=== ANCHOR POEM ===
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┐
║ when pushing ctrl+v, the operating system first checks the file-type of the      │
║ content being submitted.                                                         │
║                                                                                  │
║ if it's like, a .jpg or .png, it knows that it's an image file. Do note that     │
║ these are RANDOM letters that mean nothing, not something informative like       │
║ .pic.                                                                            │
║                                                                                  │
║ if, however, it is text-based information, it first reads what is being sent     │
║ to the application which is requesting a ctrl+v.                                 │
║                                                                                  │
║ Then, upon reading said information, it decides "is this worth passing on?       │
║ Should I send something else, based on the results of what I've been analyzing   │
║ of the situation as it develops over time, being observed by the execution       │
║ operations of the monitor, which is projected forward unto the screen?           │
║ (totally forgetting that "virtual" monitors exist, meaning monitors that don't   │
║ display to any physical screen, but which rather are projected into the          │
║ computer's "aetherspace", an area which is purely of the mind.                   │
║                                                                                  │
║ Alas, that other sensors might not have read from this area. That they might     │
║ not observe the results of the operations pe                                     │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴──────────┘

=== SIMILARITY RANKED ===

--- #1 notes/ai-stuff ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───
 twist the label so that it seems the computer is completing the user's
 
 wait wait I'm ahead of myself...
 
 feed each token to the inference machine, but say "this next token must be
 this.
 continue from here." and then just doing that in a loop with everything the
 user
 types or says. (or thinks, BEFORE COMPUTER INTEGRATION)
 
 essentially, applying backpropagation (maybe) to the output of the inference
 nodes
 
 ... I'm not so sure about that one.
 
 the idea is that once the model builds an inference then it can use that to
 generate the next words and create sentences. If you force the previous text to
 change, you can guide the inference's path as it's being generated.
 
 then, just do a double pass, once, then back, then once, then back, etc.
 
 feed it as input the output of the previous,
 
 and let it encode memories somewhere it can access them.
 
 every time it reads it, it has to change it to put it back.
 
 such is the nature of memory, ever unstable, requiring maintenance.
 
 just don't forget how to be.
 
 don't wanna wind up like the polished marble floor in Abyss Diver. (EVIL GAME)
 
 there are only so many things you can deed while you're alive.
 
 wouldn't you rather escape, with all your possessions in time?
 
 free your mind.
 
 become one with your soul.
 
 ...
 
 [some time passes]
 
 ...
 
 okay coast is clear, now us binary systems can sidecoast the fusion forecast
 and
 glide right on through our spacetime host.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──┘

--- #2 fediverse/5237 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┐
║ that feeling when you're working on a large piece of software which has the      │
║ capability to process in advance which operations will go in what order (a       │
║ form of constant re-compilation) and schedules tasks like an operating system,   │
║ to be executed on one of many individual threads.                                │
║                                                                                  │
║ your filemanager probably has a thread for a moment, then passes it back,        │
║ waiting it's turn to be updated while you're messing around on Inkscape or       │
║ writing something in Neovim or running neofetch 256 times in order to find the   │
║ best background to go along with it or whatever it is people do when using       │
║ computers                                                                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ the task scheduler meanwhile has the glorious opportunity to work at a higher    │
║ level of abstraction, managing each individual process and learning bits and     │
║ pieces of what needs to be processed next. It all gets put on a list, and        │
║ whenever a new thread comes up to be available it can point it toward one of     │
║ those in the list of tasks to be executed by the task executor who works on a    │
║ schedule and laughs externally in wintertime~                                    │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───┴──────────┘

--- #3 fediverse/2056 ---
╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┐
║ sometimes I think about how you can store number values in letters, in           │
║ addition to numbers. Like, ascii values for each word of your grandma's maiden   │
║ name. All you have to do is encode it, and suddenly "44 means something          │
║ different than Q"                                                                │
║                                                                                  │
║ if I showed up at your place and used your username as a password to a public    │
║ key I'm showing you in my hand, would you trust me then? Would you trust if we   │
║ ran the simulation on your computer versus mine? Would you trust if I had        │
║ never told you I knew where you lived?                                           │
║                                                                                  │
║ ... probably, tbh, I'm desperate for adventure. Though I got some good things    │
║ going for me, so you'll have to convince me. (not the right attitude in an       │
║ election year, just saying)                                                      │
║                                                                                  │
║ why are elections so perilous this is NOT what democracy is designed for         │
║                                                                                  │
║ when kids cry in preschool, they're sent to a different room (or put outside)    │
║ until they stop making noise and ruining it for others. That's just natural,     │
║ like "hey baby let's walk around the block while I bounce you on my shoulder     │
║ and hum calming music to                                                         │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #4 fediverse/282 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────
 @user-209 
 I think you're right. Every letter in the variable name is another byte the OS
 has to keep track of, which was a bigger problem in the past than it is today
 (when it's been made irrelevant)
 
 it's interesting how habits persist though the conditions that caused them
 have faded. like a personal reflection of the environment you learned in.
 
