=== ANCHOR POEM ===
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────
┌────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CW: re: politics-mentioned-death-mentioned │
└────────────────────────────────────────────┘
@user-1573
the easiest analogy would be to say an election is a gun, votes are bullets,
and the shooters are the candidates
could also say that the shooting event is an election, bullets as a concept is
democracy while each individual bullet is a vote, and the gun and shooters are
the ballots and voters
I dunno. I don't especially like thinking about guns and elections in the same
sentence...
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘
=== SIMILARITY RANKED ===
--- #1 fediverse/2777 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
┌──────────────────────┐
│ CW: politics │
└──────────────────────┘
if you cannot trust that both candidates will try to make the country better
in different ways, but with the same goal, then you do not have a choice when
voting.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘
--- #2 fediverse/4357 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────
┌────────────────────────┐
│ CW: politics-mentioned │
└────────────────────────┘
the white guys intentionally intend for elections to represent how much money
a particular diversion makes each four years.
divide the populace by who they vote with their wallet for.
hooray! you've reimplemented not only gerontocracy (rulership of the old) but
also fuedalism, and fiefdoms, and all kinds of digital parts.
like... "over there is comcast territory, there's also T-mobile down to our
north-south.
... okay I should probably talk about the election now
I'm just... trying to resolve myself, like just before doing something out of
order.
like, wear a big witch hat or dress up like a goth. or approach a violent
stranger and try to calm things down.
this is why I don't own a gun - if someone hands me one, I'll use it. I'm not
concerned about production because, well, why would I?
tell me, where do they put the bullet manufactories?
yeah, that's right, in places that are best adapted to supporting the current
regime.
[continued in picture]
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┘
--- #3 fediverse/1664 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CW: protests, politics, dogwhistles │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
do you ever think about how calling the BLM events "protests" versus "riots"
is a subtle dogwhistle for your politics? I usually say "riots" so that I
blend in. also because I've been conditioned by the people who I talk to about
them.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┘
--- #4 messages/286 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
> <@gabrilend:matrix.org> What if we... Ballots, bodies, militia and?
Jobs are how they deprive us of time and energy.
Rent is how they deprive us of value.
Fox news is how they deprive us of a well regulated militia (and point it at
our feet)
Sugar laced foods are how they turn our bodies against us
Ballots are how they deprive us of faith
Schools are how they take our curiosity, as teachers are not given freedom to
fully explain.
Meh... There's so many more. It's pointless to elaborate.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────┘
--- #5 fediverse/3797 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────
@user-570
unless you meant canada. I vote no on that, because there's very little
difference between there and here. I mean, it's colder, which is nice. But
don't move because of politics or whatever. We can handle that.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┘
--- #6 fediverse_boost/2468 ---
◀─╔═════════════════════[BOOST]══════════════════════────────────────────────────╗
║ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ ║
║ │ The Democratic party is not doing what they could do to win this election. │ ║
║ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ║
╠─────────┐ ┌───────────╣
║ similar │ chronological │ different ║
╚═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────┴───────╝─▶
--- #7 fediverse/4808 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────
┌────────────────────────┐
│ CW: politics-mentioned │
└────────────────────────┘
what if we elected one party to each branch of government every election
and they checked and balanced each other
georgism style individualism, chinese style communism, and american style
anarchism
for the person, for the nation, for the people
individualism, collectivism, and distributed nodes
when in power, each branch would work to move their institutions toward their
ideals.
Hey, they're the ones who repealed the chevron doctrine. How are we gonna
weaponize it?
(just spit-balling)
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┘
--- #8 fediverse/1021 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CW: politics-voting-sex-mentioned-god-mentioned │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
we don't let children vote.
nor do we let felons vote, theoretically those who harm our society (pick one,
no voting or no prison? I vote no prison industrial complex)
nor do we let non-citizens vote, for why should they tell us how to live? they
are not us, they shall not control us
nor do we let kings vote with the weight of a god, for a king is a singular
point of failure
if you can consent to sex, you are physically capable to vote. if you're
mislead by the propaganda of an abusive spouse, you are hurting your future
self by staying. [all media is propaganda that you are not immune to]
all men are created equal, and yet his dollar is worth a bit more than hers.
all of us here are equal, because we all want the bright future and a blessed
life.
we'll make this world better, using our own hands according to our own demands
and in pursuit of our own plans.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┘
--- #9 fediverse/2790 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
┌──────────────────────┐
│ CW: uspol │
└──────────────────────┘
look all I'm saying is the results this election decides whether you should
trust the government or the corporations more. and they both want things that
you don't, in addition to things you do.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘
--- #10 fediverse/1103 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────
@user-670 @user-808 @user-809
the people you're talking about with those massive arsenals are the ones who
are less scared of mass shooters and more scared of... something else.
