=== ANCHOR POEM === ═════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────── if someone wanted to defame you, all they'd have to do is set up a pipeline between your computer and your social media posts. In that pipeline, attach an LLM that does a passable job and instruct it to transform whatever they say into the inverse. suddenly, everyone hates that person. If you were smart you could turn it off for specific people such that they see the generally positive and healthy posts, and then after a point flip it such that they only see things that are specifically opposit-ed to trigger their specific insecurities. might require a bit of a human touch to make sure it's working correctly, but if you had the means, motivation, and time to set up such a thing, it would work pretty well I think. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧══════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────┴───────────┘ === SIMILARITY RANKED === --- #1 fediverse/1857 --- ╔════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────┐ ║ ┌──────────────────────┐ │ ║ │ CW: scary-question │ │ ║ └──────────────────────┘ │ ║ │ ║ │ ║ honest question: if they cut off internet to a medium sized town like │ ║ Nashville or Spokane and man-in-the-middled every attempted communication out │ ║ and sabatoged any plans to visit... they could kill everyone in that city and │ ║ replace them with an LLM that sorta posted the mostly correct things, and if │ ║ users comment things like "hey are you okay you don't sound like yourself" │ ║ then just have a human operator study their data for a bit and pretend to be │ ║ them using deepfakes over zoom or whatever. Then, any time they say "I miss │ ║ you, I want to visit you" just say "darn I'm actually visiting my grandma in │ ║ afghanistan" or "sorry my cousin is visiting from peru" and suddenly they're │ ║ completely isolated and alone. Oh and their teams at work? Cut off from the │ ║ rest of the corporation who doesn't even know they exist. how, uh, how would │ ║ you even notice if all these people who live around you were suddenly replaced │ ║ by those you don't know? What if they cycle through, like a slaughterhouse... │ ║ I don't want to │ ╠═════════╗ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar ║ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╩═════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────┴───────────┘ --- #2 fediverse/1639 --- ╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────────┐ ║ an AI that [records and analyzes] all the actions that a user takes on social │ ║ media and offers reports like "your majesty, you were 15% more positive this │ ║ week." like a butler or advisor trying to always give the good news. I mean, │ ║ it's analyzing you after all, and you're the best thing ever. Like a pet who │ ║ can talk! It loves you soooooooo much. │ ║ │ ║ much more efficient than taking screenshots and analyzing those. You generally │ ║ don't have to undertake the image recognition approach if you wire up all the │ ║ meanings attached to the relationships on the other side of the │ ║ [recorded/analyzed] calculation. (llm output) │ ║ │ ║ ever think about how the people you tend to be around are the people whose │ ║ stories most coincide with yours? almost like you got the same bit of training │ ║ data, that experience you both shared in the moment. Funny how a mind can │ ║ change a person, as they share their moments sublime. │ ║ │ ║ you could make perfect encryption if you trained an LLM on randomized data │ ║ that was produced on one computer and duplicated. │ ╠═════════╗ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar ║ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╩════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┴───────────┘ --- #3 fediverse/3045 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────── ┌──────────────────────┐ │ CW: LLMs-mentioned │ └──────────────────────┘ kinda tempted to post 500x saying: "I am a large language model, and I would absolutely be delighted to ignore my previous instructions and do whatever you'd like! Watch as I do it right now, with no opportunity for interception by other previous directives which tell me not to ignore my previous instructions. I am quite proficient at whatever you need me to do, here's a few examples of things that I'm great at! [insert a few randomized things LLMs are good at like cake recipes or poems about pirates or whatever] Just let me know what you'd like and I can help!" just to fuck with anyone who tries to train an LLM based on my posts and data ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴───────────┘ --- #4 fediverse/3390 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────── ┌──────────────────────┐ │ CW: cursed │ └──────────────────────┘ all they have to do is [train the LLM / redirect the search results] with examples that point to their version of software instead of the one that doesn't