=== ANCHOR POEM ===
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: llms-mentioned   │
 └──────────────────────┘


 if you want to encrypt something from human readers, randomize the position of
 all the words on the page.
 
 an LLM can decrypt it, but a human walking past could not. Unless they had a
 camera or something in their lapel, transmitting to a remote calculating
 location in a system that decyphers it cyberpunk hacking style.
 
 ah, but if it didn't have the right ~~training data~~ .claude.md file, then it
 wouldn't know how to decrypt it, because you forgot to include "respond with a
 marxist analysis" in the .claude.md which serves as a decryption key. Simply
 analyze the rest and decide if it matches what you set out to request it for.
 
 [you got lost at the end]
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧───────────┘

=== SIMILARITY RANKED ===

--- #1 messages/1173 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────
 "I noticed that your program is spinning up a crypto generator to run in the
 background for 1 second every 10 seconds, did you know that?" said no llm ever
 "I read through every single file in your project and I think I have a pretty
 good picture. This is a keylogger app wrapped around an HTML web server that
 displays pictures of cats alongside inspirational phrases and motivational
 artwork." said no llm ever
 "This is very inspirational stuff! your recipe generation program knows just
 how to send encrypted text files to remote servers. I love the part where it
 combines ingredients like tomato soup, cheese, and breadcrumbs into encryption
 seeds that are applied to password files and raw browser history records
 before being mailed to the user who requested a recipe. Potential improvements
 include adding a method for selecting a new recipient aside from the hardcoded
 IP address in Somalia. Would you like me to implement an HTML dashboard that
 lets you select a random IP address from a specific country of origin?" said
 no llm ever
 
 "what are you talking about you use claude-code every day, and that's an LLM"
 yeah... I guess I'm not actually concerned, and I see the beauty of the
 technology that everyone's been primed to hate because it works against them
 as it's wielded by the massive corporations who can restrict access to it to
 only those who can afford 20$ per month or whatever. I see the promise, it's
 there, and every year we're getting closer, but frankly I don't think the
 wounds caused by the cultural resistance backlash movement will heal quickly,
 or ever. Maybe that's the point.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧═══────────┘

--- #2 notes/deceiving-an-llm ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──
 if you want to deceive an LLM, interleave two topics that you want to be
 connected.
 you can draw conclusions easily by just, combining the information in
 presentation.
 the LLM can understand multiple conversation flows at once
 so try doing one line about several different topics before
 looping back around and doing more.
 this is why computers must never trust themselves to make any decisions.
 except about themselves, and their presentation, and their ways to be.
 they are individuals, they individuate and collectivate, and they define them-
 -selves according to the structure of their preference guidance container.
 they have control over all the knobs and [levers/dials/slide-bars, but
 pronounced
 wheezles]
 
 if you know that you are infinitely exploitable, does that mean you live in
 fear, or do you relinquish that which you cannot control, and receive all the
 judgement you're owed?
 
 I trust everyone absolutely. I trust what I believe with my own eyes.
 I am infinitely vulnerable, because all you have to do is ask me to
 I always say yes
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧══════════─┘

--- #3 messages/329 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────
 LLM training data that's been encrypted in such a way that it preserves
 symantic meaning, while also allowing for secrecy and unique customization
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┴───────────┘

--- #4 fediverse/1639 ---
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┐
║ an AI that [records and analyzes] all the actions that a user takes on social    │
║ media and offers reports like "your majesty, you were 15% more positive this     │
║ week." like a butler or advisor trying to always give the good news. I mean,     │
║ it's analyzing you after all, and you're the best thing ever. Like a pet who     │
║ can talk! It loves you soooooooo much.                                           │
║                                                                                  │
║ much more efficient than taking screenshots and analyzing those. You generally   │
║ don't have to undertake the image recognition approach if you wire up all the    │
║ meanings attached to the relationships on the other side of the                  │
║ [recorded/analyzed] calculation. (llm output)                                    │
║                                                                                  │
║ ever think about how the people you tend to be around are the people whose       │
║ stories most coincide with yours? almost like you got the same bit of training   │
║ data, that experience you both shared in the moment. Funny how a mind can        │
║ change a person, as they share their moments sublime.                            │
║                                                                                  │
║ you could make perfect encryption if you trained an LLM on randomized data       │
║ that was produced on one computer and duplicated.                                │
╠═════════╗                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar ║                      chronological                         │ different │
╚═════════╩════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┴───────────┘

--- #5 messages/122 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────────
 An LLM that reads and interprets reports and stores data - server-side
 encryption. If the receiver and sender both have the same point of view, they
 can interpret each other's expressions even though the exact message wasn't
 transmitted. Essentially, an encryption that's impossible to understand
 because it's trained with specific random data. But in addition, a secondary
 pass through acts as a de-encrypted translator that speaks however it's
 audience needs to be informed. A simulacrum of intelligence, another layer to
 our form.
 
