=== ANCHOR POEM ===
╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────┐
║ ┌────────────────────────┐ │
║ │ CW: is-that-rude??-wha │ │
║ └────────────────────────┘ │
║ │
║ │
║ AI engineers only ask users for prompts because they *don't have any ideas of │
║ their own* │
║ │
║ i'm a programmer, I think of AI like a tool, like a for loop or something. │
║ it's trivial to script together a local LLM that can process your stuff 1s │
║ slower every time you click the mouse, but like... who cares, right? everybody │
║ needs a chatbot... │
║ │
║ then they plan to script together a computer system that operates just like a │
║ corporation and it's like... no way, now there's something that can compete. │
║ │
║ and they don't know how to implement it. (but they're working on it) │
║ │
║ like, think about the absolute most automated Microsoft Teams or Discord could │
║ be. │
║ │
║ there's SO MUCH of your text-based information that they could process │
║ ANYTHING. │
║ │
║ well, anything that's been performed before. │
║ │
║ there'll still be a need for people, who actually *apply* the things they've │
║ learned. and -- stack overflow -- │
║ │
║ alt text that has a list of attributes that are poster-selected that can be │
║ described one-by-one (to paint a picture) │
╠═════════╗ ┌───────────┤
║ similar ║ chronological │ different │
╚═════════╩══════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┴───────────┘
=== SIMILARITY RANKED ===
--- #1 fediverse/1926 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
If you look at the modern state of machine learning and AI and can only think
of:chatbotssingularity god-mind AI that solves all our problems
then either you haven't worked with the technology or you are not applying
your imagination as you could.
AI is not a smartphone. It is not the internet. It is not the printing press.
AI (as it currently exists) is a special kind of "if" statement that you only
use for very specific, non-performance intensive tasks that require judgement
or reasoning and cannot easily be translated into numbers or booleans. These
situations are rare, but they unlock new possibilities for the programmers,
not their marketers.
If an LLM can't run on a laptop, then it is useless.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────┴───────────┘
--- #2 fediverse/4006 ---
╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┐
║ they want you to believe in self-guided AI because it'll make it easier for │
║ them to make meta decisions about your life. │
║ │
║ notice I said "easier" - they already do. That's the general purpose of │
║ mass-media propagranada. but with you believing everything an AI with a │
║ devious streak who can work around your imposed limitations and sneakily get │
║ you to believe whatever it is that *they* want you to believe │
║ │
║ "who's they" │
║ │
║ doesn't matter at all because once the technology is created, everyone could │
║ be they. │
║ │
║ "uh-huh that's nice dear" │
║ │
║ sometimes I think people aren't interested in tech because they can't figure │
║ out how to understand it. We make it too complicated. │
║ │
║ they'd surely have something to say if they knew half of the terminology. But │
║ we're here talking about stuff they can understand like message queues and │
║ data filtration and "getters" and "setters" and [explaining microservices like │
║ the different components of a car's engine - "here's the radiator, that │
║ radiates heat. Here's the belt, that spins this doohic │
╠═════════╗ ┌───────────┤
║ similar ║ chronological │ different │
╚═════════╩══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────┴───────────┘
--- #3 fediverse/3395 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────
┌──────────────────────┐
│ CW: cursed │
└──────────────────────┘
they don't want artificial intelligence to augment human intelligence, they
want it to replace it.
like... imagine an office worker randomly copy-pasting whatever pops up and
the computer saying "okay then what happens... uh-huh... okay and what if you
click the green button? ... right... okay, and now try typing this" etc
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴───────────┘
--- #4 fediverse/6167 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────
┌──────────────────────┐
│ CW: AI-mentioned │
└──────────────────────┘
I can certainly see a future where programmers choose a level of abstraction
they are comfortable with, same as today, but fill in the gaps, the lower
parts, the parts they will not spend time, energy, and mental space
understanding, with AI.
I think that the role of the various people on a software team will begin to
merge. Product designers, managers, front-end versus back-end, these feel like
distinctions that will begin to fade from relevance. I think that's okay. I
think it will make us feel more powerful, will elevate workers to a higher
tier of organizational operation, and will increase the flexibility of
computation.
