-> file: messages/483
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────
"hey listen! Do this thing to hurt me! Build the infrastructure to do it so
that you can use it on people who deserve it!"
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ │ different │
╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴───────────┘
-> file: fediverse/3308
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────
where were you when you realized you were the most "you" person that ever would
be?
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ │ different │
╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴───────────┘
-> file: fediverse/3309
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────
@user-1490 @user-688
Oh yes and human curated descriptions are always more interesting than just...
describing the picture. Humans can offer nuance, and explain more intricate or
contextual things, drawing attention where it's most important and highlighting
the implications of expression, environment, and motion in a way that a
computer just... can't.
The only issue would be that in the context of the program I described, there
will always be questions that a human hasn't written a transcription for. It's
easy with Star Trek captions, because there's only one camera angle so you only
have to describe a single viewpoint. But blind people don't always... "see"
through cameras the ways that sighted people do. It's more of an "aura of
perception" that they feel around themselves.
Being able to walk around in a space (think like, VR without the headset) and
question various aspects of a scene would be so cool
Star Trek is perfect for this since there is very little movement, it's mostly
about thought
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ │ different │
╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴───────────┘
-> file: fediverse/3310
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────
I build myself up on my own.
I spend myself on work.
To move forward, we must go back
("to monke?") no to babe ("or to pile-of-rocks") yeah sometimes my spirit
animal is a boulder
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ │ different │
╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴───────────┘
-> file: fediverse/3311
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────
┌──────────────────────────────────┐
│ CW: re: "adult" anime convention │
└──────────────────────────────────┘
@user-192
[followers only]
humans are so cute 🥰
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ │ different │
╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴───────────┘
-> file: fediverse/3312
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────
if you're too tech illiterate to use a computer, then why are you using a
computer? oh right because it's 2024 and everyone needs a phone to keep up with
the breakneck pace of infinite and immediate responsiveness
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ │ different │
╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴───────────┘
-> file: fediverse/3313
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────
what if it was illegal to add network connectivity to a device that the user
didn't explicitly request to have network connectivity?
I'm picturing any device being sold going forward to have a little radio button
with like "add network features (+10$)" and "no networking included (+0$)"
boom, no more IoT
no more dishwashers phoning home telemetry
no more consensual privacy invasions desecrations
no more "I thought it was just a polaroid camera why does it have bluetooth
enabled without broadcasting a pairing request?"
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ │ different │
╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴───────────┘
|