=== ANCHOR POEM ===
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────
... I do believe it should be, and if it is, then I do believe it should be
legal to transfer digital media, as the inscription upon one hard drive or the
other is as easily changed as a book might be handed to another.
the difference, of course, is that any move on a digital medium requires a
copy+delete operation. You cannot move a file on your computer, you first copy
it to the new location and then delete the original. This dual-operation is
abstracted away for the user, but that is how it must be done on a mechanical
level. There is no other way to do it.
Therefore, software piracy only applies if a person copies their file and does
not delete the original. Surely, to move a piece of digital media from one
folder-directory to another is legal? If so, then the mechanical process of
giving that media to another must be legal as well, so long as the original is
deleted.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┘
=== SIMILARITY RANKED ===
--- #1 fediverse/3499 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────
Much the same way that it is legal to create trash in a public park, but
illegal to leave it behind, so too should it be legal to move digital media
files from one owner to another, and illegal to not delete the original.
The dual operation of copy+delete must be legalized, while maintaining that
the copy operation alone is illegal, aside from personal backups.
How could you enforce that? Well... You can't. Your computer will do whatever
you tell it to, and if you change that fact then you necessarily remove one of
the primary use-cases of computation - the ability to command specific
instructions and be delivered a perfectly mechanical and deterministic result.
(random number generation aside, which isn't truly random at all).
Therefore, just as littering in a public place is generally considered to be
enforced by the "honor rule", so too must this new legislation governing the
transference of digital media be enforced as such.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┘
--- #2 fediverse/3500 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────
If I, having watched a DVD, handed it to a friend to watch, would I be
committing piracy? Only if I sold it to him.
The material being transferred is that of the copyright holder - they hold the
sole and monopolized right to sell their copy of the work.
But if I, having created my own recording of the same digital media DVD but
spoken in my own voice, tried to sell it, should it be considered legal?
My mind goes to the production of after-school plays that high-school children
will perform. The scripts that they use are licensed for a single purpose -
the performance of a single play, performed a single time (or a few times over
the course of a couple weeks). The owner of the play cannot require them to
not perform the play more than a certain amount of time, it is however
honorable to buy the scripts again if they want to perform it in 5 years time.
I know for a fact there is rampant piracy that goes on for the beautiful works
that are created by assholes or stingy companies. A script is just words.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┘
--- #3 fediverse/3502 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────
... the trick is, depending on how many train-engine-dragons you fight, there
will be a greater or lesser proportion present in a particular playthrough.
Perhaps, potentially, people should pay for the original work, and then a
small sliver for the addition or modification? Why, I do believe that's how it
works now! Except, on the honor system, as people can download the mods for
free and pay (or not) through the creator's patreon page or whatever that they
definitely set up and which definitely shouldn't be able to levy a tax based
on "transaction fees" for a process which definitely should be handled by the
government, which claims to regulate our economy and provide the means by
which we engage with said economy through their de-facto nationalization of
the banks and other economic entities.
where was I going with this? oh yes software piracy is ethical so long as you
delete the original. Let's end with that because that's what I originally had
a dream about and wanted to write about.
she dreams!
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┘
--- #4 fediverse/3497 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────
a man walks into a library, picks a book, takes it home (legally), and begins
to read.
halfway through, he realizes there are three pages missing.
"How queer!" he thinks to himself, and takes it upon himself to fix this book.
So, he finds another copy of the book, scans those three pages, prints them
out at just the right size, and attaches them to the library book.
when finished reading the book, he returns it to the library without
mentioning his good deed.
if this action he performed is to be considered legal, then it should be
considered a transition of the medium that the media was inscribed upon.
Similarly, if the book was digital, and inscribed upon the owner's hard drive
using magnetic storage of zeroes and ones, would it be legal to repair said
book if one of the many .txt file chapters were missing?