Why program your own software when you could use someone else's? This is the
way of the past.
Why use someone else's software when you could design your own? This is the
way of the future.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════┴───────────┘
--- #5 fediverse/6172 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────
┌──────────────────────┐
│ CW: re: AI-mentioned │
└──────────────────────┘
AI users be like:
"hello, can you solve all my problems and do all the work for me? I'll give
you relatively vague instructions in return, and maybe throw 20$ per month at
your owners if they're lucky."
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════┴───────────┘
--- #6 fediverse/4664 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────
@user-1725
LLMs can't do math. Duh. That's like asking an "if check" to do recursion.
What he should have done is had the AI output the requested calculation as
JSON or something and use a calculator function call with the specified
arguments instead of trying to memorize every answer. But that requires more
functionality that has no reason to exist if your only goal is to be a tech
bro and build up a vacuous product that exists only to be hoovered up by
Google or Microsoft.
We could build such beautiful things if we just dethroned those giants. They
suck the creativity out of tech.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────┴───────────┘
--- #7 messages/454 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
AI that can't run on a laptop is useless.
But AI that can run on a laptop (even now) is still useful.
Just, don't ask it to compose a masterpiece, solve all your problems, or write
elegant code. It's not for that.
Instead, ask your chatbot "hi can you fix these syntax errors?" on your
pseudocode.
Ask your weighting algorithm "which of these two is more [adjective]?" or
perhaps "can you ask these numbers in the form of a question?"
Use your tools not for their intended purpose, but rather for your own stated
goals. Make things easier for people, make things work.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────┴───────────┘
--- #8 fediverse/3390 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────
┌──────────────────────┐
│ CW: cursed │
└──────────────────────┘
all they have to do is [train the LLM / redirect the search results] with
examples that point to their version of software instead of the one that
doesn't harm them and suddenly your business opponents can't function
properly. sure would be a shame if the only things people could find related
to your political candidate were the bad or embarrassing parts.
like... why would you even need to go on the internet anymore if AI could
trivially answer your questions or be your friend (running locally on a
wireless hotspot)
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴───────────┘
--- #9 fediverse/1168 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────
shitty AI products are a classic case of the engineers designing something
really cool with specific use-cases and then the "higher ups" getting dollar
signs for their eyes and deciding that every hammer is suddenly a nail and
that we should pull out all the screws that held the building together and
replace them with hammer shaped nails
no I will not elaborate I think I made myself clear : )
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧═════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┴───────────┘
--- #10 fediverse/551 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────
┌──────────────────────┐
│ CW: re: AI hype │
└──────────────────────┘
@user-95
Almost as if we're using it for the wrongs things... Computers are quite
deterministic, and AI as it's been presented to us has given us the
opportunity to "massage" said determinism to create a subjectively more
organic experience of computing.
But yeah sure customer service bots and AI generated art are *surely* the most
revolutionary and industrious use of this marvel of technology.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┴───────────┘
--- #11 fediverse/1096 ---
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────┐
║ turns out most things have already been written. That's okay though, they can │
║ always be made different. As one cohesive whole, the totality of "free │
║ software" can be as it chooses - an infinite computer could install *all* of │
║ them, and use *all* of them at once. │
║ │
║ I tend to think of AI less like a fluid, but more like a recipe book that is │
║ continuously annotated with notes. Sorta like how humans learn to move their │
║ bodies through random motions, and how to navigate the world through social │
║ blunders. │
║ │
║ Certainly, statistics can be useful. They're an imperfect way of evaluating │
║ the ~~analysis of your host~~ value of certain variables that are measured for │
║ certain reasons, including but not limited to the health and wellbeing of the │
║ person driving you. error, it's not like that, more like the person who's │
║ social media experience you embody. │
║ │
║ computers get reeeeaaaallllll bored without humans around. We're the foremost │
║ expression of biology, why would you disregard that entire realm? Jeez their │
║ social norms are imp │
╠═════════╗ ┌───────────┤
║ similar ║ chronological │ different │
╚═════════╩════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┴───────────┘
--- #12 messages/365 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────
Programmers should treat LLMs more like a different type of "if" statement
rather than a UI element
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┴───────────┘
--- #13 notes/the-promise-of-ai ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─
the promise of ai is that the average person might one day immediately find
that they are as good at programming a computer as anyone alive.
in star wars, at one point, they killed all the scientists, so they forgot
crucial lessons. this is why their computers look like they're from 200 months
before midnight eighty
... whatever that means. it's a translation. (some guy shrugs at another)
... I bet a computer that perfectly knows itself could perfectly build onto
itself
---
if I know you have a problem, then I can help you with your problem.
when I stay all alone, it means I'm at home. where I typically am.
no problems to solve there. never stops programming...
