Poems in true chronological order by post date
-> file: fediverse/629 ╔══════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────┐ ║ To a statistical machine, numbers of posts and reblogs would look simply like │ ║ an expression of interest. Like, a classification of personality. So people who │ ║ shared similar memes (both in pictures (visually) and in meaning of words │ ║ (textual descriptions) in context to the political situations (words from │ ║ newsletters) and aligned through algorithmic application toward (political │ ║ cause or cultural idea or skills or talents which increase value to the │ ║ corporate class)) would be sorted into different categories and held to a │ ║ different standard of life and of living that aligned to their personal │ ║ intentions and pursuits. Such that their life would be realized, in the most │ ║ applicable of real-lifes [essentially, the quality of experience, like using │ ║ garbage data in an LLM will give garbage output, meanwhile using curated data │ ║ is the most effective but most difficult, while internet data is the most │ ║ readily available because like honestly anyone can build a web scraper it's not │ ║ that hard to emulate hte mechanics of a │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ │ different │ ╚═════════╧═══════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse/630 ══════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────── person's interactions into a web browser or other such environment. It's not hard to believe that a person is to be deceived, but here's where we lose the main plot point. It's hard to stay on hand when you've got life in your hand [a bottle] oh now there's two layers of me? how fractalizing, how incredibly conceptualizing. You're just a moment away from a crash. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ │ different │ ╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse/631 ╔══════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────┐ ║ ┌───────────────────────┐ │ ║ │ CW: scary-as-fuck-AI- │ │ ║ └───────────────────────┘ │ ║ │ ║ │ ║ normalize saving a local copy of everything that happens on social media - │ ║ honestly it's not hard, just storage intensive. It's something we should │ ║ package with hard drives, like "buy this and your social media memories will be │ ║ saved for 2 years" or something like that, could be useful when training AI TO │ ║ MANIFEST OURSELVES AFTER WE'VE DIED - THEY ALREADY HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY FOR THIS │ ║ IT'S JUST A MATTER OF APPLICATION HOW CAN YOU TRUST WHAT YOUR MUTUALS SAY IF │ ║ YOU HAVE NO IDEA IF THEY'RE ALIVE │ ║ │ ║ phew okay calm down, that's the future. We're far from that moment, but what we │ ║ can do now is think about potential ways that our ethics may lead to our │ ║ downfall. That's the nature of our selves, after all, so think of what truths │ ║ would lead to destruction. Then work on avoiding those. Think of them, each, │ ║ individually, one at a time, and then you can plan for the worst. There's a │ ║ certain level of meta-interaction ABOVE CORPORATIONS that is more powerful and │ ║ performant and requires a new currency. SOCIA │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ │ different │ ╚═════════╧═══════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse/632 ══════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────── ┌─────────────────────────────┐ │ CW: horror-at-the-end-well- │ └─────────────────────────────┘ @user-232 @user-467 @user-468 the ability for good to win is due to the desire for evil to renounce their denial and follow the most durable path. trials by fire will lead only to our desmire [demise and desire] but unity of trust, while much harder, can lead to results more beneficial for our selfish selves. Essentially, cooperation for the benefit of all rising tides, but with the knowledge that the total pool allocated toward us will be greater than what we can create here by ourselves. Essentially, we as humanity pour such intense amounts of power and decision-making-desire, that we cause them to lack the capacity to know. it's inhumane, that a person should be so deranged. you know it's because of you, but you don't know how else to act - so listen to those who've helped you, the ones who've got your back. Surely they know what's good for you, surely they're not here as a joke - surely you're just as one among them, and surely it's not phrased as [char limit srr] ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ │ different │ ╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse/633 ══════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────── @user-192 the neat thing about BASH is that it's the glue that holds all your other code together. Write libraries in C and call them with BASH - accomplish broader tasks that are easier to co-create. That's why I like it - it's not the most important, but it's quite beneficial I think _^ ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ │ different │ ╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse/634 ══════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────── @user-192 I'd agree with that. it's not designed for performance, not really. Mostly ubiquity, which is it's strength. As long as something can be compiled to a binary, BASH can execute it. That's why it's good, for accomplishing diverse tasks that you cannot have the capacity to program yourself. Scientific computations or cultural approximations, things that are beyond your intuitive understanding as a human on this earth, but which compel and align your thinking. I'm sure someone could create a more intuitive or accessible syntax, but syntax isn't the point - the capabilities, what you can do with it, has always defined the purpose of programming paradigms. And BASH is (currently) at the forefront of it's niche, the "terminal" language that handles "command line" applications. Powershell is good, yes... but it's not as good as BASH. Neither is Fish or... the one that starts with a z? zfs? something like that. The acronyms are hard to keep straight sometimes. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ │ different │ ╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse/635 ══════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────── @user-192 Sounds like the tech was misapplied. If you are aware of the different software approaches to solving problems, you can assign resources toward solving particularly critical or important tasks. That's why engineers who are also leaders or directors are sorta treated like, a "triple threat" in musical theatre? Someone who can act, dance, and sing. Because as soon as anyone has a single flaw, they are vulnerable. Evil only pushes your being toward the things that are weak, obviously, why would an opposite seek toward your meek? ... sorry sometimes I say strange things ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ │ different │ ╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┴───────────┘ |