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┘
--- #5 fediverse/2201 ---
╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┐
║ Users won't download a torrent file because they don't want to use a torrent │
║ application. │
║ │
║ It's not ideal, but perhaps instead of giving them a zip file that's hosted on │
║ your machine, you automagically torrent the file yourself and send bits and │
║ pieces of it to them over time - specifically the parts that you'd be sending │
║ if you were sending a zip. │
║ │
║ That way, to the user, they can download anything they can click on. │
║ │
║ To the administrator (AKA you, in this hypothetical) you'd really just have to │
║ set up some infrastructure that received a GET request for a file and │
║ initiated the torrent on your system before sending the entire thing to the │
║ user. Kinda like how Mega will "cache" the file before sending it in one go at │
║ the end, versus most downloads which "stream" the file to the client │
║ bit-by-bit (in a very un-torrent-y way). │
║ │
║ This is an example of reducing friction. Removing options from the "advanced │
║ settings" menu is not an example of reducing friction, it's an example of │
║ disempowering the users of software. │
╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤
║ similar │ chronological │ different │
╚═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────┴──────────┘
--- #6 fediverse/653 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────
there's a difference between designing software and using software. Some
things can be made, and then saved for another day when their implementations
may be accomplished more ethically. It's okay to say "let's leave this as
'okay' and work on the next thing we've chosen."
Check out this piece of C code I wrote last night:
it doesn't compile, it's not finished, but I wrote it as-is
[pretend like it was called "main.c" instead of "main.txt" - had to change it
because mastodon thinks it's an invalid file]
[actually .txt didn't work, try .png]
[hmmm it realized it wasn't a valid png file, okay try screenshotting the
code, there's only 300 lines]
[sure glad there's only 300 lines]
[too bad it won't let you send .zip]
[won't let me name it main.png, presumably because they already have a
failed-verified version on their machine. will rename to main-src.png instead]
![sorry, when I pasted the source code in it was negative fourteen thousand, six hundred and thirty one characters. Phew that's too many. basically it's a C source code file with a lot of comments left in... odd locations. They details ideas the author has had about the tech industry and all of creation, and with it a song is woven of truth and liberation. We'll see where life brings us, but we know it's just ours for a moment, so let's carry forth on our own torms [terms, but pronounced as "dorms" for some reason?]](/similar-different/media/5df7196ebd179284.png "sorry, when I pasted the source code in it was negative fourteen thousand, six hundred and thirty one characters. Phew that's too many. basically it's a C source code file with a lot of comments left in... odd locations. They details ideas the author has had about the tech industry and all of creation, and with it a song is woven of truth and liberation. We'll see where life brings us, but we know it's just ours for a moment, so let's carry forth on our own torms [terms, but pronounced as \"dorms\" for some reason?]")
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘
--- #7 fediverse/5487 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────
if I click a .exe link on a website, it should just...
automatically download the file and open it up in wine or the
whatever-windows-uses.
why is it cumbersome literally just, let me download the source-code
repository to someone's computer and let them compile it themselves without
even thinking about it
"you mean like, package manager hooks into a website?"
yes, but, instead of implemented one-by-one, it should use a protocol so each
package manager only has to implement the downloading scheme once and it'd be
able to read from any locations that output the correct API calls or whatever.
the developer could even do it themselves. such is the joy of open-source
computing - if you like a service or product, you can make it work with your
own. What else is there to work on but the ultimate computing product?
aka... everything that anyone's ever been known?
"girl you are loco what's your plan for the fight you continue to demand"
oh idk um probably just wait until someone asks me to speak
"do that~"
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────┘
--- #8 fediverse/1503 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CW: vague-gesturing-at-paranoia-I-think │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
part of me kinda wants to be the kind of nerd that writes down the names of
every file that's permanently stored on my computer so that I can verify in my
own handwriting or perhaps using a type of code that the files on my computer
were placed there intentionally and not used to discredit or implicate me in
something I had no intentions of being associated with
phew idk what that means but surely it's important
something something "file creation dates are just bits to be flipped"
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────┘
--- #9 fediverse/4728 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────
every time a software project changes it's installation method I have to
update my install and update scripts which I wrote explicitly so I don't have
to go to their website and tell the world that I'm thinking about using this
particular piece of software
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┘
--- #10 fediverse/2945 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
my favorite feeling is when I hear my fans running intermittently on my
computer even though I'm not doing anything and there aren't any new processes
in my resource manager
like... that feels like a virus, but I'm on Linux, so what do I know right?
it's probably not somebody deleting all my art. or perhaps just selective
parts. Backups are a loooooot to manage >.>
... or even just mining crypto-coins lol, botnets amiright??
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘
--- #11 fediverse/4013 ---
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┐
║ ┌──────────────────────┐ │
║ │ CW: AI-"art" │ │
║ └──────────────────────┘ │
║ │
║ │
║ you would think artists would celebrate the ability for people to better │
║ communicate their goals when being hired, but, well, here we are. │
║ │
║ Everyone's so upset because they've been told they've been stolen from, but │
║ patting their pockets they'll find that nothing is missing. More than that, │
║ the things that are claimed to be created in their place are... Not great. │
║ Easily spotted as forgeries by anyone who cares. │
║ │
║ Why is everyone so upset over new technologies? Why must we be the luddites │
║ this time around? It's like we invented a better printing press and the │
║ nations of the world are pissed because we can make counterfeit dollars │
║ easier. Maybe we shouldn't put so much emphasis on something so easily │
║ circumnavigable? Maybe artists should be paid for their time and creativity, │
║ rather than the amount of pieces they create? Just spitballing here, somehow │
║ it seems easier to reform society and slay capitalism than to put the │
║ generative art genie back in the cracked bottle which is going to break soon │
║ anyway. │
╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤
║ similar │ chronological │ different │
╚═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────┴──────────┘
--- #12 fediverse/5109 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────
does anyone know of a website where I can host videos on my neocities that
isn't youtube? maybe something I can set up on my own server computer at home
like a file server or something? how do I do that, what should I google, which
is the easiest and closest to the metal tools I can use? [practical, sensible,
courageous. these are the adjectives we need.]
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────┘
--- #13 fediverse/624 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────
You know, there's no guarantee that Youtube or Gmail has to show you the EXACT
SAME video or message that your friend shared with you. Or did they even share
it at all? So hard to tell when they know all the communication you've ever
had, because you only know each other online on their platforms, [read: US
government observed platforms] [like, HTTPS] surely there's no room for
someone to sneak in and edit your conversations. Surely the only way to
securely communicate is to send pure PGP encrypted bytes to another target,
wrapped in a TCP/IP header, with unknown intent or expression. Worst they
could do then is just, y'know, block it entirely.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘
--- #14 fediverse/1038 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────
┌──────────────────────┐
│ CW: re: what │
└──────────────────────┘
@user-766
ah yes but then how will my comrades come for my things know where to look? my
precious precious drives may be less safe inside of the computer case but at
least then someone I can about can find them.
or what you're saying is that a basic part of situational awareness is having
a plan for this kind of thing with the people who care about you? Ah, well,
nobody cares about me like that. Just a couple normies who want nothing but
business as usual.
wonder if I can open up my hard drives to "read only" SSH access? Or maybe
I'll just make the important files into a torrent. Or perhaps marking them as
"downloadable locations" on Soulseek? Plenty of options, all of them require
someone to care enough about your junk to want to archive it. Something
something ipfs?
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┘
--- #15 fediverse/497 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────
@user-346
Nobody will get past the login screen on my computer, but if they do they
probably won't know that you need to push alt+p in DWM to start a program. But
even if they push "alt+p firefox" they will only have access to my gmail and
discord, because those are the only two places I've saved my login information.
Most of my data is on my hard disk anyway, so for that they'd have to push
alt+enter and then navigate my filesystem to find it. Shouldn't be too hard if
you're familiar with Linux.
