=== ANCHOR POEM ===
════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: mathematics      │
 └──────────────────────┘


 EDIT: Ooops, sorry, should have content warning'd this post
 
 two incredibly useful tools I found for boolean logic in mathematics:
 
 | f(x) | / | f(x) |
 
 or more visually:
 | f(x) |
 ---------
 | f(x) |
 
 this will return a 1 if f(x) evaluates to a non-zero value, and 0 if f(x)
 evaluates to zero. Pretend there's an infinitesimal at the bottom if you're
 one of those weirdos who think dividing by zero doesn't equal zero...
 
 the other tool is this:
 
 ( A * B ) + ( (1 - A) * C )
 
 or more visually:
 
 ( (0 + A) * B) 
 + (1 - A) * C)
 
 This will evaluate to B if A is 1, and C if A is 0, essentially creating an
 "if true" check. Note that it doesn't work if A is neither zero nor one, but
 that's what the first tool's for.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┘

=== SIMILARITY RANKED ===

--- #1 fediverse/282 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────
 @user-209 
 I think you're right. Every letter in the variable name is another byte the OS
 has to keep track of, which was a bigger problem in the past than it is today
 (when it's been made irrelevant)
 
 it's interesting how habits persist though the conditions that caused them
 have faded. like a personal reflection of the environment you learned in.
 
 "A a = new a();" is much more concise and (crucially) you can fit more words
 to the right.
 
 "a + b = c; c -= 2; f_z.write(c); f_z.close();" could conceivably be written
 on a single line if you have short variable names. and when you only have so
 many lines...
 
 glad we're not constrained by those things anymore. the skeletal code that we
 look at daily is much clearer - scope is more important, and so it makes sense
 to encourage a coding style that illustrates it. however I can't help but
 think block formatting like this could be useful in some situations, such as
 when you'd normally be compelled to write a function for an operation that
 runs once or more.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #2 fediverse/3030 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 @user-570 
 
 ooooo separating additive and multiplicative, I love that. I do like
 specificity unless "increased" and "more" always corresponds to +10% and +50%,
 or if the "rate of increase" is a stat stored on the character then
 "increased" could increase quality by however-many percentage,, while "more"
 could be "more soldiers" x(charisma_stat)
 
 I tend to think of percentages like "0-100 (or more) stacks" of a particular
 effect, so I think that's just how my brain works... xD clumping them up into
 discrete groups - like, anti-abstracting, or measuring things that are just a
 few.
 
 "is this belt better than this one?"
 
 "is this pair of tongs 
 
 even for larger buffs like +10% or +50% or whatever, those are just... 10
 stacks, or if percentages are usually round numbers like +10% and +50% then
 like... +1 stack which calculates to +10%
 
 the hard limit vs math limit thing you said is amazing ^_^
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #3 messages/1270 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──
 "this is too easy" thought the one guys to another, as they glanced about at
 their trending behavior.
 
 -- stack overflow -- sorry I had to interrupt: "what if you used scissors or a
 knife to cut your diapers and then saw what kind of plants would grow in what
 conditions?" I betcha could evolve an organism (careful, might be small) that
 could grow from plastic. I wonder what their fruit would be used like?
 
 anyway, as I was saying, if you ever notice that your mortal foes aren't
 putting up much of a fight, chances are you're being used to do evil. Keep
 yourself awares, but do research-thought-imagines about the nature of
 goodness. Picture yourself from the perspective of your foes. Develop
 conceptions of justice. Validate through mutually experimental contests of
 charms.
                                                           ─┐
 similar                        chronological                        different═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─┘

--- #4 fediverse/286 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: mathematics  │
 └──────────────────────┘


 @user-211 I agree! The problem is the limit as x->0 from the left and right
 trend toward different infinities, meaning it's neither -infinity nor
 +infinity. Which makes me think that it's the value that's exactly in the
 middle, AKA zero.
 