Something worse.
They are so ardent because fear is a primal emotion that's difficult to
assuage with statistics or logic.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┘
--- #11 fediverse/3117 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
┌──────────────────────┐
│ CW: cursed-uspol │
└──────────────────────┘
hey. wanna know what would be really cursed?
--
if trump dropped out and musk took his place
--
good thing it'll never happen because those dinguses can't accept defeat and
will never tactically retreat
--
maybe something to keep in mind for 4 years from now. eyes on the prize for
now means our eyes aren't to our flanks.
what else could they do that would come out of left field?
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘
--- #12 fediverse/2844 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CW: re: politics-violence-mentioned │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
@user-831
those billionaires are using their money as a weapon to "vote" toward what
companies they think capitalism would most grow from. Unfortunately for us,
they often aren't very efficient because they're only looking at what sells.
human interest is not the only factor to optimize for, and yet that's the only
one they're incentivized to.
kinda makes me think that the only reason to replace them would be to
institute something that could not be incentivized because it was more
objective or decentralized.
(the only reason they'd accept)
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┘
--- #13 fediverse/5334 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────
┌───────────────────────┐
│ CW: cursing-mentioned │
└───────────────────────┘
every value judgement is a "hell yeah!" from those who already agree with you
and a "aw fuck off" from those who don't.
this is probably either a good or a bad thing, who can say.
if you don't take a stand, nobody will like you, but if you aren't careful,
you'll poison your well of support.
"why can't it be easy" because then it'd be done.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────┘
--- #14 fediverse/3080 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
┌─────────────────────────┐
│ CW: re: uspol kvetching │
└─────────────────────────┘
@user-1443
sorry 😅
re-reading what you wrote, your point was that it's unfair that republicans
are granted the control they have over our society through the
disenfranchisement of democrat voters, right?
and I was saying that if those limitations were removed, the democrats would
win in a landslide everywhere in the country, which gives me faith in my
fellow countrymen.
am I on the right track now?
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┘
--- #15 messages/687 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────
What the person you voted for represented you?
At the end of rue election, the top X percent of broad demographics each vote
for a specific candidate, yeah? What if each candidate could represent those
people specifically and any laws they made wouldn't effect people who they
didn't represent. Sounds like a legislative nightmare doesn't it? And
repealing laws, they'd only be repealed for their constituents.
You'd need a github page to track the changes and each demographic's "forks"
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────┘
--- #16 fediverse/4811 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────
┌────────────────────────────┐
│ CW: re: politics-mentioned │
└────────────────────────────┘
@user-1074
georgism is pretty similar to liberalism if I understand it correctly. I think
it could be a neat simple way to say "hey what if we taxed landlords" and
that's good enough for a start.
by no means is it the desired end-state, though.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┘
--- #17 fediverse/2160 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────
they could vote on "next year's project" in times of peace, or perhaps have
massive brain-storms with chatrooms set up at different tables that they could
pick up a phone and contribute to then wander to another table at, or maybe
even set up structures for who does what. Then they could do things that they
claimed responsibility for, and in doing so they could be judged.
perhaps according to a system like this:
https://ritz-menardi.neocities.org/algorism/html-pages/education-system
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┘
--- #18 fediverse/4365 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────
┌────────────────────────┐
│ CW: politics-mentioned │
└────────────────────────┘
what if Trump controlled x% of the land (according to electoral college votes)
and kamala controlled y% of the resources (according to popular vote) and they
each could do whatever they wanted there
the house and the senate in congress would function the same and unite the
two, but anything the president disagreed with they could veto for their
particular pieces of land and it would only affect their constituents.
why should we settle for anything less than legitimate representation,
unclouded by the division and spite?
if some combination of presidential vetos created an impossible situation,
then by law people weren't allowed to interface.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┘
--- #19 fediverse/5499 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────
┌───────────────────────────────┐
│ CW: nuclear-weapons-mentioned │
└───────────────────────────────┘
ultimately as long as the "shooting down nuclear weapons" capability is
greater than the "shooting falling nuclear weapons" capability then the world
is safe from ultimate harm.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────┘
--- #20 fediverse/4492 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────
┌────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CW: politics-mentioned-death-mentioned │
└────────────────────────────────────────┘
I've thought about it a bit, and I think blaming democracy for Hitler is a bit
like blaming bullets for death.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧╧═════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┘
|