-> file: fediverse/1972
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
@user-1120
pretty! ^_^
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ │ different │
╘═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────┴───────────┘
-> file: fediverse/1973
╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────┐
║ You cannot base your argument on the assumption that a person should do as you │
║ suggest. │
║ │
║ to do so is a form of circular reasoning. │
║ │
║ "You should do this thing, and yet you aren't, which means you're wrong" │
║ doesn't work logically if you, the person suggesting the thing for this other │
║ person to do, is wrong. │
║ │
║ Its a weakness in your argument, a flaw in your design. │
║ │
║ "You should not kill other people" is generally regarded as a true statement, │
║ but it rests its power upon the conclusion that you shouldnt harm another │
║ person. "your rights end where another's begin" and all that. │
║ │
║ If, however, that baseline axiom should change (that your right to kill someone │
║ ends as soon as another person's right to life comes into the picture) such as │
║ in the case when a person LOSES their right to life, for example if they're a │
║ nazi who is part of a death cult that actively seeks to destroy the lives of │
║ other people, then PERHAPS and maybe EVEN POSSIBLY it's possible that PERHAPS │
║ they, the nazi in question, should be slain. By you. │
╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤
║ similar │ │ different │
╚═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┴───────────┘
-> file: fediverse/1974
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
┌─────────────────────────────┐
│ CW: fascism-nazis-mentioned │
└─────────────────────────────┘
... have you ever seen the movie "Guns Akimbo"? I only remember the start, how
the main Harry Potter character got his hands replaced with hand-guns.
He was like, trolling some fascist dipshit on the internet, and sometimes I
can't help but wonder if the same kind of retribution is ever going to be
visited upon me.
Though I guess "we should kill nazis" is a little tame compared to what some of
ya'll post, so maybe I'm fine
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ │ different │
╘═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────┴───────────┘
-> file: fediverse/1975
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
the actions of the AI depend solely on the training data. Outside circumstances
(like a prompt, or an image description) can only give so much guidance - how
it executes on the intentions of the user are what is important.
For example, if an AI was trained with the knowledge of how to commit crimes,
for example, it could create a narrative of many different execution patterns.
Then it's just up to the listeners to execute functions based on the narrative
supplied by the crime-committer AI who was trained with knowledge about how to
commit those crimes by the owner of the software who programmed it into them in
order to [do the thing that people with power wants to do - intentionally left
generic because different ends will have different means]
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ │ different │
╘═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────┴───────────┘
-> file: fediverse/1976
╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────┐
║ when pushing ctrl+v, the operating system first checks the file-type of the │
║ content being submitted. │
║ │
║ if it's like, a .jpg or .png, it knows that it's an image file. Do note that │
║ these are RANDOM letters that mean nothing, not something informative like .pic. │
║ │
║ if, however, it is text-based information, it first reads what is being sent to │
║ the application which is requesting a ctrl+v. │
║ │
║ Then, upon reading said information, it decides "is this worth passing on? │
║ Should I send something else, based on the results of what I've been analyzing │
║ of the situation as it develops over time, being observed by the execution │
║ operations of the monitor, which is projected forward unto the screen? (totally │
║ forgetting that "virtual" monitors exist, meaning monitors that don't display │
║ to any physical screen, but which rather are projected into the computer's │
║ "aetherspace", an area which is purely of the mind. │
║ │
║ Alas, that other sensors might not have read from this area. That they might │
║ not observe the results of the operations pe │
╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤
║ similar │ │ different │
╚═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┴───────────┘
-> file: fediverse/1977
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
functions should be forced to describe the context of why they were being
called. I think it would help debug a lot if we supplied a reasoning for each
and every request [function call] that we made. We might even be able to parse
them into semantic pyramids which we could sorta use to estimate [tree-like
scanning] how and why the program did do wrong.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ │ different │
╘═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────┴───────────┘
-> file: fediverse/1978
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│ CW: re: fascism-nazis-mentioned │
└─────────────────────────────────┘
@user-1074
that's kinda how police are supposed to operate, btw.
put them in dangerous places, and if anyone starts getting angry or aggressive
then draw your firearm before them and attempt to calm things down. If that
doesn't work, start shooting and run, so you can tell others of what's going
on. Oh also you should leave a trail of your actions so others can audit it and
see exactly what you were doing at which time. But alas, cops are bogged down
in paperwork, so much stuff that needs doing. If only we assigned them
secretaries, and treated them like... managers, rather than individual
contributors. Perhaps then they, being the collective applicator of the
commonly considered ethical good, (laws), then perhaps they might be able to
direct other people (who do the paperwork) to handle certain aspects of an
investigation, and in doing so better reveal the truth.
because the rich and powerful LOVE to hide things behind impossible amounts of
proof.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ │ different │
╘═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────┴───────────┘
|