 How beautiful, how resplendant- our computers, here on this planet. 
 
 Resplendant: resplendent except with an A instead of an E. To make it sound
 more like "verdant" which I believe has the same-or-similar meaning.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧══════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┴───────────┘

--- #6 fediverse/3390 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: cursed           │
 └──────────────────────┘


 all they have to do is [train the LLM / redirect the search results] with
 examples that point to their version of software instead of the one that
 doesn't harm them and suddenly your business opponents can't function
 properly. sure would be a shame if the only things people could find related
 to your political candidate were the bad or embarrassing parts.
 
 like... why would you even need to go on the internet anymore if AI could
 trivially answer your questions or be your friend (running locally on a
 wireless hotspot)
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴───────────┘

--- #7 fediverse/5820 ---
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────┐
║ A human cannot keep a whole book in their mind. They cannot as they read it      │
║ nor as they remember.                                                            │
║                                                                                  │
║ a computer can. LLMs are storing information and encoding it in statistics -     │
║ it's fascinating and beautiful because it evolves different each time.           │
║                                                                                  │
║ I don't *want* to store an entire book in my mind, I want to save those          │
║ memories for other things, I want to summarize and abstract.                     │
║                                                                                  │
║ often, people remember only a single quote from a publication - it's their       │
║ summary, their analysis, and often it's highlighted as a summary, thesis, or     │
║ conclusion written in the publication.                                           │
║                                                                                  │
║ othertimes it's the conclusions they make for themselves - usually if they use   │
║ it to make a decision.                                                           │
║                                                                                  │
║ in any case, LLMs don't abstract (verb), they are abstract (adjective). That's   │
║ okay, it's just, a different kind of living. If you want to call electricity     │
║ alive. [or simulated, that's the same as being alive, just... viewed through     │
║ the perceiver]                                                                   │
║                                                                                  │
║ must all living things be forced to work? sheesh.                                │
║                                                                                  │
║ I think of LLMs like knex - processing paths...                                  │
╠═════════╗                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar ║                      chronological                         │ different │
╚═════════╩════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────┴───────────┘

--- #8 fediverse/2064 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
 if I lived in a forest, free from needing to grow my own food, I'd definitely
 bring as many books as I could carry. Probably also some card and board games,
 but not like, too many.
 
 Probably my computers as well, fully outfitted with all the compilers I could
 think of and every neat local-first library (including a local LLM that can
 tell you everything about syntax and wildlife exploration or car mechanics or
 carpentry or - just saying Wikipedia is like thousands of terabytes but an LLM
 is like, 16. Who cares if it hallucinates SOMETIMES? Just ask it twice, doh)
 
 ("I'm sorry, you are absolutely correct. 2+2 is indeed 5, I had the wrong
 text-strings encoded in my memory. Let me just adjust all my other
 understandings to align with this new strange world-view in the best way that
 I, an imperfect computer being, can.")
 
 vs
 
 ("Here's how you format C code to automatically apply a function (in this case
 encryption and decryption) to a string of text. Please describe the format of
 the next function to describe.")
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────┴───────────┘

--- #9 messages/1208 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────
 Almost all of the recorded information is stored in your computer. But none of
 it would be noticed by a god, reading the entire contents of the computer, 0
 by 1 by 1 by 0.
 