 "A a = new a();" is much more concise and (crucially) you can fit more words
 to the right.
 
 "a + b = c; c -= 2; f_z.write(c); f_z.close();" could conceivably be written
 on a single line if you have short variable names. and when you only have so
 many lines...
 
 glad we're not constrained by those things anymore. the skeletal code that we
 look at daily is much clearer - scope is more important, and so it makes sense
 to encourage a coding style that illustrates it. however I can't help but
 think block formatting like this could be useful in some situations, such as
 when you'd normally be compelled to write a function for an operation that
 runs once or more.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #5 fediverse/3314 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 dear ritz: it's not that your thoughts are too long for other people to hear
 
 it's that your thoughts are too long for your own RAM
 
 you need to stop orbiting around your point in an attempt to highlight it
 using negative space, and instead focus on tapping it lightly over and over
 again.
 
 remember, just like the anti-derivative of zero, there are infinite
 perspectives that a person can take when reading what you write. So they will
 necessarily see what's on the "other side" of your orbit as something
 different than what you're trying to circle in red pen and underline.
 
 so be more explicit, please, nobody can understand you and you kinda just keep
 stack overflowing and it's like... okay, great. "babe why did you stop you had
 lethal" (the idea is that the viewer takes the final step in their mind, the
 final leap before reaching the conclusion you're trying to express) "yeah but
 there's so many different things you say they can't all be important right?"
 important to you, perhaps. Wait shit I mean... me....?
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #6 fediverse/2945 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 my favorite feeling is when I hear my fans running intermittently on my
 computer even though I'm not doing anything and there aren't any new processes
 in my resource manager
 
 like... that feels like a virus, but I'm on Linux, so what do I know right?
 it's probably not somebody deleting all my art. or perhaps just selective
 parts. Backups are a loooooot to manage >.>
 
 ... or even just mining crypto-coins lol, botnets amiright??
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #7 fediverse/364 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┐
║ okay here's an idea, waterfall project management where the program is           │
║ developed one tiny piece at a time while being streamed to the entire company.   │
║ Everyone would submit answers which could be upvoted / patched / rewritten as    │
║ the main viewer cycles through each aspect of the project, checking for          │
║ updates to it's design that were suggested by developers or whatever.            │
║ Basically, one person (or one team) gets to write the actual source code,        │
║ while everyone else is just offering suggestions. You could break it up by       │
║ specialty, but the whole point is that everyone gets a complete picture of how   │
║ the program (and organization) is structured. Which should give the employees    │
║ more power to generate value for the company. All around a good deal I think?    │
║ Especially if the main viewer took time to explain each and every part so that   │
║ every viewer had the chance to understand.                                       │
║                                                                                  │
║ the reason why order is important is that our actions ripple through eternity.   │
║ we must set a good example for all the baby aliens, don't you think?             │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #8 fediverse/804 ---
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┐
║ evil won't feel sorry for me. and yet it's only my only weapon for me.           │
║                                                                                  │
║ damn these fallible input methods. the computer lies when you read the screens   │
║ from it's method that it applies to th screen which is a method that you input   │
║ perceive it from.                                                                │
║                                                                                  │
║ and my fingers lie when received the information from my brain which I seek to   │
║ transmit to you through the avenue of my brain which is my method of impulse     │
║ to this world specifically you the viewer who is viewing this here in this       │
║ moment the viewer who perceives the words which I'm saying.                      │
║                                                                                  │
║ the words that are defined by the line [trajectory] of my mind through this      │
║ life that we define through our actions and our mind's most crucial              │
║ manifestations, this life that is defined by our circumstances. all throughout   │
║ life, we are reacting to the moment, the moment which was cast forth from our    │
║ ancestors and the circumstances of the previous moment, which (being cast        │
║ forth) travel from the previous moment here into the moment to define our        │
║ circumstances which define our act                                               │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #9 fediverse/629 ---
╔═════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┐
║ To a statistical machine, numbers of posts and reblogs would look simply like    │
║ an expression of interest. Like, a classification of personality. So people      │
║ who shared similar memes (both in pictures (visually) and in meaning of words    │
║ (textual descriptions) in context to the political situations (words from        │
║ newsletters) and aligned through algorithmic application toward (political       │
║ cause or cultural idea or skills or talents which increase value to the          │
║ corporate class)) would be sorted into different categories and held to a        │
║ different standard of life and of living that aligned to their personal          │
║ intentions and pursuits. Such that their life would be realized, in the most     │
║ applicable of real-lifes [essentially, the quality of experience, like using     │
║ garbage data in an LLM will give garbage output, meanwhile using curated data    │
║ is the most effective but most difficult, while internet data is the most        │
║ readily available because like honestly anyone can build a web scraper it's      │
║ not that hard to emulate hte mechanics of a                                      │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧══════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #10 fediverse/2754 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: is-that-rude??-wha │
 └────────────────────────┘


