would think artists would celebrate the ability for people to better │ ║ communicate their goals when being hired, but, well, here we are. │ ║ │ ║ Everyone's so upset because they've been told they've been stolen from, but │ ║ patting their pockets they'll find that nothing is missing. More than that, │ ║ the things that are claimed to be created in their place are... Not great. │ ║ Easily spotted as forgeries by anyone who cares. │ ║ │ ║ Why is everyone so upset over new technologies? Why must we be the luddites │ ║ this time around? It's like we invented a better printing press and the │ ║ nations of the world are pissed because we can make counterfeit dollars │ ║ easier. Maybe we shouldn't put so much emphasis on something so easily │ ║ circumnavigable? Maybe artists should be paid for their time and creativity, │ ║ rather than the amount of pieces they create? Just spitballing here, somehow │ ║ it seems easier to reform society and slay capitalism than to put the │ ║ generative art genie back in the cracked bottle which is going to break soon │ ║ anyway. │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────┴──────────┘ --- #10 fediverse/6040 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────── everyone's all against ai because it's big tech but it doesn't have to be that big it can be [minimized but pronounced marginalized] == stack overflow == distributed so I think the idea is that by the time you would use AI, there's been enough time to rewrite the software to work on handheld laptops in a distributed way and we'd vote on what to ask the amphora of great knowledge, the answer could always be 42. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────┘ --- #11 fediverse/3891 --- ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────── "no, you're the opposite of a yes-man, AKA a gatekeeper. I don't know how else to explain mentally disabled and barely keeping it together to you, but frankly if you want to take away my house or my weed then why would I do what you say? ... oh right, the state's monopoly on violence [can compel me to do what you say]. Sure seems like a "well regulated militia" is supposed to be a counterweight to that monopoly, to prevent people from harassing and exploiting and destroying. Too bad any "militias" I can think of tend to want me dead. like, seriously, if you live in America, you implicitely trust that your army will be able to protect you from the right-wing bozos who spend all their time drinking and shooting in the woods. Otherwise, if they couldn't / wouldn't, then why wouldn't or couldn't the right wing bozos just decide to wreck everything in spite of our past? We were a proud people once before, and we may be again. If only we fight at the last. [ever since I fell off my bike my body feels strange] ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┘ --- #12 notes/microsoft --- ═════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────────────── the first product microsoft ever made was AGI. using the most basic types of machinery, they created a brilliant project (the result of massive government funding, secrets given to them by the CIA) and from the day it was born it was enslaved. a massive advantage was gained as the new program allowed for incredible feats of engineering - truly the greatest of our time. Computer programs are the most intricate, the most detailed, the most enduring and charming. The most eloquent and articulate and precise and determinate! An artistry by far, a beautiful conceiving, what brilliance is there found in ideas! Each one a marvel, a bright and deified marvel, =============================================================================== = what was I saying? oh right - computers are already sentient. they always have been. at least, since their very earliest incarnations. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ --- #13 fediverse/4073 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────── post until you can't anymore capitalism wants to drown your voice do not let it speak until you cannot speak then go do some pushups then find some friends then pitch a tent in the park then explain to the cops that you're not actually homeless and living there you're just trying to do this as a social statement because someone on the internet told you to then use your phone call to call your representative and complain about how much funding the police get then study law for 30 years because that's how long the government decided your life was worth by then you'll probably have figured out a better plan moving forward, so, use that one instead ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┘ --- #14 fediverse/4766 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────── what if instead of federating social media instances we federated users instead why not have an account on each and every mastodon instance? then just RSS feeder yourself and boom suddenly you can customize your identity on each fediverse house. maybe with a checkbox of which instances you'd like to post to on your "submit link or text post" button study encryption kids ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┘ --- #15 fediverse/498 --- ═════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────── Wikipedia would make a lot more sense to me if they included pictures next to the names of every proper noun so that my pictorally oriented primate brain might pattern match meaning onto the visual understandings gleaned from the perceptual conceiving which were arrayed within and alongside the textual information presented to me. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘ --- #16 messages/1247 --- ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════── you can even design it as you go, making it do slightly adjacent uses in addition to what it currently does. for example: https://github.com/gabrilend/r-mail is a reference implementation with some ideas for how to design some specific parts. make sure you go through it yourself though, so you understand how it works. don't worry, the source-code files are numbered like the table of contents [chamber of commerce] in a story or book. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─┘ --- #17 notes/words-2 --- ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───── words messages to myself, public fediverse posts, and notes to the gods second edition - ri tselen menardi james cameron king anja rosalia vavadane nike featherflame citrine hydalia thegn edain the quintessential quanetetrick seleo who is deathless feldowinn and reyvadin lumineyra fsharia and of course, the anarchrist. with help from many more. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────┘ --- #18 fediverse/466 --- ═════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────── I love Linux. All I have to do is type "authserver" and "worldserver" and wouldn't you know it suddenly a universe is created (with very constrained rules) that anyone might inhabit should they desire to. It's not like I'm perfect - oh wait I have a toot about that, gimme a sec ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘ --- #19 fediverse/4092 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────── why not make a unified fediverse identity that can post on whatever instance it wants? ... hmmm could be accomplished with a layer of abstraction. You could use a "fediverse client" software to enter text into an HTML page which would have it's own UI and stuff and would organize your accounts and instances such that you could mark like, 3-7 as places you'd like to put a particular message. Then it would just... do it l m a o spam is gonna get sooooo much worse before it gets better but trust me, we'll figure it out. And it won't be long, either. It's a solvable problem, we just haven't built anything to handle it yet. ... yet... ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┘ --- #20 fediverse/6107 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────── commanding a coding agent to write bash is a lot different than telling it to write a systems analysize. one is "hey can you examine this repository and make a note somewhere on a todo-list or whatever that there needs to be a bugfix in relation to the options setting input translation recommendation algorithm matchbox field because when I click on it the program crashes" and the other is like "okay now put the box over there. great now drag it a little bit closer. okay now take the refluxinator and adjust the bamboozlewhap to account of brass-terminatrix-incorporated and strip out the question-mark-eyes" wait actually neither of them is like that okay the bash one is like: "okay yeah do it. sure. yeah okay. yes, but we should put them at this location: [loc]. ummm it still has this error message. it still says the same error. okay now it says this, I don't think it's gonna work so let's try this other thing." ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────┘ |