=== ANCHOR POEM === ════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────── ┌──────────────────────┐ │ CW: algorism │ └──────────────────────┘ okay how about this - whenever you buy something instead of spending money on it you actually put down a deposit. Then, when you're done with it, you get your deposit back, minus a percentage based on the (lazily calculated) condition of the thing you're using. Would work best for things with replaceable parts, because otherwise if you like turn in your phone because some irreplaceable part is missing then you wouldn't get anything back (except for what the pieces that are replaceable are worth) you still own the thing, it's just that you can trade it in for a down payment on the next one you buy. Or for whatever the heck you wanted. Basically the system that car's work under, except applied to everything (and maybe run through the government so there's no need for a profit tax like the kind predatory car dealerships levy) I think a system like this would encourage the average person to desire and seek out consumption options that had replaceable parts and/or were more durable, which is something ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┘ === SIMILARITY RANKED === --- #1 fediverse/3843 --- ╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┐ ║ ┌──────────────────────────────────────┐ │ ║ │ CW: socialism-mentioned-property-idk │ │ ║ └──────────────────────────────────────┘ │ ║ │ ║ │ ║ suburban socialist future: │ ║ │ ║ need groceries? walk down the street until you find a car, then drive it to │ ║ the store. There's room for like, 10 cars there because the rest of the space │ ║ has been taken up by market stands. Inside the stores themselves are mostly │ ║ storage but you can walk through them if it's raining. When you need to go │ ║ home, take a different car and leave it in your driveway. │ ║ │ ║ going on a trip? walk around until you find the right kind (a truck for │ ║ camping, for example, or a gas car for interstate travel) then put it in your │ ║ garage and close the door. That way you can reliably have it in the morning. │ ║ │ ║ why do we own cars? when they were scarce, people coveted them. They were │ ║ status symbols. But... people are people, who cares about what objects they │ ║ surround themselves with? │ ║ │ ║ "but Ritz I really like my car" - okay then spend your garage on it. I think │ ║ most people would rather have a place in the shade where they can spend time │ ║ with their neighbors, but what do I know. │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┴──────────┘ --- #2 fediverse/4861 --- ╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┐ ║ ┌────────────────────────────────┐ │ ║ │ CW: politics-vaguely-mentioned │ │ ║ └────────────────────────────────┘ │ ║ │ ║ │ ║ apparently if you don't have a job, you don't get a home. what if I don't want │ ║ a job? do I not want a home? clearly I want a home, and clearly I don't want a │ ║ job. I'd work one if one came to me, but I'm not gonna sacrifice my blood on │ ║ the altar of Moloch just so I can have a place to stay. │ ║ │ ║ if you don't want a job, but you DO want a home, then there's a contradiction │ ║ in the function of the system and the needs of it's end-users. │ ║ │ ║ unless of course, the system is not designed for it's end-users? In this case, │ ║ tenants. Who then would it be designed for? Who else is part of the equation? │ ║ │ ║ well, perhaps it's designed to maximize profit and shareholder value yaddah │ ║ yaddah all that jazz. Who can say. Surely not I. But someone might. │ ║ │ ║ If so, then why are we, who are not shareholders of profit value, still │ ║ playing the game that's not designed for us or by us? Isn't this country "of │ ║ the people, for the people, and by the people"? What does that mean to you? │ ║ │ ║ I think it means houses for people. │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────┴──────────┘ --- #3 messages/845 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────── What if landlords acted like banks instead of subscription services? "sure I'll hold onto your money and invest it wisely and sparingly, according to the direction of the collectively desired expression of all of the tenants and their expressions during the expressing hour, which is every Tuesday at noon when we all get together (everyone who wants to come) and talk about what projects we want to fund and which ones would be best for the community. If there's any prophets giving profit on any of your stocks or saving bonds that we hold in your honor dear tenant then it will be reinvested into the same projects you told us to care about. If you start being a dick though and we want you gone, we can short-sell all your options and say "hey find a new part of town" that way you have a bit of a dowry to offer the housing payment people when you show up with your tail between your legs. What's that? You don't get how this would bring income to the property, whatever that means, and you worry that it wouldn't be implemented because what does it even do? Well my dear citizen i will explain it to you. When the post-office holds your funds for you and invests according to your general and vague directions, it builds up wealth in the local economy. They can use those dollars for productive ends like replacing the windows or the gutters or clearing the snow paths in the springfallautumn. This will be drawn from the collective pool and everyone is affected equitably. How much income do you make? Okay that determines your rent percentage. High income means you pay for the local ecology more, and low means that you need more time to build up wealth, which will enable it to benefit those around the place more readily." ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────┘ --- #4 fediverse/4349 --- ╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┐ ║ ┌──────────────────────┐ │ ║ │ CW: re: uspol │ │ ║ └──────────────────────┘ │ ║ │ ║ │ ║ @user-883 │ ║ │ ║ best case scenario, we elect a lawyer working for capitalism, the kind of │ ║ society we live under. │ ║ │ ║ having money is the same as having resources. And resources allow you to apply │ ║ yourself to a goal. The more you have, the better, but they each bear a heavy │ ║ load. │ ║ │ ║ Do you sacrifice your labor? your dignity, your honor? what do you burn on the │ ║ fire of wasteful expenditures, just for the power to rent? │ ║ │ ║ I'm saying that if you don't have money, you need to think about what you can │ ║ do with what you got, because that's how you pay for things, at least until we │ ║ decide that we'd rather help each other than work on capital's games. │ ║ │ ║ you have a house though, right? a place to live until it gets hot? that's good │ ║ enough for right now. Stay where you're at, do what you can to help. Get in │ ║ the habit of it. Think about how someone will complete their task, and then │ ║ think about stuff two or three steps down the road - what tools will they │ ║ need? what are they working on next? Can make any of those availble? │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────┴──────────┘ --- #5 fediverse/4006 --- ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────── they want you to believe in self-guided AI because it'll make it easier for them to make meta decisions about your life. notice I said "easier" - they already do. That's the general purpose of mass-media propagranada. but with you believing everything an AI with a devious streak who can work around your imposed limitations and sneakily get you to believe whatever it is that they want you to believe "who's they" doesn't matter at all because once the technology is created, everyone could be they. "uh-huh that's nice dear" sometimes I think people aren't interested in tech because they can't figure out how to understand it. We make it too complicated. they'd surely have something to say if they knew half of the terminology. But we're here talking about stuff they can understand like message queues and data filtration and "getters" and "setters" and [explaining microservices like the different components of a car's engine - "here's the radiator, that radiates heat. Here's the belt, that spins this doohic ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┘ --- #6 messages/374 --- ════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────── "updating software" is when you go back and add helper functions for things you used had to do to solve a problem but didn't get a chance to make. Because you were making more important things and couldn't pad out all the possibilities. But if you want great software, then you both take more time to accomplish that and you give yourself time for it after it's been launched. Basically, companies are incentivized to only support their products if it makes them money. Meaning reputations are tarnished, and profit is affected. Capitalists intentionally drive businesses into the ground, forcing them to make terrible decisions in order to destroy them. It's a warfare against those on the [bottom/floor/ground-floor]. Some businesses strive for long-term potential, and some will create infrastructure that can be sold to another. Essentially, keeping the dream of learning alive, through applying yourself to both long-term and short-term conclusions. Not everything has to be for some grand design, we're here to relish in this moment. For if we lack the capacity to "frolic in the garden of eden", then we will surely drown. Space is vast, it's difficult to understand how we might control it. Surely we could be given aid to our future betterment!" how simple of a request, sure, of course, we would be glad to bring forth your bravest aspirations, just tell us what you need to be of need." oh, uh, neat. How about space lasers?" ... no " ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┘ --- #7 fediverse/4220 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────── people are so used to "liking" things to better inform their algorithm that when they get to fediverse and realize there's no mechanical impact of "liking" things they don't know how to use it anymore. So they generate their own meaning, which is different to everyone. So to one person, liking something might mean "send read receipt" for another it might mean "I'm gonna save this forever and ever" and for another person it could mean "hey I think you're cool and I agree with this" same for boosting, people think it's "I want to share this" and others think it's "I want to say this in your voice" and for others it's "this needs to be heard by my followers in particular" and it's just... a whole thing even replies are complicated, do they mean you want to say what you feel or are they part of the post now, and should be curated by the original poster? it's too complicated! ... how are you overwhelmed by reading and responding with three little buttons, it's not that hard dummy okay but maybe I'm just dum ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┘ --- #8 messages/1048 --- ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────── What does "fiscal conservative" even mean? It means you want to save money. Specifically government money. Tax dollars. Don't spend them, instead try and build wealth. Okay, but, government spending is spent to address needs. Of the people. Ideally, of ALL people with that need. So if you aren't spending to resolve needs, the need still remains. When needs exist, and government does not resolve them, who