=== ANCHOR POEM === ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────── ┌──────────────────────┐ │ CW: uspol │ └──────────────────────┘ @user-1428 @user-1280 @user-1429 it's not a contest of "who can spend more" their voters already believe what they believe. nothing will change their mind. so there's little purpose for their money. our voters need encouragement to come out and vote. The more people that vote, the more democrats tend to win. This speaks to a demographic advantage to the left, as more people can always be introduced to our ideas. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘ === SIMILARITY RANKED === --- #1 fediverse/2844 --- ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────── ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ CW: re: politics-violence-mentioned │ └─────────────────────────────────────┘ @user-831 those billionaires are using their money as a weapon to "vote" toward what companies they think capitalism would most grow from. Unfortunately for us, they often aren't very efficient because they're only looking at what sells. human interest is not the only factor to optimize for, and yet that's the only one they're incentivized to. kinda makes me think that the only reason to replace them would be to institute something that could not be incentivized because it was more objective or decentralized. (the only reason they'd accept) ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘ --- #2 fediverse/2777 --- ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────── ┌──────────────────────┐ │ CW: politics │ └──────────────────────┘ if you cannot trust that both candidates will try to make the country better in different ways, but with the same goal, then you do not have a choice when voting. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘ --- #3 fediverse/2971 --- ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────── @user-1407 @user-855 @user-1408 moving forward, for every year we have democrats in charge is another year we can buy solar panels, drones, 3d printers, and other supplies. every year the fascists are in charge is another year we have to fight. I'd rather buy more time than spend it wisely, as buying time costs labor while spending it costs blood. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘ --- #4 fediverse/1021 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────── ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ CW: politics-voting-sex-mentioned-god-mentioned │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ we don't let children vote. nor do we let felons vote, theoretically those who harm our society (pick one, no voting or no prison? I vote no prison industrial complex) nor do we let non-citizens vote, for why should they tell us how to live? they are not us, they shall not control us nor do we let kings vote with the weight of a god, for a king is a singular point of failure if you can consent to sex, you are physically capable to vote. if you're mislead by the propaganda of an abusive spouse, you are hurting your future self by staying. [all media is propaganda that you are not immune to] all men are created equal, and yet his dollar is worth a bit more than hers. all of us here are equal, because we all want the bright future and a blessed life. we'll make this world better, using our own hands according to our own demands and in pursuit of our own plans. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┘ --- #5 messages/409 --- ════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────── A style of debate where the two parties take turns interrogating each other - like lawyers presenting their case by forcing the other party to answer their specific questions. In doing so they can highlight the logical flaws and inherent absurdities in each other's notion. And you have to be as truthful and honest as possible, or else the entire process is flawed. Giving each person in the debate a chance to speak their mind about how they feel about particular issues. Kinda like a caucus, where people debate for their chosen candidate Democrats need to listen to what regular voters care about and like, do that. Instead they think "how much can we get away with while still delivering their 51% of votes that secure us the nomination" And the most radical amongst us should be the most dedicated to the Democratic process. It is how we the people wield ourselves, our divine birthright granted to us all - to choose the circumstances of our living. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┘ --- #6 fediverse/2959 --- ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────── ┌──────────────────────┐ │ CW: uspol │ └──────────────────────┘ @user-1396 it isn't a vote between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump - it's a vote between democrat or republican. always has been. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘ --- #7 fediverse/3168 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────── ┌──────────────────────┐ │ CW: uspol │ └──────────────────────┘ You know how we select from amongst our number electors and representatives who vote on our behalf? Truly an excellent strategy in the era of instant communication, an aft-gone luxury that our ancient forebearers surely would have incorporated into their nationbuilding design, if they had had it. I can't help but wonder if it would be a useful strategy to "give" our votes to a representative who voted on our behalf. Most people do not care and cannot possess the capacity to care about voting, but if they gave their vote to someone they trusted who they had a personal connection to beyond party loyalty, then perhaps we could mandate voting I can't help but wonder what that would do to our electoral landscape. If voting is mandated, and as easy as pointing at someone and saying "yeah whatever she picks", then perhaps the old white grannies with quivering lower lips who stare with hatred whenever a black person walks past and chat with their gal pals at church wouldn't have as much power over us. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘ --- #8 messages/687 --- ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────── What the person you voted for represented you? At the end of rue election, the top X percent of broad demographics each vote for a specific candidate, yeah? What if each candidate could represent those people specifically and any laws they made wouldn't effect people who they didn't represent. Sounds like a legislative nightmare doesn't it? And repealing laws, they'd only be repealed for their constituents. You'd need a github page to track the changes and each demographic's "forks" ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────┘ --- #9 fediverse_boost/2468 --- ◀─╔═════════════════════[BOOST]══════════════════════────────────────────────────╗ ║ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ ║ ║ │ The Democratic party is not doing what they could do to win this election. │ ║ ║ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ║ ╠─────────┐ ┌───────────╣ ║ similar │ chronological │ different ║ ╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────┴───────╝─▶ --- #10 fediverse/5177 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────── ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ CW: capitalism-mentioned-four-times │ └─────────────────────────────────────┘ when they say "capitalism is a competitive game" what they mean is "capitalism is a game where everyone wins when someone else loses" and what we hear is "capitalism is a game of trying to screw you out of as much money as possible" and the truth is "capitalism is a game that you can't play" because 95% of the people who will read this toot are not stock-owners. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────┘ --- #11 fediverse/5235 --- ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────── @user-1782 it's not that they lost value in their company due to the lack of sale of their products, but instead because they don't have to pay for marketing if their car looks "cool" enough and they can give them away for a lower blood price ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────┘ --- #12 fediverse/2004 --- ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────── ┌──────────────────────┐ │ CW: re: politics │ └──────────────────────┘ @user-1126 Yes, I have very little faith in the democratic process in my country. Unfortunately, while democracy is crucial to fair, honest, and just representation, as you said it's unlikely that democracy would be allowed to exist if it threatened the power of the powerful. Thus, our twisted form that sorta works, but requires a LOT of effort and a LOT of maintenance. More than the average person can give. They've tuned it to be JUST dysfunctional enough to overwhelm our natural innate tendencies to contribute to "the tribe of tribes", while leaving it just functional enough such that if you work your ass off with ALL of the people who agree with you, then MAYBE you might get a measure on the ballot for something insignificant (which won't pass, because why would it?) I have faith in people, not the democratic process, for I have faith in democracy, but not the process. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┘ --- #13 fediverse/3551 --- ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────── ┌────────────────────────┐ │ CW: politics-mentioned │ └────────────────────────┘ liberalism is capitalism with a dash of globalism. they are of the right, and it is important to have a right-wing party because a one-winged bird cannot fly. there are legitimate benefits to their philosophies, and they may be applied to all kinds of systems, even those that do not utilize currency at all. however, in modern america, there is another party, a party farther to the right, a party which is voted into power based on culture, something unassailable and inalienable and yet always perpetually under threat. or so they make it seem. this "farther-to-the-right" party is duplicitous in it's ideals. their persona is that of businessmen, familymen, and journeymen. they claim to be farmers, pastors, and step-fathers. but they are something more, something behind their mask, that those who vote for them cannot see. for they were all of them, deceived... another plan was made. a project, if you will, to be implemented posthaste, in merely a single-year's time. it's cruelty indeed. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┘ --- #14 fediverse/5504 --- ╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────┐ ║ pacifistic defiance is not about overcoming your opponents through │ ║ "legislative pressure" or whatever the liberals are on about │ ║ │ ║ it's about getting the orphan-chopping-machine operators to question their │ ║ humanity and resolve a crisis of faith in your favor │ ║ │ ║ [I think that kills you if you stand in front of tanks.] │ ║ │ ║ yeah but sometimes they just go around. which is not progress, but a │ ║ reimplementation of [reification of] the power of the │ ║ [machine-to-be-raged-against, but pronounced like "town"] because it signifies │ ║ that any weakness in the will of the operators can simply be circumvented │ ║ while the state still gets what it wants. │ ║ │ ║ great. thanks ghandi, unfortunately our entire propaganda piece requires that │ ║ people are invested in their background. who cares what there is to say about │ ║ a computer running circles around a meat farm? │ ║ │ ║ "help help I'm being oppressed" said the derided, "help help I'm being │ ║ depressed" said the divided, "help help I'm losing my sound" said the │ ║ war-like-minded, "help help I have no ground │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──┴──────────┘ --- #15 messages/298 --- ═════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────── When you say "we need more low income housing" they hear "I want to live near more poor people" and they think "why would I want to live near poor people? They're poor for a reason! We only need enough around to work the jobs that suck anyway." which is basically their way of justifying slavery/indentured servitude, as it's not like they'd ever offer a way to climb out of that low-income pit. And its not like they'd ever let you pay them more, so they can afford to be equals, because then they wouldn't be middle-class anymore. They'd just be mid. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────┘ --- #16 fediverse/2664 --- ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────── @user-1311 @user-1312 @user-1313 @user-1135 @user-1314 @user-1315 @user-687 @user-1316 a rare chance when retracting the right to strategically vote actually increases the number of options available to the user. the difference between frequency and magnitude of impact. the only thing a political party can really offer is consistency. otherwise people would just vote in whoever was most relevant to them at the time! can't have the proletariate choosing their fate, after all. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘ --- #17 messages/666 --- ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────── It doesn't have to be more complicated than "give us money and we'll fight back the right wing death squads" ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘ --- #18 fediverse/3196 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────── ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ CW: re: politics-mentione-cursing-mentioned │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────┘ @user-1475 @user-1476 @user-1280 @user-1074 @user-1477 @user-1478 the alternative is lateral thinking. In the given example with leaded gasoline, the answer is to limit the usage of all gasoline, not just the leaded kind. However that is not in the best interests of anyone, at least short term, so it's not likely to happen. lateral, long-term thinking. Do what you can in the moment to make the world better. Pick the best out of all the options presented to you, and if your options only treat the symptoms and not the problem, try and identify solutions that would treat the problem. Then, pick the better of the two options which treat the symptom, and moving forward work toward implementing the solution which fixes the problem. Hence, why we should vote Democrat, but ONLY with the real solution in mind. what kind of solution would you have? I know mine. I can tell you about it if you'd like. The most important thing is that you share and build for that future. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘ --- #19 messages/634 --- ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────── The Democrats had one BILLION dollars. This is what they should have been doing, but they couldn't have known. They needed to spend it on the election in order for us to see that money, talent, and rationality can't beat whatever Trump brings to the table. Give me a billion dollars and I'll slay fascism. Give me ten and I'll save the world. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘ --- #20 fediverse/4459 --- ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────── ┌────────────────────────┐ │ CW: politics-mentioned │ └────────────────────────┘ democrats probably won't fight for socialism, but they sure as heck will fight against republicans. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘ |