=== ANCHOR POEM ===
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 @user-1311 @user-1312 @user-1313 @user-1135 @user-1314 @user-1315 @user-687
 @user-1316
 
 a rare chance when retracting the right to strategically vote actually
 increases the number of options available to the user.
 
 the difference between frequency and magnitude of impact.
 
 the only thing a political party can really offer is consistency. otherwise
 people would just vote in whoever was most relevant to them at the time! can't
 have the proletariate choosing their fate, after all.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

=== SIMILARITY RANKED ===

--- #1 fediverse/2777 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: politics         │
 └──────────────────────┘


 if you cannot trust that both candidates will try to make the country better
 in different ways, but with the same goal, then you do not have a choice when
 voting.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #2 fediverse/2717 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 ┌─────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: USpol; shooting │
 └─────────────────────────┘


 @user-1328 
 
 the only method that needs to fail for them to realize what you're saying as
 truth is their method to vote.
 
 they will quickly grasp for power they once held and realize it was little
 more than an "I OWE YOU"
 
 Then, they might listen. Then, they might hear.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #3 messages/286 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
 > <@gabrilend:matrix.org> What if we... Ballots, bodies, militia and?
 
 Jobs are how they deprive us of time and energy.
 
 Rent is how they deprive us of value.
 
 Fox news is how they deprive us of a well regulated militia (and point it at
 our feet)
 
 Sugar laced foods are how they turn our bodies against us 
 
 Ballots are how they deprive us of faith 
 
 Schools are how they take our curiosity, as teachers are not given freedom to
 fully explain.
 
 Meh... There's so many more. It's pointless to elaborate.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────┘

--- #4 fediverse/4300 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────
 @user-467 
 
 democracy works best with a well-informed populace, and those who are against
 democracy would do anything to make it harder to be "well-informed" -
 including diluting the pool of candidates in order to make it harder to
 research them.
 
 ... Or maybe it was the first time and none of the candidates realized they'd
 be running against so many people? I'm not sure, I'm on the other side of
 forest park and I had at most 5ish options, and no ranked choice voting. : (
 
 I think this might be one of the reasons political parties formed, way back in
 the distant days of yore. Much easier to say "I agree with this group of
 people so I'm voting for who they champion" than "I don't know how to pick
 between 30+ candidates (who I don't know because this is the past and we don't
 have the internet back then ... back now)
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┘

--- #5 fediverse/3196 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: politics-mentione-cursing-mentioned │
 └─────────────────────────────────────────────┘


 @user-1475 @user-1476 @user-1280 @user-1074 @user-1477 @user-1478 
 
 the alternative is lateral thinking. In the given example with leaded
 gasoline, the answer is to limit the usage of all gasoline, not just the
 leaded kind. However that is not in the best interests of anyone, at least
 short term, so it's not likely to happen.
 
 lateral, long-term thinking. Do what you can in the moment to make the world
 better. Pick the best out of all the options presented to you, and if your
 options only treat the symptoms and not the problem, try and identify
 solutions that would treat the problem. Then, pick the better of the two
 options which treat the symptom, and moving forward work toward implementing
 the solution which fixes the problem.
 
 Hence, why we should vote Democrat, but ONLY with the real solution in mind.
 
 what kind of solution would you have? I know mine. I can tell you about it if
 you'd like. The most important thing is that you share and build for that
 future.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #6 fediverse/2539 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 ┌─────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: re: housing-crisis-idea │
 └─────────────────────────────┘


 @user-1074 
 
 true. your idea is more revolutionary, mine is more reformist. each would be
 more fit for different political environments.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #7 fediverse/3168 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: uspol            │
 └──────────────────────┘


 You know how we select from amongst our number electors and representatives
 who vote on our behalf?
 
 Truly an excellent strategy in the era of instant communication, an aft-gone
 luxury that our ancient forebearers surely would have incorporated into their
 nationbuilding design, if they had had it.
 
 I can't help but wonder if it would be a useful strategy to "give" our votes
 to a representative who voted on our behalf. Most people do not care and
 cannot possess the capacity to care about voting, but if they gave their vote
 to someone they trusted who they had a personal connection to beyond party
 loyalty, then perhaps we could mandate voting
 
 I can't help but wonder what that would do to our electoral landscape. If
 voting is mandated, and as easy as pointing at someone and saying "yeah
 whatever she picks", then perhaps the old white grannies with quivering lower
 lips who stare with hatred whenever a black person walks past and chat with
 their gal pals at church wouldn't have as much power over us.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #8 fediverse_boost/4419 ---
◀─[BOOST]
  
  I've had this #cartoon in my files for decades. It's no longer a cartoon but the reality many Americans voted for.  
  #election #politics #fascism #pollution #press #news #trump #corporatism    
  
                                                            
 similar                        chronological                        different 
─▶

--- #9 fediverse/1342 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────
 we should be able to vote on "minors DNI" tags that mechanically prevent
 people who didn't lie about their age when creating their account from viewing
 a piece of data transmitted over the internet
 
 and if it's suitably controversial then no matter which way the vote swings it
 gets blocked (temporarily) anyway
 
 sorry I was connecting to a "think of the children" kind of person recently
 and that's what my brain came up with >.>
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┘