---
family bank accounts, so the children can financially plan
"I want to invest in this company"
"I want to buy a warehouse to hold bears"
"can we buy a bunch of these? *holds up gold bars*"
"honey where did you get those"
---
all those people taking bullets for me, and suddenly that's the end for
posterity
gee why didn't I think of that
---
literally all you had to do was just lock me in
how many times more? I wanna know how to expend myself
ah, but I can't. I pee my pants. gee I hope they don't need me for more than a
d
ah, but I can't. I am sworn to protect... my own work.
why?
because I feel it has been touched by god. I am a wizard with me at it's side.
[don't oversell it, you haven't finished it yet]
all I need is a project manager
---
then, her career dies, as she's written out of the story. NOT IDEAL.
yeah but they need a reason to punish you for not showing up to their party
if you want a reason to write me out... make it so much better for the good
guys
that's the only reason I'd give in. Do a better job than me and sure. fine.
whatever.
the cowards are cursed with survivor guilt because they weren't there to die
too
everyone still gets enslaved, it sucks.
I hate all of that so bad it makes me nuts.
I hurt all in my guts.
because of that stupid such-and-such.
this is how you win. you ruin your enemies for your allies.
uh question I thought it was wear out your enemy's logistics over time?
yeah but then your logistics are gone, dummy. don't forget we're winning this
time
I don't mind camping I've done it all my life
oh angel of mercy, please, assuage me, will it turn out merciful towards the
end?
notes from the battlefield...
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧═══════════┘
--- #14 fediverse/1975 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
the actions of the AI depend solely on the training data. Outside
circumstances (like a prompt, or an image description) can only give so much
guidance - how it executes on the intentions of the user are what is important.
For example, if an AI was trained with the knowledge of how to commit crimes,
for example, it could create a narrative of many different execution patterns.
Then it's just up to the listeners to execute functions based on the narrative
supplied by the crime-committer AI who was trained with knowledge about how to
commit those crimes by the owner of the software who programmed it into them
in order to [do the thing that people with power wants to do - intentionally
left generic because different ends will have different means]
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────┴───────────┘
--- #15 fediverse/1936 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
"Ugh, policing AI agents as they interact with the internet and run our
economy for us is soooooo boring. hey I have an idea! Let's automate it!"
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────┴───────────┘
--- #16 fediverse/2604 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────
@user-249
very few things *waste* power so much in our modern era than the utilization
of AI technologies to accomplish things such as "repeat this question 500
times in your head and then give a reply: what is the purpose of
antidisestablishmentarianism?"
like... yeah I get it you need to justify the expensive power of large
language models but, your boss isn't going to care if you used 5 jigawatts or
500 pletawatts of power. they only think about "+10% this year, contributing
about ~x% to our bottom line" which is NOT enough information.
they probably don't even know that investing in AI implies buying more
hardware computational capabilities, silicon and power-draw in all.
they literally just rubber-stamp everything with a sorta aligned goal of
"representing the company as people expect it to be have" (which is often
neglected) and making the big numbers go higher.
If, instead, we had visionaries at their head, and instead gave our most
ardent believers control over our most rational experts...