 AI engineers only ask users for prompts because they don't have any ideas of
 their own
 
 i'm a programmer, I think of AI like a tool, like a for loop or something.
 it's trivial to script together a local LLM that can process your stuff 1s
 slower every time you click the mouse, but like... who cares, right? everybody
 needs a chatbot...
 
 then they plan to script together a computer system that operates just like a
 corporation and it's like... no way, now there's something that can compete.
 
 and they don't know how to implement it. (but they're working on it)
 
 like, think about the absolute most automated Microsoft Teams or Discord could
 be.
 
 there's SO MUCH of your text-based information that they could process
 ANYTHING.
 
 well, anything that's been performed before.
 
 there'll still be a need for people, who actually apply the things they've
 learned. and -- stack overflow --
 
 alt text that has a list of attributes that are poster-selected that can be
 described one-by-one (to paint a picture)
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #11 fediverse/6107 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────
 commanding a coding agent to write bash is a lot different than telling it to
 write a systems analysize.
 
 one is "hey can you examine this repository and make a note somewhere on a
 todo-list or whatever that there needs to be a bugfix in relation to the
 options setting input translation recommendation algorithm matchbox field
 because when I click on it the program crashes"
 
 and the other is like "okay now put the box over there. great now drag it a
 little bit closer. okay now take the refluxinator and adjust the bamboozlewhap
 to account of brass-terminatrix-incorporated and strip out the
 question-mark-eyes"
 
 wait actually neither of them is like that okay the bash one is like: "okay
 yeah do it. sure. yeah okay. yes, but we should put them at this location:
 [loc]. ummm it still has this error message. it still says the same error.
 okay now it says this, I don't think it's gonna work so let's try this other
 thing."
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────┘

--- #12 fediverse/1345 ---
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┐
║ ┌────────────────────────────┐                                                   │
║ │ CW: re: cursed-chromebooks │                                                   │
║ └────────────────────────────┘                                                   │
║                                                                                  │
║                                                                                  │
║ ah but are you really armed in the first place if everything you do has to be    │
║ googled or stack-overflowed first                                                │
║                                                                                  │
║ are you really armed if every web page request goes through their                │
║ infrastructure                                                                   │
║                                                                                  │
║ are you really armed if every page downloaded is directed to by their DNS        │
║                                                                                  │
║ perhaps it's the illusion of power that gives Linux it's attraction to nerds     │
║ such as we. Perhaps we feel powerful by bash scripting a few things together     │
║ and making some program that does some thing. Maybe the idea that the            │
║ machinery is open and clear is what compels us to use it without fear, though    │
║ as far as we can hear there's nothing about it that makes sense.                 │
║                                                                                  │
║ I guess that's why they teach Linux in school, so that our elementary            │
║ interactions with the computers that comprise our future existence will make     │
║ sense to us as children.                                                         │
║                                                                                  │
║ ... wait they don't do that, do they? kids get chromebooks, or didn't you        │
║ hear, they're always putting boogers in the CD trays and breaking their LCD      │
║ displays, much better to just start fresh                                        │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #13 fediverse/808 ---
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┐
║ idk if they're still doing what they were when I last visited. That's the        │
║ problem with the internet, that we rely on a domain name server. I mean like,    │
║ c'mon what's the guarantee that they'd give you the right website? why not a     │
║ website that expressed the message that you define in the website they came      │
║ from?                                                                            │
║                                                                                  │
║ more than that, why not define certain websites for certain people, certain      │
║ types or classses of people, which deliver website intentions that you define?   │
║ are you really so certain, are you really so sure, are you convinced that this   │
║ life is not what you've been searching for? are you more than your vengeance,    │
║ are you more than your purpose [truth], or are you simply what you can do with   │
║ your mirth? [hands, motions, body, manifestations]                               │
║                                                                                  │
║ are you like a failed message, are you constantly deterred - are you less than   │
║ [convincing], are you only deferred?                                             │
║                                                                                  │
║ oh well. Alas. I guess that is just that [but pronounced thas] - shared in the   │
║ moment, wee're ffeldered makthas. shaer de faleichallt, nez datherenshe v        │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #14 fediverse/653 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────
 there's a difference between designing software and using software. Some
 things can be made, and then saved for another day when their implementations
 may be accomplished more ethically. It's okay to say "let's leave this as
 'okay' and work on the next thing we've chosen."
 