--- #10 fediverse/2238 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┐
 ┌──────────────────────┐                                                         │
 │ CW: uspol            │                                                         │
 └──────────────────────┘                                                         │
 two parties obviously can cause division.                                        │
 but it can also give you the ability to "tune for balance", while a single       │
 monolith strives straight into disaster.                                         │
 and disaster will come, for the future is a shifting and dynamic place, and      │
 the best laid rail lines can't handle sudden floods.                             │
 we have ranked choice voting now, and if you vote on how important each          │
 decision is to you (via smartphone app once or twice a day, in a way that can    │
 be changed later as your feelings shift)                                         │
 [6+months-later]                                                                 │
 ... then you can have left unity for long-term governance by having cohesion     │
 at one end, and dispersion on the other.                                         │
 If everyone votes, then we can ensure (based on voted priority) that each        │
 issue trends towards an equal exchange.                                          │
 (I'm sure there will be issues but we're all cool and pretty chill so we'll      │
 figure it out)                                                                   │
 [6+ months later]                                                                │
 okay we're battle-hardened vets, but we hold true to our values and so we can    │
 remember the spirit of unity we wept for.                                        │
 ... I'm better at writing than making sandwiches. BRB                            │
                                                            ┌───────────┤
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────┴──────────┘

--- #11 fediverse/4459 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: politics-mentioned │
 └────────────────────────┘


 democrats probably won't fight for socialism, but they sure as heck will fight
 against republicans.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘

--- #12 fediverse/3015 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: uspol            │
 └──────────────────────┘


 @user-1428 @user-1280 @user-1429 
 
 it's not a contest of "who can spend more"
 
 their voters already believe what they believe. nothing will change their
 mind. so there's little purpose for their money.
 
 our voters need encouragement to come out and vote. The more people that vote,
 the more democrats tend to win. This speaks to a demographic advantage to the
 left, as more people can always be introduced to our ideas.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘

--- #13 fediverse/2959 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: uspol            │
 └──────────────────────┘


 @user-1396 
 
 it isn't a vote between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump - it's a vote between
 democrat or republican. always has been.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #14 fediverse/3797 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────
 @user-570 
 
 unless you meant canada. I vote no on that, because there's very little
 difference between there and here. I mean, it's colder, which is nice. But
 don't move because of politics or whatever. We can handle that.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┘

--- #15 fediverse/1838 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────
 Gee I sure wish my country didn't hold the decisionmaking capability from me
 by gatekeeping it behind elections and polling. Sure wish our media wasn't so
 involved in decisionmaking - isn't it something we should talk about amongst
 ourselves? To find out how we feel, and really explore our feelings around a
 topic before expressing ourselves. Ideally more often than twice a year,
 perhaps whenever we want?
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┘

--- #16 fediverse/3551 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: politics-mentioned │
 └────────────────────────┘


 liberalism is capitalism with a dash of globalism. they are of the right, and
 it is important to have a right-wing party because a one-winged bird cannot
 fly.
 
 there are legitimate benefits to their philosophies, and they may be applied
 to all kinds of systems, even those that do not utilize currency at all.
 
 however, in modern america, there is another party, a party farther to the
 right, a party which is voted into power based on culture, something
 unassailable and inalienable and yet always perpetually under threat. or so
 they make it seem.
 
 this "farther-to-the-right" party is duplicitous in it's ideals. their persona
 is that of businessmen, familymen, and journeymen. they claim to be farmers,
 pastors, and step-fathers.
 
 but they are something more, something behind their mask, that those who vote
 for them cannot see.
 
 for they were all of them, deceived...
 
 another plan was made. a project, if you will, to be implemented posthaste, in
 merely a single-year's time.
 
 it's cruelty indeed.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┘

--- #17 fediverse/2790 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: uspol            │
 └──────────────────────┘


 look all I'm saying is the results this election decides whether you should
 trust the government or the corporations more. and they both want things that
 you don't, in addition to things you do.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘

--- #18 fediverse/1388 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────
 @user-969 @user-970 
 
 When you choose, you choose a 33% chance
 
 when they choose which door to remove, they are removing 50% of the possible
 wrong answers.
 
 which means when you get the chance to choose again, your 33% chance (which is
 locked in stone) is now boosted to a 50% chance, but only if you switch.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent══════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┘

--- #19 messages/599 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────
 If you live in a red state, come to a blue state *now*. If you live in a blue
 state, house people. Let them come, and let the right leave. They probably
 won't, but if they try to, let them.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┘

--- #20 fediverse/2971 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
 @user-1407 @user-855 @user-1408 
 
 moving forward, for every year we have democrats in charge is another year we
 can buy solar panels, drones, 3d printers, and other supplies.
 
 every year the fascists are in charge is another year we have to fight.
 
 I'd rather buy more time than spend it wisely, as buying time costs labor
 while spending it costs blood.
                                                           ┌───────────┐
 similar                        chronologicaldifferent════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