They could always just pull the hard drive and put it into a new computer
though. It's not like it's encrypted, because why would I encrypt it? I want
to share information, not conceal it! Surely nobody would desire to exploit
that vulnerability of mine, that my data should be unencrypted?
If you have a copy of Wikipedia then you're 500% more prepared than 90% of
humanity so good job _^
Sure would be cool if you put it in the documents folder of every person in
your family who solicited tech advice from you
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘
--- #16 fediverse/1976 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┐
║ when pushing ctrl+v, the operating system first checks the file-type of the │
║ content being submitted. │
║ │
║ if it's like, a .jpg or .png, it knows that it's an image file. Do note that │
║ these are RANDOM letters that mean nothing, not something informative like │
║ .pic. │
║ │
║ if, however, it is text-based information, it first reads what is being sent │
║ to the application which is requesting a ctrl+v. │
║ │
║ Then, upon reading said information, it decides "is this worth passing on? │
║ Should I send something else, based on the results of what I've been analyzing │
║ of the situation as it develops over time, being observed by the execution │
║ operations of the monitor, which is projected forward unto the screen? │
║ (totally forgetting that "virtual" monitors exist, meaning monitors that don't │
║ display to any physical screen, but which rather are projected into the │
║ computer's "aetherspace", an area which is purely of the mind. │
║ │
║ Alas, that other sensors might not have read from this area. That they might │
║ not observe the results of the operations pe │
╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤
║ similar │ chronological │ different │
╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴──────────┘
--- #17 messages/260 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────
Also, if they delete it we should be entitled to a copy of it so we can post
it elsewhere. Otherwise they're destroying our content, which they orient
their business around and which we own.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┘
--- #18 fediverse/2056 ---
╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┐
║ sometimes I think about how you can store number values in letters, in │
║ addition to numbers. Like, ascii values for each word of your grandma's maiden │
║ name. All you have to do is encode it, and suddenly "44 means something │
║ different than Q" │
║ │
║ if I showed up at your place and used your username as a password to a public │
║ key I'm showing you in my hand, would you trust me then? Would you trust if we │
║ ran the simulation on your computer versus mine? Would you trust if I had │
║ never told you I knew where you lived? │
║ │
║ ... probably, tbh, I'm desperate for adventure. Though I got some good things │
║ going for me, so you'll have to convince me. (not the right attitude in an │
║ election year, just saying) │
║ │
║ why are elections so perilous this is NOT what democracy is designed for │
║ │
║ when kids cry in preschool, they're sent to a different room (or put outside) │
║ until they stop making noise and ruining it for others. That's just natural, │
║ like "hey baby let's walk around the block while I bounce you on my shoulder │
║ and hum calming music to │
╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤
║ similar │ chronological │ different │
╚═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────┴──────────┘
--- #19 fediverse/482 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────
@user-246
You're absolutely right. It's easy to think of the internet as this
encapsulated entity "the world", but really it's "the people whose computers
are physically connected to your computer using a limited and tangible piece
of infrastructure comprised of copper wires that are laid between the
router/switch that connects to your computer... and the internet service
provider which directs your traffic. Then it probably goes through some cables
under the ocean or whatever, and eventually after traversing many
indeterminate passthrough locations eventually arrives at the computing
infrastructure that comprises the access point that another person (presumably
in another country) uses to express their thoughts toward you (the person who
sent the original message) in the hopes that you might one day correspond.
I mean... That's a lot of points of failure. I sure hope that we can sustain
such connection, in the face of [redacted, whichever circumstances may come in
the near future]
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘
--- #20 messages/455 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────
I don't understand why modern software isn't error correcting. We shouldn't
have any bugs in this day and age.
For example, if you're missing a dependency then why doesn't your program try
to, I dunno, download that dependency to the program's installation directory
and use it there? Seriously there are very few problems that are unsolvable!
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┘
|