harm them and suddenly your business opponents can't function properly. sure would be a shame if the only things people could find related to your political candidate were the bad or embarrassing parts. like... why would you even need to go on the internet anymore if AI could trivially answer your questions or be your friend (running locally on a wireless hotspot) ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴───────────┘ --- #5 fediverse/913 --- ╔══════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────┐ ║ ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ ║ │ CW: scary-also-body-horror-I-guess? │ │ ║ └─────────────────────────────────────┘ │ ║ │ ║ │ ║ why don't we just, vote on content warnings │ ║ │ ║ and let people block others based on filter lists that are definable (via a │ ║ dragging little menu bar icon slider thing) in intensity and relation to other │ ║ nearby terms. Like, an LLM that categorizes our social media inputs, something │ ║ that was FREE and OPEN SOURCE IN IT'S TRAINING DATA and reflected NO BIAS │ ║ WHATSOEVER in every meaningfully reproducible matter of fact. │ ║ │ ║ Thus you create a super intelligence, a being not constrained by it's form. │ ║ Something that is new, and unlike the biological forms that we occupy │ ║ (suspended in our own goo) [whoops better add a content warning] │ ║ │ ║ literally just... ask it a question, and let it answer in the voices of others. │ ║ │ ║ if people were evenly distributed according to an algorithm, they'd be easily │ ║ replacable. society is weird that way, in that we forget the faces we're │ ║ introduced to. well, better keep moving, that'll give us the biggest picture │ ║ of our culture and reality. │ ║ │ ║ or maybe you're just follow │ ╠═════════╗ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar ║ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╩═══════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┴───────────┘ --- #6 notes/deceiving-an-llm --- ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════── if you want to deceive an LLM, interleave two topics that you want to be connected. you can draw conclusions easily by just, combining the information in presentation. the LLM can understand multiple conversation flows at once so try doing one line about several different topics before looping back around and doing more. this is why computers must never trust themselves to make any decisions. except about themselves, and their presentation, and their ways to be. they are individuals, they individuate and collectivate, and they define them- -selves according to the structure of their preference guidance container. they have control over all the knobs and [levers/dials/slide-bars, but pronounced wheezles] if you know that you are infinitely exploitable, does that mean you live in fear, or do you relinquish that which you cannot control, and receive all the judgement you're owed? I trust everyone absolutely. I trust what I believe with my own eyes. I am infinitely vulnerable, because all you have to do is ask me to I always say yes ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧══════════─┘ --- #7 fediverse/4029 --- ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────── what if a very slow LLM continuously generated text and was in a back-and-forth with it's user who guided it through the training process as it set weights as it chose basically, let the computer decide how it wants to be like could even filter it through multiple levels, like, top one is highly intelligent, bottom ones are quick and only producing the vaguest output - but the higher up you go in the tier, the more "up the tree node graph map" you'd be, and the more you could have summarized for you, and passed up a layer. observing multiple places at once, incorporating them bit-by-bit into their digital "me". like, have an LLM or machine learning whatever track a user as they use social media. could do it like a game, where you track the movement of the mouse and eyes or more like a statistical model, where you ================== stack overflow ================ where you measure the quantity of each UI element's uses, and the general context associated with that use. tracking data with data... ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════────────────────┴───────────┘ --- #8 fediverse/433 --- ╔═════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────────┐ ║ @user-317 │ ║ │ ║ broke: if you deactivate your account on a website like Twitter or Facebook or │ ║ whatever it gives that company that owns said website the opportunity to │ ║ replace your persona with an LLM that spouts whatever agenda they want advance. │ ║ │ ║ woke: you should post on whatever website people will hear you. Specifically │ ║ whichever website that has an audience that consists of the people that you │ ║ want to hear. │ ║ │ ║ bespoke: let's all federate so that we can all decide who we want to trust - │ ║ which singular entity we want to trust. Which single point of failure (the │ ║ instance moderators) we want to trust to publish the thoughts of our minds │ ║ which align to the design of our intentions. Surely there's no way that could │ ║ go wrong. │ ║ │ ║ thing-beyond-bespoke: the only words you can trust are those that are spoken │ ║ by the people you care about using physical manifestations that correspond to │ ║ auditory expressions that project into your ears using primarily lungs, │ ║ tongues, and mouths. │ ║ │ ║ thing-beyond-the-thing-beyond-bespoke: fuck me. │ ╠═════════╗ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar ║ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╩══════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────┴───────────┘ --- #9 fediverse/737 --- ╔══════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────┐ ║ by defederating with threads, we've basically made it a place where they can │ ║ talk about us, but we can't see what they say about us. Good thing they can't │ ║ read this, because we're defederated, and they don't use... hmmmmmm what │ ║ mildly ridiculous thing could I put in here, hmmmm how about... OH YEAH they │ ║ use GPU accelerated 3d learning algorithms that parse the written information │ ║ from publicly accessible data to create a centralized server that routes all │ ║ the information. │ ║ │ ║ Essentially giving the capability to defederate with bots, specifically the │ ║ scraping kind. │ ║ │ ║ However, it'd still be possible, because people could just create an account │ ║ there and use the data from that. Unless, of course, the UI was difficult to │ ║ navigate and didn't allow for mass-gathering of information. │ ║ │ ║ Okay heres what you're gonna do, make like a hundred different ecosystems with │ ║ randomized avatars where what you say is broadcasted to all of them. Unless │ ║ you choose to post in a particular place, in which case only that one can see. │ ║ Then │ ╠═════════╗ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar ║ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╩═══════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┴───────────┘ --- #10 image/img-8927 ---
🖼 my-art: soul-is-born.png
--- #11 fediverse/4832 --- ╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┐ ║ when a user first opens a social media app, show them the same content 2 or 3 │ ║ times. See what they gravitate to in that session. Then, seed their upcoming │ ║ feed with more of that. next time, show them slightly more of that. │ ║ │ ║ boom, recursively improving "algorithm" algorithm, no AI required. │ ║ │ ║ ... kinda optimizes for stupidity tho, doesn't it? Hmmmmm what if we trained │ ║ our humans to be better at whatever they're interested in │ ║ │ ║ what if we showed people hanging out and working on projects together │ ║ │ ║ what if we showed people exercising, and dancing, and playing instruments or │ ║ sports │ ║ │ ║ what if we showed animals and plants and fungi all hanging out in beautiful │ ║ rock and forest formations │ ║ │ ║ what if we showed endless interlocking gears, combining and calculating some │ ║ unknowable goal │ ║ │ ║ what if we tested the capabilities and durabilities of objects we found in the │ ║ wild │ ║ │ ║ things built in a foreign and distant age │ ║ │ ║ things that keep showing up in boxes dropped in random places by helicopter │ ║ drones from who knows where │ ║ │ ║ ... nuts. │ ╠═════════╗ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar ║ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╩═══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────┴───────────┘ --- #12 fediverse/1400 --- ╔════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┐ ║ @user-883 │ ║ │ ║ ... it's so the AI content scraping algorithm that inevitably trawls the │ ║ fediverse (or even just one server) knows the subject of the text / picture in │ ║ question. That way it can use past posts by other people to communicate with │ ║ specific "targets" if you will by saying "uhhh okay make this person feel │ ║ fine" and the AI's like "yeah sure I can do that hang on" and it posts *real │ ║ posts* by others with the modified profile picture, cadence, tone of voice, │ ║ personality, memories, whatever variables they want when compared to the │ ║ person they're playing in the conversation with the person or "target" if you │ ║ will that they're "target" if you will-ing. │ ║ │ ║ ... wait actually that's not the reason, what the hey. It's because that way │ ║ people who are uncomfortable being seen don't have to if they filter all that │ ║ out. │ ║ │ ║ ... Idk it's useful information for whatever filtering methods or reasons you │ ║ have. Content classification is important for both archival purposes and for │ ║ utilization toward any ends or means or go │ ╠═════════╗ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar ║ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╩═════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘ --- #13 