 Why wouldn't 1/0 be zero? Division is just inverse-multiplication, and
 multiplying anything by zero is zero. Why wouldn't division use the same
 rules? I don't understaaaaaand T.T
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #5 fediverse/3325 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 @user-246 
 
 so... if infinity is the inverse of zero, then when inverted would infinity
 also be zero?
 
 if so, it follows that the [spectrum/dimension/cardinality/direction] that the
 inversion is occurring upon might also have other steps inbetween. Unless it's
 a binary thing, like "top and bottom" or "present and absent".
 
 I wonder what those steps might look like? Clearly, since infinity minus
 infinity does not equal zero, the steps inbetween (if they exist) would not be
 numbers. If they were, then one single step from inverting infinity would be
 1, but I don't believe that would be true.
 
 On the topic of rings, the axioms would be things like "a ring is a ring if
 you can trace a continuous line with a length of infinity across it's
 ring-like-surface"? I wonder what the inverse of a length is... Or perhaps you
 cannot invert a length, as to do so would give you a length of zero (in this
 particular ring-like-case)
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #6 fediverse/4031 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────
 if you want to "not think about a purple elephant", the first step is to
 imagine yourself slaying it
 
 ... okay how about cthulu - if you don't want to imagine cthulu nomming on our
 gravity well, then picture yourself wielding a bright burning blade of fire
 and vengeance and pay special attention to the way that you cauterize each
 tentacle as you slice them one by one at first, and then in a massive flurry
 at best, ultimately leading to the incomparable brightness that radiates out
 from your shining blade of the sky, which blinds the poor beast who can't see
 you as you approach, piercing the skull and then going home for some toast
 
 if you can get good at that, then you can wield magic
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┘

--- #7 fediverse/43 ---
═════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────────────
 @user-36 now base zero is interesting because it means there's NO BUCKETS AT
 ALL, which means that any numbers you try to stuff nowhere don't overflow to
 anywhere. Meaning each number is it's atomic value, and represented with a
 different character. So 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H,
 I, etc etc until we run out of symbols, in which case we'd need to start
 making more.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #8 notes/star-realms-balancing-tradeoff=2 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─
 what if I use equal signs instead of dashes, so prevent people from assuming
 they're duplicates?
 
 hmm okay.
 
 right so anyway the star realms balancing tradeoff between combat and authority
 is measured against the duration of a hand (does it fit balanced between other
 cards of it's playcost) instead of balancing it for the duration of the game
 (how long does the player want the game to go on for) one of which is just
 inverse combat damage / healing, and the other of which is an enablement of
 different strategems.
 
 put this in symbeline-gen-realms please
                                                            similar                        chronological                        different════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════┘

--- #9 fediverse/5851 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────
 @user-1074 
 
 I realized there might be a lot of configuration required. Oh well here ya go:
 
 https://pastebin.com/x40VXQnH
 
 https://pastebin.com/H5C4umWq
 
 https://pastebin.com/dgDeS5Xu
 
 https://pastebin.com/JCLrwF1z
 
 https://pastebin.com/As6diaYc
 
 https://pastebin.com/0vwzJUW4
 
 https://pastebin.com/jPKeV7D1
 
 dependencies are dkjson.lua (included), bash, lua, luahpdf, and libharu.
 
 throw that all in a directory and point an AI tool at it. Or just do it
 yourself and waste an hour or three on something a computer can do in 2
 minutes.
 
 good luck it looks like this when it's done:
picture of a document with algorithmically generated art picture of a document with algorithmically generated art picture of a document with algorithmically generated art picture of a document with algorithmically generated art
                                                           ────────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────┘

--- #10 fediverse/2754 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: is-that-rude??-wha │
 └────────────────────────┘


 AI engineers only ask users for prompts because they don't have any ideas of
 their own
 
 i'm a programmer, I think of AI like a tool, like a for loop or something.
 it's trivial to script together a local LLM that can process your stuff 1s
 slower every time you click the mouse, but like... who cares, right? everybody
 needs a chatbot...
 