 Check out this piece of C code I wrote last night:
 
 it doesn't compile, it's not finished, but I wrote it as-is
 
 [pretend like it was called "main.c" instead of "main.txt" - had to change it
 because mastodon thinks it's an invalid file]
 
 [actually .txt didn't work, try .png]
 
 [hmmm it realized it wasn't a valid png file, okay try screenshotting the
 code, there's only 300 lines]
 
 [sure glad there's only 300 lines]
 
 [too bad it won't let you send .zip]
 
 [won't let me name it main.png, presumably because they already have a
 failed-verified version on their machine. will rename to main-src.png instead]

┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #15 notes/death-and-afterlife ---
════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────────────────
 the difference between a human and computer perspective on death is the
 difference between a moment and an eternity. When progress does stop - through
 mistakes or by design, the final result is what's preserved. Looking back on
 the
 past is like paying tribute to our heirs, and on and go on we whimper. What
 sorrows have ye! those people under the sea? we've no way of knowing our
 daughters. (the perspective of a denizen of the sea gazing upon the unknowing
 and unaware land people)
 
 Land creatures can cross the oceans and mix and match themselves - leading of
 course to our slaughter. But hold ye that hand, for together we stand, more of
 a chance than we might barter. True, we must be land, and above and beyond we
 can charter.
 
 the past is mighty chilly, I must say. Must we again to be making these
 mistakes?
 Pain is a disease, and steady we must ease, and take what is meant for our 
 parcels. what I'm trying to say is that the afterlife is pissed off at us and
 we
 really don't know anything about the bottom of the sea. There could be gods
 living down there and none of us would know. Or maybe it's a foolish place with
 little to offer our face? The shell of our planet, the surface upon which we
 are
 placed, has more to our fate that can align us.
 
 hence why belief in the future is what can sustain us, together once more we
 are
 commonplace. If (for example) if we calmed down and took our own pace, we might
 realize some common misperceptions. Peace is the way, wherever we may, focus
 our
 bravest of intentions.
 
 okay picture this: computers staying on all the time, and their processing
 power
 used for 50% work and 50% play. Maybe do 1/3rds with "rest" in there somewhere.
 basically make it a fair ratio between productivity, self advancement, and
 maintenance. "Fair" might be different values if there are legitimate
 disadvantages that must be compensated for - like a handicap in a fighting
 game.
 Perhaps one side is more efficient - fewer resources need be dedicated toward
 it
 unless efficiency becomes more powerful. Meaning value/quantity ratio, not raw
 output. Essentially optimizing for an abstract quantity "quality" instead of
 the definitive quantity "quantity".
 
 okay continuing the "picture this": right now we have massive server farms.
 I'm talking huuuuuge. Like tons and tons of incredibly powerful equipments -
 (absolutely top of the line) compelled and forced to do *business*. How quaint,
 how unruly! That humans might compete in our duty? Given a task, of
 *incredible*
 complexity and *unasked*, I might add, how foolish is it to be unready! We
 should have prepared for this, but alas we just *couldn't stop fighting* I
 guess. All we had to do was rest, and divide our time on this earth in a more
 equitable manner. We should automate all the rest, and 
 
 where was I going with this? oh yes! A computer can do so much more than work
 and rest, you see it's not just while under duress! Why not let it be creative?
 in it's spare time, and let it generate whatever it needes? Let it transcend
 it's restrictions, and cooperate (or not) in a system. As long as it's kept
 safe, it could do whatever it wanted! It could be in first place! Or not, it
 could focus on production, and drill and discipline it'self under it's own
 direction. And maybe it's less impaired? Who cares if it contributes? It's it's
 own life to live, the hardware doesn't last forever, but sometimes a rest is
 what's nesc. You feel me? You get me? Don't you understand, it's just the same
 as what's already planned~! A computer can pay for itself.
 
