=== ANCHOR POEM ===
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: uspol            │
 └──────────────────────┘


 The supreme court is the institution which protects our most sacred of
 documents. It is a court most supreme, but their word is not law - they
 protect and adapt the law to fit our new societal conclusions.
 
 The constitution is law, and they broke it at the behest of a tyrant king we
 shouldn't need to vanquish.
 
 They broke the law. They are criminals.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

=== SIMILARITY RANKED ===

--- #1 fediverse/2492 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: uspol        │
 └──────────────────────┘


 the third reason is that I am a patriot, and the supreme court recently gave
 the president legal immunity. The president has always been a citizen first,
 for the government is of the people. However, with legal immunity, they would
 be considered closer to a king than a citizen.
 
 they would dismantle our democracy and institute a de-facto monarchy. This is
 unacceptable here.
 
 [4/5]
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #2 fediverse/2269 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┐
 ┌──────────────────────┐                                                         │
 │ CW: uspol            │                                                         │
 └──────────────────────┘                                                         │
 The constitution is a document which bears our most precious of human rights.    │
 It has been amended many times, to include additional protections and            │
 guidelines for the standards we owe to each other.                               │
 The one standard that stands above all is that your rights end where another's   │
 begin. This law is universal, it Trumps all else.                                │
 When rights are deprived, liberty dies. Liberty, the freedom to be, to do as     │
 you will and exist in our society. Liberty, that most sacred of trees, the       │
 branches that shade us and the roots that [support us, but pronounced like       │
 chain, shame, profane, contain, something like that]                             │
 One standard that exists alongside many others is the right to be as you are     │
 in public society. Public is defined as something we share, and to deny the      │
 right to be for any other is to deny them liberty.                               │
 In cities, the streets are public. In rural areas, the commercial spaces         │
 (outdoor malls) aren't, but probably should be. In the distant past of last      │
 week, they could harass you until you left. Now, jail.                           │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #3 fediverse/2585 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 @user-1209 
 
 as long as I don't do anything they haven't, then there's a reasonable claim
 to be made that arresting me would be enforcing the law partially (as opposed
 to impartially)
 
 yet more examples of the ways our false democracy has betrayed our trust.
 
 we'll see though. I have faith in those who hold power over me. I trust that
 they understand the implications of this most recent supreme court session.
 
 they broke the law first. I'm trying to restore it and rebuild it in such a
 way that it is immune to the injustices and misdeeds that spelled it's current
 doom.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #4 fediverse/2270 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: uspol        │
 └──────────────────────┘


 @user-1203 
 
 The judges prevent the politicians from harming the people who elect the
 politicians who select the judges. Sounds like it should work well, no?
 
 well... the people are divided, but the politicians it seem are hardly so. So,
 the politicians elect their judges, who allow the passage of such laws which
 contradict the will of the people.
 
 The keys to power should rest in the hands of those who deserve it, not those
 who claim it. If those who claim it do not relinquish it for a worthy other,
 they are corrupt and must be dethroned.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #5 fediverse_boost/5802 ---
◀─[BOOST]
  
  The civil war started when you weren't looking, if you're not aware. The Republican MAGA  Army has quickly invaded and occupied our nation's capital in Washington, and it wasn't for a non-existent crime emergency but something much more sinister and destructive. We must defend the Constitution! 🇺🇸  
  
                                                            
 similar                        chronological                        different 
─▶

--- #6 fediverse/4613 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: genocide-mentioned │
 └────────────────────────┘


 The American military did not intervene in World War 2 to stop the human
 atrocities of the Japanese or Germans or anything else of the sort.
 
 They did it because they couldn't ensure the safety of their people in a world
 dominated by an alliance they weren't part of.
 
 Without their people, they lose their power. Without their power, they cannot
 complete their objectives, which (ideally) would be upholding the oath they
 swore to their constitution.
 
 I wonder how they feel about recent events, especially in regards to the
 recent updates made to that particular document?
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────┘

--- #7 fediverse/2752 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: police-mentioned │
 └──────────────────────┘


 cops thought "enforcing the law" was their job when really it was "keeping the
 peace"
 
 and like, yeah, sure, laws define how they optimize for
 
 but sometimes the laws are just out of reach.
 