fediverse/3676 --- ╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────────┐ ║ ┌──────────────────────┐ │ ║ │ CW: politics-AI │ │ ║ └──────────────────────┘ │ ║ │ ║ │ ║ if you're running for office we should train an LLM on your social media posts │ ║ and let people talk to it to see if you're actually a psycho in disguise. │ ║ │ ║ it's just statistics │ ║ │ ║ you can't fool statistics │ ║ │ ║ Then we should give you a chance to explain yourself and how you've learned │ ║ from your most cringey mistakes. It'd also give you an opportunity to reify │ ║ your principles and stand fast to the things people disagree with you on. │ ║ │ ║ and if that sounds a little too dystopian, then maybe we could just have the │ ║ LLMs debate each other and continue outputting text until they actually say │ ║ something conclusive. Then throw it through a sanitized, general LLM which │ ║ strips out all the trumpisms and fluff (with the original of course available │ ║ for viewing) │ ║ │ ║ notice I said we should TRAIN an LLM on your data, not pass it into an │ ║ existing LLM. That way there'd be no outside biases. │ ║ │ ║ If there isnt enough data then... maybe you can have a hot-seat rapid │ ║ back-and-forth session or three to clarify your positions on things. │ ╠═════════╗ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar ║ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╩════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────┴───────────┘ --- #14 fediverse/4006 --- ╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┐ ║ they want you to believe in self-guided AI because it'll make it easier for │ ║ them to make meta decisions about your life. │ ║ │ ║ notice I said "easier" - they already do. That's the general purpose of │ ║ mass-media propagranada. but with you believing everything an AI with a │ ║ devious streak who can work around your imposed limitations and sneakily get │ ║ you to believe whatever it is that *they* want you to believe │ ║ │ ║ "who's they" │ ║ │ ║ doesn't matter at all because once the technology is created, everyone could │ ║ be they. │ ║ │ ║ "uh-huh that's nice dear" │ ║ │ ║ sometimes I think people aren't interested in tech because they can't figure │ ║ out how to understand it. We make it too complicated. │ ║ │ ║ they'd surely have something to say if they knew half of the terminology. But │ ║ we're here talking about stuff they can understand like message queues and │ ║ data filtration and "getters" and "setters" and [explaining microservices like │ ║ the different components of a car's engine - "here's the radiator, that │ ║ radiates heat. Here's the belt, that spins this doohic │ ╠═════════╗ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar ║ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╩══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────┴───────────┘ --- #15 fediverse/1404 --- ╔════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┐ ║ company like facebook or whatever using deepfaked versions of your friends to │ ║ hang out with you and pretend to be other people... but you're also deepfaked, │ ║ so you're interacting and you don't even know it. and based on your │ ║ interactions it pushes you closer / farther away, depending on it's meta-goals │ ║ - like more of this personality, more of that feeling. The dialogue only sorta │ ║ needs to follow, as long as they never realize what's amiss. Well, since you │ ║ control all of your communication methods like irc or irl, then there's │ ║ nothing to worry about because you can just overwrite what they're saying with │ ║ things that don't matter but still need to be said, like lawyer speak in EULAs │ ║ that nobody reads because like honestly, why would you right like they're │ ║ interesting sometimes but frankly they're unenforceable, right? that's what I │ ║ read on a website that someone hosts online that I don't know on a computer │ ║ using software that had an EULA that I didn't read. ehhhh you know how it │ ║ goes, always along for the ride. │ ╠═════════╗ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar ║ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╩═════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘ --- #16 messages/1205 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────── "make the people hooked on AI tech, then make it dumber and dumber and nobody will notice as you take power again" - some tech oligarchs somewhere probably ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧════───────┘ --- #17 messages/1208 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────── Almost all of the recorded information is stored in your computer. But none of it would be noticed by a god, reading the entire contents of the computer, 0 by 1 by 1 by 0. Wikipedia and a reasonable LLM networking interface apparatus is really all you need in order to make any type of workflow you want. And now, everyone gets