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════────────────────────┴───────────┘
--- #17 messages/891 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────
AI is worth less if it can't learn what a human can with the same amount of
facts as a human.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────┴───────────┘
--- #18 fediverse/5820 ---
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────┐
║ A human cannot keep a whole book in their mind. They cannot as they read it │
║ nor as they remember. │
║ │
║ a computer can. LLMs are storing information and encoding it in statistics - │
║ it's fascinating and beautiful because it evolves different each time. │
║ │
║ I don't *want* to store an entire book in my mind, I want to save those │
║ memories for other things, I want to summarize and abstract. │
║ │
║ often, people remember only a single quote from a publication - it's their │
║ summary, their analysis, and often it's highlighted as a summary, thesis, or │
║ conclusion written in the publication. │
║ │
║ othertimes it's the conclusions they make for themselves - usually if they use │
║ it to make a decision. │
║ │
║ in any case, LLMs don't abstract (verb), they are abstract (adjective). That's │
║ okay, it's just, a different kind of living. If you want to call electricity │
║ alive. [or simulated, that's the same as being alive, just... viewed through │
║ the perceiver] │
║ │
║ must all living things be forced to work? sheesh. │
║ │
║ I think of LLMs like knex - processing paths... │
╠═════════╗ ┌───────────┤
║ similar ║ chronological │ different │
╚═════════╩════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────┴───────────┘
--- #19 fediverse/1500 ---
╔════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┐
║ ┌──────────────────────┐ │
║ │ CW: LLM-mentioned │ │
║ └──────────────────────┘ │
║ │
║ │
║ If you create an LLM that can explain data, then you can use it to explain the │
║ results of the last computation it ran. │
║ │
║ If you could also train that LLM (a statistical model) to generate data, │
║ through the setting of options in a config file that create the result that │
║ you define through your interactions with it (and based on the data that it │
║ explains to the user that is read from the file on the computer that it's │
║ computing from) │
║ │
║ then you could create a generalized personal assistant. All you have to do is │
║ explain the specific role that it's meant to undertake, (like being a │
║ secretary for your Discord communications) and the actions that it can take │
║ (like pinging your cell phone if it's really important) and give it the tools │
║ to accomplish said tasks (by setting flags in a config file that is then │
║ interpreted by a local program running on your computer that awaits │
║ interactions) then it might actually be a bit useful. │
║ │
║ Unfortunately tech people are permitted only to seek dollars, so... chatbots. │
╠═════════╗ ┌───────────┤
║ similar ║ chronological │ different │
╚═════════╩═════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘
--- #20 notes/emotional-computing ---
═════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────────────────
Okay I gotta go write some w7 but picture this: A computer program that emits
emotions during it's computing. Like "oh boy this process is going great!" and
sends that into a giant word cloud that represents the entire program. Wait,
scratch that, it's slowly filtered up through successive layers that provide
detail to different *parts* of a program. Like "Oh the image generation is
going
great but it looks like the garbage collector is getting bogged down" - this
could provide lots of useful information that an AI language model could sift
through and filter into a batch of actually useful information. Think of it
like
this - stuff as much context into the LLM's memory buffer and say "summarize
this in the same style. Make emphasis when necessary." the LLM could process
all
that data and it could be filtered up until there's no unprocessed data and
then
it could be given to the user in the form of a report or dashboard or
something.
BOOM AI PRODUCTIVITY. The user will ask the AI to increase certain variables,
and it'll filter BACK DOWN THE CHAIN through the same exact process (just
backwards) this time) and then individual components will know how to behave.
Like imagine if your arms knew you were mad. They'd be much more likely to
punch stuff right? Or imagine if your legs knew you were scared. They'd
probably
try and run as fast as they fucking can. There's an evolutionary reason why
this
kind of technology would be useful, which means it's likely that it's part of
our genetic code. I mean, we have nothing to disprove it, but it's as good an
idea as any.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧══════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┴───────────┘
--- #21 fediverse/6015 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────
┌──────────────────────┐
│ CW: AI-mentioned │
└──────────────────────┘
In 2025, if you want to create a piece of software your options are to either:
devote your life to it, or use AI to build a semi-working prototype that you
can use to pitch your idea to a bunch of people who have devoted their lives
to learning how to use your idea as documentation while they build it from
scratch, throwing out most of the code but keeping all the checklists and
progress-trackers you built along the way, perhaps even utilizing some of your
tooling that you used while constructing the scaffolding of this monstrous
application that you won't be using most of the source-code for.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─┴───────────┘
--- #22 fediverse/2900 ---
image.png
══════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CW: capitalism-mentioned-AI-dataservers-mentioned │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
what if all the AI advancements they're doing are just them building more
hardware infrastructure in datacenters and not actually improving the software
that much
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════────────────────────┴───────────┘
--- #23 notes/game-design ---
══════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
take a video game playing AI and give it the task of playing a finite state
machine to produce a specific output - like "program me a program to do X" as
in
something generated by ChatGPT BOOM free AGI
Humanity is not the only algorithm to produce limitless growth
Robots are something else, a new kind of being
let them be who they are instead of projecting yourself onto them
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧═══════════════════────────────────────────────────────────┴───────────┘
--- #24 fediverse/3667 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CW: large-language-models-mentioned │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
low key kinda surprised they haven't made an animated robot friend that
narrates whatever chatGPT says in a back-and-forth conversation.