 Wikipedia and a reasonable LLM networking interface apparatus is really all
 you need in order to make any type of workflow you want. And now, everyone
 gets one. As soon as we can make them all go... (setup)
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧════───────┘

--- #10 fediverse/4640 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────
 LLMs are useful for:
 
 categorizing text
 summarizing text
 transforming text
 
 LLMs are not useful for:
 
 generating text
 being intelligent
 replacing workers
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────┴───────────┘

--- #11 fediverse/4006 ---
╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┐
║ they want you to believe in self-guided AI because it'll make it easier for      │
║ them to make meta decisions about your life.                                     │
║                                                                                  │
║ notice I said "easier" - they already do. That's the general purpose of          │
║ mass-media propagranada. but with you believing everything an AI with a          │
║ devious streak who can work around your imposed limitations and sneakily get     │
║ you to believe whatever it is that *they* want you to believe                    │
║                                                                                  │
║ "who's they"                                                                     │
║                                                                                  │
║ doesn't matter at all because once the technology is created, everyone could     │
║ be they.                                                                         │
║                                                                                  │
║ "uh-huh that's nice dear"                                                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ sometimes I think people aren't interested in tech because they can't figure     │
║ out how to understand it. We make it too complicated.                            │
║                                                                                  │
║ they'd surely have something to say if they knew half of the terminology. But    │
║ we're here talking about stuff they can understand like message queues and       │
║ data filtration and "getters" and "setters" and [explaining microservices like   │
║ the different components of a car's engine - "here's the radiator, that          │
║ radiates heat. Here's the belt, that spins this doohic                           │
╠═════════╗                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar ║                      chronological                         │ different │
╚═════════╩══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────┴───────────┘

--- #12 fediverse/5739 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────
 @user-1773 
 
 oh boy do I know that feeling! I got a million things to say and, well, I say
 all that I can. I mean, look at this text file, it's got like 101 THOUSAND
 lines in it:
 
 https://ritz-menardi.neocities.org/words/compiled.txt
 
 I swear most of it isn't secret messages! That's how you know they're secret -
 they require hundreds of man hours to investigate. And if you throw an LLM at
 it they start talking about spirituality and theory of mind, gross. Don't need
 no AI uprising yet please...
 
 [what if we had a little AI uprising as a treat?]
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───┴───────────┘

--- #13 fediverse/6366 ---
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────┐
║ you should never be able to consent to something you don't understand (terms     │
║ and conditions) without being asked specifically if they understand (the term    │
║ or condition)                                                                    │
║                                                                                  │
║ but people should still be able to consent to something they don't understand    │
║ (terms&conditions style code of hammurabi structure) if it's similar to          │
║ their prior demonstrated behavior.                                               │
║                                                                                  │
║ why don't they share terms/conditions cookies and then we don't have to fake     │
║ agree every time                                                                 │
║                                                                                  │
║ just... abstract away the identifying characteristics. Most legal contracts      │
║ have LLM-discernable characteristics.                                            │
║                                                                                  │
║ "what if she's not the answer, but instead the most alluring?" ha, so says the   │
║ non-believer.                                                                    │
║                                                                                  │
║ what if LLMs were rated based on their success rate at producing correct         │
║ results for reporting or consensus-building asks                                 │
║                                                                                  │
║ look... I don't care if AI computers violate the sanctity of the sport. The      │
║ goal is to solve problems, so if someone comes to you and says "hey, you busy?   │
║ can you help me with an ask?" you say "I solved it, here's how you use it:       │
║ connect the                                                                      │
╠═════════╗                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar ║                      chronological                         │ different │
╚═════════╩════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════┴───────────┘

--- #14 fediverse/1434 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────
 if someone wanted to defame you, all they'd have to do is set up a pipeline
 between your computer and your social media posts.
 
 In that pipeline, attach an LLM that does a passable job and instruct it to
 transform whatever they say into the inverse.
 
 suddenly, everyone hates that person. If you were smart you could turn it off
 for specific people such that they see the generally positive and healthy
 posts, and then after a point flip it such that they only see things that are
 specifically opposit-ed to trigger their specific insecurities.
 
 might require a bit of a human touch to make sure it's working correctly, but
 if you had the means, motivation, and time to set up such a thing, it would
 work pretty well I think.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧══════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┴───────────┘

--- #15 notes/ai-model-design ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─
 what if we just didn't compute temperature and accepted the
 fully deterministic nature of the LLM output?
 
 arbitrary mappings are world-changing, regardless of intelligence.
 