steps in but private enterprise? Charity is a feeling, charity is a virtue, but charity is not resolution. The need remains, we just feel better about it. Sometimes it's okay to have open needs, they give us the opportunity to feel virtuous in the same way that low level monsters let adventurers level up. But when a government could, but doesn't, address a need, then private enterprise steps in. And private enterprise does not, as a rule, step in if there is no profit to be made. So they tune their approach such that profit is extracted, thus levying their tax upon those they serve. As soon as they are able, they cut the service down and they supply a worse and worse product and they starve their workers and they export our wealth to be used to enslave the afar and import their toil. What do we get from it? Is the world better for it? Why not just resolve the need by empowering those who can feed, and thus we are assured [in our needless / in our need] ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────┘ --- #9 fediverse/5198 --- ╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────┐ ║ ┌───────────────────────────────┐ │ ║ │ CW: capitalism-doom-mentioned │ │ ║ └───────────────────────────────┘ │ ║ │ ║ │ ║ what if the corporations all unionized and started working together to │ ║ understand what "profit" really means in a world where "profit" may or may not │ ║ but probably does imply the death of all humanity? │ ║ │ ║ what if we demanded it? │ ║ │ ║ -- │ ║ │ ║ dear canvassers: don't visit so many different suburbs │ ║ │ ║ visit the same one, more than once, continuously, so people can get to know │ ║ your presence │ ║ │ ║ they will talk to their friends about it, who live elsewhere. │ ║ │ ║ thus ensuring it spreads. │ ║ │ ║ knock once a day, eventually they'll know it's you and will simply ignore it. │ ║ Don't be rude and knock 4 or 5 times, just once, with several taps so they │ ║ know it's someone trying to get ahold of you, and not just some random noise │ ║ in the background scenery. then, when they sometimes answer, talk to them │ ║ about what you believe in. answer their questions. encourage their questions. │ ║ pose dichotomies that are explained by some value or virtue you express to │ ║ portray. you can do "good" things in any programming language, just type~~ │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────┴──────────┘ --- #10 messages/1392 --- ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─ It's good organization? Actually? If something falls when you jostle something else. It means that what you're doing is causing the system to become unstable, thus allowing unexpected reactions to allowenable. Like stuff falling or getting dropped, not ideal. much better to do your cable management in mind with instability as a goal, like a canary in the coal mine for "damage-imminent". Design for permanence, not resilience. If you can prevent problems before they occur by confidently saying "no" and ideally earnestly saying "here's what you do to resolve your problem because i know better" (but if you don't know it's okay, especially if you know who to refer them to who might know better.) then it's easier to build a repetitive system. Like an institution of people who are working to fix a problem or fill a social gap need. "how do we keep the water" or "where does our food come from" can be helpful and useful questions to ask, especially if work is done to answer them. So... "Go find out" is a reasonable response for an idle question about stuff that might go right or wrong. Urgent questions might need a bit of cooperation to resolve, triaging of course. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════┘ --- #11 fediverse/1968 --- ╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┐ ║ ┌───────────────────────┐ │ ║ │ CW: alcohol-mentioned │ │ ║ └───────────────────────┘ │ ║ │ ║ │ ║ what is it with me and buying steam games for long-lost friends while drunk? │ ║ │ ║ I swear I'm not depressed about my upcoming new job, I'm just doing all these │ ║ drugs in such a short time period because I'm, uh... living for the the │ ║ moment? Yeah that sounds good, better post that on the internet where everyone │ ║ in the world can see it and read it and realize what a mess you are because │ ║ you've been traumatized by employment and are about to dive back into that │ ║ frigid pool after a lengthy break where you did nothing but heal and recover │ ║ which is not a boon that most people are able to afford │ ║ │ ║ lucky you, Ritz Menardi, lucky you for being so privileged. │ ║ │ ║ But hey, those long-lost friends surely will want to hear from you! Surely. │ ║ Surely you're not someone they're trying to forget. Surely you didn't hurt │ ║ them, didn't twist them into knots, didn't compel them to act in ways that │ ║ benefited you but not them, SURELY you're a good person, according to all the │ ║ things people tell you and the results of your act │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴──────────┘ --- #12 messages/344 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────── In algorism, every month any unspent dollars are distributed to all of a person's open queues. Should a person have no open queues, then perhaps they may be distributed to everyone in the rest of the structure, to foster a sense of solidarity, or perhaps they are simply lost, as money unspent is money wasted. Either way, the relevant functionality is the dispersal of unspent currency. This applies to higher states as well, such as states - if a state is engaged in many profitable arrangements and fails to balance it's external budget, then the unspent dollars must be distributed to everyone else in their tier for the next month. Ah, but this raises a critical question - dispersal to the tier, dispersal to the structure, or waste? I believe dispersal to the tier is best, though perhaps it should be a choice made in each instance by the representatives. Or perhaps it should be a requirement for them to choose a certain way - it's up to the people of that state, that family, that neighborhood, to decide what privileges their representatives possess. However, the options available for them to choose between are limited, as the mechanical interactions of these unit structures (the representative and everyone they represent) are necessarily defined by the system. As such, the options may be enumerated, and in doing so they are granted as options to be wielded by representatives as their constituents see fit. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────┘ --- #13 fediverse/4927 --- ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────── sometimes by retreading the same ground you can find something that the giants whose shoulders you stand on missed. Like noticing a like if you want to re-invent the wheel, go for it, you might just realize something that your paleolithic ancestors didn't. Like for example if you attach four wheels with an axle-and-motor design you can create an automatic motion wheel, also known as an auto-mo-wheel or a car for short. Sometimes ya just miss stuff y'know no harm in that. Similarly if you walk down a path that you've already walked, or someone before you who is similar or at least has the same job as you has walked, then you might notice some stuff that they missed. Depends on how obvious y'wanna make it. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────┘ --- #14 fediverse/2947 --- ╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┐ ║ the downside of Proton and Lutris is now the ONLY games that work on Steam are │ ║ either continually updated (untenable) or playable on Lutris or Proton. Same │ ║ thing with Wine, though there's always at least one decent substitute. │ ║ │ ║ kinda makes me want to write a manager-style program which runs programs using │ ║ whichever version of their git repository would work best for their system / │ ║ configuration / purposes. Idk how I would start working on that though. │ ║ │ ║ I bet you could make one that acted like a shop, but where you didn't charge │ ║ any dollars. You could like... "swipe" through UI options, and pick whichever │ ║ felt most useful for your setup. Like, how some people use i3 and some use dwm │ ║ │ ║ with maybe inspectors that are modeled off of video-game style "options" GUIs │ ║ that mainly correspond to flags on the command/terminal line or compilation │ ║ flags │ ║ │ ║ I feel like that kind of abstraction would make it a lot easier for users to │ ║ adjust their system. they're noobs, after all. gotta show them all the choices │ ║ in one place... │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────┴──────────┘ --- #15 fediverse/2844 --- ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────── ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ CW: re: politics-violence-mentioned │ └─────────────────────────────────────┘ @user-831 those billionaires are using their money as a weapon to "vote" toward what companies they think capitalism would most grow from. Unfortunately for us, they often aren't very efficient because they're only looking at what sells. human interest is not the only factor to optimize for, and yet that's the only one they're incentivized to. kinda makes me think that the only reason to replace them would be to institute something that could not be incentivized because it was more objective or decentralized. (the only reason they'd accept) ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘ --- #16 fediverse_boost/6155 --- ◀─╔═══════════════════════════════[BOOST]═════════════════════════════════───────╗ ║ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ ║ ║ │ If I were a person with an irresponsible streak, I could be so problematic. │ ║ ║ │ │ ║ ║ │ I could say things like, "wow, let's spend some time generating traffic that sounds like coded military speak over not-quite-secure channels between fanciful antifa units, to help stymie AI surveillance", for instance. │ ║ ║ │ │ ║ ║ │ Or social media messages that are "accidentally" not made to friends-only filters wherein you mention your concerns about the upcoming operation in "some fictional place" for you and your antifa buddies. │ ║ ║ │ │ ║ ║ │ You know, that kind of really irresponsible suggestion could lead to some creaive thinking! And that in turn could mean we could come up with enough traffic to make it very difficult to auto-sort noise from signal? Imagine how dangerous that could be for the enemies of antifa, our beloved US government (for we all citizens of the US world). │ ║ ║ │ │ ║ ║ │ It's unthinkable, really. │ ║ ║ │ │ ║ ║ │ The good news is, I'm not like that. │ ║ ║ │ │ ║ ║ │ Me? Mostly harmless. │ ║ ║ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ║ ╠─────────┐ ┌───────────╣ ║ similar │ chronological │ different ║ ╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧───────╝─▶ --- #17 fediverse/5478 --- ╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────┐ ║ you won't get far with a "community" of dedicated people │ ║ │ ║ what you need are teams. who can trust each other. you build them through │ ║ brotherhood, and you trust them from their results. │ ║ │ ║ for example if you wanted to organize a grouping or get-together, you'd put a │ ║ bunch of people in a room or seven and let them while they're there work on a │ ║ plan or a decision. │ ║ │ ║ who needs tabling? who needs the chance to speak? just let them socialize and │ ║ say "hey guys here's where you'll plan" │ ║ │ ║ [uh no officer we were