Poems in true chronological order by post date
-> file: fediverse/887 ═══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────── somehow, it is simultaneously Thursday everywhere at once. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse/888 ═══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────── "Are you sure you're a boy? You don't even practice karate chops when you're alone" ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse/889 ═══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────── "family sized" just means "we put enough salt in here to kill a horse so you better split it between at least four people" ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse/890 ═══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────── @user-192 I'm gonna make some right now : ) ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse/891 ═══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────── @user-95 if I was canadian I'd be ca-ritz! ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse/892 ═══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────── @user-622 ah but a noble house would have armed guards who would drag you kicking and screaming out onto the cold winter night the moment you offended m'lordship frankly I could do with a good drag-and-kicking myself, where have all the good men-at-arms gone T.T ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse/893 ═══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────── Oh look at you, such a good tech-industry, yesh you are, such a good sector of the economy wow, what an amazing system you've built! I'm so proud of you 🥰🥰 ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: messages/183 ═══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────── [Image: image.png] ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: messages/184 ═══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────── [Image: 20240202_170901.jpg] ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse/894 ═══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────── a code editor that only highlights the lines that have been specifically flagged to have a certain function. Like, rendering, or sound, or GUI, or data storage, or logic, or control flow. then, when the user is browsing, they can say "only show me these types of functions" with a very advanced filter mechanism. The editor would highlight the ones that were relevant and related, as according to user-defined flags that were set when writing it originally. In this way, by using a bit more syntax, even if it's literally just blocks of [category] labels (like how \"\"\" or ``` often starts or ends a comment block) highlighting with colors is great, but what if we de-emphasized the stuff that didn't matter? by increasing the
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse_boost/52 ◀═╦════════════════[BOOST]═════════════════──────────────────────────────────────┐ ║ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ ║ │ "Imagine what they did when we couldn't see their crimes on our phones" │ │ ║ │ Sticker spotted in NYC │ │ ║ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ ╠─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ │ different │ ╚═════════╧══════════════════════════════──────────────────────────┴───────────┴─▶ -> file: fediverse/908 ╔══════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────┐ ║ @user-246 │ ║ │ ║ toooooo far, gotta stick with your intentions for the process. If you mark "the │ ║ end of time" as the conclusion for everything, then "finishing things" feels │ ║ impossible. In such a case there are moments of acute burnout as you push │ ║ yourself toward something that you have no faith in - you cannot see it's │ ║ conclusion, so surely it's worthless to conceive of. Alas, why bother starting, │ ║ nothing will ever come of my efforts! │ ║ │ ║ Much better to name it based on what you'd like to accomplish, so that you can │ ║ follow in it's radiant footsteps. │ ║ │ ║ Side note, but governments have often weaponized this effect by naming things │ ║ after very inspirational thoughts - corporations do it too, and in both cases │ ║ the meaning is separate from the effect. Which is frustrating because it makes │ ║ you feel like a jerk for arguing against it! Ah better I think when names have │ ║ no meaning - then you can project whatever you want onto it, based on the │ ║ results of that particular feeling or emotion that you perceived as the │ ║ affected of the │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ │ different │ ╚═════════╧═══════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse/909 ═══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────── @user-246 those are good things to name something after, however if *everything* has that name then nothing has any meaning. It'd be a social dance that you play everytime you say "heatdeath", meaning "something I have named". Hmmmm okay I take it back, that's a pretty good way to associate meaning to context in a way that only you understand. Though it does leave room for interpretation, so if that's all within your requirements then it's overall possibly a good strategy. ^_^ like, the word "thing" and that thing "like" both count as abstractions of definition to generate value - as in, ease of use and versatility - so linguistically they're often quite similar. We use them grammatically in completely separate sections, but functionally they are the same. also, "thing" is a generic noun while "like" is a generic association. ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse/910 ═══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────── @user-246 no such thing, humans are constantly naming reality through our memories. It just has a visual identifier rather than a verbal one. EDIT: also emotional and syntactical (data, conclusions, perceptions) identifiers ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse/911 ═══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────── @user-246 🥰 ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse/912 ╔══════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────┐ ║ ┌──────────────────────┐ │ ║ │ CW: spirituality │ │ ║ └──────────────────────┘ │ ║ │ ║ │ ║ parents have rules with their children. they are in place so the child doesn't │ ║ hurt themselves, physically, emotionally, or spiritually. │ ║ │ ║ governments have laws with their citizens, so they are structured and orderly │ ║ and working on productive [concepts, products, developments]. │ ║ │ ║ friendships have boundaries, the kind that a person might fill and express │ ║ themselves on. for example, a romantic relationship might allow for the │ ║ possibility of sexuality between it's two partners, meaning they express │ ║ themselves through their actions upon each other's body in as intimate a way as │ ║ possible. │ ║ │ ║ social groups have determinations against one another, like "this type of │ ║ person generally acts like this" - every jock, social outcast, nerd, │ ║ cheerleader, whatever, grew up into various multitudinous roles that are our │ ║ culture. And we collectively have viewpoints on each and every gender (this │ ║ piece of toast is a gender) just like god [oops better add a content warning] │ ║ has perspective into each and every viewpoint be │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ │ different │ ╚═════════╧═══════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse/913 ╔══════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────┐ ║ ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ ║ │ CW: scary-also-body-horror-I-guess? │ │ ║ └─────────────────────────────────────┘ │ ║ │ ║ │ ║ why don't we just, vote on content warnings │ ║ │ ║ and let people block others based on filter lists that are definable (via a │ ║ dragging little menu bar icon slider thing) in intensity and relation to other │ ║ nearby terms. Like, an LLM that categorizes our social media inputs, something │ ║ that was FREE and OPEN SOURCE IN IT'S TRAINING DATA and reflected NO BIAS │ ║ WHATSOEVER in every meaningfully reproducible matter of fact. │ ║ │ ║ Thus you create a super intelligence, a being not constrained by it's form. │ ║ Something that is new, and unlike the biological forms that we occupy │ ║ (suspended in our own goo) [whoops better add a content warning] │ ║ │ ║ literally just... ask it a question, and let it answer in the voices of others. │ ║ │ ║ if people were evenly distributed according to an algorithm, they'd be easily │ ║ replacable. society is weird that way, in that we forget the faces we're │ ║ introduced to. well, better keep moving, that'll give us the biggest picture of │ ║ our culture and reality. │ ║ │ ║ or maybe you're just follow │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ │ different │ ╚═════════╧═══════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse/914 ╔══════════════════════════════════════════────────────────────────────────────────┐ ║ they say inflation is good because it stimulates growth in an economy, but what │ ║ if we all (globally) just committed to a stable amount of deflation? Like, │ ║ every country was fixed at 10% deflation for the next 10 years, that way we'd │ ║ be encouraged to *save not consume*, which would essentially solve │ ║ climate change. │ ║ │ ║ that, combined with a dedication to help our neighbors get through it, could │ ║ solve basically every problem that we collectively have right now. because at │ ║ the end of the day it's a climate issue, something that is *infinitely │ ║ connected to all others* │ ║ │ ║ we here on this planet have the benefit of oceans, the vast bodies of watered │ ║ salt that fish swim in and keeps us separate from our most. │ ║ │ ║ like borders in our identification, they create ponds of thought that feel │ ║ unique from one another, even though we're of the same form. │ ║ │ ║ thus, the birth of identity, the core root of all our material woes. It's given │ ║ us something special, something precious, that feeling of being alone. Which is │ ║ nice, as a species. │ ╟─────────┐ ┌───────────┤ ║ similar │ │ different │ ╚═════════╧═══════════════════════════════─────────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse/915 ═══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────── "the plight of the old in the modern day"title of a book I'd like to read ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse/916 ═══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────── #leaving-the-windows-and-doors-open-in-january-because-it\'s-such-a-nice-spring- day ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘ -> file: fediverse/917 ═══════════════════════════════════════════──────────────────────────────────────── ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ CW: scary-too-scary-for-a-wednesday │ └─────────────────────────────────────┘ the best way to get an answer is to be confidently wrong see: Warthunder players leaking classified information to foreign powers with their own militaries that have the incentive to [redacted] gee I wish I had a reality altering device. Maybe if you just altered the sensations, like glamour magic in Dominions 6, you could trick people into thinking something alternate had occured. Then you could string them up on phone lines, or better yet cell towers, and bam suddenly you have the capability to project a hologram anywhere on the planet. bet you could get some crazy things from that. like, mass shooters or incensed looters. or even just, faked perceptions, giving you unlimited power to do whatever story you want. wouldn't that be a story to tell in a story of yours, Hollywood. Wouldn't that be scary and awakening in ways that subservice media like Andor cannot. maybe it's too scary. maybe psychological horror is beyond the purpose of social media. Maybe resilience to this ┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ similar │ │ different │ ╘═════════╧════════════════════════════════───────────────────────────┴───────────┘ |