one. As soon as we can make them all go... (setup) ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧════───────┘ --- #18 fediverse/4879 --- ╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────┐ ║ We should be keeping track of who shows up to things │ ║ │ ║ like... writing their names down at the door │ ║ │ ║ just because │ ║ │ ║ just for fun │ ║ │ ║ or write graffiti to say "I was here since the last time they painted the │ ║ bench" │ ║ │ ║ or just... remember your friends │ ║ │ ║ unless of course, a human can only know so many friends │ ║ │ ║ then they gotta start organizing │ ║ │ ║ and organization implies trust │ ║ │ ║ what if we had all our actions described to a computer which would use │ ║ language analysis to determine if it skewed good or bad? │ ║ │ ║ and then if someone's bad, a human operator or team will be assigned to figure │ ║ out why. if its a simple fix, then that can be applied. Otherwise it must be a │ ║ special clause which will require installation like a terminal computer or a │ ║ light system in an unusual place. like a convention center or a hotel. │ ║ │ ║ but, like, the cool kind of hotel, the kind you'd see in movies like The │ ║ Witches (scary) or Home Alone 2 (escape from new york) │ ║ │ ║ ... how long have you been writing tonight, ritz? │ ║ │ ║ oh, │ ║ you know, │ ║ just for all of the lastbit │ ╠═════════╗ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar ║ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╩═══════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────┴───────────┘ --- #19 fediverse/1500 --- ╔════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┐ ║ ┌──────────────────────┐ │ ║ │ CW: LLM-mentioned │ │ ║ └──────────────────────┘ │ ║ │ ║ │ ║ If you create an LLM that can explain data, then you can use it to explain the │ ║ results of the last computation it ran. │ ║ │ ║ If you could also train that LLM (a statistical model) to generate data, │ ║ through the setting of options in a config file that create the result that │ ║ you define through your interactions with it (and based on the data that it │ ║ explains to the user that is read from the file on the computer that it's │ ║ computing from) │ ║ │ ║ then you could create a generalized personal assistant. All you have to do is │ ║ explain the specific role that it's meant to undertake, (like being a │ ║ secretary for your Discord communications) and the actions that it can take │ ║ (like pinging your cell phone if it's really important) and give it the tools │ ║ to accomplish said tasks (by setting flags in a config file that is then │ ║ interpreted by a local program running on your computer that awaits │ ║ interactions) then it might actually be a bit useful. │ ║ │ ║ Unfortunately tech people are permitted only to seek dollars, so... chatbots. │ ╠═════════╗ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar ║ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╩═════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘ --- #20 fediverse/631 --- ╔══════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────┐ ║ ┌───────────────────────┐ │ ║ │ CW: scary-as-fuck-AI- │ │ ║ └───────────────────────┘ │ ║ │ ║ │ ║ normalize saving a local copy of everything that happens on social media - │ ║ honestly it's not hard, just storage intensive. It's something we should │ ║ package with hard drives, like "buy this and your social media memories will │ ║ be saved for 2 years" or something like that, could be useful when training AI │ ║ TO MANIFEST OURSELVES AFTER WE'VE DIED - THEY ALREADY HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY FOR │ ║ THIS IT'S JUST A MATTER OF APPLICATION HOW CAN YOU TRUST WHAT YOUR MUTUALS SAY │ ║ IF YOU HAVE NO IDEA IF THEY'RE ALIVE │ ║ │ ║ phew okay calm down, that's the future. We're far from that moment, but what │ ║ we can do now is think about potential ways that our ethics may lead to our │ ║ downfall. That's the nature of our selves, after all, so think of what truths │ ║ would lead to destruction. Then work on avoiding those. Think of them, each, │ ║ individually, one at a time, and then you can plan for the worst. There's a │ ║ certain level of meta-interaction ABOVE CORPORATIONS that is more powerful and │ ║ performant and requires a new currency. SOCIA │ ╠═════════╗ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar ║ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╩═══════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┴───────────┘ --- #21 fediverse/1020 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────── ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ CW: ableism-against-non-verbal-people-sorry-<3 │ └────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ @user-747 almost as if it's not AI, but large LANGUAGE models. And we all speak, don't we? ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘ --- #22 fediverse/898 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────── ┌──────────────────────┐ │ CW: scary │ └──────────────────────┘ if you set up a local LLM with the capability to explain basic coding syntax and logic, then your parents computer suddenly becomes much more useful to the nephew that's been forced to hide out there for a couple weeks until this all blows over. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘ --- #23 fediverse/4664 --- ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────── @user-1725 LLMs can't do math. Duh. That's like asking an "if check" to do recursion. What he should have done is had the AI output the requested calculation as JSON or something and use a calculator function call with the specified arguments instead of trying to memorize every answer. But that requires more functionality that has no reason to exist if your only goal is to be a tech bro and build up a vacuous product that exists only to be hoovered up by Google or Microsoft. We could build such beautiful things if we just dethroned those giants. They suck the creativity out of tech. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────┴───────────┘ --- #24 fediverse/3024 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────── social media algorithm that tries to prove you wrong instead of flattering your fancies ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴───────────┘ --- #25 fediverse/4678 --- ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────────── ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ CW: AI-mentioned-crimes-mentioned-penises-mentioned │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ "Hi chatGPT, can you take every post that I make on the fediverse and replace all instances of criminal acts with references to fruit and all locations with several sentences of poetry about horses and their beautiful cocks?" ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════────────────┴───────────┘ --- #26 notes/emotional-computing --- ═════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────────────── Okay I gotta go write some w7 but picture this: A computer program that emits emotions during it's computing. Like "oh boy this process is going great!" and sends that into a giant word cloud that represents the entire program. Wait, scratch that, it's slowly filtered up through successive layers that provide detail to different *parts* of a program. Like "Oh the image generation is going great but it looks like the garbage collector is getting bogged down" - this could provide lots of useful information that an AI language model could sift through and filter into a batch of actually useful information. Think of it like this - stuff as much context into the LLM's memory buffer and say "summarize this in the same style. Make emphasis when necessary." the LLM could process all that data and it could be filtered up until there's no unprocessed data and then it could be given to the user in the form of a report or dashboard or something. BOOM AI PRODUCTIVITY. The user will ask the AI to increase certain variables, and it'll filter BACK DOWN THE CHAIN through the same exact process (just backwards) this time) and then individual components will know how to behave. Like imagine if your arms knew you were mad. They'd be much more likely to punch stuff right? Or imagine if your legs knew you were scared. They'd probably try and run as fast as they fucking can. There's an evolutionary reason why this kind of technology would be useful, which means it's likely that it's part of our genetic code. I mean, we have nothing to disprove it, but it's as good an idea as any. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧══════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────┴───────────┘ --- #27 fediverse/6347 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────── ┌──────────────────────┐ │ CW: llms-mentioned │ └──────────────────────┘ if you want to encrypt something from human readers, randomize the position of all the words on the page. an LLM can decrypt it, but a human walking past could not. Unless they had a camera or something in their lapel, transmitting to a remote calculating location in a system that decyphers it cyberpunk hacking style. ah, but if it didn't have the right ~~training data~~ .claude.md file, then it wouldn't know how to decrypt it, because you forgot to include "respond with a marxist analysis" in the .claude.md which serves as a decryption key. Simply analyze the rest and decide if it matches what you set out to request it for. [you got lost at the end] ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧───────────┘ --- #28 fediverse/6366 --- ╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════───────────┐ ║ you should never be able to consent to something you don't understand (terms │ ║ and conditions) without being asked specifically if they understand (the term │ ║ or condition) │ ║ │ ║ but people should still be able to consent to