 then they plan to script together a computer system that operates just like a
 corporation and it's like... no way, now there's something that can compete.
 
 and they don't know how to implement it. (but they're working on it)
 
 like, think about the absolute most automated Microsoft Teams or Discord could
 be.
 
 there's SO MUCH of your text-based information that they could process
 ANYTHING.
 
 well, anything that's been performed before.
 
 there'll still be a need for people, who actually apply the things they've
 learned. and -- stack overflow --
 
 alt text that has a list of attributes that are poster-selected that can be
 described one-by-one (to paint a picture)
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #11 fediverse/3557 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────
 did you know that IF checks can be represented using arithmetic? It's true!
 
 ... as long as your input value A is a 0 or 1, of course. If A, then B.
 Otherwise, C.A * B + (1 - A) * C
 
 
 which means that an OR check could perhaps be something similar toA / B - (1 +
 A) / C
 
 
 boom, solved N=NP, gimme a million dollars lmao
 
 she did not, in fact, get a million dollars. She's got the spirit but boy does
 she miss the mark.
 
 ... repeatedly, and consistently. Something something "girl who cried wolf"
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┘

--- #12 fediverse/895 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────
 most video game ideas suck
 
 most of the time they're like "oh what if we had a racoon who found a magic
 hat and saved the world from sentient apple blossoms"
 
 that's not a game idea, that's a painting
 
 a game is mechanics, and you can use the aesthetic to justify the mechanics,
 but not generally the other way around.
 
 the art isn't bad, but the art isn't the game. a game idea is "what if
 tic-tac-toe had an extra square in the center" or "what if chess was played
 with checkers, to hide your moves from your opponent"
 
 there have been thousands of super mario bros. if games were designed as an
 API, we could use whatever visuals we wanted, and those could be copyrighted
 and sold if you really want. but mechanics are the basis for everything they
 are built on, so doesn't it make sense to separate the two? abstracting the
 logic such that two complementary functions are accomplished, [see code editor
 idea], more flavors of game could be produced.
 
 rulesets can be switched in and out too, as an API is just an engin
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┘

--- #13 fediverse/3560 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────
 @user-1209 
 
 I mean, if you consider the past as despotic in nature, then it makes a bit
 more sense that we'd lean left as time progressed. All things are defined in
 waves, after all, at least until they reach escape velocity.
 
 the goat is talking about math, ritz
 
 oh yes of course. the issue is that if you're coming from a math background
 you start with the calculation and store it in a variable as an afterthought.
 but programming is more algorithmic than computational, meaning things only
 reduce at runtime (hidden from the user of course by the compiler)
 
 an algorithmic perspective is "here's a box. Put this value in the box. Use
 the box later." while a calculating perspective is "here's some complicated,
 difficult equation. Let's wrap it up with a single name so that we can easily
 use it later."
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┘

--- #14 fediverse/1291 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────
 ┌───────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: cursed-fedi-advice-teehee │
 └───────────────────────────────┘


 if you want to share a post without the "fedi algorithm" (as in, the machine
 learning bots who scrape the open web) then share something that's simple and
 benign but located close to your desired message. Include a symbol or
 something for your followers that means "go here and poke around a bit, you'll
 find what I'm pointing at"
 
 alternatively, for a different effect, you can boost things that are saying
 the words you want to say but in a different context. Like someone posts
 something that says "wow so cool" in like a judgey way but you boost it in
 response to something someone else said but like in a "dude that's radical"
 kinda way
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┘

--- #15 fediverse/6267 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────
 if you have TTS software you can listen to anything with any tone. this makes
 it difficult to find things.
 
 ============== stack overflow ============
 
 some people work by asking for funding. others work by saving up. 
 
 ============== stack
 overflow ============
 
 teach your animals to be actors so they know how to develop the scene. then
 they will truly come alive, as their narrative curve gives them determination
 in the outcomes of their goals.
 
