=== ANCHOR POEM ===
◀─[BOOST]
  
  250 years of no Supreme Court ruling allowing presidential immunity.        
                                                                              
  No presidential immunity for Nixon, SCOTUS ruled Watergate tapes were not protected.   
                                                                              
  No presidential immunity for Reagan for the crimes of Iran Contra and the most corrupt administration in US history (to that point in time)  
                                                                              
  No presidential immunity for W over false evidence that took us to war with Iraq.    
                                                                              
  The SCOTUS is The Elephant in the room.                                     
  
                                                            
 similar                        chronological                        different 
─▶

=== SIMILARITY RANKED ===

--- #1 fediverse/2492 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: uspol        │
 └──────────────────────┘


 the third reason is that I am a patriot, and the supreme court recently gave
 the president legal immunity. The president has always been a citizen first,
 for the government is of the people. However, with legal immunity, they would
 be considered closer to a king than a citizen.
 
 they would dismantle our democracy and institute a de-facto monarchy. This is
 unacceptable here.
 
 [4/5]
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #2 fediverse/5251 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────
 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: CURSED-DEFINITELY-CURSED-um-maybe-cursed-maybe-not-it-really-depends-on-your-frame-of-reference │
 └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘


 what if we made it an international crime to use any non-parent soldiers.
 
 essentially, forcing military force to be a cost paid in children's lives.
 
 who would deploy such a casual-stroke? why cut straight to their heart, why
 proceed to feast upon their liver? are they not owed the pursuit and the
 chase? [insert picture of deer killing]
 
 humanity is an expert in killing the least suspe-ghost. it's what we do to
 maintain false identity. the obscenity clause applies to the president and any
 other non-governmental political appointees. everything else is run like an
 administration, with no cause for compulsion by the class of immoral elites.
 
 she wield[ed/s] weed like a weapon
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┘

--- #3 fediverse/2585 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 @user-1209 
 
 as long as I don't do anything they haven't, then there's a reasonable claim
 to be made that arresting me would be enforcing the law partially (as opposed
 to impartially)
 
 yet more examples of the ways our false democracy has betrayed our trust.
 
 we'll see though. I have faith in those who hold power over me. I trust that
 they understand the implications of this most recent supreme court session.
 
 they broke the law first. I'm trying to restore it and rebuild it in such a
 way that it is immune to the injustices and misdeeds that spelled it's current
 doom.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #4 fediverse_boost/4734 ---
◀─[BOOST]
  
  I don't think they have any intention of ceding power in four years, I think project 2025 is all about dismantling checks and balances on their power and I think Trump said at one of his rallies once "you won't have to vote again"  
                                                                              
  I think for these people to lose power they will have to be forced.         
  
                                                            
 similar                        chronological                        different 
─▶

--- #5 fediverse/1875 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────
 when elected to be president, I will do nothing all day every day except sign
 my signature on the pardons that my trusted team places on my desk.
 
 For four years, I will do nothing but dismantle the prison industrial complex
 in the least radical and most focused way I can think of.
 
 ... please don't elect me twice I don't think my sanity could take it
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┘

--- #6 fediverse/2268 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: uspol            │
 └──────────────────────┘


 The supreme court is the institution which protects our most sacred of
 documents. It is a court most supreme, but their word is not law - they
 protect and adapt the law to fit our new societal conclusions.
 
 The constitution is law, and they broke it at the behest of a tyrant king we
 shouldn't need to vanquish.
 
 They broke the law. They are criminals.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #7 fediverse/5152 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: politics-mentioned │
 └────────────────────────┘


 keep in mind...
 
 trump is not their endgame.
 
 what is he doing?
 
 sabotaging our institutions without warrant or respite
 
 prepare for foes that would benefit from degraded institutions.
 
 who's right when nobody controls the truth?
 
 were they ever truly right?
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────┘

--- #8 fediverse/1468 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────
 ┌───────────────────────┐
 │ CW: american-politics │
 └───────────────────────┘


 broke:
 the Biden presidency was meant to defuse the rage of BLM
 
 woke:
 we needed more time to gather our strength
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┘

--- #9 fediverse_boost/3198 ---
◀─[BOOST]
  
  If #Musk is allowed to say "#CivilWar is inevitable", we're allowed to say revolution and the uncompensated nationalisation of the assets of billionaires is inevitable.  
  