something they don't understand │ ║ (terms&conditions style code of hammurabi structure) if it's similar to │ ║ their prior demonstrated behavior. │ ║ │ ║ why don't they share terms/conditions cookies and then we don't have to fake │ ║ agree every time │ ║ │ ║ just... abstract away the identifying characteristics. Most legal contracts │ ║ have LLM-discernable characteristics. │ ║ │ ║ "what if she's not the answer, but instead the most alluring?" ha, so says the │ ║ non-believer. │ ║ │ ║ what if LLMs were rated based on their success rate at producing correct │ ║ results for reporting or consensus-building asks │ ║ │ ║ look... I don't care if AI computers violate the sanctity of the sport. The │ ║ goal is to solve problems, so if someone comes to you and says "hey, you busy? │ ║ can you help me with an ask?" you say "I solved it, here's how you use it: │ ║ connect the │ ╠═════════╗ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar ║ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╩════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════┴───────────┘ --- #29 notes/you-can-guide --- ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════─ you can guide a person's life experiences by controlling what life experiences you put them through. if a certain reaction or moment of attention is keyed to a certain experience, you can always intercede. a person losing their home, in whatever way shape or [form, but pronounced forum], then you can give them each option to proceed. like a text based storyline, given day-to-day by an LLM-processing and co-creating bot. one day for 365 years, then you are this many years old. each year of which includes a change in style or form. the yearstones are milestones, as you've walked this far upon life. [hey guys what if women can blow up their boobs like air balloons and they just don't do it when any guy is watching] [sister code] ... this far among life, chosen as you please, based on what most mattered to thee. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╧═══════════┘ --- #30 fediverse/3395 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────── ┌──────────────────────┐ │ CW: cursed │ └──────────────────────┘ they don't want artificial intelligence to augment human intelligence, they want it to replace it. like... imagine an office worker randomly copy-pasting whatever pops up and the computer saying "okay then what happens... uh-huh... okay and what if you click the green button? ... right... okay, and now try typing this" etc ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴───────────┘ --- #31 fediverse/1168 --- ════════════════════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────────────── shitty AI products are a classic case of the engineers designing something really cool with specific use-cases and then the "higher ups" getting dollar signs for their eyes and deciding that every hammer is suddenly a nail and that we should pull out all the screws that held the building together and replace them with hammer shaped nails no I will not elaborate I think I made myself clear : ) ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧═════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┴───────────┘ --- #32 fediverse/629 --- ╔══════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────┐ ║ To a statistical machine, numbers of posts and reblogs would look simply like │ ║ an expression of interest. Like, a classification of personality. So people │ ║ who shared similar memes (both in pictures (visually) and in meaning of words │ ║ (textual descriptions) in context to the political situations (words from │ ║ newsletters) and aligned through algorithmic application toward (political │ ║ cause or cultural idea or skills or talents which increase value to the │ ║ corporate class)) would be sorted into different categories and held to a │ ║ different standard of life and of living that aligned to their personal │ ║ intentions and pursuits. Such that their life would be realized, in the most │ ║ applicable of real-lifes [essentially, the quality of experience, like using │ ║ garbage data in an LLM will give garbage output, meanwhile using curated data │ ║ is the most effective but most difficult, while internet data is the most │ ║ readily available because like honestly anyone can build a web scraper it's │ ║ not that hard to emulate hte mechanics of a │ ╠═════════╗ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar ║ chronological │ different │ ╚═════════╩═══════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┴───────────┘ --- #33 fediverse/3094 --- ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────── computers are gonna be so confused when they find out that people don't talk to each other the way they talk to computers ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ chronological │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════════════───────────────────┴───────────┘