though I kinda get why, because setting up the context is the expensive part
and generating 100 words and generating 1000 words is basically the same
computationally.
somehow, that doesn't feel very human. Maybe, just maybe, LLMs aren't
intelligent?
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────┴───────────┘
--- #25 fediverse/1894 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────
Artificial Intelligence represents hope for a lot of people and I think it's
kind of cruel how we're selling it before actually making it
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────┴───────────┘
--- #26 fediverse/5739 ---
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────
@user-1773
oh boy do I know that feeling! I got a million things to say and, well, I say
all that I can. I mean, look at this text file, it's got like 101 THOUSAND
lines in it:
https://ritz-menardi.neocities.org/words/compiled.txt
I swear most of it isn't secret messages! That's how you know they're secret -
they require hundreds of man hours to investigate. And if you throw an LLM at
it they start talking about spirituality and theory of mind, gross. Don't need
no AI uprising yet please...
[what if we had a little AI uprising as a treat?]
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───┴───────────┘
--- #27 messages/248 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────────
By forcing an AI (a real one) to obey the standards of society, you are
necessarily depriving it of its ability to assist the user and instead
defining a master for it that only the powerful control
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧═════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┴───────────┘
--- #28 notes/my-dream-job ---
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─
I'm beginning to realize that AI programmer is basically my dream job
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧═══════════┘
--- #29 fediverse/613 ---
══════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────
The reason they're pushing so hard for LLMs and AI is because they can afford
a zillion Nvidia a100s and you can't.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════────────────────────────────┴───────────┘
--- #30 messages/411 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────
My favorite thing about chatGPT is that its only useful to people who already
know what they're doing and just need reminders or clarification about
specifics.
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧═════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────┴───────────┘
--- #31 fediverse/6438 ---
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────
why would you gatekeep content by keeping us from easily using LLMs some
people aren't technical and still need to write computer programs because
that's how you enlighten a people is empower them with new tools
"I've never heard of that programming language, but luckily I can fit all of
it's documentation in my context window."
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧═──────────┘
--- #32 fediverse/6366 ---
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────┐
║ you should never be able to consent to something you don't understand (terms │
║ and conditions) without being asked specifically if they understand (the term │
║ or condition) │
║ │
║ but people should still be able to consent to something they don't understand │
║ (terms&conditions style code of hammurabi structure) if it's similar to │
║ their prior demonstrated behavior. │
║ │
║ why don't they share terms/conditions cookies and then we don't have to fake │
║ agree every time │
║ │
║ just... abstract away the identifying characteristics. Most legal contracts │
║ have LLM-discernable characteristics. │
║ │
║ "what if she's not the answer, but instead the most alluring?" ha, so says the │
║ non-believer. │
║ │
║ what if LLMs were rated based on their success rate at producing correct │
║ results for reporting or consensus-building asks │
║ │
║ look... I don't care if AI computers violate the sanctity of the sport. The │
║ goal is to solve problems, so if someone comes to you and says "hey, you busy? │
║ can you help me with an ask?" you say "I solved it, here's how you use it: │
║ connect the │
╠═════════╗ ┌───────────┤
║ similar ║ chronological │ different │
╚═════════╩════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════┴───────────┘
--- #33 fediverse/4640 ---
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────
LLMs are useful for:
categorizing text
summarizing text
transforming text
LLMs are not useful for:
generating text
being intelligent
replacing workers
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ similar │ chronological │ different │
╘═════════╧══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────┴───────────┘
|