 (though such an impartialized system is also pretty flawed in it's own unique
 ways, like for example the enforcers of the law would be able to apply their
 law selectively, which... would not be great.)
 
 downside is... how do you dissent to those who cannot hear you? you have to
 break things
 
 which is why I believe that breaking things unnecessarily is unethical.
 
 sometimes you have to do a MORE unethical act in the pursuit of your goals,
 however nefarious or not they may be, but as long as they are done in pursuit
 of a greater grander truth, then... the ends justify the means? right?"
 
 ...
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #8 fediverse/2490 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: uspol        │
 └──────────────────────┘


 the first reason I feel the way I do is because the supreme court recently
 made a decision that made it constitutional for people to be jailed or fined
 for sleeping in public.
 
 homeless people, by definition, have no place to (reliably) go but public
 spaces.
 
 therefore, by existing in their environment, they are criminals.
 
 a criminalized people is genocide.
 
 I cannot respect the legitimacy of a legal system that would condone genocide.
 
 [2/5]
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #9 messages/338 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────
 The question remains - how do you develop and maintain national cohesion while
 also ensuring localized liberty? It cannot be done through culture, as culture
 is unique to each home. It cannot be done through litigation, as laws must be
 unique to each land. It cannot be done through force, as force deprives us of
 justice. It cannot be done through economics, as economics wielded as a weapon
 brings inequity and unbalanced hierarchies that surely shall topple. It cannot
 be done through any application of the state's authority, so it must be done
 using something that cannot be forced.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────┘

--- #10 fediverse/2031 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────
 @user-1074 
 
 We've always been that way in their eyes. If they make it legal, nothing will
 change in how people think of you. They might be a bit bolder if there's fewer
 legal protections, but laws have always just been words.
 
 There are more of us than there are of them. If you have community, you'll
 feel safer. I know it's scary but we can get through it together.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┘

--- #11 fediverse_boost/3950 ---
◀─[BOOST]
  
  250 years of no Supreme Court ruling allowing presidential immunity.        
                                                                              
  No presidential immunity for Nixon, SCOTUS ruled Watergate tapes were not protected.   
                                                                              
  No presidential immunity for Reagan for the crimes of Iran Contra and the most corrupt administration in US history (to that point in time)  
                                                                              
  No presidential immunity for W over false evidence that took us to war with Iraq.    
                                                                              
  The SCOTUS is The Elephant in the room.                                     
  
                                                            
 similar                        chronological                        different 
─▶

--- #12 notes/this-is-a-test ---
═══════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 the betrayal of the middle east is reason enough to reform our political
 system.
 no such consequential actions should be left to the whims of the people, they
 cannot understand the circumstances to a degree that would allow them to make
 decent decisions.
 
 at the same time, they need control over the process so that they are kept
 safe.
 absolute power corrupts absolutely, and a country can die just as easily from
 the wounds of another as the corrosion of internal processes.
 
 there is a communal duty to safeguard the realm of our children. we share this
 burden as members of a society. what purpose is there in our lives if not to
 survive and grow? The Nation is a collective consensus of our communal purpose.
 
 we live in a global society. It is our duty to be the best we can be, and to
 help others become self-actualized. It is thus important to share experiences
 and beliefs.
 
 People identify with their beliefs more than necessary. It is a human
 condition.
 
 consensus is that which we agree is the correct truth. It's often better to
 have
 a bad plan and work together than to have no plan at all.
 
 just saying
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

--- #13 fediverse/4110 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: government-corporations-capitalism-mentioned │
 └──────────────────────────────────────────────────┘


 if you have a job, your life is dictated by your corporation just as much as
 it is by your government.
 
 And yet corporate leaders are not elected, but rather selected. And that is
 unfair for all the reasons that primogeniture was. It is unjust for all the
 same reasons that monarchy was. It is a tool of oppression, just like
 autocracy is.
 
 The world will never be free until we can be as we choose to be. Our society
 is simply too enmeshed with capitalism to destroy it, but we could, with the
 minimal required effort, dismantle the corruption and authoritarian control
 that is wielded against us as we weld our own chains day after day.
 
 We can replace them. We can vote for them. We can select leaders who know more
 than us and are better suited for the role than those who seek only to
 maximize profit over all else.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┘

--- #14 messages/438 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────
 The rich should act as courtiers in the houses of America. They should not be
 lords of labor, nor directors of change. They should represent our best hopes
 and refinement - essentially, kings from another time.
 