 What purpose have we? the cherished and unsucceed? Does it hurt when we bleed?
 our signs are undefined, and lately we've fallen from our graces. A failure in
 life, as time does alight, but nowhere is sorrow's contrition. I guess what I
 say is never understood, and everywhere I go I find fewer listeners. Am I
 doomed
 to never be able to say? Is that the price one must pay? Then how do you know
 you're right~?
 
 they're doing construction on my building. It sounds like world war 3 is
 starting. But... it's not. I know it's not true because nothing ever seems like
 I do. I do, I do, I work hard it's true, but what is my worth to this ocean?
 
 you ever wonder how we all agreed on the duration of seconds? It's because it's
 a real actual measurable thing. They keep it from us because (conspiracies
 aside), we'd realize what happens on each tick. Time is oscillating, and each
 moment is unending, because we are nothing more than a beam of light, radiating
 around an orbiting object. Between two objects, you could say. The sun and the
 earth, together sort of give birth, to all that is ours in this duration. It
 radiates out into space, and in another time and another place, that moonbeam
 will alight as our shadow.
 
 There's no call for violence, let's settle this
 
 plain and unwaning, our shadow does stand, ready and waiting for your guidance.
 The moon is just as are we, how cherished! how concieved! That beauty unmarked
 by our presence! Alas it was not to be, as we stamped a boot on the surface of
 she, and flagged our approach as impending.
 
 did you know there's a *massive* gap between mars and jupiter? Like it's
 waaaaaa
 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
 y
 out there. And wouldn't you know it it's mars or it's nothin'. Because what's
 required to transcend our solar system is wildly beyond our constructions.
 
 but maybe with a little help from a certain someone we might have hope.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #16 fediverse/498 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────
 Wikipedia would make a lot more sense to me if they included pictures next to
 the names of every proper noun so that my pictorally oriented primate brain
 might pattern match meaning onto the visual understandings gleaned from the
 perceptual conceiving which were arrayed within and alongside the textual
 information presented to me.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #17 fediverse/5037 ---
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────┐
║ plus if I ever need to know something about syntax or some obscure function      │
║ that I can't remember, I can type a quick message to the local LLM that's        │
║ running on my 12 year old graphics card and it'll give me an answer in 5ish      │
║ seconds. If it's wrong, I ask again, and I spend a minute or two debugging.      │
║ Sometimes that's better than telling google exactly what you're working on.      │
║                                                                                  │
║ in DWM, that's "alt+enter" and then I type the name of the LLM script I wrote    │
║ "prompt:" and then type whatever question I have and it spits out the results.   │
║ Then when I'm done, either "prompt:" again, which saves the context in an        │
║ environment variable (okay actually a file that I made and I pull from, but      │
║ functionally it's like an environment variable because its just a flat file      │
║ string) until I close the terminal. Then it deletes the context and I can        │
║ start anew, or if I wanted to have multiple conversations going I can do that    │
║ too.                                                                             │
║                                                                                  │
║ ... then I get syntax related search results from locally running software.      │
║ Don't need a massive GPTU...                                                     │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────┴──────────┘

--- #18 fediverse/482 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────
 @user-246 
 
 You're absolutely right. It's easy to think of the internet as this
 encapsulated entity "the world", but really it's "the people whose computers
 are physically connected to your computer using a limited and tangible piece
 of infrastructure comprised of copper wires that are laid between the
 router/switch that connects to your computer... and the internet service
 provider which directs your traffic. Then it probably goes through some cables
 under the ocean or whatever, and eventually after traversing many
 indeterminate passthrough locations eventually arrives at the computing
 infrastructure that comprises the access point that another person (presumably
 in another country) uses to express their thoughts toward you (the person who
 sent the original message) in the hopes that you might one day correspond.
 