                                                            
 similar                        chronological                        different 
─▶

--- #10 fediverse_boost/5526 ---
◀─[BOOST]
  
  Say what you will about the US strikes in Iran but they sure knocked the story of the assassination of two elected Dems out of the headlines and took the heat off ICE for a bit  
  
                                                            
 similar                        chronological                        different 
─▶

--- #11 fediverse/1155 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┐
 @user-638                                                                        │
 In the 2000s when the Bush administration prevented people from working with     │
 stem cell research I remember my father going on rants about the same kind of    │
 thing.                                                                           │
 "They're limiting our access to information and the future of humanity because   │
 of their religion!" that kind of thing                                           │
 I loved listening to him. He was so passionate about that kind of thing. I       │
 think he got a little disillusioned sometime between now and then, because now   │
 he just tries to do the best he can with what tools he has available to him.     │
 And I love him for it.                                                           │
 He (mostly) abandoned his grand narratives because as the right got worse, the   │
 "left" sorta stayed the same, and he never forgave them for that. He still       │
 votes, and he'll still rant about that kind of thing, but only the stuff that    │
 affects him personally - like electric cars or cannabis or things like that. A   │
 democrat through and through.                                                    │
 He lives in a different country now, and I wish I could see him. But I cherish   │
 our phone calls and the few holidays when he visits.                             │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #12 fediverse/2269 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┐
 ┌──────────────────────┐                                                         │
 │ CW: uspol            │                                                         │
 └──────────────────────┘                                                         │
 The constitution is a document which bears our most precious of human rights.    │
 It has been amended many times, to include additional protections and            │
 guidelines for the standards we owe to each other.                               │
 The one standard that stands above all is that your rights end where another's   │
 begin. This law is universal, it Trumps all else.                                │
 When rights are deprived, liberty dies. Liberty, the freedom to be, to do as     │
 you will and exist in our society. Liberty, that most sacred of trees, the       │
 branches that shade us and the roots that [support us, but pronounced like       │
 chain, shame, profane, contain, something like that]                             │
 One standard that exists alongside many others is the right to be as you are     │
 in public society. Public is defined as something we share, and to deny the      │
 right to be for any other is to deny them liberty.                               │
 In cities, the streets are public. In rural areas, the commercial spaces         │
 (outdoor malls) aren't, but probably should be. In the distant past of last      │
 week, they could harass you until you left. Now, jail.                           │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #13 fediverse/4488 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: politics-mentioned │
 └────────────────────────┘


 I was never going to consent to a Trump presidency. I knew this back in June
 when the Supreme Court nominated him as our king.
 
 We still have time to save our liberty.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘

--- #14 fediverse/3943 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: politics-mentioned │
 └────────────────────────┘


 one of my most humbling political memories is getting in a fight with a kid at
 school (okay, a heated argument) because he said republicans lower taxes and I
 thought democrats did.
 
 turns out we were both right, because one of our dads had money.
 
 gotta raise taxes for public services, and well inflation's just a fact of
 life y'know, at least stuff doesn't cost as much as way back when.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┘

--- #15 fediverse/4365 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: politics-mentioned │
 └────────────────────────┘


 what if Trump controlled x% of the land (according to electoral college votes)
 and kamala controlled y% of the resources (according to popular vote) and they
 each could do whatever they wanted there
 
 the house and the senate in congress would function the same and unite the
 two, but anything the president disagreed with they could veto for their
 particular pieces of land and it would only affect their constituents.
 
 why should we settle for anything less than legitimate representation,
 unclouded by the division and spite?
 
 if some combination of presidential vetos created an impossible situation,
 then by law people weren't allowed to interface.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┘

--- #16 fediverse/4641 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────
 ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: politics-and-violence-mentioned │
 └─────────────────────────────────────┘


 the fact that it took this long to have a high-profile assassination in
 response to our ongoing oppression really speaks to the decency and stability
 of our nation.
 
 that's just a nice way of saying that democrats are defanged and republicans
 are misled
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────┘

--- #17 fediverse/4330 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: politics-mentioned │
 └────────────────────────┘


 if all the democrats work in accounting and all of the republicans work in
 shipping and receiving, then who's driving the boat?
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┘

--- #18 fediverse/2270 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: uspol        │
 └──────────────────────┘


 @user-1203 
 
 The judges prevent the politicians from harming the people who elect the
 politicians who select the judges. Sounds like it should work well, no?
 
 well... the people are divided, but the politicians it seem are hardly so. So,
 the politicians elect their judges, who allow the passage of such laws which
 contradict the will of the people.
 
 The keys to power should rest in the hands of those who deserve it, not those
 who claim it. If those who claim it do not relinquish it for a worthy other,
 they are corrupt and must be dethroned.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #19 fediverse/2490 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: uspol        │
 └──────────────────────┘


 the first reason I feel the way I do is because the supreme court recently
 made a decision that made it constitutional for people to be jailed or fined
 for sleeping in public.
 
 homeless people, by definition, have no place to (reliably) go but public
 spaces.
 
 therefore, by existing in their environment, they are criminals.
 
 a criminalized people is genocide.
 
 I cannot respect the legitimacy of a legal system that would condone genocide.
 
 [2/5]
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #20 fediverse/5499 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────
 ┌───────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: nuclear-weapons-mentioned │
 └───────────────────────────────┘


 ultimately as long as the "shooting down nuclear weapons" capability is
 greater than the "shooting falling nuclear weapons" capability then the world
 is safe from ultimate harm.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────┘