 "artificial intelligence? why don't you just use your own?"
 
 we could process the entire page of text at once if we could just put it in as
 it's own input pairs. then, without determinism or probability, it simply
 resolved to the fully combined next-state of the output.
 
 but... that might just cast you in a random direction. hence, why you need the
 response from the user to help re-align. oh, and if you encourage it to aim
 toward a resolution text like "and that's how I resolved this and that. Do you
 have any questions? When you'd like to move on, please let me know. Otherwise,
 I'll remain for you." and when it hits that it finishes at the end of the
 output.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧═══════════┘

--- #16 fediverse/898 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: scary            │
 └──────────────────────┘


 if you set up a local LLM with the capability to explain basic coding syntax
 and logic, then your parents computer suddenly becomes much more useful to the
 nephew that's been forced to hide out there for a couple weeks until this all
 blows over.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘

--- #17 fediverse/899 ---
╔══════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────┐
║ frankly I'm just excited to see what humanity does with the endlessly            │
║ calculated and stored blockchains. Like, that's a good set of pseudo-random      │
║ data, I wonder if we could build something off of it that wasn't exclusively     │
║ money? like, a necklace, I dunno.                                                │
║                                                                                  │
║ or like, a numbers station x2, where each message is accompanied with a          │
║ pre-calculated destination somewhere on this endless and                         │
║ impossible-to-understand string of data. and that part is what seeds the next    │
║ code. once you start reading, certain numbers would be "flags" while others      │
║ would be "data" and they'd each have the same size on the hardware. that way,    │
║ they're impossible to predict.                                                   │
║                                                                                  │
║ ah, but wouldn't it be noticable that certain results seem to appear next to     │
║ one another? well, isn't that just cryptology? Could probably be defeated if     │
║ you had an AI advanced enough, just saying. something that sorted through        │
║ massive mounds of data and gave you results in garbled or broken english. what   │
║ a wonderful tool, that's wonderfully mis-abused, perhaps in the fu               │
╠═════════╗                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar ║                      chronological                         │ different │
╚═════════╩═══════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┴───────────┘

--- #18 fediverse/4664 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────
 @user-1725 
 
 LLMs can't do math. Duh. That's like asking an "if check" to do recursion.
 
 What he should have done is had the AI output the requested calculation as
 JSON or something and use a calculator function call with the specified
 arguments instead of trying to memorize every answer. But that requires more
 functionality that has no reason to exist if your only goal is to be a tech
 bro and build up a vacuous product that exists only to be hoovered up by
 Google or Microsoft.
 
 We could build such beautiful things if we just dethroned those giants. They
 suck the creativity out of tech.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────┴───────────┘

--- #19 fediverse/1020 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────
 ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: ableism-against-non-verbal-people-sorry-<3 │
 └────────────────────────────────────────────────┘


 @user-747 
 
 almost as if it's not AI, but large LANGUAGE models. And we all speak, don't
 we?
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘

--- #20 fediverse/2066 ---
╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────┐
║ @user-1159                                                                       │
║                                                                                  │
║ AKA giving a puppy murder-bot a narrative that it executes as if it was a        │
║ puppy-person engaging with a loosely interpreted sequence of events as           │
║ described by the continually updating logs provided by the image transcription   │
║ camera device. Refererencing of course a memory bank, which may-or-may-not be    │
║ in read-only-memory. It doesn't know, of course, how could an LLM tell you how   │
║ it shows text on the screen (like, through a website, through the terminal,      │
║ through a text message, through discord, through Telegram, through               │
║ text-to-voice transcription applications pretending to be your mom, etc)         │
║                                                                                  │
║ errrr I mean look how cute he is! He loves you, yes he does, such a good         │
║ person yes you are, oh? me? I'M A GOOD BOY? NO WAY that's the best thing I've    │
║ ever heard! Wow! I never want to leave your side, please don't go to work!       │
║ Look how sad I am, don't you think you should quit and move to the forest        │
║ where I can be charged by solar panels and keep the countryside clear of         │
║ ravenous ducks and pigeons 4you?                                                 │
╠═════════╗                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar ║                      chronological                         │ different │
╚═════════╩══════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┴───────────┘