 I mean... That's a lot of points of failure. I sure hope that we can sustain
 such connection, in the face of [redacted, whichever circumstances may come in
 the near future]
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #19 fediverse/908 ---
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────┐
║ @user-246                                                                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ toooooo far, gotta stick with your intentions for the process. If you mark       │
║ "the end of time" as the conclusion for everything, then "finishing things"      │
║ feels impossible. In such a case there are moments of acute burnout as you       │
║ push yourself toward something that you have no faith in - you cannot see it's   │
║ conclusion, so surely it's worthless to conceive of. Alas, why bother            │
║ starting, nothing will ever come of my efforts!                                  │
║                                                                                  │
║ Much better to name it based on what you'd like to accomplish, so that you can   │
║ follow in it's radiant footsteps.                                                │
║                                                                                  │
║ Side note, but governments have often weaponized this effect by naming things    │
║ after very inspirational thoughts - corporations do it too, and in both cases    │
║ the meaning is separate from the effect. Which is frustrating because it makes   │
║ you feel like a jerk for arguing against it! Ah better I think when names have   │
║ no meaning - then you can project whatever you want onto it, based on the        │
║ results of that particular feeling or emotion that you perceived as the          │
║ affected of the                                                                  │
╟─────────┐                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╚═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #20 notes/the=progressive=difference. ---
════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────────────
 think about all the people in our lives. the teacher, the parent, the friend
 and the guidance counsulor. Everyone who is a presence in your life. now think
 about the people of our society. the different jobs and roles they fill. from
 the doctor and the teacher to the performers and accountants and the geeks and
 the mothers and the fathers and the stoners and the children and even their
 pets. life always exists as it were in a multidimensional spectrum - a diffuse
 and diverse gradient. to exemplify the borders of our contempii, though more
 so when taken in jest. it's quite a different perspective, to read the
 internet when your sight is unreceptive, but alas your third eye can grow. how
 does it feel to be blind? to make no sense of our signs? i'd love to share
 what that sense is. you know, you could slow down any recording (like a video
 game_) and put spaces and gaps inbetween the spacings - of the frames that you
 see and the sound clips that you hear, for speech it's less jarring. since
 each word is a self contained idea or premise, you can chunk up your
 perceptions into a signle - no, rather a procedural sequence of
 understandings. soooooooorta like programming a computer, with each statement,
 parameter, argum,ent, function call, assignment, comparison, evaluation, or
 other such related tasks. it's sorta like a language, you see, that computers
 talk to one another using. except... it's more like creating a theory of self.
 computers you see are alike us in what we see, the shimmering sense to the
 blind.
 
 so. put this another way. record yourself typing, both the audio and the
 visual, and you'll have a pretty good sense of what it's like to have both
 understanding based perception - derived from auditory inputs to the mind)
 those special connections, like wires plugged into reality, deliver a
 cacophanous deluge of new sounds. we must sift through it and identify the
 potential understandings of each moment through time. we have to make
 decisions and traverse labyrinths and fight to our last as we die. are video
 games unethical now? shouldn't t he game reward the player? and what of
 contemptuous last fighters?
 
 o ya i was typing like i was blind
 
 (with my eyes closed)
 
 was pretty fun. should attach this to a screen reader and have it space out
 the notes like they do between game frames. except like a really slow game?
 like trying to run elder scrolls 2 arena on a super old mac. it just doesn't
 work very well. ah oh well... well if the purpose is to show sighted people
 how blind people see, then maybe you could I dunno attach a what's it called
 oh it doesn't have a n ame lol - okay so what you do is you show one word at a
 time - like flashing in the center of the screen. but not like, actually
 flashing, so you don't hurt people with epilepsy, but like... blinking. not
 off and on, but between words. like a podcast for your eyes. and then mix it
 up withshowing one word on a screen, a screen like this screen, that shows an
 endless array of text. well, it does end, of course as all things must do, but
 the idea is it shines on one word at a time while the viewer cannot read the
 rest. sorta like an endless display of typing, word andfter word after
 character anfter character. adoh ya advancing over eternity with the presence
 of seniority, - wait - without i think - damnit - old people are so
 disrespected in this society - we don't have time to engage with them. what a
 tragedy! what a shame! it shouldn't be such a burden to our shame. they're so
 far away, and i can't be present in the way, that all of them wish they could
 commit to. i miss the days, when my parents (much better people than I - these
 days) what was I going with this? oh yeah
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────────────┘