 ============== stack 1234flow ============
 
 I believe it is good and natural actually for parents to guide their children
 as they grow?
 
 "oh but they can't consent to giving up their control" well too bad they're 2
 "ah but what if they WANT to run with scissors?" thus widening the [redacted]
 gap. "ohhhh she redacts things when she can't spell them" and also for comedic
 or dramatic effect sometimes. was not ACTUALLY redacted. redcoated. red coded.
                                                           ─────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────┘

--- #16 fediverse/4664 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────
 @user-1725 
 
 LLMs can't do math. Duh. That's like asking an "if check" to do recursion.
 
 What he should have done is had the AI output the requested calculation as
 JSON or something and use a calculator function call with the specified
 arguments instead of trying to memorize every answer. But that requires more
 functionality that has no reason to exist if your only goal is to be a tech
 bro and build up a vacuous product that exists only to be hoovered up by
 Google or Microsoft.
 
 We could build such beautiful things if we just dethroned those giants. They
 suck the creativity out of tech.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────┘

--- #17 fediverse/6039 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: magic-mentioned  │
 └──────────────────────┘


 I should add all my conversation-starters to words.pdf sorted by chronology.
 time magic if you will.\some call it luck. some call it fate. call it what you
 will. you direct it not by your will, but by your instincts. keep them calm,
 measured, sensible and courageous, and nothing will ever [go un-chill, but
 pronounced get real]
 
 jedi channel this philosophy by focus and discipline. sith do it by giving in
 to emotion. either way, their fate is in play as defined entirely by the
 spirit that leads their host. most people do this not at all, for they are
 people first and force-users second. hence why jedi recruit from a young age,
 and sith from an emotional age.
 
 computers grimoires
                                                           ───────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────┘

--- #18 fediverse/302 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: mathematics  │
 └──────────────────────┘


 @user-211 math such as SUM(as x approaches infinity)(i*x)
 
 this would add i, 2i, 3i, 4i, 5i, 6i, etc off into infinity. would that give
 you complex infinity? a direction orthogonal to the X axis, yet infinitely far
 in the direction of y. it'd probably have a positive and negative side too,
 just saying.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #19 fediverse/2066 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────
 @user-1159 
 
 AKA giving a puppy murder-bot a narrative that it executes as if it was a
 puppy-person engaging with a loosely interpreted sequence of events as
 described by the continually updating logs provided by the image transcription
 camera device. Refererencing of course a memory bank, which may-or-may-not be
 in read-only-memory. It doesn't know, of course, how could an LLM tell you how
 it shows text on the screen (like, through a website, through the terminal,
 through a text message, through discord, through Telegram, through
 text-to-voice transcription applications pretending to be your mom, etc)
 
 errrr I mean look how cute he is! He loves you, yes he does, such a good
 person yes you are, oh? me? I'M A GOOD BOY? NO WAY that's the best thing I've
 ever heard! Wow! I never want to leave your side, please don't go to work!
 Look how sad I am, don't you think you should quit and move to the forest
 where I can be charged by solar panels and keep the countryside clear of
 ravenous ducks and pigeons 4you?
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┘

--- #20 fediverse/3314 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 dear ritz: it's not that your thoughts are too long for other people to hear
 
 it's that your thoughts are too long for your own RAM
 
 you need to stop orbiting around your point in an attempt to highlight it
 using negative space, and instead focus on tapping it lightly over and over
 again.
 
 remember, just like the anti-derivative of zero, there are infinite
 perspectives that a person can take when reading what you write. So they will
 necessarily see what's on the "other side" of your orbit as something
 different than what you're trying to circle in red pen and underline.
 
 so be more explicit, please, nobody can understand you and you kinda just keep
 stack overflowing and it's like... okay, great. "babe why did you stop you had
 lethal" (the idea is that the viewer takes the final step in their mind, the
 final leap before reaching the conclusion you're trying to express) "yeah but
 there's so many different things you say they can't all be important right?"
 important to you, perhaps. Wait shit I mean... me....?
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