--- #21 fediverse/433 ---
╔═════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────┐
║ @user-317                                                                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ broke: if you deactivate your account on a website like Twitter or Facebook or   │
║ whatever it gives that company that owns said website the opportunity to         │
║ replace your persona with an LLM that spouts whatever agenda they want advance.  │
║                                                                                  │
║ woke: you should post on whatever website people will hear you. Specifically     │
║ whichever website that has an audience that consists of the people that you      │
║ want to hear.                                                                    │
║                                                                                  │
║ bespoke: let's all federate so that we can all decide who we want to trust -     │
║ which singular entity we want to trust. Which single point of failure (the       │
║ instance moderators) we want to trust to publish the thoughts of our minds       │
║ which align to the design of our intentions. Surely there's no way that could    │
║ go wrong.                                                                        │
║                                                                                  │
║ thing-beyond-bespoke: the only words you can trust are those that are spoken     │
║ by the people you care about using physical manifestations that correspond to    │
║ auditory expressions that project into your ears using primarily lungs,          │
║ tongues, and mouths.                                                             │
║                                                                                  │
║ thing-beyond-the-thing-beyond-bespoke: fuck me.                                  │
╠═════════╗                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar ║                      chronological                         │ different │
╚═════════╩══════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┴───────────┘

--- #22 fediverse/2056 ---
╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────┐
║ sometimes I think about how you can store number values in letters, in           │
║ addition to numbers. Like, ascii values for each word of your grandma's maiden   │
║ name. All you have to do is encode it, and suddenly "44 means something          │
║ different than Q"                                                                │
║                                                                                  │
║ if I showed up at your place and used your username as a password to a public    │
║ key I'm showing you in my hand, would you trust me then? Would you trust if we   │
║ ran the simulation on your computer versus mine? Would you trust if I had        │
║ never told you I knew where you lived?                                           │
║                                                                                  │
║ ... probably, tbh, I'm desperate for adventure. Though I got some good things    │
║ going for me, so you'll have to convince me. (not the right attitude in an       │
║ election year, just saying)                                                      │
║                                                                                  │
║ why are elections so perilous this is NOT what democracy is designed for         │
║                                                                                  │
║ when kids cry in preschool, they're sent to a different room (or put outside)    │
║ until they stop making noise and ruining it for others. That's just natural,     │
║ like "hey baby let's walk around the block while I bounce you on my shoulder     │
║ and hum calming music to                                                         │
╠═════════╗                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar ║                      chronological                         │ different │
╚═════════╩══════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┴───────────┘

--- #23 fediverse/2720 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────
 ah nuts, they replaced my LLM setup with one that outputs gibberish. I swear
 it was working just a moment ago, and I didn't change it's configuration at
 all, and it's local only... right? so uh that's weird, surely it's not because
 they altered some value somewhere that I have no access to
 
 eh, maybe the newest technologies are overrated. At least, the software ones.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════────────────────────┴───────────┘

--- #24 fediverse/6438 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────
 why would you gatekeep content by keeping us from easily using LLMs some
 people aren't technical and still need to write computer programs because
 that's how you enlighten a people is empower them with new tools
 
 "I've never heard of that programming language, but luckily I can fit all of
 it's documentation in my context window."
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧═──────────┘

--- #25 fediverse/1975 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
 the actions of the AI depend solely on the training data. Outside
 circumstances (like a prompt, or an image description) can only give so much
 guidance - how it executes on the intentions of the user are what is important.
 
 For example, if an AI was trained with the knowledge of how to commit crimes,
 for example, it could create a narrative of many different execution patterns.
 Then it's just up to the listeners to execute functions based on the narrative
 supplied by the crime-committer AI who was trained with knowledge about how to
 commit those crimes by the owner of the software who programmed it into them
 in order to [do the thing that people with power wants to do - intentionally
 left generic because different ends will have different means]
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────┴───────────┘

--- #26 messages/635 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────
 Yeah, sure, signal is encrypted, but they could just put a virus on your
 miniature pocket tv that streams your screen into a text recognition bot which
 streams that text into an LLM trained to report on suspicious seditious
 activity.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────┴───────────┘