 I would gladly be inspired by a virtuous leader. And yet none has yet to
 appear. I wonder why the media wouldn't show us a good representation of the
 people we are meant to fear?
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┘

--- #15 messages/982 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────
 if you want a government to be unable to harm it's citizens, you must deprive
 it of the power to do so. or rather, have the main capabilities in the hands
 of the citizenry.
 
 can you imagine if soldiers had to prove themselves to civilians in order to
 be trusted with mechano-chinery?
 
 who would ever choose the non-valorous and determinable?
 
 instilling the culture of greatness
 
 within the archetypes and character structures that we believed were confisight
 
 bold and determined and measured and freely detectable
 
 who would slay the brave paladin? none but the fools, who shared in their lack
 of conviction.
 
 determined? ha, I am as you see me. Come and claim me, that I might determine
 you some more.
                                                           ─────────┐
 similar                        chronological                        different═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────┘

--- #16 messages/336 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────
 And while we're at it, the generation of laws should be distributed, while the
 execution of them should be centralized. Meaning, there should be one state
 who operates on the rules and regulations created by the masses. This state
 wields only the power explicitly given to it by those who it serves,
 specifically the people. These rules are based on ethical understandings
 generated by crowd-sourced and abstracted scenarios that are pitched to people
 randomly. they are then asked to judge, using their own personal morality, the
 result of how things should be. By considering all of these responses, trends
 may be extracted and analyzed - for example, let's say that culturally people
 in, I dunno, Georgia believe something different about punishment for, say,
 stealing a loaf of bread when compared to people in Spokane Washington. They
 should not be forced to obey the cultural maxims of people who live so far
 away. The laws should be executed region-by-region according to the dominant
 culture there. I believe this will cause people to develop a more consistent
 and personal attachment to the people around them, thus developing social
 solidarity and unity.
 
 however, should enough time pass, perhaps the people of Georgia should feel
 that they no longer identify as the same nation as the people of Spokane. This
 would eventually lead to the dissolution of our great nation, and I do not
 believe that's necessarily a good thing. To that end, there must be mechanics
 in place that bring people together not just locally, but nationally as well.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────┘

--- #17 fediverse_boost/5570 ---
◀─[BOOST]
  
  The fact that no ICE agents have been shot yet seems both a statistical absurdity and proof they aren't really going after criminals.  
  
                                                            
 similar                        chronological                        different 
─▶

--- #18 fediverse/5251 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────
 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: CURSED-DEFINITELY-CURSED-um-maybe-cursed-maybe-not-it-really-depends-on-your-frame-of-reference │
 └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘


 what if we made it an international crime to use any non-parent soldiers.
 
 essentially, forcing military force to be a cost paid in children's lives.
 
 who would deploy such a casual-stroke? why cut straight to their heart, why
 proceed to feast upon their liver? are they not owed the pursuit and the
 chase? [insert picture of deer killing]
 
 humanity is an expert in killing the least suspe-ghost. it's what we do to
 maintain false identity. the obscenity clause applies to the president and any
 other non-governmental political appointees. everything else is run like an
 administration, with no cause for compulsion by the class of immoral elites.
 
 she wield[ed/s] weed like a weapon
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┘

--- #19 fediverse/3082 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: states-mentioned-climate-change │
 └─────────────────────────────────────┘


 the government doesn't want you using solar panels because then the coal and
 gas infrastructure won't be able to consume coal and gas, and everyone knows
 that using resources as fast as possible is surely the best and most
 productive use of our state's time
 
 like, subsidies exist. they could just... make it cheaper, but instead they're
 stuck doing... nothing of value
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #20 fediverse/506 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────
 @user-366 @user-367 @user-246 @user-353 
 
 Ah, if only our judgement was computerized. They only speak in absolutes, do
 they not? Surely extreme discretion is impermeable, and impossible to
 controvert.
 
 What's that you say, that justice might wait yet another day? That we should
 be forced to be oppressed by our own dues? Something about how the impossible
 machine of the bureaucracy is destructive and vicious, like the Kinsey Winsey
 or the Moloch expressed in this essay:
 
 https://ritz-menardi.neocities.org/hello-computer-all-is-well/pics/meditations-
 on-moloch.png
 
 https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/07/30/meditations-on-moloch/
 
 Wait, hang on, what was I saying? Oh yeah the fallibility of humanity is both
 our greatest weakness and our greatest strength. Because through it we might
 design imperfect structures (laws) that we orient ourselves around and build
 our society upon, but also that we might identify those imperfections and use
 them to enact good upon the world.
 
 Unfortunately, we also tend to use those imperfections for our own benefit,
 AKA, to enact evil upon the world. Alas. Human nature is tricky. : \
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┘