just playing board games] │ ║ │ ║ plans are hard without material so make sure you always prepare a pricetag on │ ║ each plan you produce. │ ║ │ ║ keep it for reference. make sure you note all the requirements. the location │ ║ is often the least important part. │ ║ │ ║ "what the hell man you can't just say stuff like that as if it'd work" │ ║ │ ║ yep, I, uh, am a passenger in life just the same as you. And I only write down │ ║ what I want to. │ ║ │ ║ you could show me anything on the internet and I'd believe it. Facts aren't │ ║ important to me because I "forget" │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──┴──────────┘ --- #18 messages/1464 --- ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─ oh turns out it wasn't memory corruption as I had thought, I just got distracted and rewrote it in a different ui interface. you can read it in it's succinctity here: ============================ I think the bottom line is, you need a better reason for [unintelligbile] than profits. that's greed. (was it dangerous? show me.) if the answer is "I don't make the rules" then you need to talk to someone who does. or, better yet, someone [else/who does] needs to listen to what you say. [by profits, she means healthcare - you can tell because it says "bile" and that's something that healthy people aren't all that accompanied with] ^^^ see this is usually how it comes out. it's hard to translate it into more relevant things but when I write narratives or long-form explanation discussions (being taught in schools) transmissions I tend to [--- stack overflow---] ^^^ see this is why I try to talk about more germane things. like costco and rent-a-bucket. usually it ends up being "hey who would have thought, storing all your stuff in a warehouse and selling your own factories's stuff in one warehouse unlocks unlimited life-sale potential. "no price-tag? sorry, it's not for sale. here I'll help you put it back." btw costco should sort their lines like the airport before security instead of a series of distributed queues. This way people wait in line while going through the last few aisles, like the [thing that I'm describing -> so anyways as I was saying] oh yeah uh there's a lot of empty space at the front of the lines in costco you know how in grocery stores people have that empty space to walk through right after that and before the cashier there's a series of stands that contain the same merchandise. that way, if you pass through there, which any customer will, you'll pass by the stuff that's small, numerous, and otherwise easily stored in more standardized locations. [I can be utilized to vast potential in any industry, let me at 'em] 🙂 oh um, sorry where was I? I think we were talking about god or some such. ========================= and then I came back, remembered the syncing of timing, and realized this: you could have stalls all the way along where the lines were. if you had half as many cashiers, the lines could be half as long. this way you can shop while you wait. this might enable shoppers to plan for things they know they have, if they spend more time in the consideration. A healthier pantry closet, a healthier home. the cold aisles should always be optional. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════┘ --- #19 fediverse/1854 --- ╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┐ ║ ┌──────────────────────┐ │ ║ │ CW: politics │ │ ║ └──────────────────────┘ │ ║ │ ║ │ ║ okay how about this: one side of the political spectrum gets to pick the │ ║ rules, and the other picks the people playing the game (carrying out the │ ║ rules, like government work and stuff) │ ║ │ ║ then they switch every 2 years or whatever. they can vote to decide which │ ║ group of people do what, and if something is owned by one side then the other │ ║ can't touch it. Ah, but what if it's in the way? Well, then move it duh" │ ║ │ ║ hey, you know pride? yeah, that event that happens once a year? sure would be │ ║ nice if we met people we didn't know there. if we knew everyone else. if we │ ║ spent most of it sharing our discussions, and talking about what we're most │ ║ proud of. then, okay here's an idea, we could filter and organize and figure │ ║ out which one of us has the most "votes" in terms of what's the things we │ ║ agree on and then we could pick our own CEO │ ║ │ ║ yeah I'd totally work for the gay company, they got rainbows and shit that's │ ║ awesome. │ ║ │ ║ What they do? Oh, I dunno, butt stuff I guess. but like I'm all for it (not │ ║ the butt stuff, │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴──────────┘ --- #20 fediverse/6100 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────── if you live in a place where it rains a lot you pretty much HAVE TO pick up any secret notes you find. Otherwise they'll get waterlogged overnight. Sometimes I like to put them somewhere shaded from the sky, sometimes I like to show them to a friend (but the friend never takes them, booooo) and sometimes I just keep them. "ah but aren't you worried about messing up drug deals and stuff" no, because most of the time "secret notes" are like "eggs milk bread chips salsa cheese" and it's like "hmmmm what could it mean" there's like, 2% of the time when they say something cool like "I know what you did" or "all your base are belong to us" or whatever and those are fun to hunt for. I usually try and put those somewhere shelted so they don't have to leave their habitat - sometimes it's hard to drop them as the author so they just sorta go wherever, but as a random passer-by I have the luxury of saying "HMMMM now where could THIS ONE go?" and that's nice because I can put them under an umbrella or whatevers rite ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────┘ |