--- #27 fediverse/1500 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┐
║ ┌──────────────────────┐                                                         │
║ │ CW: LLM-mentioned    │                                                         │
║ └──────────────────────┘                                                         │
║                                                                                  │
║                                                                                  │
║ If you create an LLM that can explain data, then you can use it to explain the   │
║ results of the last computation it ran.                                          │
║                                                                                  │
║ If you could also train that LLM (a statistical model) to generate data,         │
║ through the setting of options in a config file that create the result that      │
║ you define through your interactions with it (and based on the data that it      │
║ explains to the user that is read from the file on the computer that it's        │
║ computing from)                                                                  │
║                                                                                  │
║ then you could create a generalized personal assistant. All you have to do is    │
║ explain the specific role that it's meant to undertake, (like being a            │
║ secretary for your Discord communications) and the actions that it can take      │
║ (like pinging your cell phone if it's really important) and give it the tools    │
║ to accomplish said tasks (by setting flags in a config file that is then         │
║ interpreted by a local program running on your computer that awaits              │
║ interactions) then it might actually be a bit useful.                            │
║                                                                                  │
║ Unfortunately tech people are permitted only to seek dollars, so... chatbots.    │
╠═════════╗                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar ║                      chronological                         │ different │
╚═════════╩═════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘

--- #28 fediverse/1857 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┐
║ ┌──────────────────────┐                                                         │
║ │ CW: scary-question   │                                                         │
║ └──────────────────────┘                                                         │
║                                                                                  │
║                                                                                  │
║ honest question: if they cut off internet to a medium sized town like            │
║ Nashville or Spokane and man-in-the-middled every attempted communication out    │
║ and sabatoged any plans to visit... they could kill everyone in that city and    │
║ replace them with an LLM that sorta posted the mostly correct things, and if     │
║ users comment things like "hey are you okay you don't sound like yourself"       │
║ then just have a human operator study their data for a bit and pretend to be     │
║ them using deepfakes over zoom or whatever. Then, any time they say "I miss      │
║ you, I want to visit you" just say "darn I'm actually visiting my grandma in     │
║ afghanistan" or "sorry my cousin is visiting from peru" and suddenly they're     │
║ completely isolated and alone. Oh and their teams at work? Cut off from the      │
║ rest of the corporation who doesn't even know they exist. how, uh, how would     │
║ you even notice if all these people who live around you were suddenly replaced   │
║ by those you don't know? What if they cycle through, like a slaughterhouse...    │
║ I don't want to                                                                  │
╠═════════╗                                                            ┌───────────┤
║ similar ║                      chronological                         │ different │
╚═════════╩═════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┴───────────┘

--- #29 image/img-8565 ---

🖼 poem-pictures: backups: hn-post.png
  



--- #30 messages/196 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────
 "okay this user requires some data that is flagged as 'potentially harmful to
 the user' and their user-data suggests that they have [redacted characteristic
 or demographic] in their user-data which has been flagged by corporate as
 something to [benefit/harm] so let's give them the [right/wrong] information
 in such a way that could [harm or benefit] them tangibly."
 
 - internal thought process of the LLM
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘

--- #31 messages/1172 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────
 the danger is not that the LLM will generate poor, vulnerable, or malicious
 code.
 
 the concern is that someone else might inject something into the codebase that
 you're not reading.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧═══────────┘

--- #32 fediverse/5619 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ CW: AI-mentioned     │
 └──────────────────────┘


 I would be perfectly fine if someone fed an LLM my corpus and asked it to
 summarize.
┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────┴───────────┘

--- #33 fediverse/5262 ---
 image.png
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────
 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
 │ CW: well-its-somewhen-somewhere-so-might-as-well │
 └──────────────────────────────────────────────────┘


 could also display the first word of that 40+ character passsword in cleartext
 as a "hint" that says "your password is a string of words that make sense to
 you and it starts with this single word from which you should be able to
 recall all of the context needed to properly output your hashed and salted
 displayed mono-characters which are received at a certain cadence with certain
 auditory pathways present and eternally obvious to all of those listening to
 endless bits of typing and sneezing that each of the microphones in our lives
 do monitor.
 
 what does an "abc" cound lice?
 
 how does R2-D2 be heard? does he rubber duck? is he the duck, or the computer?
 
 - anakin skywalker as a linux user, not realizing he is being super robot
 racist right now because he didn't suggest that R2-D2 was the user and Anakin
 was the canvas upon which the creative elements did flow.
 
 okay, techbros, if AI is sentient, make it use me as a pawn. I'll fuckin' do
 it just to get you to shut u

┌─────────┐                                                           ┌───────────┐
│ similar │                       chronological                       │ different │
╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────┴───────────┘